Effects of a High-Fiber, Low-Fat Diet Intervention on Serum Concentrations of Reproductive Steroid Hormones in Women With a History of Breast Cancer

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 2379-2387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheryl L. Rock ◽  
Shirley W. Flatt ◽  
Cynthia A. Thomson ◽  
Marcia L. Stefanick ◽  
Vicky A. Newman ◽  
...  

Purpose Diet intervention trials are testing whether postdiagnosis dietary modification can influence breast cancer recurrence and survival. One possible mechanism is an effect on reproductive steroid hormones. Participants and Methods Serum reproductive steroid hormones were measured at enrollment and 1 year in 291 women with a history of breast cancer who were enrolled onto a randomized, controlled diet intervention trial. Dietary goals for the intervention group were increased fiber, vegetable, and fruit intakes and reduced fat intake. Estradiol, bioavailable estradiol, estrone, estrone sulfate, androstenedione, testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, follicle-stimulating hormone, and sex hormone-binding globulin were measured. Results The intervention (but not the comparison) group reported a significantly lower intake of energy from fat (21% v 28%), and higher intake of fiber (29 g/d v 22 g/d), at 1-year follow-up (P < .001). Significant weight loss did not occur in either group. A significant difference in the change in bioavailable estradiol concentration from baseline to 1 year in the intervention (−13 pmol/L) versus the comparison (+3 pmol/L) group was observed (P < .05). Change in fiber (but not fat) intake was significantly and independently related to change in serum bioavailable estradiol (P < .01) and total estradiol (P < .05) concentrations. Conclusion Results from this study indicate that a high-fiber, low-fat diet intervention is associated with reduced serum bioavailable estradiol concentration in women diagnosed with breast cancer, the majority of whom did not exhibit weight loss. Increased fiber intake was independently related to the reduction in serum estradiol concentration.

2017 ◽  
pp. jn252395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison C Sylvetsky ◽  
Sharon L Edelstein ◽  
Geoffrey Walford ◽  
Edward J Boyko ◽  
Edward S Horton ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (15) ◽  
pp. 2311-2317 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Gregory Hislop ◽  
Chris D. Bajdik ◽  
Lynda G. Balneaves ◽  
Andrea Holmes ◽  
Selina Chan ◽  
...  

Purpose Little is known about the potential adverse effects of interventions to reduce dietary fat. We examined the physical and emotional health effects, and social consequences experienced by women at high risk for breast cancer who had participated in a low-fat diet intervention, randomized, controlled trial for at least 5 years. Methods Participants in the Canadian Diet and Breast Cancer Prevention Trial from British Columbia were mailed a survey questionnaire that included the validated Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Women's Health Questionnaire (WHQ), and a series of questions on health-related and social constructs. Responses were compared between the diet intervention and control groups by menopausal status. Results Completed questionnaires were returned by 359 women in the diet intervention group and 382 in the control group. No significant differences were found between these groups for SF-36 and WHQ health outcomes, hair/nail changes, physical activity levels, family/friend support levels, and doctor visits. Significantly more women in the intervention group reported taking products for arthritis (other than pain medication), greater difficulty in maintaining eating habits in social situations and at work, greater stress, and guilt related to personal eating habits. These findings persisted for both premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Conclusion Changes resulting from a low-fat diet intervention can be incorporated into women's daily lives with limited long-term negative effects.


2009 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grant D Brinkworth ◽  
Manny Noakes ◽  
Jonathan D Buckley ◽  
Jennifer B Keogh ◽  
Peter M Clifton

1990 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-53
Author(s):  
I. Marilyn Buzzard ◽  
Elaine H. Asp ◽  
Rowan T. Chlebowski ◽  
Andrea P. Boyar ◽  
Robert W. Jeffery ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 959-968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew A. Allison ◽  
Aaron K. Aragaki ◽  
Roberta M. Ray ◽  
Karen L. Margolis ◽  
Shirley A.A. Beresford ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily L. Rossi ◽  
Laura W. Bowers ◽  
Subreen A. Khatib ◽  
Laura A. Smith ◽  
Steven S. Doerstling ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document