Adjuvant phase III trial to compare intense dose-dense adjuvant treatment with EnPC to dose dense, tailored therapy with dtEC-dtD for patients with high-risk early breast cancer (GAIN-2).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS1137-TPS1137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Volker Moebus ◽  
Helmut Forstbauer ◽  
Grischa Wachsmann ◽  
Andreas Schneeweiss ◽  
Angelika Ober ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Dose Dense

TPS1137 Background: Intense dose-dense (idd) chemotherapy (CT) significantly improves overall survival in breast cancer patients. Two preceding trials explored iddETC vs a dd combination of EC-TX (GAIN) and dtEC-dtD vs conventional dosed FEC-D (Panther). Nab-paclitaxel (nP) provides a better toxicity profile and higher efficacy compared to solvent based taxanes and might be preferred in an idd regimen. Methods: This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label phase III trial comparing iddEnPC or dtEC-dtD as adjuvant CT. Pts with uni- or bilateral primary high risk node-positive (N+) breast cancer (BC) and centrally confirmed ER/PR/HER2 and Ki-67 status can be included. Luminal A pts are only recruited with N+ ≥4. Randomization to iddEnPC or dtEC-dtD will be stratified by biological subtype defined by hormone receptor, HER2 and Ki-67. The iddEnPC arm will receive epirubicin (150mg/m2) q2w x3 followed by nP (260-330mg/m2, dose to be determined in run-in phase) q2w x3, followed by cyclophosphamide (2g/m2) q2w x3. The dtEC-dtD arm will receive EC (38-120/450-1200 mg/m2) q2w x4 followed after 1 wk rest by docetaxel (60-100mg/m2) q2w x4. GAIN-2 will compare toxicity and efficacy of an idd regimen (EnPC) vs a dd regimen with modification of single doses depending on individual hematological and non-hematological toxicities. Primary objective is invasive disease-free survival (IDFS). Secondary objectives are survival by other definitions, compliance, safety, side effects of taxanes and subgroup analyses (by 0-3, 4-9 or 10+ involved nodes and Ki-67). Efficacy analyses are planned 60 mths after end of accrual, safety interim analyses after 200 and 900 pts have completed CT. It was assumed that dtEC-dtD will achieve a 5-yr IDFS of 75% and ddEnPC will improve IDFS to 79% (HR 0.819) with a power of 80% (α=0.05, ß= 0.2).GAIN-2 is registered under NCT01690702 Results: 75pts were recruited since 1stOct 2012. Recruitment (in total 2886 pts) is planned for 36 mths in 80-100 sites in Germany. Run-in safety data to be presented. Conclusion: GAIN-2 will compare the efficacy of adjuvant iddEnPC and dtEC-dtD in pts with early N+ BC. Clinical trial information: NCT01690702.

German Adjuvant Intergroup Node-Positive Study: A Phase III Trial to Compare Oral Ibandronate Versus Observation in Patients With High-Risk Early Breast Cancer

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (28) ◽  
pp. 3531-3539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunter von Minckwitz ◽  
Volker Möbus ◽  
Andreas Schneeweiss ◽  
Jens Huober ◽  
Christoph Thomssen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Early Breast Cancer ◽  
Data Monitoring Committee ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Positive Study ◽  
Node Positive ◽  
Dose Dense

Purpose Bisphosphonates prevent skeletal-related events in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Their effect in early breast cancer is controversial. Ibandronate is an orally and intravenously available amino-bisphosphonate with a favorable toxicity profile. It therefore qualifies as potential agent for adjuvant use. Patients and Methods The GAIN (German Adjuvant Intergroup Node-Positive) study was an open-label, randomized, controlled phase III trial with a 2 × 2 factorial design. Patients with node-positive early breast cancer were randomly assigned 1:1 to two different dose-dense chemotherapy regimens and 2:1 to ibandronate 50 mg per day orally for 2 years or observation. In all, 2,640 patients and 728 events were estimated to be required to demonstrate an increase in disease-free survival (DFS) by ibandronate from 75% to 79.5% by using a two-sided α = .05 and 1-β of 80%. We report here the efficacy analysis for ibandronate, which was released by the independent data monitoring committee because the futility boundary was not crossed after 50% of the required DFS events were observed. Results Between June 2004 and August 2008, 2,015 patients were randomly assigned to ibandronate and 1,008 to observation. Patients randomly assigned to ibandronate showed no superior DFS or overall survival (OS) compared with patients randomly assigned to observation (DFS: hazard ratio, 0.945; 95% CI, 0.768 to 1.161; P = .589; OS: HR, 1.040; 95% CI, 0.763 to 1.419; P = .803). DFS was numerically longer if ibandronate was used in patients younger than 40 years or older than 60 years compared with patients age 40 to 59 years (test for interaction P = .093). Conclusion Adjuvant treatment with oral ibandronate did not improve outcome of patients with high-risk early breast cancer who received dose-dense chemotherapy.

