EGFR expression using immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing as a tool for selecting patients (pts) for treatment with cetuximab

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13000-13000 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. L. Ervin-Haynes ◽  
R. M. Schinagl ◽  
M. R. Dalesandro ◽  
J. Roecker ◽  
H. Youssoufian ◽  
...  

13000 Background: EGFR expression, as determined by IHC, is currently used to select patients for cetuximab therapy. Based on prior studies in colorectal cancer patients, approximately 60 to 75% of patients express EGFR. There is increasing evidence that EGFR expression is not predictive of response to cetuximab therapy, and does not properly select patients who might benefit from such therapy (Chung et al 2005, Saltz et al 2005, Scartozi et al 2004, NCCN 2005). Such selection limits access to a considerable number of patients who might otherwise benefit. Methods: A clinical trial of cetuximab (Erbitux®) monotherapy is being conducted in 60 EGFR-undetectable patients with metastatic colorectal cancer at 14 sites in the US and Canada to explore the relationship between EGFR expression and cetuximab activity. Results: As of January 5, 2006, 112 patients have been screened. Of these patients, 33 (29%) were EGFR-undetectable and continued screening for study enrollment; 52 (46%) tested positive for EGFR expression; and 2 (2%) did not have enough tissue to evaluate EGFR status and were not enrolled onto the trial. The remaining 25 pts (22%), were initially found to be EGFR-undetectable by IHC testing at local labs, but were subsequently identified as EGFR-positive after reevaluation at a highly experienced, centralized laboratory. Conclusion: The majority of patients tested for EGFR expression are tested using the EGFR pharmDx™ IHC assay. Results of the IHC-based assay for EGFR expression are highly dependent upon sample preparation and the methods used in conducting the assay. Variability in methods among labs may result in poor identification of pts expressing EGFR. This finding, together with the growing evidence that EGFR expression is not predictive of response to cetuximab therapy, indicate that the current routine practice of tumor IHC EGFR testing for the purpose of selecting cetuximab therapy may be inappropriate and pts who could potentially benefit from cetuximab therapy are being excluded from a treatment option. [Table: see text]

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji-Lin Li ◽  
Shu-Han Lin ◽  
Hong-Qiu Chen ◽  
Li-Sheng Liang ◽  
Xian-Wei Mo ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 271-278
Author(s):  
Charlene HL Wong ◽  
Tobias Sundberg ◽  
Vincent CH Chung ◽  
Petra Voiss ◽  
Holger Cramer

Abstract Background In the USA, colorectal cancer is among the top diagnosed cancers. The current study specifically targets the US adult population that have a history of colorectal cancer. Methods We used the 2017 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) to investigate the prevalence and predictors of colorectal cancer survivors using complementary medicine in the past 12 months in a representative sample of the US population (N = 26,742). We descriptively analyzed the 12-month prevalence of any complementary medicine use separately for individuals with a prior diagnosis of colorectal cancer and those without. Using chi-squared tests and backward stepwise multiple logistic regression analyses, we identified predictors of complementary medicine use in the past 12 months. Results A weighted total of 1,501,481 US adults (0.6%) had a history of colorectal cancer. More individuals without (weighted n = 76,550,503; 31.2%) than those with a history of colorectal cancer (weighted n = 410,086; 27.3%) had used complementary medicine. The most commonly used complementary medicine among colorectal cancer patients was mind-body medicine, followed by chiropractic. A higher prevalence of complementary medicine use was associated with being female, higher educated and/or living in the US Midwest or South. Conclusions In this study, over one fourth of the US colorectal cancer survivors had used complementary medicine. Mind-body medicine was found to be the most commonly used. With evidence supporting the effectiveness and safety of mind-body medicine use among colorectal cancer patients, promoting the use of evidence-based mind-body medicine for colorectal cancer management could be considered.


2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. 1803-1810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ki Young Chung ◽  
Jinru Shia ◽  
Nancy E. Kemeny ◽  
Manish Shah ◽  
Gary K. Schwartz ◽  
...  

