Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Irinotecan and Docetaxel in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors: Preliminary Evidence of Clinical Activity

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 1116-1116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex A. Adjei ◽  
Cheri E. Klein ◽  
Helen Kastrissios ◽  
Richard M. Goldberg ◽  
Steven R. Alberts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Intravenous Infusion ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose ◽  
Tumor Types ◽  
Dose Levels

PURPOSE: The goals of this study were to determine the maximum-tolerated dose and describe the toxicities of the combination of irinotecan and docetaxel administered every 3 weeks to patients with advanced malignancies and, also, to evaluate the effect of irinotecan on the disposition of docetaxel and describe preliminary evidence of antitumor activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients received 85 courses (median, two courses; range, one to 15 courses) of treatment with irinotecan, administered over 90 minutes by intravenous infusion, followed by docetaxel, administered over 60 minutes by intravenous infusion. Four escalating dose levels of irinotecan/docetaxel (160/50 mg/m2, 160/65 mg/m2, 200/65 mg/m2, and 200/75 mg/m2) were studied. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of irinotecan on the disposition of docetaxel. RESULTS: The most common and dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression, which consisted of neutropenia that was severe (National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria [NCI CTC] grade 4) but brief (< 5 days) in 11 patients, with three episodes of febrile neutropenia. Nonhematologic toxicities of anorexia, nausea, and stomatitis were mild to moderate (NCI CTC grades 1 and 2), but there was one incidence each of both CTC grade 3 anorexia and nausea. All patients had total alopecia. Diarrhea was dose-dependent and severe in four patients who failed to take adequate antidiarrhea therapy. Five out of 16 assessable patients, one with cholangiocarcinoma, one with leiomyosarcoma, and three with non–small-cell lung cancer, achieved partial remissions. CONCLUSION: The combination of irinotecan and docetaxel causes significant reversible myelosuppression, which was dose limiting but led to no serious sequelae. There was no evidence of a clinically significant interaction using these two agents in this sequence. The combination showed antitumor activity at all the dose levels tested and should be further studied in a number of tumor types. The recommended phase II dose on this schedule is irinotecan 160 mg/m2 and docetaxel 65 mg/m2.

Phase I and pharmacologic study of estramustine phosphate and short infusions of paclitaxel in women with solid tumors.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 2959-2963 ◽  
Author(s):  
A A Garcia ◽  
S Keren-Rosenberg ◽  
D Parimoo ◽  
M Rogers ◽  
S Jeffers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Estramustine Phosphate ◽  
Antitumor Effects ◽  
Ovarian Cancers ◽  
P Glycoprotein ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose ◽  
Pharmacologic Study

PURPOSE We sought to determine the tolerance of estramustine phosphate (EMP) combined with a 3-hour paclitaxel infusion in women with solid paclitaxel-pretreated solid tumors. Paclitaxel pharmacology was to be studied at the recommended phase II dose. PATIENTS AND METHODS Paclitaxel was administered to cohorts of at least three assessable patients at doses of 150, 180, 210, and 225 mg/m2, while EMP was given at 900 and 1,200 mg/m2/d in divided doses orally for 2 days preceding and on the day of paclitaxel. The pharmacologic study was performed at 225 mg/m2 paclitaxel given in the absence and 3 weeks later in the presence of EMP 900 mg/m2/d. RESULTS Thirty-eight patients received a total of 178 courses. Grade 3 nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were common at EMP 1,200 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 225 mg/ m2; this was considered the maximum-tolerated dose. Since these toxicities appeared related to EMP, the pharmacologic study used a dose of 900 mg/m2 of this agent with 225 mg/m2 paclitaxel. Antitumor activity was documented against breast and ovarian cancers at all levels. Paclitaxel pharmacokinetics without and with EMP did not differ. CONCLUSION EMP 900 mg/m2 for 3 days and 225 mg/m2 paclitaxel by 3-hour infusion are well tolerated; antitumor activity was seen in women with paclitaxel-pretreated solid tumors. This apparent enhancement of antitumor effects is unlikely to be mediated by P-glycoprotein.

