Fludarabine-Based Conditioning for Allogeneic Marrow Transplantation From Unrelated Donors in Severe Aplastic Anemia (SAA): Serious and Unexpected Adverse Events in Pre-Defined Cyclophosphamide (CY) Dose Levels

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3009-3009
Author(s):  
Jakub Tolar ◽  
H. Joachim Deeg ◽  
Sally Arai ◽  
Mitchell Horwitz ◽  
Joseph H. Antin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Marrow Transplantation ◽  
Graft Failure ◽  
Marrow Transplant ◽  
The Other ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Abstract 3009FN2 Objective: To determine toxicity and efficacy of adding fludarabine (FLU) to a regimen of total body irradiation (TBI), anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and cyclophosphamide (CY), with de-escalation of the CY dose. The goal is to minimize CY-related toxicities while preserving (or improving) engraftment and survival in patients with SAA receiving an unrelated donor marrow transplant. Patients and Methods: Since May 2006, the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN), sponsored by the NHLBI and NCI, has conducted a prospective Phase I/II clinical trial of unrelated donor marrow transplantation in SAA (BMT CTN 0301). Patients with SAA are eligible if they are < 65 years, have adequate organ function, and have an available unrelated marrow donor matched 7 of 8 HLA-A, B, C, DRB1 loci. Patients with Fanconi anemia and other marrow failure syndromes are excluded. All patients receive TBI 200 cGy, ATG (either thymoglobulin: 3 mg/kg IV or ATGAM 30 mg/kg IV daily × 3, days –4 to –2), FLU (30 mg/m2 IV daily × 4, days –5 to –2). The Phase I portion of the trial sequentially tested four CY dose levels: 150 mg/kg (administered days –4 to –2); 100 mg/kg (days –3 to –2); 50 mg/kg (day –2); and, 0 mg/kg, and allowed enrollment of up to six patients at each CY dose level unless toxicity or graft failure boundaries were crossed. In the Phase II portion of the trial, patients enroll onto the optimal CY dose level, which is chosen using adaptive Bayesian criteria to rank desirability of the CY doses. All patients are followed for two years after transplantation. Early stopping guidelines are used to monitor for graft failure and early transplant-related mortality through day 100. Results: Twenty-one patients accrued to the Phase I portion of the trial. CY dose level 0 mg/kg was closed after all three enrolled patients developed secondary graft failure. All received a second allograft. One patient remains alive at 23 months after the first transplantation. The other two died from adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) at 114 days after the first transplant and idiopathic pneumonia at 200 days after the first transplant. Review of Phase I results for the other three dose levels suggested CY dose 150 mg/kg as the optimal dose level for Phase II testing. However, after an additional eight patients were treated at this dose, the level was closed to further accrual because of excess toxicity. Seven of the 14 patients receiving 150 mg/kg of CY (and 7 of the last 8 enrolled) died. Causes of death were cardiac/pulmonary/multi-organ failure (n=4), ARDS (n=2), and parainfluenza virus type 3 pneumonia (n=1). Bayesian evaluation of the two remaining dose levels indicates very similar desirability scores and accrual continues at both the CY 100 mg/kg and 50 mg/kg levels. As of July 15, 2011, a total of 61 patients have been enrolled, 17 on the two closed levels, 33 on the 100 mg/kg level and 11 on the 50 mg/kg level. Conclusions: Early analysis of this trial, made necessary by these unexpected severe adverse events, revealed two important findings among patients receiving low-dose TBI, ATG, and FLU at the doses outlined: 1) CY dose 0 mg/kg is associated with higher than expected graft failure; and, 2) CY dose 150 mg/kg is associated with excess transplant-related toxicity. Neither CY dose level should be tested further in the context of the regimen used in this trial. To date, the two intermediate CY dose levels (100 mg/kg and 50 mg/kg) have not crossed the graft failure or fatality stopping boundaries and accrual is in progress. Disclosures: Pulsipher: Genzyme: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Optimized Cyclophosphamide (CY) Dosing in Combination with Fludarabine, TBI and ATG As Conditioning for Unrelated Donor Bone Marrow Transplantation (BMT) in Severe Aplastic Anemia (SAA): A Phase I/II Study from the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN)