Purpose To establish evidence of activity, or lack thereof, of cetuximab-based therapy in patients with refractory colorectal cancer with tumors that do not demonstrate epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Patients and Methods Pharmacy computer records were reviewed to identify all patients who received cetuximab at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in a nonstudy setting during the first 3 months of cetuximab's commercial availability. Medical records of these patients were then reviewed to identify colorectal cancer patients who had experienced failure with a prior irinotecan-based regimen and who had a pathology report indicating an EGFR-negative tumor by IHC. Pathology slides from these patients were reviewed by a reference pathologist to confirm EGFR negativity, and computed tomography scans during cetuximab-based therapy were reviewed by a reference radiologist. Response rates were reported using WHO criteria. Results Sixteen chemotherapy-refractory, EGFR-negative colorectal cancer patients who received cetuximab in a nonstudy setting were identified. Fourteen of these patients received cetuximab plus irinotecan, and two received cetuximab monotherapy. In the 16 patients, four major objective responses were seen (response rate, 25%; 95% CI, 4% to 46%). Conclusion Colorectal cancer patients with EGFR-negative tumors have the potential to respond to cetuximab-based therapies. EGFR analysis by current IHC techniques does not seem to have predictive value, and selection or exclusion of patients for cetuximab therapy on the basis of currently available EGFR IHC does not seem warranted.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13500-13500 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Razis ◽  
E. Briasoulis ◽  
I. Kostopoulos ◽  
M. Bobos ◽  
C. Christodoulou ◽  
...  

13500 Background: Cetuximab is an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody with activity in colorectal cancer. Patients most likely to benefit should be identified using molecular markers. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients treated with cetuximab who had paraffin embedded tissue available for testing. Tumor specimens were tested for EGFR (31G7, Zymed), PTEN (28H6, Novocastra) and pAkt 1/2/3 (Thr 308, Santa Cruz) expression by IHC. The EGFR gene status was investigated by FISH (Vysis). Results: Seventy-two patients were identified. EGFR expression was detected in 32/68 patients tested. PTEN was positive in all cases tested (64/64) and pAkt in 52 of 64 patients, in >70% of cells in 21/64 cases. Most patients were treated with cetuximab in various combinations, three patients received it as a single agent and 7 patients in more than one line of therapy. Median follow-up from diagnosis was 30.7 months and from Cetuximab initiation 6.9 months. Median survival from diagnosis has not been reached yet but from initiation of Cetuximab it is 13.6 months. 19 patients achieved a PR and 1 a CR. Most patients with PR were treated in first or second line however, 6 patients achieved a PR in 3rd line and 3 in subsequent lines. The patient with complete response, was treated in first line with CPT 11 and Cetuximab. TTP was 7.4 months for patients treated with Cetuximab in 1st line, 7.5 in 2nd line and 5.3 in 3rd line. Survival did not correlate significantly with any of the immunohistochemically assessed parameters. TTP correlated significantly with pAkt overexpression for patients treated in 3rd line (p=0.0065). The CR was seen in the only patient with EGFR amplification.The presence of skin toxicity did not correlate with response to therapy. Conclusions: Overexpression of pAkt may correlate with response to Cetuximab in colorectal cancer. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2003 ◽  
Vol 124 (4) ◽  
pp. A238
Author(s):  
Jean-Philippe Spano ◽  
Julien Domont ◽  
Dan Atlan ◽  
Christine Lagorce ◽  
Robert Benamouzig ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Xu ◽  
Zong-Hao Huang ◽  
Charlie Zhi-Lin Zheng ◽  
Cong Li ◽  
Yu-Qin Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Since December 2019, China has experienced a public health emergency from the coronavirus disease, which has become a pandemic and is impacting the care of cancer patients worldwide. This study evaluated the impact of the pandemic on colorectal cancer (CRC) patients at our center and aimed to share the lessons we learned with clinics currently experiencing this impact. Methods We retrospectively collected data on CRC patients admitted between January 1, 2020 and May 3, 2020; the control group comprised patients admitted between January 1, 2019 and May 3, 2019. Results During the pandemic, outpatient volumes decreased significantly, especially those of nonlocal and elderly patients, whereas the number of patients who received chemotherapy and surgery remained the same. During the pandemic, 710 CRC patients underwent curative resection. The proportion of patients who received laparoscopic surgeries was 49.4%, significantly higher than the 39.5% during the same period in 2019. The proportion of major complication during the pandemic was not significantly different from that of the control group. The mean hospital stay was significantly longer than that of the control group. Conclusions CRC patients confirmed to be infection-free can receive routine treatment. Using online medical counseling and appropriate identification, treatment and follow-up can be effectively maintained. Adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy should not be discontinued. Endoscopic polypectomy, elective, palliative, and multidisciplinary surgeries can be postponed, while curative surgery should proceed as usual. For elderly CRC patients, endoscopic surgery and neoadjuvant radiotherapy are recommended.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document