scholarly journals Adjuvant Capecitabine With Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide Plus Epirubicin for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (CBCSG010): An Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (16) ◽  
pp. 1774-1784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junjie Li ◽  
Keda Yu ◽  
Da Pang ◽  
Changqin Wang ◽  
Jun Jiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Control Treatment ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE Standard adjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) includes a taxane and an anthracycline. Concomitant capecitabine may be beneficial, but robust data to support this are lacking. The efficacy and safety of the addition of capecitabine into the TNBC adjuvant treatment regimen was evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS This randomized, open-label, phase III trial was conducted in China. Eligible female patients with early TNBC after definitive surgery were randomly assigned (1:1) to either capecitabine (3 cycles of capecitabine and docetaxel followed by 3 cycles of capecitabine, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide) or control treatment (3 cycles of docetaxel followed by 3 cycles of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide). Randomization was centralized without stratification. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS Between June 2012 and December 2013, 636 patients with TNBC were screened, and 585 were randomly assigned to treatment (control, 288; capecitabine, 297). Median follow-up was 67 months. The 5-year DFS rate was higher for capecitabine than for control treatment (86.3% v 80.4%; hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.99; P = .044). Five-year overall survival rates were numerically higher but not significantly improved (capecitabine, 93.3%; control, 90.7%). Overall, 39.1% of patients had capecitabine dose reductions, and 8.4% reported grade ≥ 3 hand-foot syndrome. The most common grade ≥ 3 hematologic toxicities were neutropenia (capecitabine, 136 [45.8%]; control, 118 [41.0%]) and febrile neutropenia (capecitabine, 50 [16.8%]; control, 46 [16.0%]). Safety data were similar to the known capecitabine safety profile and generally comparable between arms. CONCLUSION Capecitabine when added to 3 cycles of docetaxel followed by 3 cycles of a 3-drug anthracycline combination containing capecitabine instead of fluorouracil significantly improved DFS in TNBC without new safety concerns.

Safety analysis from PACS 04—A phase III trial comparing 6 cycles of FEC100 with 6 cycles of ET75 for node-positive early breast cancer patients, followed by sequential trastuzumab in HER2+ patients: Preliminary results

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 632-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Spielmann ◽  
H. Roché ◽  
T. Delozier ◽  
G. Romieu ◽  
H. Bourgeois ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Post Surgery

632 Background: Following the BCIRG 001, PACS 01 and HERA trials, this randomised, multicentre, open-label, Phase III trial was designed to demonstrate the benefit of concomitant docetaxel and epirubicin versus anthracyclines, and evaluate the use of sequential trastuzumab. Methods: Patients (pts) with localised, resectable, unilateral breast cancer who met the following criteria were eligible: age <65 years, ≥1 positive node, M0, adequate heart and organ functions. Pts were randomised to receive either 6 cycles of 5-fluorouracil-epirubicin-cyclophosphamide (FEC100: F and C, 500 mg/m2, E 100 mg/m2) (Arm A) or epirubicin-docetaxel (ET75: E 75 mg/m2, T 75 mg/m2) (Arm B). Primary prophylaxis with G-CSF was not planned. Radiotherapy was mandatory after conservative surgery and tamoxifen was required in pts with hormone receptor-positive tumours. Pts with HER2-positive disease were then further randomised to observation only or to 1 year of trastuzumab monotherapy (6 mg/kg iv every 3 weeks). In HER2-positive pts receiving trastuzumab, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was determined at Cycles 2, 4, 8, 13, 18 and after 2 years. Otherwise, LVEF was determined at baseline and at 1 year post-surgery. Results: Of the 3010 pts recruited (2622 evaluable for safety to date), 1518 received FEC100 and 1492 received ET75 after the first randomisation. Haematologic toxicity was the most frequent toxicity in both arms. Grade 3–4 toxicities were similar for Arms A and B, except febrile neutropenia (10.3% and 31.4%, respectively) and nausea/vomiting (13.2% and 7.5%, respectively). Grade 2 clinical cardiac toxicity (decreased LVEF) was observed in 4 pts in Arm A and 5 in Arm B, with median LVEF scores of 63% in both arms at the end of chemotherapy. HER2-positive pts (n=500) were then randomised to either receive trastuzumab (n=259) or observation only (n=241). Conclusions: These preliminary safety data indicate that FEC100 and ET75 were both well tolerated, with acceptable cardiac safety values. The trial is ongoing and further analysis regarding the use of trastuzumab in this setting will be presented. [Table: see text]