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 541-541
Author(s):  
Paolo Anderlini ◽  
Juan Wu ◽  
H. Joachim Deeg ◽  
Iris Gersten ◽  
Marian Ewell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Absolute Neutrophil Count ◽  
Neutrophil Count ◽  
Graft Failure ◽  
Early Death ◽  
Marrow Transplant ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Objective : To determine toxicity and efficacy of adding fludarabine (FLU) to a standard preparative regimen of low-dose total body irradiation (TBI), anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and CY (Deeg J et al, Blood 108:1485, 2006), with de-escalation of the CY dose. Patients and Methods : Between May 2006 and December 2013, the BMT CTN (sponsored by the NHLBI and NCI) conducted a Phase I/II trial of unrelated donor BMT in SAA (BMT CTN 0301; NCT 00326417). Patients were eligible if they were aged < 65 years, with adequate organ function, and an available unrelated marrow donor matched at 7 or 8 of 8 HLA-A, B, C, and DRB1 loci. The trial accrued 97 patients, although analyses are limited to 96; 1 patient withdrew consent prior to BMT. All patients received TBI 200 cGy (day -1), ATG (either thymoglobulin 3 mg/kg IV or ATGAM 30 mg/kg IV daily x 3, days –4 to –2), FLU (30 mg/m2 IV daily x 4, days –5 to –2). The Phase I portion of the trial tested four CY dose levels: 150 mg/kg (days –4 to –2); 100 mg/kg (days –3 to –2); 50 mg/kg (day –2); and 0 mg/kg. The Phase I design allowed enrollment of up to six patients at each CY dose level unless toxicity or graft failure boundaries were crossed. In the Phase II portion, patients were enrolled onto the optimal CY dose level, using adaptive Bayesian criteria to rank desirability of CY doses based on Day 100 outcomes of engraftment and early death. The primary endpoint of the study was determination of the optimal CY dose based on Day 100 assessments of graft failure (primary: absolute neutrophil count <0.5 x 109/L and secondary: sustained decline in absolute neutrophil count to <0.5 x 109/L), major (grade 3 or higher) regimen-related toxicity (RRT) and early death. Early stopping guidelines were based on a composite endpoint of graft failure and treatment-related mortality through day 100. Results : Twenty-one patients accrued to the Phase I portion of the trial and all CY dose levels were tested. CY dose level 0 mg/kg was closed after 3 of the first 3 patients developed secondary graft failure. The Phase II portion of the trial opened with CY dose level 150 mg/kg. However, this dose level was closed for excess toxicity (7 of 14 patients died; organ failure n=4, ARDS n=2 and infection n=1; Tolar et al, Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 2012). Patients were subsequently assigned to CY dose level 100 mg/kg (CY DL 100; n=41) or CY dose level 50 mg/kg (CY DL 50; n=38), depending on Bayesian assessment of criteria noted above except that the last 20 patients were preferentially assigned to CY DL 50 to balance accrual to the two dose levels. Approximately half of patients were male and 79% Caucasian. The median age was 20.6 years. The median age for CY DL 50 and DL 100 was 24.5 (0.5-65) and 17.6 (1.9-63) years, respectively. The number of transplants with a mismatched (i.e.7/8) donor was 7 (18%) in the CY DL 50 group and 14 (34%) in the CY DL 100 group. All patients reached their Day 100 endpoint. The cumulative incidence of grade 2-4 acute GVHD was comparable between the two CY dose levels: 24% (DL 50) vs 27% (DL 100). All deaths before Day 100 were due to primary or secondary graft failure (CY DL 50; n=1 and CY DL 100; n=2),. Table 1 shows individual Day 100 outcomes for CY DL 50 and CY DL 100. Median follow up is 15 (3-27) and 24 (12-50) months for CY DL 50 and 100, respectively. All surviving patients on CY dose level 100 mg/kg have achieved a minimum follow up of 12 months, as opposed to only 75% of surviving patients on CY dose level 50 mg/kg. Conclusion : Results of the adaptive Bayesian dose selection suggest that the most desirable CY dose is 50 mg/kg followed by CY dose, 100 mg/kg. However, interpretation of data needs to take into account the potential imbalance of donor-recipient HLA disparity in the CY 50 mg/kg dose level. CY dose 150 mg/kg and 0 mg/kg should be avoided. Table 1 Day 100 Outcome CY DL 50 (n=38) CY DL 100 (n=41) Graft Failure, primary and secondary 3 (8%) 6 (15%) Survival 37 (97%) 39 (95%) Major RRT (Grade III or higher) 4 (11%) 9 (22%) Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Phase I trial of subcutaneous interleukin-6 in patients with advanced malignancies.

