Sequenced Compared With Simultaneous Anthracycline and Cyclophosphamide in High-Risk Stage I and II Breast Cancer: Final Analysis From INT-0137 (S9313)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 656-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah M. Linden ◽  
Charles M. Haskell ◽  
Stephanie J. Green ◽  
C. Kent Osborne ◽  
George W. Sledge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Total Dose ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Node Negative

Purpose We conducted a phase III randomized study of two adjuvant treatment schedules of doxorubicin (A) and cyclophosphamide (C) in early-stage breast cancer to determine if administration of sequential single agents (A → C) results in superior disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) versus the same total dose given in combination (AC). Patients and Methods High-risk node-negative or low-risk node-positive breast cancer patients received AC given: (arm I) concurrently (AC) doxorubicin 54 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 1.2 g/m2 intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks for six cycles; or (arm II) in sequence (A → C) doxorubicin 40.5 mg/m2 IV days 1 and 2 every 3 weeks for four cyles followed by cyclophosphamide 2.4 gm/m2 IV every 2 weeks for three cycles. Total dose and duration were identical, but the intensity of each drug was increased on A → C. Both arms included granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support and prophylactic antibiotics. All but premenopausal women with receptor negative tumors received tamoxifen after chemotherapy. Results Between 1994 and 1997, 3,176 patients were randomly assigned. Arms were well balanced; 48% of eligible patients were node-negative and 48% were estrogen receptor–positive. No significant differences in OS or DFS were observed; 5-year estimates of OS (95% CI) were 88% (87% to 90%) on AC and 89% (87% to 91%) on A → C. Grade 4 hematologic toxicity was greater on A → C, but nonhematological grade 4 was similar. Conclusion The overall result does not support superiority of dose-intense sequenced single agents. The greater toxicity of higher doses of single agents does not support their sequential use.

NSABP B-47: A randomized phase III trial of adjuvant therapy comparing chemotherapy alone to chemotherapy plus trastuzumab in women with node-positive or high-risk node-negative HER2-low invasive breast cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS1139-TPS1139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis Fehrenbacher ◽  
Jong-Hyeon Jeong ◽  
Priya Rastogi ◽  
Charles E. Geyer ◽  
Soonmyung Paik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Statistical Power ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Adjuvant Radiation ◽  
Weight Changes ◽  
Node Negative ◽  
Node Positive ◽  
Her2 Breast Cancer

TPS1139 Background: Adjuvant trastuzumab trials in HER2+ breast cancer (BC) demonstrated a large reduction in recurrence and death. Central testing showed HER2 non-amplified participants derived similar benefit. Among HER2-amplified patients (pts), multiple studies showed no effect on benefit by degree of amplification. Blinded internal and external review confirmed the non-amplified nature of the HER2 normal group. Based on these findings, NSABP B-47, sponsored by the NCI, was activated January 2011 and is actively accruing. The study is NCI central IRB approved, open via the CTSU, and endorsed by SWOG, ECOG, and RTOG. Methods: Study: Chemotherapy treatment is by physician choice: The non-anthracycline regimen is TC (docetaxel 75 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide (C) 600 mg/m2) IV q 3 wks for 6 cycles; the anthracycline regimen is AC → WP (doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 and C 600 mg/m2 IV either q 3 wks or q 2 wks [investigator discretion] for 4 cycles → paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 IV wkly for 12 doses). Pts are randomly assigned to chemotherapy with or without trastuzumab for 1 year. Pts receive adjuvant radiation therapy and endocrine therapy, as clinically indicated. Detailed menstrual history, concurrent medications, weight changes, and biomarkers (estrogen, stress, inflammation), are being collected. Eligibility: Eligibility includes: node positive or high risk node negative BC pts; HER2 IHC 1+ or 2+ scores, but non amplified by FISH; normal cardiac, renal, and liver function. Detailed eligibility will be provided. Statistical Design: The primary aim is to determine whether the addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy improves invasive disease-free survival (IDFS). 3,260 pts will be enrolled to provide statistical power of 0.9 to detect a 33% reduction in the hazard rate of IDFS using a one-sided alpha level of 0.025. Progress: Protocol was activated in January 2011. First pt was entered in February 2011. As of January 23, 2013, 1,416 of 3,260 (43.4 %) pts have been enrolled. Updated information on enrollment and study background will be provided. Support: NCI U10-12027, -37377, 69651, 69974, and Genentech, Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT01275677.