A phase I clinical study of biweekly carboplatin and gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12024-12024
Author(s):  
P. Kumar ◽  
M. Keshtgarpour ◽  
H. Kumar ◽  
A. Dudek
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Number Of Cycles ◽  
Tumor Types ◽  
Dose Levels

12024 Background: Carboplatin (CBDCA) and gemcitabine (GEM) in combination is used commonly in lung cancer and is administered on a 21 day cycle. The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of CBDCA and GEM administered on a biweekly schedule and to assess safety and efficacy of this schedule. Methods: GEM was given intravenously (IV) over 30 minutes followed by CBDCA also given IV over 30 minutes. This combination was given on day 1 every 2 weeks. The dose levels examined are shown in the Table . A total of 26 patients were studied (18 male, 8 female) with median age of 56 (range 41–83 years); ECOG performance status of 24 patients were 0 (5), 1 (16), 2 (2), 3 (1); prior chemotherapy ranged from 0 to 4 regimens; median number of cycles administered per patient was 3 (range 1–9) with a total of 81 cycles. The primary tumors were lung (11), melanoma (4), head and neck (3), squamous cell penile/toe (2), bladder (2), kidney (1), gastric (1), esophageal (1) and ovary (1). Results: No DLTs were seen in any of these patients and the MTD was not reached. Delay in treatment was seen in total of 6 cycles due to myelosuppression and 1 cycle due to nausea and anorexia. Grade 3/4 hematological toxicity rates: anemia - 3/81 cycles (3.7%), neutropenia - 20/81 cycles (25%), and thrombocytopenia - 4/81 cycles (5%). Non-hematological toxicity was mild. The median time to progression was 40 days (range 4–133) and of 18 evaluable patients partial response or stable disease was seen in 7 (38.8%). Conclusions: Even at maximum tested dose of GEM at 2000 mg/m2 and CBDCA at AUC of 3.0, this schedule is well tolerated. Hematological toxicity such as neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was minimal. We plan to study this schedule of GEM and CBDCA in appropriate tumor types in combination with biologic agents. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Pemetrexed in combination with paclitaxel: A phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic trial in patients with solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2051-2051 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Graefe ◽  
C. Bolling ◽  
C. Lubbing ◽  
J. Latz ◽  
J. Blatter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Thyroid Carcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Recommended Dose ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose

2051 Background: Pemetrexed (Alimta [AL]) and paclitaxel (P) are clinically active in a variety of tumors. The primary objective of this trial was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the ALP combination; secondary objectives were: determination of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), definition of a recommended phase II dose, pharmacokinetic (PK) characterization and the anecdotal collection of antitumor activity. Methods: Escalating doses of P (3h infusion, d1 and d8) and AL (10 min infusion, d8 prior to P) were given in a 21d cycle. Results: 59 patients (pts) were enrolled. DLTs occurred at the following ALP (mg/m2) doses: 400/30 [G3 bilirubin (b), G3 and G4 thrombocytopenia (plts)]; 500/30 (G4 plts); 500/40 (G3 b); 500/75 (G4 ANC); 500/100 (G4 leukopenia, G4 ANC). With G4 leukopenia and G4 ANC in 4/6 pts and febrile neutropenia in 1 pt, the MTD was reached at the ALP (mg/m2) dose of 500/120. To confirm safety at the recommended dose-level, another 6 patients were treated at the ALP (mg/m2) dose of 500/100. 18 pts [mesothelioma (3), esophagus (2), lung (1), liver (1), renal (1), stomach (1), thyroid (9)] showed stable disease as best response. 4/14 (29%) pts with thyroid carcinoma showed long lasting partial responses [duration (months) 29+, 22, 18, 15]. One additional PR (2) was observed in a pt with penile carcinoma. AL PK when administered with P were consistent with those for AL administered as a single-agent. Conclusions: The ALP combination is safe and shows broad clinical activity. 500/100 mg/m2 is the recommended dose for further studies. Promising antitumor activity was observed in thyroid cancer. A phase II trial in thyroid carcinoma will be conducted. [Table: see text]

Phase I study of bortezomib plus cetuximab in patients with tumors expressing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18143-18143 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Dudek ◽  
P. Gada ◽  
K. Mulamalla ◽  
N. Shehadeh
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
Day Treatment ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Human Antibody ◽  
Chimeric Mouse ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