1993 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 499-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Weber ◽  
J C Yang ◽  
S L Topalian ◽  
D R Parkinson ◽  
D S Schwartzentruber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Interleukin 6 ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Organ Toxicity ◽  
Advanced Malignancies ◽  
Major Organ ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Grade Iii

PURPOSE Based on preclinical evidence in murine models that interleukin-6 (IL-6) mediates regression of metastatic tumors, we performed a phase I study of recombinant human IL-6 in patients with refractory advanced malignancies to determine its pharmacokinetics, toxicities, and possible immunologic and antitumor effects. PATIENTS AND METHODS Recombinant IL-6 was administered as a single subcutaneous dose daily for 7 days, with 7 days off therapy followed by another 7 days of IL-6. Doses were escalated in cohorts of three patients starting at 3 micrograms/kg/d, provided that toxicity at the preceding dose level was not dose-limiting. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as grade III or IV major organ toxicity that did not resolve to grade II or less in 24 hours after stopping IL-6, using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. Patients were treated with 3, 10, and 30 micrograms/kg/d IL-6 subcutaneously. RESULTS Three patients each were treated at the 3- and 10-micrograms dose levels. Two of five patients treated with 30 micrograms/kg/d IL-6 subcutaneously had grade III major organ toxicity that required IL-6 therapy to be discontinued. All patients experienced fever, chills, and minor fatigue. Significant increases in C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen, platelet counts, and lymphocyte IL-2 receptor levels were seen in patients at the 10- and 30-micrograms/kg dose levels. Decreases in albumin and hemoglobin were observed, particularly at the 30-micrograms/kg dose level. The half-life (T1/2 beta) was 4.2 hours, with a peak IL-6 level at 5 hours. No antitumor responses were seen. CONCLUSION A safely tolerated dose of daily subcutaneous IL-6 is 10 micrograms/kg, with hepatotoxicity and cardiac arrhythmia being the dose-limiting toxicities at 30 micrograms/kg. Phase II trials of IL-6 administered subcutaneously daily for at least 7 days for two cycles with an intervening week of rest are recommended for phase II trials. However, patients with extensive replacement of liver by tumor and abnormal liver functions should receive IL-6 therapy with caution.

Final Results of a Phase I Study of the Fc Engineered CD19 Antibody XmAb®5574 (MOR00208) in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) or Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (SLL).

