Volume of Lymphatic Metastases Does Not Independently Influence Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 1506-1511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan H. Wong ◽  
Susan Steinemann ◽  
Paul Tom ◽  
Shane Morita ◽  
Pamela Tauchi-Nishi

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic relevance of the volume of nodal metastatic disease in colorectal cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred node-positive patients with T2 or T3 carcinoma of the colon or rectum after routine histologic examination of the regional nodes were studied. The metastatic tumor was measured with an ocular micrometer, and the tumor volume was determined. RESULTS: The mean lymph node metastatic tumor volume was 5.1 ± 4.99 mm3 (range, 0.05 to 83,434 mm3). There was only a weak positive correlation with number of nodes involved with metastatic disease and tumor volume in nodes (r = .45). Median follow-up was 39 months (range, 1 to 87 months). The number of nodes was highly predictive of outcome. Individuals with one to three positive nodes had a substantially better survival than individuals with four or more positive nodes (P < .001). The volume of nodal metastatic disease correlated with outcome (P = .019). Patients dying as a result of disease had substantially greater mean metastatic nodal volume than those who were alive (3,705 v 1,783 mm3; P = .036). However, the total metastatic nodal volume did not, independent of positive nodes or number of positive nodes, predict outcome. Individuals with micrometastatic nodal volume did not have improved survival when compared with individuals with macrometastatic nodal volume (P = .79). CONCLUSION: The number of nodes involved with metastatic tumor, rather the volume of metastatic involvement of the regional lymph nodes, predicts outcome. These results suggest that micrometastatic disease may have a similar prognosis as macrometastatic disease when the same number of lymph nodes are involved with metastatic tumor.

In Vivo ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 849-856
Author(s):  
KEISUKE KAZAMA ◽  
JUNYA OTAKE ◽  
TETSUTA SATOYOSHI ◽  
MANABU SHIOZAWA ◽  
NOBUHIRO SUGANO ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. e30-e39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ariel Zwenger ◽  
Martin Rabassa ◽  
Sandra Demichelis ◽  
Gabriel Grossman ◽  
Amada Segal-Eiras ◽  
...  

Aim Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most prevalent malignancies in Argentina with 11,043 new cases and 6,596 deaths estimated to have occurred in 2008. The present study was developed to clarify the differential expression of MUC1, MUC2, sLex, and sLea in colorectal cancer patients and their relationship with survival and clinical and histological features. Methods Ninety primary tumor samples and 43 metastatic lymph nodes from CRC patients were studied; follow-up was documented. Twenty-six adenoma and 68 histological normal mucosa specimens were analyzed. An immunohistochemical approach was applied and statistical analysis was performed. Results In tumor samples, MUC1, sLea, and sLex were highly expressed (94%, 67%, and 91%, respectively); also, we found a significantly increased expression of the 3 antigens in primary tumors and metastatic lymph nodes compared with normal mucosa and adenomas. MUC2 was expressed in 52% of both normal mucosa and CRC samples; this reactivity significantly decreased in metastatic lymph nodes (p<0.05). A multiple comparison analysis showed that MUC1 and sLex discriminated among 3 groups: normal, adenoma, and CRC tissues. The increase of sLex expression showed an association with recurrence, and survival analysis showed that a high sLex staining was significantly associated with a poor survival. By multivariate analysis MUC1 inmunoreactivity correlated positively and significantly with tumor size, while MUC2 expression showed the opposite correlation. Conclusions The correlation of sLex overexpression in primary tumors and metastatic lymph nodes, the discrimination among the normal, adenoma, and CRC groups based on sLex expression, as well as its association with recurrence and survival, all suggest a prognostic role of sLex in Argentinian CRC patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document