Subgroup efficacy evaluation of the AE37 HER2 vaccine in breast cancer patients in the adjuvant setting.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3088-3088 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaitlin M. Peace ◽  
Elizabeth Ann Mittendorf ◽  
Sonia A. Perez ◽  
Panagiotis Tzonis ◽  
Nikolaos Fragkiskos Pistamaltzian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Her2 Expression ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Adjuvant Setting ◽  
Gm Csf ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Disease Free

3088 Background: AE37 is a Ii-Key hybrid of the HER2 peptide AE36 (HER2776-790), which stimulates peptide-specific T cells. We have completed the active phase of a prospective, randomized, multi-center, phase II trial of the AE37 vaccine in the adjuvant setting. The primary analysis, performed after a median follow up (f/u) of 25 months (mo), did not show a significant difference in disease free survival (DFS) between vaccinated and control patients (pts). However, demonstrating the efficacy of cancer vaccines may require more time than other therapies, especially in malignancies with relatively late recurrences like breast cancer. Here, we present updated efficacy data after extended f/u in subgroups of pts stratified by clinicopathologic characteristics. Methods: Clinically disease-free, node positive or high-risk node negative pts with any level of HER2 expression were randomized to receive AE37 + GM-CSF (VG) or GM-CSF alone (CG) following standard of care therapy. Pts received 6 monthly intradermal inoculations during the primary vaccine series (PVS) followed by 4 boosters administered every 6 mo. Kaplan Meier and log rank analyses were performed from the time of the first inoculation in pts who completed at least the PVS, according to stage, node status, tumor size, HER2 expression and ER/PR status. Results: There were no clinicopathologic differences between groups in the 298 enrolled pts (VG = 153, CG = 145). The vaccine is safe and well tolerated. After a median f/u of 55 mo, there was a trend toward improved DFS in the VG among stage IIB/III pts (VG, n = 73, DFS 82% vs CG, n = 61, 67%, HR = 0.48, p = 0.06) and those with low HER2 expression (HER2 LE, VG, n = 68, 89% vs CG, n = 66, 51%, HR = 0.47, p = 0.1). Improved DFS in the VG was documented in patients with both stage IIB/III disease and HER2 LE (VG, n = 39, 90% vs CG, n = 38, 32%, HR 0.3, p = 0.02) and triple negative (TNBC) pts (VG, n = 21, 89% vs CG, n = 21, 0%, HR 0.26, p = 0.05). Conclusions: The AE37 vaccine is safe and well tolerated and has statistically significant efficacy in stage IIB/III pts with HER2 LE and in TNBC pts. This justifies further evaluation in a phase III study enrolling stage IIb/III pts not eligible for trastuzumab treatment and the very high risk TNBC group. Clinical trial information: NCT00524277.

GAIN-2: Neo-/adjuvant phase III trial to compare intense dose-dense chemotherapy (CT) to tailored dose-dense CT in patients (pts) with high risk early breast cancer (EBC): Results on safety and interim invasive disease-free survival (iDFS).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 516-516
Author(s):  
Volker Moebus ◽  
Hans-Joachim Lueck ◽  
Ekkehart Ladda ◽  
Peter Klare ◽  
Marcus Schmidt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Cranial Nerves ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Luminal B ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Dense