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2894-2894 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer A. Woyach ◽  
Farrukh Awan ◽  
Ian W. Flinn ◽  
Rolondo Enoch ◽  
Paul A. Foster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
B Cell Malignancies ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Abstract 2894 Antibody (Ab) therapies such as the CD20 monoclonal abs rituximab and ofatumumab are commonly used in CLL alone and in combination with chemotherapy, however, CD20 density is low on CLL cells, suggesting this may not be the ideal target. CD19, which is ubiquitously expressed on CLL cells and those of other B cell malignancies is a reasonable candidate for ab targeting. XmAb5574 is a novel humanized IgG1 CD19 monoclonal ab with an engineered Fc region to enhance Fc gamma receptor binding affinity. In vitro, this ab demonstrates direct cytotoxicity and antibody dependent cellular phagocytosis similar to rituximab, however, shows enhanced natural killer antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity compared to other therapeutic abs used in CLL (Awan, FT Blood 2009). We have performed a first in human trial of this ab as a single agent in relapsed or refractory (R/R) CLL, and present the results in this report. This study is a multi-institutional phase I trial of XmAb5574 in patients (pts) with R/R CLL. Eligible pts were those with CLL who had at least 1 prior therapy and required treatment by International Working Group on CLL (IWCLL) 2008 Guidelines (Hallek, M Blood 2008), had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status <3, had platelets ≥50,000/mm3, and had adequate organ function. Primary endpoints were to determine maximal tolerated dose (MTD), describe toxicity, and characterize pharmacokinetics (PK). A secondary endpoint was to explore efficacy. An accelerated titration design was used in which 1 pt was accrued to the first two dose levels provided there were no dose limiting toxicities (DLT) or ≥ grade 2 adverse events (AE), and then a standard 3×3 design was employed from dose level 3 forward. Dose levels included 0.3, 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 mg/kg with an expansion to a total of 16 pts at the MTD. XmAb5574 was administered as an intravenous infusion on days 1, 4, 8, 15, and 22 of cycle (C) 1, and on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of C2. Toxicity was assessed using the National Cancer Institute's Common Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 for non-hematologic toxicity, and IWCLL 2008 guidelines for hematologic toxicity. Disease response assessment by physical exam was performed on C1D28, C2D28, and 4, 8, and 12 weeks after the end of C2. Radiographic assessment was performed C2D28. 27 pts were enrolled to this phase I trial. The median age of all pts was 66 years (range 40–84). The pts were generally high risk: 14 (52%) had high-risk disease by Rai stage, 8 (30%) had del(11q22.3) and 10 (37%) had del(17p13.1) by FISH, and 24 (89%) had IgVH unmutated disease. The median number of prior therapies was 4 (range 1–14). Toxicity with this agent was modest. Dose escalation continued without dose limiting toxicity (DLT) until the highest dose level, in which one patient experienced grade 4 neutropenia associated with febrile neutropenia which required dose discontinuation. 100% of patients experienced any AE, with the majority of AE being grade 1–2. The most common AEs were infusion reactions in 18 patients (67%), all of which were grade 1 or 2. Treatment-related Grade 3 or 4 AEs occurred in 5 pts (19%), and included neutropenia (n=3), thrombocytopenia (n=2), increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (n=1), febrile neutropenia (n=1), and tumor lysis syndrome (n=1). All were on the 12 mg/kg dose level except one pt receiving 1mg/kg who experienced neutropenia. Overall response rate by IWCLL 2008 criteria is 11%, all of which have been partial responses (PR). Using IWCLL 1996 response criteria which does not include CT scan assessment of disease resulted in a PR in 13 pts (42%). Only 2 pts had PD at the 8 week evaluation point. Responses occurred at the 6, 9, and 12 mg/kg dose levels. All objective responses were in pts categorized as CLL as opposed to SLL, and no patients with lymph nodes >5cm responded. PK was best modeled by a two-compartment model. Half-life was 14 days, with clearance 5mL/day/kg that was not dose-dependent. Across the dose range, area under the curve increased in a dose-proportional manner, while maximum concentration increased in a less than proportional manner. A steady-state was reached at or before infusion 9. XmAb5574 shows acceptable toxicity and signs of preliminary efficacy in patients with high-risk, heavily pretreated CLL. These results justify movement into phase II study in CLL as well as other B cell malignancies. Modest toxicity, in particular infectious toxicity, will potentially allow combinations with other active agents in CLL. Disclosures: Enoch: Xencor, Inc.: Employment. Foster:Xencor, Inc: Consultancy.

A phase I trial of ABT-751 and carboplatin (C) in patients (pts) with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 17098-17098 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. H. Dragnev ◽  
J. R. Rigas ◽  
W. M. Disalvo ◽  
S. A. Simeone ◽  
A. E. Hagey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Xenograft Model ◽  
The United States ◽  
Buccal Swabs ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Dose Levels