18143 Background: Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that augments EGFR inhibitor activity (Cancer Research 2007; 67:(2),1–8). Cetuximab is a chimeric mouse-human antibody against EGFR that has been found to induce tumor responses in patients with colon cancer and head and neck cancer. The purpose of this study was to establish a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for the combination of bortezomib plus cetuximab in patients with EGFR-expressing epithelial tumors. Methods: A 21-day treatment cycle was given with a maximum of six cycles per patient. Bortezomib was administered intravenously on days 1 and 8 via dose escalation, beginning with a minimum dose of 1.3 mg/m2 and increasing in one-tenth increments to 2.0 mg/m2 for a total of eight dose levels. Cetuximab was delivered with an initial dose of 400mg/m2 on day 1 cycle 1, with subsequent doses of 250mg/ m2 on days 1, 8 and 15. Results: Twenty patients (13 male and 7 female) with an ECOG PS <2 were enrolled in this study from November 2005 to December 2006. The median age was 59.5 (range: 41- 68), and the median number of prior chemotherapy regimens was 5 (range 1–7). Primary tumor sites included lung (9), head and neck (4), kidney (3), pancreas (2), bladder (1), and ovary (1). A total of 54 cycles of chemotherapy were administered; the median number of cycles per patient was 2.5 (range 1–6). Thirteen patients discontinued therapy because of disease progression. Two patients completed all six cycles of therapy. One dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was seen at dose level 4 (bortezomib 1.6 mg/m2), which included grade 3 nausea, vomiting and dysphagia based on evaluation using CTCAE (version 3.0). Level 4 was expanded to enroll 3 additional patients, and no further grade 3 or 4 toxicities were observed. Grade 3/4 non- hematological toxicities were observed in 14 patients after their first cycle of therapy. Nine patients had delay in treatment. Conclusions: MTD for bortezomib plus cetuximab was not achieved at dose levels 1–6. This combination therapy has shown limited clinical activity in our extensively pretreated group of patients with solid tumors. Complete results for all dose levels, including dose levels 7–8, will be reported at the 2007 meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. [Table: see text]

Phase I study of MK-3475 (anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody) in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2512-2512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amita Patnaik ◽  
Soonmo Peter Kang ◽  
Anthony W. Tolcher ◽  
Drew Warren Rasco ◽  
Kyriakos P. Papadopoulos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Advanced Malignancy ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Label Dose ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Tumor Types

2512 Background: Programmed death-1 (PD-1) is an inhibitory T-cell coreceptor that may lead to suppression of antitumor immunity. MK-3475 is a humanized monoclonal IgG4 antibody against PD-1. Preclinically, MK-3475 has shown antitumor activity in multiple tumor types. This first-in-human phase I trial explored safety, PK, PD, and antitumor activity of MK-3475. Methods: An open-label, dose escalation study was conducted in patients with advanced malignancy refractory to standard therapy. Cohorts of 3-6 patients were enrolled (3+3 design) at escalating IV doses of 1, 3, and 10 mg/kg. Following an initial dose and 28-day Cycle 1, patients were allowed to subsequently receive multiple doses given every 2 wks. Radiographic assessment was conducted every 8 wks using RECIST 1.1 guidelines. Results: Nine patients, 3 at each dose level, completed the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) period (28 d). Patients had non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, n=3), rectal cancer (n=2), melanoma (MEL, n=2), sarcoma (n=1), or carcinoid (n=1). To date, a total of 63 doses were administered (median 7/patient; max 12) without DLT. Drug-related adverse events (AEs) across all doses included Grade 1 fatigue (n=3), nausea (n=2), diarrhea (n=1), dysgeusia (n=1), breast pain (n=1), and pruritus (n=1). One drug-related Grade 2 AE of pruritus was reported. No drug-related AEs ≥ Grade 3 were observed. PK data are shown in the table. Based on RECIST, 1 patient with MEL on therapy >6 mths had a partial response, and preliminary evidence of tumor size reduction (stable disease) was observed in 3 additional patients with advanced cancer. Conclusions: MK-3475 was well-tolerated without DLT across 3 tested dose levels. Evidence of antitumor activity was observed. Enrollment continues to obtain additional safety, PK, and efficacy data; updated data will be presented at the meeting. [Table: see text]

A phase lb, open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation study of the oral pan-PI3K inhibitor BKM120 in combination with the oral MEK1/2 inhibitor GSK1120212 in patients (pts) with selected advanced solid tumors.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3003-3003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Bedard ◽  
Josep Tabernero ◽  
Razelle Kurzrock ◽  
Carolyn D. Britten ◽  
Anastasios Stathis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Plasma Concentrations ◽  
Oral Intake ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose ◽  
Bayesian Logistic Regression