Subgroup efficacy evaluation of the AE37 HER2 vaccine in breast cancer patients in the adjuvant setting.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3088-3088 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaitlin M. Peace ◽  
Elizabeth Ann Mittendorf ◽  
Sonia A. Perez ◽  
Panagiotis Tzonis ◽  
Nikolaos Fragkiskos Pistamaltzian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Her2 Expression ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Adjuvant Setting ◽  
Gm Csf ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Disease Free

3088 Background: AE37 is a Ii-Key hybrid of the HER2 peptide AE36 (HER2776-790), which stimulates peptide-specific T cells. We have completed the active phase of a prospective, randomized, multi-center, phase II trial of the AE37 vaccine in the adjuvant setting. The primary analysis, performed after a median follow up (f/u) of 25 months (mo), did not show a significant difference in disease free survival (DFS) between vaccinated and control patients (pts). However, demonstrating the efficacy of cancer vaccines may require more time than other therapies, especially in malignancies with relatively late recurrences like breast cancer. Here, we present updated efficacy data after extended f/u in subgroups of pts stratified by clinicopathologic characteristics. Methods: Clinically disease-free, node positive or high-risk node negative pts with any level of HER2 expression were randomized to receive AE37 + GM-CSF (VG) or GM-CSF alone (CG) following standard of care therapy. Pts received 6 monthly intradermal inoculations during the primary vaccine series (PVS) followed by 4 boosters administered every 6 mo. Kaplan Meier and log rank analyses were performed from the time of the first inoculation in pts who completed at least the PVS, according to stage, node status, tumor size, HER2 expression and ER/PR status. Results: There were no clinicopathologic differences between groups in the 298 enrolled pts (VG = 153, CG = 145). The vaccine is safe and well tolerated. After a median f/u of 55 mo, there was a trend toward improved DFS in the VG among stage IIB/III pts (VG, n = 73, DFS 82% vs CG, n = 61, 67%, HR = 0.48, p = 0.06) and those with low HER2 expression (HER2 LE, VG, n = 68, 89% vs CG, n = 66, 51%, HR = 0.47, p = 0.1). Improved DFS in the VG was documented in patients with both stage IIB/III disease and HER2 LE (VG, n = 39, 90% vs CG, n = 38, 32%, HR 0.3, p = 0.02) and triple negative (TNBC) pts (VG, n = 21, 89% vs CG, n = 21, 0%, HR 0.26, p = 0.05). Conclusions: The AE37 vaccine is safe and well tolerated and has statistically significant efficacy in stage IIB/III pts with HER2 LE and in TNBC pts. This justifies further evaluation in a phase III study enrolling stage IIb/III pts not eligible for trastuzumab treatment and the very high risk TNBC group. Clinical trial information: NCT00524277.

scholarly journals Gemcitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-risk early breast cancer—results from the randomized phase III SUCCESS-A trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amelie de Gregorio ◽  
Lothar Häberle ◽  
Peter A. Fasching ◽  
Volkmar Müller ◽  
Iris Schrader ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Early Breast Cancer ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Tumor Grade ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Standard Chemotherapy

Abstract Background When chemotherapy is indicated in patients with early breast cancer, regimens that contain anthracyclines and taxanes are established standard treatments. Gemcitabine has shown promising effects on the response and prognosis in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The SUCCESS-A trial (NCT02181101) examined the addition of gemcitabine to a standard chemotherapy regimen in high-risk early breast cancer patients. Methods A total of 3754 patients with at least one of the following characteristics were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment arms: nodal positivity, tumor grade 3, age ≤ 35 years, tumor larger than 2 cm, or negative hormone receptor status. The treatment arms received either three cycles of 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide, followed by three cycles of docetaxel (FEC → Doc); or three cycles of FEC followed by three cycles of docetaxel and gemcitabine (FEC → Doc/Gem). The primary study aim was disease-free survival (DFS), and the main secondary objectives were overall survival (OS) and safety. Results No differences were observed in the 5-year DFS or OS between FEC → Doc and FEC → Doc/Gem. The hazard ratio was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.78 to 1.12; P = 0.47) for DFS and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.74 to 1.19; P = 0.60) for OS. For patients treated with FEC → Doc and FEC → Doc/Gem, the 5-year probabilities of DFS were 86.6% and 87.2%, and the 5-year probabilities of OS were 92.8% and 92.5%, respectively. Conclusion Adding gemcitabine to a standard chemotherapy does not improve the outcomes in patients with high-risk early breast cancer and should therefore not be included in the adjuvant treatment setting. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02181101 and EU Clinical Trials Register EudraCT 2005-000490-21. Registered September 2005.