17098 Background: NSCLC is the leading cause of cancer mortality for men and women in the United States. More effective treatments are needed to prolong survival and improve quality of life. Platin-containing chemotherapy doublets are commonly used in NSCLC treatment. ABT-751 is a novel oral anti-microtubule agent targeting the colchicine binding site. As single agent, it was well-tolerated and showed a preliminary signal of activity in previously treated NSCLC. In vivo studies demonstrated additive activity between ABT-751 and cisplatin in a NSCLC xenograft model. Methods: A phase I trial of ABT-751 and C was conducted in pts with advanced previously treated NSCLC. Primary objective - maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary objectives - toxicities, efficacy, and surrogate markers of response (cell cycle changes and cyclin D1 expression) in buccal swabs from pts at the phase II dose. Six dose levels - 1: ABT-751 100mg bid, C AUC 4.5; 2: ABT-751 125 mg bid, C AUC 4.5; 3: ABT-751 125 mg bid, C AUC 6; 4: ABT-751 150 mg bid, C AUC 6; 5: ABT-751 175 mg bid, C AUC 6; 6: ABT-751 200 mg bid, C AUC 6. ABT-751 was taken orally twice a day for 14 days in a 21 day cycle, C was administered intravenously on day 4 during cycle 1 and on day 1 on subsequent cycles. Rapid dose escalation was used for the first 3 dose levels followed by cohorts of at least 3 patients for the remaining dose levels. Results: Eight pts were enrolled, all stage IV NSCLC, 4 women, median age 62 (47–73), all KPS 80, 6 had one and 2 had 2 prior therapies. A median of 3.5 (1–4) cycles was administered. Dose-limiting toxiticies of grade 3 fatigue and grade 4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were observed in 2/5 patients on dose level 4. Common grade 2 toxicites were constipation and peripheral sensory neuropathy (levels 2–4). MTD was dose level 3. Seven pts were evaluable for response, 2 had partial responses (levels 2 and 4, both had one prior therapy), 4 had stable disease, 1 had disease progression. Median time to progression was 18.7 weeks (6–24+). Pharmacokinetic analyses and buccal swabs are being performed. Conclusions: The recommended phase II doses are ABT-751 125 mg twice daily for 14 days and carboplatin AUC 6 on a 21-day cycle. This regimen is well tolerated and shows preliminary evidence of activity for previously treated NSCLC. [Table: see text]

Phase I study of weekly intraperitoneal paclitaxel combined with S-1 and oxaliplatin for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 146-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hironori Ishigami ◽  
Shoichi Kaisaki ◽  
Hironori Yamaguchi ◽  
Hiroharu Yamashita ◽  
Shigenobu Emoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Peritoneal Metastasis ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

146 Background: Intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy is a promising treatment option for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis. We previously verified the safety and efficacy of IP paclitaxel (PTX) combined with S-1 and intravenous PTX in phase I and phase II studies. S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) demonstrated efficacy in a phase II study, and is regarded as a candidate for the next-generation standard regimen for gastric cancer. We designed a new regimen combining weekly IP PTX with SOX in order to maximize systemic effects as well as local effects in the peritoneal cavity. A dose-escalation study of IP PTX in combination with fixed doses of SOX was carried out to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD). Methods: PTX was administered intraperitoneally on days 1 and 8 with an initial dose of 20 mg/m2 (level 1), stepped up to 30 mg/m2 (level 2) or 40 mg/m2 (level 3) depending on observed toxicity. S-1 was administered orally at a dose of 80 mg/m2/day (b.i.d.) for 14 days followed by a 7-day rest. Oxaliplatin was administered intravenously at a dose of 100 mg/m2 on day 1. This treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. Toxicity was graded according to CTCAE v4.0. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined as grade 4 leukopenia, grade 3 febrile neutropenia, grade 3 thrombocytopenia, and grade 3 non-hematological toxicity. The MTD was defined as the dose level at which 2 or more of 3 or 6 patients developed DLTs during two courses of treatment. The RD was defined as one dose level under the MTD. Results: A total of 12 gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis were enrolled. No DLTs were observed at all dose levels. Neutropenia in one patient at dose level 3 was the only grade 3 toxicity observed. Grade 2/3 leukopenia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed only in 2 patients at dose level 3. Regarding grade 2 non-hematological toxicities, anorexia, fatigue and nausea were observed in 6, 4 and 2 patients, respectively, independent of dose levels. Consequently, the MTD was not reached, and the RD of IP PTX was determined to be 40 mg/m2 (level 3). Conclusions: Combination chemotherapy of IP PTX with SOX was shown to be a safe regimen that should be further explored in clinical trials.