3003 Background: MAPK and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways regulate proliferation, differentiation and cell death in human cancers. Known interaction between the 2 pathways provides the rationale for combining both inhibitors in a phase I study. Methods: The objective is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase II dose (RP2D) for oral, daily administered, BKM120 + GSK1120212, mainly in pts with tumors with RAS/RAF mutations (mt). A Bayesian logistic regression model with overdose control guides the dose escalation of the treatment. Secondary objectives include safety, tolerability, PK and efficacy. Results: As of 22.09.11, 49 pts were treated with BKM120 + GSK1120212 as follows: 30mg + 0.5mg, 60mg + 0.5mg, 60mg + 1.0mg, 60mg + 1.5mg, 60mg + 2.0mg, 70mg + 1.5mg, 80mg + 1.0mg, 80mg + 1.5mg. 6 pts had dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs); all were reversible. Grade 3 DLTs were: 3 x stomatitis, 1 x dysphagia, 1 x LVEF decrease, 1 x CK increase, 1 x nausea, 1 x anorexia, 1 x decreased oral intake. MTD and/or RP2D for the combination have not been reached. Most common adverse events (AEs) (>25%), all grades and causality, were dermatitis acneiform, diarrhea (51% each); nausea (41%); vomiting (37%); rash (33%); asthenia (31%); CK increase, decreased appetite, pyrexia or stomatitis (29% each) and hyperglycemia (27%). There were 4 on-treatment deaths unrelated to treatment. AEs led to treatment discontinuation, 17 pts (35%) and interruptions/dose reductions, 25 pts (51%). Apparent steady-states of BKM120 and GSK1120212 were reached by day 28. Plasma concentrations of BKM120 in combination with GSK1120212 were lower than for monotherapy. Exposure to GSK1120212 with BKM120 was similar to that observed in monotherapy studies. 3 confirmed partial responses have been observed in pts with KRAS mt ovarian cancer; 2 lasting >9 months. 2 patients with BRAF mt melanoma, who had previously progressed on BRAF inhibitors, had stable disease, for 1 of whom treatment is still ongoing in cycle 6. Conclusions: BKM120 and GSK1120212 can be safely combined. Signs of clinical activity have been seen in pts with RAS/RAF mt tumors.

Clinical development of namitecan (ST1968), a novel camptothecin derivative with high antitumor activity: Phase I clinical data

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2570-2570 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Hess ◽  
S. Boehm ◽  
A. Delmonte ◽  
E. Gallerani ◽  
P. Barbieri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Water Soluble ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Cohort Design ◽  
Blood And Urine Samples ◽  
High Antitumor Activity ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity

2570 Background: Namitecan is a new water-soluble camptothecin analogue which showed high antitumor activity in preclinical models. Aim of this trial was to determine safety, PK profile and activity in adult patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: The dose escalation started at 2.5 mg i.v. on days 1 and 8 of a 21 day cycle (D1, D8 Q21D) and increased according to 3+3 cohort design depending on the observed toxicity. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) definitions were: ANC <0.5x109/L for >5 days; PLT ≥ Grade 3 (CTC V3); grade ≥2 liver/renal toxicity not recovered by D22; any non-hematologic toxicity ≥ Grade 3; D8 dose skipping due to toxicity. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) were the primary end-points. Blood and urine samples were collected at cycle 1 for PK evaluation. Results: 31 pts (11 endometrial ca., 5 CRC, 5 ovarian ca., 2 NSCLC, 8 other) have been included, with 6 dose levels evaluated (2.5; 5; 10; 15; 17.5 and 20 mg). 17.5 mg was introduced later when 2/7 DLTs at 20 mg were observed (ANC G4>5days, one with D8 skipping). At 17.5mg 2/4 pts experienced DLTs (ANC G4; D8 skipped). Uncomplicated neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were the most relevant G3/4 hematological toxicities. Other toxicities were mild or moderate asthenia, fatigue and alopecia. The MTD was defined at 17.5 mg and the RD was 15 mg. Stable disease ≥ 6 cycles was recorded in 6 pts (2 stable diseases ≥ 10 cycles). PK was linear and data suggest an entero-hepatic recirculation. No metabolites were found in plasma and the product resulted poorly excreted into urine. Conclusions: The MTD and RD of D1, D8 Q21D schedule have been identified. The study will continue with the evaluation of MTD and RD of a single administration per cycle (D1 Q21D), to optimize the schedule of treatment. [Table: see text]