Palbociclib combined with endocrine treatment in breast cancer patients with high relapse risk after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Subgroup analyses of premenopausal patients in PENELOPE-B.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 518-518
Author(s):  
Frederik Marmé ◽  
Miguel Martin ◽  
Michael Untch ◽  
Herve R. Bonnefoi ◽  
Sung-Bae Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Endocrine Treatment ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity

518 Background: PENELOPE-B assessed efficacy of the CDK4/6 inhibitor 1-year palbociclib versus placebo added to endocrine therapy (ET) as post-neoadjuvant treatment in a high-risk breast cancer population. Palbociclib did not improve invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) compared to placebo (3-year iDFS 81.3% vs 77.7%) (Loibl et al. J Clin Oncol 2021). Here we report results from the subpopulation of premenopausal women. Methods: Patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2-negative breast cancer without pathological complete response after taxane‐containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and at high risk of relapse (CPS‐EG score ≥3 or 2 and ypN+) were randomized (1:1) to receive 13 cycles of palbociclib 125mg daily or placebo on days 1-21 in a 28d cycle in addition to standard endocrine treatment including tamoxifen (TAM) +/- gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRH) and aromatase inhibitor (AI) +/- GnRH. Randomization was stratified by nodal status at surgery, age ( < 50 vs ≥50 years), Ki-67, region, and CPS-EG score. Results: 616/1250 patients were premenopausal at the time of enrollment, 185 of these patients (30.0%) were younger than 40 years of age. 95.2% had ypN+ after surgery; 42.8% had ypT2 and 46.8% a CPS-EG score of 3. 23.1% of the premenopausal women had a Ki67 of > 15% in residual disease. 66.1% started with TAM alone; 19.3% with TAM and ovarian function suppression (OFS); and 13.6% received an AI+OFS. There was no difference in iDFS between palbociclib and placebo in the premenopausal women HR 0.948 (0.693-1.30). The 3-year iDFS was 80.6% and 78.3%, respectively. Palbociclib vs placebo in subgroups by endocrine treatment: TAM alone HR 1.05 (0.715-1.53) p = 0.817; TAM+GnRH HR 0.52 (0.267-1.02) p = 0.057 and AI+GnRH HR 1.58 (0.548-4.56) p = 0.397; pinteraction0.124. Hematologic toxicity was significantly more common with palbociclib. Non-hematological toxicity any grade palbociclib vs placebo were: fatigue 67.4% vs 51.3%; hot flushes 52.2% vs 54.8%; bone pain 15.6% vs 16.6%; and vaginal dryness 11.0% vs 11.5%. When receiving palbociclib fewer patients in the AI+GnRH group vs the TAM +/- GnRH cohort experienced anemia (54.1% vs 80.5%) and thrombocytopenia (37.8% vs 65.1%). Fatigue (75.7% vs 66.3%) and nausea (40.5% vs 24.9%) were more common with AI+GnRH than TAM +/-GnRH when palbociclib was added. Thromboembolic events were low with overall 9 events (4 vs 5; AI+GnRH 2.4% vs 1.3% TAM+/-GnRH). Conclusions: The addition of palbociclib to endocrine therapy did not improve iDFS in premenopausal women. These are the first safety results from a phase III study for the combination tamoxifen +/-GnRH and palbociclib. The addition of palbociclib to tamoxifen +/-GnRH in premenopausal women did not increase side effects compared to AI+GnRH and seems to be an alternative to AI+GnRH. Clinical trial information: NCT01864746.