scholarly journals Phase I Trial of Rituximab, Cladribine and Temsirolimus (RCT) for Initial Therapy of Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3661-3661 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Inwards ◽  
Paul Fishkin ◽  
Betsy R. LaPlant ◽  
Matthew T. Drake ◽  
Paul Kurtin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Abstract 3661 Objective: We conducted this trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and schedule of temsirolimus added to an established regimen comprised of rituximab and cladribine for the initial treatment of mantle cell lymphoma and to generate preliminary information on the toxicity and efficacy of this combination. Methods: A standard phase I cohort of 3 study design was utilized. MTD was defined as the dose level below the lowest dose that induces dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in at least one-third of patients (at least 2 of a maximum of 6 new patients). DLT was defined as grade 4 ANC (<500) for ≥5 days, grade 4 ANC (<500) associated with fever (>100.5 F) and/or active infection, PLT <25,000, grade 4 infection, or ≥grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity during the first cycle of therapy as per NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0. The fixed doses of rituximab and cladribine were 375 mg/m2 IV day 1 and 5 mg/m2/d IV days 1–5 of a 28 day cycle, respectively, as previously published. There were 5 planned temsirolimus IV dose levels: 15 mg day 1; 25 mg day 1; 25 mg days 1 and 15; 25 mg days 1,8 and 15; and 25 mg days 1,8,15, and 22. The fifth dose level is as previously published in combination with rituximab. Results: A total of 17 patients were treated: 3 each at dose levels 1–4 and 5 at dose level 5 (25 mg temsirolimus days 1,8,15, and 22). The median age was 75 years (52–86). There were 11 males and 6 females. At presentation 88% had stage IV disease, and 94% had extranodal disease. MIPI scores were low in 6% (1 patient), intermediate in 59% (10 patients), and high in 35% (6 patients). There was a single DLT recorded at dose level 3 based on the initial DLT criteria, though this cytokine release syndrome was clearly rituximab related, and occurred prior to the first dose of temsirolimus. Five patients were treated at the highest planned temsirolimus dose level (25 mg days 1,8,15, and 22) with no DLT observed. No further dose escalation was planned, and this level was determined to be tolerated, though higher levels may be tolerable. All patients were evaluable for adverse events. Hematologic toxicity was frequent, with grade 3 anemia in 12% of patients, grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 35%, grade 4 thrombocytopenia in 30%, grade 4 lymphopenia in 47%, grade 3 neutropenia in 24%, and grade 4 neutropenia in 18% of patients. There were 3 thrombotic episodes, 2 of which were attributed to therapy, and 3 episodes of pneumonitis. The overall response rate was 94% with 53% CR and 41% PR. The median progression free survival was 18.7 months. Conclusions: Temsirolimus 25 mg IV weekly may be safely added to rituximab and cladribine at 375 mg/m2 IV day 1 and 5 mg/m2/d IV days 1–5 of a 28 day cycle, respectively. This regimen had promising preliminary activity in an elderly cohort of patients with mantle cell lymphoma. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Temsirolimus for mantle cell lymphoma.

Phase I study of stereotactic body radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS158-TPS158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie Ballas ◽  
Monish Aron ◽  
Shamim Jhimlee ◽  
Igor Shuryak ◽  
Tanya B. Dorff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Toxicity ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Dose Fractionation ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

TPS158 Background: Although multiple Phase I/II studies demonstrate safety and low rates of toxicity following stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to the intact prostate, there are limited data on hypofractionation and SBRT after prostatectomy. This Phase I study was performed to evaluate acute toxicity associated with dose escalation from 3.6 Gy per fraction to 7.1 Gy per fraction to the prostate bed in the post-prostatectomy treatment of prostate cancer. We hypothesize that the toxicity of escalating the dose per fraction to the prostate fossa in the post-operative setting will be well tolerated; and we expect toxicity to be comparable to normal fractionation schedules. Methods: This study (NCT02446366) was designed to look at acute toxicity, defined as toxicity that occurred within the first 10 weeks of RT, of different dose fractionation schemes in the post-prostatectomy setting. The doses chosen for dose escalation on this study are based on an equivalent biological effective dose to a previously published hypofractionated post-prostatectomy study that showed no increase in acute bowel or bladder toxicity. The dose levels are as follows: Level 1 -3.6 Gy x 15 fractions; Level 2- 4.7 Gy x 10 fractions; Level 3 - 7.1 Gy x 5 fractions. Eligibility for participation on the trial was for patients who had pT3N0 disease regardless of margin status in the post-prostatectomy setting, pT2N0 patients with positive margin or with a negative surgical margin and a rising post-operative PSA. Patients could be on concurrent ADT and enroll on this study. Dose was escalated according to a 6+6 schema. For purposes of deciding whether to escalate to a new dose level, expand a dose level or de-escalate from a dose level, we used toxicities and adverse events that occur during the 1st 10 weeks after completion of radiotherapy. Six patients were enrolled on each new dose level with a total of 12 patients required at the maximum tolerated dose. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 3 or worse fatigue, gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) toxicity by Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events (version 4.03). Dose levels 1 and 2 have been completed without any DLT. Dose level 3 has enrolled 9/12 patients without any DLT. Clinical trial information: NCT02446366.