516 Background: GAIN-2 (NCT01690702) compared efficacy and safety of intense, dose-dense epirubicin, nab-paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide (iddEnPC) vs dose-dense, dose-tailored epirubicin/ cyclophosphamide followed by dose-dense, dose-tailored docetaxel (dtEC-dtD) as adjuvant or neoadjuvant CT for node-positive or high risk node-negative EBC. Here, we report safety results and interim analysis (IA) of the primary endpoint iDFS. Methods: Pts (luminal A ≥N2; luminal B N+; HER2+ and TNBC) were randomized between iddEnPC (E 150 mg/m2, nP 330 mg/m2, C 2000 mg/m2, all q2w x 3) or dtEC-dtD (dtEC q2w x 4 followed after 1 week rest by dtD q2w x 4). Primary objective was to compare iDFS. 797 events are needed to detect a hazard ratio of 0.819 with a 2-sided log-rank-test with 80% power and α=0.05. The IA of iDFS was planned after 50% of the events have occurred. Safety and compliance were secondary objectives. Results: Between 10/2012 and 09/2018, 2887 pts were randomized and 2857 started treatment (iddEnPC 1429; dtEC-dtD 1428). Median age was 51 (range 18-75) years. Overall, 18.1% were luminal A, 31.5% luminal B/HER2-, 18.8% hormone-receptor (HR)+/HER2+, 8.5% HR-/HER2+ and 23.2% TNBC. Overall, 88.1% of pts completed all treatment in both arms. 66.8% with iddEnPC vs 58.8% with dtEC-dtD delayed CT dose (p<0.001). Grade 3-4 non-hematological adverse events (AEs) were more frequent with iddEnPC (iddEnPC 50.8% vs dtEC-dtD 45.1%, p=0.002). Grade 3-4 leukopenia, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, arthralgia, and peripheral sensory neuropathy were significantly higher with iddEnPC. There were 1464 serious AEs (iddEnPC 870 vs dtEC-dtD 594) and 26 (9 vs 17) predefined AEs of special interest (anaphylaxis, any AE affecting cranial nerves, macula edema). Two deaths occurred during dtEC-dtD. After a median follow-up of 45.8 months, there was no difference in iDFS between arms (log-rank p=0.9102, hazard ratio iddEnPC vs dtEC-dtD 1.01, 95% CI 0.83-1.23). Conclusions: No new safety concerns were observed. Use of both iddEnPC and dtEC-dtD appears feasible in the (neo)adjuvant treatment of high risk EBC. Clinical trial information: NCT01690702 .

scholarly journals Gemcitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-risk early breast cancer—results from the randomized phase III SUCCESS-A trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amelie de Gregorio ◽  
Lothar Häberle ◽  
Peter A. Fasching ◽  
Volkmar Müller ◽  
Iris Schrader ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Early Breast Cancer ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Tumor Grade ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Standard Chemotherapy

Abstract Background When chemotherapy is indicated in patients with early breast cancer, regimens that contain anthracyclines and taxanes are established standard treatments. Gemcitabine has shown promising effects on the response and prognosis in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The SUCCESS-A trial (NCT02181101) examined the addition of gemcitabine to a standard chemotherapy regimen in high-risk early breast cancer patients. Methods A total of 3754 patients with at least one of the following characteristics were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment arms: nodal positivity, tumor grade 3, age ≤ 35 years, tumor larger than 2 cm, or negative hormone receptor status. The treatment arms received either three cycles of 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide, followed by three cycles of docetaxel (FEC → Doc); or three cycles of FEC followed by three cycles of docetaxel and gemcitabine (FEC → Doc/Gem). The primary study aim was disease-free survival (DFS), and the main secondary objectives were overall survival (OS) and safety. Results No differences were observed in the 5-year DFS or OS between FEC → Doc and FEC → Doc/Gem. The hazard ratio was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.78 to 1.12; P = 0.47) for DFS and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.74 to 1.19; P = 0.60) for OS. For patients treated with FEC → Doc and FEC → Doc/Gem, the 5-year probabilities of DFS were 86.6% and 87.2%, and the 5-year probabilities of OS were 92.8% and 92.5%, respectively. Conclusion Adding gemcitabine to a standard chemotherapy does not improve the outcomes in patients with high-risk early breast cancer and should therefore not be included in the adjuvant treatment setting. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02181101 and EU Clinical Trials Register EudraCT 2005-000490-21. Registered September 2005.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document