Adjuvant phase III trial to compare intense dose-dense adjuvant treatment with EnPC to dose dense, tailored therapy with dtEC-dtD for patients with high-risk early breast cancer (GAIN-2).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS1137-TPS1137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Volker Moebus ◽  
Helmut Forstbauer ◽  
Grischa Wachsmann ◽  
Andreas Schneeweiss ◽  
Angelika Ober ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Dose Dense

TPS1137 Background: Intense dose-dense (idd) chemotherapy (CT) significantly improves overall survival in breast cancer patients. Two preceding trials explored iddETC vs a dd combination of EC-TX (GAIN) and dtEC-dtD vs conventional dosed FEC-D (Panther). Nab-paclitaxel (nP) provides a better toxicity profile and higher efficacy compared to solvent based taxanes and might be preferred in an idd regimen. Methods: This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label phase III trial comparing iddEnPC or dtEC-dtD as adjuvant CT. Pts with uni- or bilateral primary high risk node-positive (N+) breast cancer (BC) and centrally confirmed ER/PR/HER2 and Ki-67 status can be included. Luminal A pts are only recruited with N+ ≥4. Randomization to iddEnPC or dtEC-dtD will be stratified by biological subtype defined by hormone receptor, HER2 and Ki-67. The iddEnPC arm will receive epirubicin (150mg/m2) q2w x3 followed by nP (260-330mg/m2, dose to be determined in run-in phase) q2w x3, followed by cyclophosphamide (2g/m2) q2w x3. The dtEC-dtD arm will receive EC (38-120/450-1200 mg/m2) q2w x4 followed after 1 wk rest by docetaxel (60-100mg/m2) q2w x4. GAIN-2 will compare toxicity and efficacy of an idd regimen (EnPC) vs a dd regimen with modification of single doses depending on individual hematological and non-hematological toxicities. Primary objective is invasive disease-free survival (IDFS). Secondary objectives are survival by other definitions, compliance, safety, side effects of taxanes and subgroup analyses (by 0-3, 4-9 or 10+ involved nodes and Ki-67). Efficacy analyses are planned 60 mths after end of accrual, safety interim analyses after 200 and 900 pts have completed CT. It was assumed that dtEC-dtD will achieve a 5-yr IDFS of 75% and ddEnPC will improve IDFS to 79% (HR 0.819) with a power of 80% (α=0.05, ß= 0.2).GAIN-2 is registered under NCT01690702 Results: 75pts were recruited since 1stOct 2012. Recruitment (in total 2886 pts) is planned for 36 mths in 80-100 sites in Germany. Run-in safety data to be presented. Conclusion: GAIN-2 will compare the efficacy of adjuvant iddEnPC and dtEC-dtD in pts with early N+ BC. Clinical trial information: NCT01690702.

scholarly journals SWOG S0221: A Phase III Trial Comparing Chemotherapy Schedules in High-Risk Early-Stage Breast Cancer

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
George T. Budd ◽  
William E. Barlow ◽  
Halle C.F. Moore ◽  
Timothy J. Hobday ◽  
James A. Stewart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Early Stage Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Original Design ◽  
Significant Difference

Purpose To determine the optimal dose and schedule of anthracycline and taxane administration as adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer. Patients and Methods A 2 × 2 factorial design was used to test two hypotheses: (1) that a novel continuous schedule of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide was superior to six cycles of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide once every 2 weeks and (2) that paclitaxel once per week was superior to six cycles of paclitaxel once every 2 weeks in patients with node-positive or high-risk node-negative early-stage breast cancer. With 3,250 patients, a disease-free survival (DFS) hazard ratio of 0.82 for each randomization could be detected with 90% power with two-sided α = .05. Overall survival (OS) was a secondary outcome. Results Interim analyses crossed the futility boundaries for demonstrating superiority of both once-per-week regimens and once-every-2-weeks regimens. After a median follow-up of 6 years, a significant interaction developed between the two randomization factors (DFS P = .024; OS P = .010) in the 2,716 patients randomly assigned in the original design, which precluded interpretation of the two factors separately. Comparing all four arms showed a significant difference in OS (P = .040) but not in DFS (P = .11), with all treatments given once every 2 weeks associated with the highest OS. This difference in OS seemed confined to patients with hormone receptor–negative/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) –negative tumors (P = .067), with no differences seen with hormone receptor–positive/HER2-negative (P = .90) or HER2-positive tumors (P = .40). Conclusion Patients achieved a similar DFS with any of these regimens. Subset analysis suggests the hypothesis that once-every-2-weeks dosing may be best for patients with hormone receptor–negative/HER2-negative tumors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document