The relationship between response and dose in published, contemporary phase 1 oncology trials.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14583-e14583
Author(s):  
Antonious Ziad Hazim ◽  
Emerson Yu-sheng Chen ◽  
Gordon B. Mills ◽  
Vinay Prasad
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Treatment Response ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Drug Dose ◽  
Phase I Trials ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
The Relationship

e14583 Background: Traditional dose-escalation trial designs have changed little even as diverse classes of oncology drugs have been developed. We aimed to examine whether the association of drug dose to preliminary clinical efficacy previously established in cytotoxic chemotherapies remains true in contemporary phase I dose-escalation oncology trials. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of recent early-phase, dose-finding clinical trials of oncology drugs from November 15, 2015 to November 15, 2018 to examine the relationship between the dose of the investigational drug and objective response rate. We searched PubMed using “cancer” or “oncology” search terms and selected studies that enrolled adults with advanced cancer, determined maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase II dose, and reported efficacy results by drug dose level. Trials testing combination therapies, single dose level, and non-pharmacologic therapies were excluded. Information related to the study drug, study design, cancer type, dose levels, MTD, and recommended phase II dose were all collected. Treatment response for every dose level was categorized into: complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease. Dose level was categorized into four categories: < = 40%, 41-80%, 81-120%, and > 120% of the recommended phase II dose. Results: We identified 93 trials with 2506 participants having both dose and treatment response data. Of these trials, 71 (76%) were testing targeted agents, 7 (8%) were immunotherapy, and 6 (7%) were cytotoxic chemotherapy. Median response rate across trials was 5% (range 0-83%). Among the dose range of < = 40%, the response rate was 12% (57 of 491), 41-80% was 17% (95 of 562), 81-120% was 23% (272 of 1206), and > 120% was 29% (71 of 247). Conclusions: Observed treatment response across dose levels in recent phase I trials should cause us to re-examine the toxicity-benefit ratio and influence how we design phase I trials testing novel classes of oncology drugs.

Phase I study of topotecan and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors: a cancer and leukemia group B study.

1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 2743-2750 ◽  
Author(s):  
A A Miller ◽  
J B Hargis ◽  
R C Lilenbaum ◽  
S Z Fields ◽  
G L Rosner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

PURPOSE The objectives of this phase I trial were to determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the novel topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan combined with cisplatin, to define the maximum-tolerated doses (MTDs) of the combination without and with the use of filgrastim, and to define recommended doses for phase II trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced solid tumors were eligible if they had normal bone marrow, renal, and hepatic function and had not previously been treated with platinum compounds. Topotecan was administered intravenously on days 1 through 5 and cisplatin was administered intravenously on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. The topotecan dose was fixed at 1.0 mg/m2/d on the first four dose levels, and cisplatin was escalated in 25-mg/m2 increments from 25 to 100 mg/m2 without filgrastim. After encountering DLT, the dose of cisplatin was decreased by one level and topotecan dose escalation was attempted. After defining the MTD without growth factor, the study proceeded with escalating cisplatin doses to define the MTD with filgrastim 5 micrograms/kg subcutaneously (SC) daily starting on day 6 of treatment. Priming with filgrastim 5 micrograms/kg SC on days -6 to -2 before the first course was explored last. RESULTS Of 38 patients entered, 37 were eligible, 35 assessable for toxicity in the first course, and 28 assessable for response. The principal toxicity was grade 4 neutropenia, which had to last more than 7 days to be considered dose-limiting. No DLT was observed at the starting cisplatin dose of 25 mg/m2 (dose level 1). On level 2 (cisplatin 50 mg/m2, one patient had dose-limiting neutropenia and one patient had grade 3 renal toxicity. On level 3 (cisplatin 75 mg/m2), two patients had dose-limiting neutropenia. Therefore, cisplatin dose escalation was stopped. On dose level 5 (cisplatin 50 mg/m2 and topotecan 1.25 mg/m2/d), one patient had grade 4 neutropenia that lasted more than 7 days and one patient died of neutropenic sepsis. The remaining dose levels used topotecan 1.0 mg/m2/d plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 (level 6) and 100 mg/m2 (levels 7 and 8) with filgrastim. No DLT was observed on level 6. On level 7, two patients had dose-limiting neutropenia and one patient had grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia. Priming with filgrastim on level 8 demonstrated no obvious advantage over level 7, and one patient had grade 4 thrombocytopenia that lasted more than 7 days. Three patients with non-small-cell lung cancer achieved a partial response and one patient with breast cancer had a complete response. CONCLUSION Topotecan and cisplatin in combination cause more neutropenia than expected from either drug given alone at the same dosage. The recommended phase II doses are topotecan 1.0 mg/m2/d for 5 days in combination with cisplatin 50 mg/m2 on day 1 without filgrastim or cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1 with filgrastim support.