Phase I/II safety and antitumor activity of nivolumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): CA209-040.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA101-LBA101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony B. El-Khoueiry ◽  
Ignacio Melero ◽  
Todd S. Crocenzi ◽  
Theodore Hobart Welling ◽  
Thomas Cheung Yau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Hepatitis Virus ◽  
Response Duration ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

LBA101 Background: Overexpression of PD-L1 in HCC has a poor prognosis. Safety and preliminary antitumor efficacy of nivolumab, a fully human IgG4 monoclonal antibody PD-1 inhibitor, was evaluated in a multiple ascending-dose, phase I/II study in patients (pts) with HCC. Methods: Pts with histologically confirmed advanced HCC with Child-Pugh (CP) score ≤ B7 and progressive disease (PD) on, intolerant of, or refusing sorafenib were enrolled. Dose escalation occurred in parallel cohorts based on etiology: no active hepatitis virus infection or virus-infected HCC pts. Pts received nivolumab 0.1 – 10 mg/kg intravenously for up to two years. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints included antitumor activity using mRECIST criteria, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. Results: The study has enrolled 41 pts with a CP score of 5 (n = 35) or 6 (n = 6), ECOG score of 0 (n = 26) or 1 (n = 15), 73% with extrahepatic metastasis and/or portal vein invasion, and 77% with prior sorafenib use. Eighteen pts remain on study, and 23 discontinued treatment due to PD (n = 17), complete response (CR; n = 2), drug-related adverse events (AEs; n = 2) and non-drug–related AEs (n = 2). Drug-related AEs of any grade occurred in 29 pts (71%; 17% grade 3/4), with ≥ 10% of pts experiencing aspartate aminotransferase (AST) increase and rash (each 17%), alanine aminotransferase(ALT) and lipase increase (each 15%), and amylase increase (12%). Grade 3 and 4 AEs ≥ 5% were AST increase (12%), ALT increase (10%) and lipase increase (5%). A dose-limiting toxicity occurred in an uninfected pt at 10 mg/kg; no maximum tolerated dose was defined in any cohort. Response was evaluable in 39 pts: 2 CR (5%) and 7 partial responses (PR; 18%). Response duration was 14–17+ months for CR, < 1–8+ months for PR, and 1.5–17+ months for stable disease (SD). Overall survival (OS) rate at 6 months is 72%. Conclusions: Nivolumab has a manageable AE profile and produced durable responses across all dose levels and HCC cohorts, with a favorable 6-month OS rate. Updated safety, antitumor activity, and biomarker data will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT01658878. [Table: see text]

A phase I study of pazopanib with weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin in advanced solid tumors.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3021-3021
Author(s):  
Nancy Chan ◽  
Daniella E. Portal ◽  
Rebecca Anne Moss ◽  
Ann W. Silk ◽  
Mark N. Stein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Unknown Primary ◽  
Weak Inhibitor ◽  
Standard Design ◽  
Proportional Increase ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Tumor Types ◽  
Dose Levels

3021 Background: Pazopanib (pazo) is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFR, PDGFR and c-Kit. It is a weak inhibitor of CYP3A4 and CYP2C8 and may decrease paclitaxel (P) clearance. Daily pazo with P and carboplatin (C) every 21 days was not feasible on a previous study. We hypothesized that pazo dosed intermittently and on a different day from P and C may be tolerable. We sought to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and pharmacokinetics (PK) of pazo with weekly P and C. Methods: Using a 3+3 standard design, a schedule of P 60-80 mg/m2 and C AUC2 on days 1, 8, and 15 with pazo 400-800 mg on days 2-5, 9-12, and 16-26 on a 28-day cycle was evaluated. Pazo alone could be continued if P and C were omitted due to maximal benefit or toxicity. PK was collected during cycles 1 and 2. Results: 34 patients (pts) were treated over 6 dose levels (Table). Mean age 57 (37-79). Tumor types: breast (22), lung (3) and other (9); 27 had prior platinum. Delay in starting cycle 2 due to grade 3 neutropenia was a DLT at dose level 2 and 5. Pts on 5A missed dosing during C1 and C2 due to neutropenia and required subsequent growth factor, and this was deemed unlikely to be sustainable long-term. All grade toxicities included anemia (62%), neutropenia (59%), and thrombocytopenia (56%). Protocol-defined MTD was not determined. PK analysis showed a dose proportional increase in pazo concentration, consistent with previous reports. Pazo did not alter the PK of C. Cmax of P was higher C2D1 vs C1D1; mean Cmax ratio between C2D1:C1D1 was 1.63 (95% CI:1.29-1.96). There were 11 objective responses (3 CRs, 8 PRs). Five breast pts were on pazo alone for a median of 9 cycles (2-52) with CR (2), PR (2) and SD (1); a squamous cell of unknown primary in CR received 22 cycles. Clinical trial information: NCT01407562. Conclusions: PK confirm that pazo is a weak inhibitor of CYP3A4 and CYP2C8. Myelosuppression was a major adverse event at all dose levels. MTD was not determined. Antitumor activity was achieved with this alternate combination schedule and sustained responses from sequential pazo monotherapy was observed.[Table: see text]

