Preoperative dose-dense sequential chemotherapy of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel/capecitabine in patients with early breast cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10598-10598
Author(s):  
S. Iacobelli ◽  
E. Cianchetti ◽  
C. Ficorella ◽  
D. Angelucci ◽  
S. Grossi ◽  
...  

10598 Background: The use of preoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer has been shown to result in similar disease-free and overall survival as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Additionally, the rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) in the breast after preoperative chemotherapy has been shown to correlate with survival. The objective of this study was to evaluate the activity and safety of a dose-dense and sequential chemotherapy of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) followed by docetaxel/capecitabine (DXe) given preoperatively in patients with early breast cancer not candidate to breast-conserving surgery. Methods: Forty-one women with histologically/cytologically confirmed primary breast cancer (T2–3, N0–2, M0) received 4 cycles of EC (cyclophosphamide, 600 mg/m2 and epirubicin, 90 mg/m2) q2 weeks followed by two cycles of DXe (docetaxel, 36 mg/m2 days 1, 8, and 15 and capecitabine, 1250 mg/m2 days 5–18) q 28 days, with pegfilgrastim support. The study was designed as a Simon’s two-step phase II study. The primary end point of the study was the incidence of pCR defined as the absence of invasive cancer in the breast at definitive surgery. Results: Thirty-nine out of 41 enrolled patients were evaluable for response to treatment (one patient withdrew from the study for G4 neutropenia after the first EC cycle, and the other for therapy refusal after the 4 EC cycles). A pCR was observed in 10 patients for a total pCR rate of 25.6%. Interestingly, all but one of the 10 pCR cases showed ER/PR-negative/Her2-positive tumors. A clinical response (CR or PR) detected by palpation and by imaging was observed in 37 patients, for an overall response rate of 95%. Twenty-nine patients (75%) underwent breast-conserving surgery. The treatment was well tolerated: one patient experienced G3 mucositis and another patient required a 25% dose reduction of capecitabine because of hand-foot syndrome. There was no case of cardiac toxicity, thrombocytopenia or any other serious adverse event. Conclusions: The dose-dense sequential combination EC/DXe is endowed with good antitumor activity and limited toxicity, allowing a high rate of pCR and breast conservation. Thus, this regimen can be considered for further clinical trial. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
George Fountzilas ◽  
Christos Valavanis ◽  
Vassiliki Kotoula ◽  
Anastasia G Eleftheraki ◽  
Konstantine T Kalogeras ◽  
...  




2021 ◽  
pp. 030089162110626
Author(s):  
Elena Guerini-Rocco ◽  
Gerardo Botti ◽  
Maria Pia Foschini ◽  
Caterina Marchiò ◽  
Mauro Giuseppe Mastropasqua ◽  
...  

Pathologic evaluation of early breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy is essential to provide prognostic information based on tumor response to treatment (pathologic complete response [pCR] or non-pCR) and to inform therapy decisions after surgery. To harmonize the pathologist’s handling of surgical specimens after neoadjuvant therapy, a panel of experts in breast cancer convened to developed a consensus on six main topics: (1) definition of pCR, (2) required clinical information, (3) gross examination and sampling, (4) microscopic examination, (5) evaluation of lymph node status, and (6) staging of residual breast tumor. The resulting consensus statements reported in this document highlight the role of an accurate evaluation of tumor response and define the minimum requirements to standardize the assessment of breast cancer specimens after neoadjuvant therapy.



2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (18) ◽  
pp. 2938-2945 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Untch ◽  
Volker Möbus ◽  
Walther Kuhn ◽  
Bernd Rudolph Muck ◽  
Christoph Thomssen ◽  
...  

Purpose To compare preoperative intense dose-dense (IDD) chemotherapy with conventionally scheduled preoperative chemotherapy in high-risk primary breast cancer (BC). Patients and Methods In this randomized phase III trial a total of 668 eligible primary BC patients stratified for tumors ≥ 3 cm (n = 567) or inflammatory BC (n = 101) were randomly assigned to receive concurrent preoperative epirubicin/paclitaxel every 3 weeks or dose-dense and dose-escalated sequential epirubicin followed by paclitaxel every 2 weeks. All patients received three cycles of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil chemotherapy after surgery. Results IDD treatment significantly improved pathologic complete response rate (18% v 10%; odds ratio [OR] 1.89; P = .008), disease-free survival (DFS; hazard ratio [HR], 0.71; P = .011), and overall survival (OS; HR, 0.83; P = .041) compared to epirubicin/paclitaxel. Patients with inflammatory BC had a particularly poor prognosis and did not appear to benefit from IDD therapy in this trial (DFS HR, 1.10; P = .739; OS HR, 1.25; P = .544). In contrast, patients with noninflammatory BC significantly benefited from IDD treatment (DFS HR, 0.65, P = .005; OS HR, 0.77, P = .013). Treatment effects in multivariate analysis were significant for noninflammatory BC (DFS HR, 0.65, P = .015; OS HR, 0.79, P = .034), but not for all patients (DFS HR, 0.76; P = .088; OS HR, 0.82; P = .059). IDD therapy was associated with significantly more nonhematologic toxicities, anemia, and thrombocytopenia, but with similar neutropenia and infection rates. Conclusion Our results support the efficacy and short-term safety of IDD as preoperative chemotherapy. IDD was less well tolerated compared to standard treatment, but improved clinical outcomes in patients with noninflammatory high-risk primary BC.



Author(s):  
Simon Peter Gampenrieder ◽  
Gabriel Rinnerthaler ◽  
Richard Greil

SummaryThe three top abstracts at the 2020 virtual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium regarding hormone-receptor-positive early breast cancer, from our point of view, were the long-awaited results from PenelopeB and RxPONDER as well as the data from the ADAPT trial of the West German Study Group. PenelopeB failed to show any benefit by adjuvant palbociclib when added to standard endocrine therapy in patients without pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. RxPONDER demonstrated that postmenopausal patients with early hormone receptor positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2−) breast cancer, 1–3 positive lymph nodes and an Oncotype DX Recurrence Score of less than 26 can safely be treated with endocrine therapy alone. In contrast, in premenopausal women with positive nodes, adjuvant chemotherapy plays still a role even in case of low genomic risk. Whether the benefit by chemotherapy is mainly an indirect endocrine effect and if ovarian function suppression would be similarly effective, is still a matter of debate. The HR+/HER2− part of the ADAPT umbrella trial investigated the role of a Ki-67 response to a short endocrine therapy before surgery in addition to Oncotype DX—performed on the pretreatment biopsy—to identify low-risk patients who can safely forgo adjuvant chemotherapy irrespective of menopausal status.





2012 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 456
Author(s):  
Amy Godden ◽  
Tom Fysh ◽  
Julie Dunn ◽  
Douglas Ferguson


2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 494-495
Author(s):  
U.Y. Cheema ◽  
S. Kalapurakal ◽  
P. White ◽  
A.U. Khan


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document