Phase I Study of Flavopiridol in Combination with Imatinib Mesylate (STI571, Gleevec) in Bcr/Abl+ Hematological Malignancies.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 1102-1102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Grant ◽  
Judith E. Karp ◽  
Omer N. Koc ◽  
Brenda Cooper ◽  
Selina Luger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Leukemia Cells ◽  
Human Leukemia ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Pronounced Increase ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Imatinib (Im), a rationally designed inhibitor of the Bcr/Abl kinase as well as other kinases, represents the standard treatment for Bcr/Abl+ malignancies. Im as a single agent, however, is not curative. Flavopiridol (Fl), an investigational cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor, is broadly active in vitro against human leukemia cells (Blood91:2482,1998). Previously we have shown that simultaneous disruption of a survival signaling pathway and a cell cycle regulatory pathway results in a pronounced increase in leukemic cell death (Cancer Res.61:5106,2001) and in more recent preclinical studies demonstrated synergistic interactions between Im and Fl in Bcr/Abl+ leukemia cells, including some that were resistant to Im (Clin Cancer Res8;2976,2002). Based on these considerations, we have initiated a phase I trial to identify appropriate doses of Im+Fl for further investigation. Eligible patients (pts) have CML with a suboptimal response to prior Im, CML in blast crisis, or Bcr/Abl+ acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL). CML-BC and ALL patients may be Im-naïve. Pts receive Im by continuous daily oral dosing and Fl by 1 hour intravenous infusion weekly x 3 repeated every 4 weeks. Targeted dose levels are (Fl/Im; mg/m2): 30/400, 30/600, 45/600, 60/600, 60/800, 60/1000. Patients are divided into 2 strata based upon blast percentage in peripheral blood or bone marrow: stratum 1, &lt;15%; and stratum 2, ≥15%. For stratum 1 dose limiting toxicity (DLT) is defined as NCI CTCAE grade 4 ANC/platelet for &gt; 1 week or grade ≥ 3 non-heme toxicity; for stratum 2, DLT is profound marrow hypoplasia in the absence of persistent leukemia. In stratum 1, 16 pts have been treated at 4 dose levels; in stratum 2, 5 pts in the 1st and 3rd dose level. In stratum 1, 1 DLT has occurred at dose level 4 (cholecystitis requiring cholecystectomy); in stratum 2, 1 DLT has occurred at dose level 3 (sepsis/multi-organ failure which was not clearly related to treatment). The only frequent toxicities have been hematological. 4 pts have experienced objective responses including complete hematological remissions in 2 pts in stratum 1 treated with Im/Fl 30/600 who had been previously treated with Im 800 and complete hematological remissions in 2 pts in stratum 2 (who had not received prior Im). Preliminary studies indicate no Fl impact upon Im pharmacokinetics, and variable post-treatment effects on signaling pathways in CML cells. These findings indicate that a regimen consisting of Fl and Im is tolerable and active in at least some patients with Bcr/Abl+ hematologic malignancies, including some with Im-resistant disease. Pending identification of the MTD and the recommended Phase II dose (RPTD), Phase II trials will be necessary to assess the activity of this strategy more definitively.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document