scholarly journals Role and evaluation of pathologic response in early breast cancer specimens after neoadjuvant therapy: consensus statement

2021 ◽  
pp. 030089162110626
Author(s):  
Elena Guerini-Rocco ◽  
Gerardo Botti ◽  
Maria Pia Foschini ◽  
Caterina Marchiò ◽  
Mauro Giuseppe Mastropasqua ◽  
...  

Pathologic evaluation of early breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy is essential to provide prognostic information based on tumor response to treatment (pathologic complete response [pCR] or non-pCR) and to inform therapy decisions after surgery. To harmonize the pathologist’s handling of surgical specimens after neoadjuvant therapy, a panel of experts in breast cancer convened to developed a consensus on six main topics: (1) definition of pCR, (2) required clinical information, (3) gross examination and sampling, (4) microscopic examination, (5) evaluation of lymph node status, and (6) staging of residual breast tumor. The resulting consensus statements reported in this document highlight the role of an accurate evaluation of tumor response and define the minimum requirements to standardize the assessment of breast cancer specimens after neoadjuvant therapy.

Breast Care ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-71
Author(s):  
Mircea Dediu ◽  
Christoph Zielinski

Many analyses of the efficacy of neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) for early breast cancer including a meta-analysis derived from 10 randomized trials came to the conclusion that patients who would achieve pathologic complete response (pCR) following NAT would experience significant improvement in disease-free and overall survival (OS). Thus, pCR was proposed as a surrogate endpoint for OS, with pCR representing a robust prognostic marker for survival at an individual level. In the current analysis, we argue that OS following NAT-induced pCR might have reflected the initial prognosis of patients mainly defined – among other factors – by the initial pathological lymph node status while being largely independent on the type of administrated treatment, thus pleading against the pCR surrogacy hypothesis. We therefore propose to redefine pCR as a surrogate endpoint of NAT trials by the involvement of additional biologic parameters.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Chen ◽  
Tong Zhao ◽  
Zhao Bi ◽  
Zhao-Peng Zhang ◽  
Li Xie ◽  
...  

 The purpose was to integrate clinicopathological and laboratory indicators to predict axillary nodal pathologic complete response (apCR) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). The pretreatment clinicopathological and laboratory indicators of 416 clinical nodal-positive breast cancer patients who underwent surgery after NAT were analyzed from April 2015 to 2020. Predictive factors of apCR were examined by logistic analysis. A nomogram was built according to logistic analysis. Among the 416 patients, 37.3% achieved apCR. Multivariate analysis showed that age, pathological grading, molecular subtype and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were independent predictors of apCR. A nomogram was established based on these four factors. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.758 in the training set. The validation set showed good discrimination, with AUC of 0.732. In subtype analysis, apCR was 23.8, 47.1 and 50.8% in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-, HER2+ and triple-negative subgroups, respectively. According to the results of the multivariate analysis, pathological grade and fibrinogen level were independent predictors of apCR after NAT in HER2+ patients. Except for traditional clinicopathological factors, laboratory indicators could also be identified as predictive factors of apCR after NAT. The nomogram integrating pretreatment indicators demonstrated its distinguishing capability, with a high AUC, and could help to guide individualized treatment options.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kun Cao ◽  
Bo Zhao ◽  
Xiao-Ting Li ◽  
Yan-Ling Li ◽  
Ying-Shi Sun

Objectives. MRI is the standard imaging method in evaluating treatment response of breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), while identification of pathologic complete response (pCR) remains challenging. Texture analysis (TA) on post-NAT dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI was explored to assess the existence of pCR in mass-like cancer. Materials and Methods. A primary cohort of 112 consecutive patients (40 pCR and 72 non-pCR) with mass-like breast cancers who received preoperative NAT were retrospectively enrolled. On post-NAT MRI, volumes of the residual-enhanced areas and TA first-order features (19 for each sequence) of the corresponding areas were achieved for both early- and late-phase DCE using an in-house radiomics software. Groups were divided according to the operational pathology. Receiver operating characteristic curves and binary logistic regression analysis were used to select features and achieve a predicting formula. Overall diagnostic abilities were compared between TA and radiologists’ subjective judgments. Validation was performed on a time-independent cohort of 39 consecutive patients. Results. TA features with high consistency (Cronbach’s alpha >0.9) between 2 observers showed significant differences between pCR and non-pCR groups. Logistic regression using features selected by ROC curves generated a synthesized formula containing 3 variables (volume of residual enhancement, entropy, and robust mean absolute deviation from early-phase) to yield AUC = 0.81, higher than that of using radiologists’ subjective judgment (AUC = 0.72), and entropy was an independent risk factor (P<0.001). Accuracy and sensitivity for identifying pCR were 83.93% and 70.00%. AUC of the validation cohort was 0.80. Conclusions. TA may help to improve the diagnostic ability of post-NAT MRI in identifying pCR in mass-like breast cancer. Entropy, as a first-order feature to depict residual tumor heterogeneity, is an important factor.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10598-10598
Author(s):  
S. Iacobelli ◽  
E. Cianchetti ◽  
C. Ficorella ◽  
D. Angelucci ◽  
S. Grossi ◽  
...  

10598 Background: The use of preoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer has been shown to result in similar disease-free and overall survival as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Additionally, the rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) in the breast after preoperative chemotherapy has been shown to correlate with survival. The objective of this study was to evaluate the activity and safety of a dose-dense and sequential chemotherapy of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) followed by docetaxel/capecitabine (DXe) given preoperatively in patients with early breast cancer not candidate to breast-conserving surgery. Methods: Forty-one women with histologically/cytologically confirmed primary breast cancer (T2–3, N0–2, M0) received 4 cycles of EC (cyclophosphamide, 600 mg/m2 and epirubicin, 90 mg/m2) q2 weeks followed by two cycles of DXe (docetaxel, 36 mg/m2 days 1, 8, and 15 and capecitabine, 1250 mg/m2 days 5–18) q 28 days, with pegfilgrastim support. The study was designed as a Simon’s two-step phase II study. The primary end point of the study was the incidence of pCR defined as the absence of invasive cancer in the breast at definitive surgery. Results: Thirty-nine out of 41 enrolled patients were evaluable for response to treatment (one patient withdrew from the study for G4 neutropenia after the first EC cycle, and the other for therapy refusal after the 4 EC cycles). A pCR was observed in 10 patients for a total pCR rate of 25.6%. Interestingly, all but one of the 10 pCR cases showed ER/PR-negative/Her2-positive tumors. A clinical response (CR or PR) detected by palpation and by imaging was observed in 37 patients, for an overall response rate of 95%. Twenty-nine patients (75%) underwent breast-conserving surgery. The treatment was well tolerated: one patient experienced G3 mucositis and another patient required a 25% dose reduction of capecitabine because of hand-foot syndrome. There was no case of cardiac toxicity, thrombocytopenia or any other serious adverse event. Conclusions: The dose-dense sequential combination EC/DXe is endowed with good antitumor activity and limited toxicity, allowing a high rate of pCR and breast conservation. Thus, this regimen can be considered for further clinical trial. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document