393 First-in-human phase 1/2a study of the novel nonfucosylated anti–CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody BMS-986218 ± nivolumab in advanced solid tumors: initial phase 1 results

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A418-A418
Author(s):  
Claire Friedman ◽  
Paolo Ascierto ◽  
Diwakar Davar ◽  
Mark O’Hara ◽  
Ronnie Shapira-Frommer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
List Type ◽  
Grade 3

BackgroundCTLA-4 pathway blockade with ipilimumab (IPI) ± nivolumab (NIVO; anti–PD-1) is an effective treatment for several cancers. A nonfucosylated version of IPI, BMS-986218, was developed to increase the effects of CTLA-4 blockade and enhance intratumoral regulatory T-cell depletion via its increased affinity for Fcγ receptors (FcγR, CD16) on natural killer T cells and macrophages, resulting in enhancement of antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Preclinical data supported the mechanism of action of BMS-986218 and demonstrated greater antitumor activity in an MC38 tumor model vs IPI.1 Here, we present initial results from the first-in-human phase 1/2a trial of BMS-986218 ± NIVO in previously treated patients with advanced cancer (NCT03110107).MethodsPatients with ≥1 prior therapy received BMS-986218 2–70 mg intravenously Q4W. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics were evaluated.ResultsAs of December 12, 2019, 65 patients (median age, 61 years [range, 24–85 years]) received BMS-986218 monotherapy. TRAEs occurred in 52% of patients; most were grade 1–2. The most common (≥10%) TRAEs (any grade; grade 3) were pruritus (12%; 0%) and diarrhea (11%; 3%). Eight patients (12%) had grade 3 TRAEs; most resolved with protocol-defined management. No grade 4 TRAEs were reported; 1 grade 5 TRAE (pneumonitis; 2 mg) occurred. Seven patients (11%) discontinued treatment due to TRAEs; 4 dose-limiting toxicities occurred. The maximum tolerated dose has not been reached. BMS-986218 exposure increased dose proportionally, and the half-life was ≈2 weeks. Increased levels of serum chemokine ligands 9 and 10 and interferon-γ indicate that pharmacodynamic changes occurred at the lowest dose tested (2 mg [≈0.03 mg/kg]), similar to previous findings with IPI 3 mg/kg, and at higher doses (40–70 mg [≈0.06–1 mg/kg]), consistent with findings with IPI 10 mg/kg. In a subset of patients with paired biopsies, BMS-986218 was associated with an increased gene signature linked to CD8+ T-cell infiltration and inflammation. In a highly heterogeneous population, as part of dose escalation, BMS-986218 monotherapy treatment was associated with clinical activity in some patients. Updated data based on a September 2020 data cutoff will be presented.ConclusionsBMS-986218 monotherapy demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and signs of clinical benefit in this heterogeneous patient population with select advanced cancers. Preliminary pharmacodynamic activity was consistent with enhanced effects of CTLA-4 blockade. Data from continuing dose escalation of BMS-986218 ± NIVO along with preclinical results provide support for ongoing monotherapy expansions and for BMS-986218 + NIVO expansions in patients with advanced cancer.AcknowledgementsThe authors acknowledge Dr Charles Drake while at Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA, for his contributions to the study.Trial RegistrationNCT03110107Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by the WCG Independent Review Board, approval number 20170464ReferenceEngelhardt J, Akter R, Valle J, et al. Preclinical characterization of BMS-986218, a novel nonfucosylated anti–CTLA-4 antibody designed to enhance antitumor activity. Presented at the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Virtual Annual Meeting II; June 22–24, 2020 [poster 4552].

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document