Changes in cancer patients’ perceptions of do-not-resuscitate orders as end of life (EOL) approaches

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (16_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8072-8072
Author(s):  
I. N. Olver ◽  
J. A. Eliott
2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 1521-1526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alaina J. Brown ◽  
Megan J. Shen ◽  
Lois M. Ramondetta ◽  
Diane C. Bodurka ◽  
Robert L. Giuntoli ◽  
...  

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to determine if a gynecologic cancer patient’s comfort level discussing end-of-life care issues with her caregivers is related to her death anxiety level.Materials/MethodsGynecologic oncology clinic patients were asked to rate their degree of agreeability with 4 statements regarding comfort level discussing end-of-life care issues. Participants also completed the Hoge’s Intrinsic Religiosity Scale and Templer’s Death Anxiety Scale.ResultsFour hundred one surveys were distributed. One hundred twenty-nine patients participated, with a response rate of 32.2%. The median age of the sample was 55 years. Most patients were white (72.9%), married (58.9%), and Christian (85.3%). Most patients had ovarian cancer (40.4%). Of the 74 patients who knew their cancer stage, 59% had been diagnosed with advanced (stage III-IV) disease. Thirty-three percent were currently in remission, and 17% had recurrent disease. Of all patients surveyed, 32.6% were currently receiving treatment. Chemotherapy was the most common treatment (62% of those being treated). Higher level of comfort discussing end-of-life care topics such as do-not-resuscitate orders with family members was significantly associated with decreased death anxiety (P = 0.008 and P = 0.001). There was no significant association between comfort level when patients discussed do-not-resuscitate orders with physicians and patients’ death anxiety (P = 0.14). After controlling for age, race, marital status, education level, current treatment status, and religiosity, linear regression analysis demonstrated that the relationship between a patient’s increased comfort level when discussing end-of-life care topics with family members and decreased death anxiety remained statistically significant (P = 0.005 and P = 0.001).ConclusionsConversations regarding goals of treatment are an important component of caring for cancer patients. Death anxiety may contribute to decreased communication between patients and their family members regarding the patient’s end-of-life care wishes. Obtaining a better understanding of the role death anxiety plays in end-of-life care discussions may help patients receive the end-of-life care they desire.


2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 677-685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aart Osinski ◽  
Gerard Vreugdenhil ◽  
Jan de Koning ◽  
Johannes G. van der Hoeven

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyeyoung Kim ◽  
Hyeon-Su Im ◽  
Kyong Og Lee ◽  
Young Joo Min ◽  
Jae-Cheol Jo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Cancer is a leading cause of death in Korea. To protect the autonomy and dignity of terminally ill patients, the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decision-Making Act (LST-Act) came into full effect in Korea in February 2018. However, it is unclear whether the LST-Act influences end-of-life (EOL) discussion and decision-making processes for terminally ill cancer patients. Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted with a medical record review of cancer patients who died at Ulsan University Hospital between July 2015 and May 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: those who died in the period before the implementation of the LST-Act (from July 2015 to October 2017, Group 1) and after the implementation of the LST-Act (from February 2018 to May 2020, Group 2). We measured the self-determination rate and the timing of documentation of Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) or Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) in both groups. Results: A total of 1,834 patients were included in the analysis (Group 1, n=943; Group 2, n=891). Documentation of DNR or POLST was completed by patients themselves in 1.5% and 63.5% of patients in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (p<0.001). The mean number of days between documentation of POLST or DNR and death was higher in Group 2 than in Group 1 (21.2 days vs. 14.4 days, p=0.001). The rate of late discussion, defined as documentation of DNR or POLST within seven days prior to death, decreased significantly in Group 2 (46.6% vs. 41.4%, p=0.027). In the multivariable analysis, hospice palliative care referral (OR [odds ratio] 0.25, p<0.001) and patients’ years of education (OR 0.68, p=0.027) were positively related to self-determination. However, physicians with clinical experience of less than three years had a higher rate of surrogate decision-making (OR 5.1, p=0.029) and late discussion (OR 2.53, p=0.019). Conclusions: After the implementation of the LST-Act, the rate of self-determination increased and EOL discussion occurred earlier than in the era before the implementation of the LST-Act.


2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 1485-1489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allan J. Walkey ◽  
Amber E. Barnato ◽  
Seppo T. Rinne ◽  
Colin R. Cooke ◽  
Meng-Shiou Shieh ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 341-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomer T. Levin ◽  
Yuelin Li ◽  
Joseph S. Weiner ◽  
Frank Lewis ◽  
Abraham Bartell ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTObjectives:End-of-life communication is crucial because most U.S. hospitals implement cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the absence of do-not-resuscitate directives (DNRs). Despite this, there is little DNR utilization data to guide the design of communication-training programs. The objective of this study was to determine DNR utilization patterns and whether their use is increasing.Methods:A retrospective database analysis (2000–2005) of DNR data for 206,437 patients, the entire patient population at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), was performed.Results:The hospital recorded, on average, 4,167 deaths/year. In 2005, 86% of inpatient deaths had a DNR, a 3% increase since 2000 (p < .01). For patients who died outside the institution (e.g., hospice), 52% had a DNR, a 24% increase over 6 years (p < .00001). Adult inpatients signed 53% of DNRs but 34% were signed by surrogates. The median time between signing and death was 0 days, that is, the day of death. Only 5.5% of inpatient deaths had previously signed an outpatient DNR. Here, the median time between signing and death was 30 days.Significance of results:Although DNR directives are commonly utilized and their use has increased significantly over the past 6 years, most cancer patients/surrogates sign the directives on the day of death. The proximity between signing and death may be a marker of delayed end-of-life palliative care and suboptimal doctor–patient communication. These data underscore the importance of communication-training research tailored to improve end-of-life decision making.


2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 1763-1769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhen Wang ◽  
Yang-Si Li ◽  
Ning Zhao ◽  
Jin-Ji Yang ◽  
Hai-Yan Tu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document