Evaluation of the safety of C-1311 administered in a phase I dose-escalation trial as a weekly infusion for 3 consecutive weeks in patients with advanced solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2069-2069 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Isambert ◽  
M. Campone ◽  
E. Bourbouloux ◽  
M. Drouin ◽  
A. Major ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Recommended Dose ◽  
Active Member ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Advanced Malignancy ◽  
Drug Concentrations ◽  
Grade 3

2069 Background: C-1311 is the most active member of a new series of anti-cancer agents, the imidazoacridinones, specially designed compounds developed from research on the structure-activity relationships of other cancer therapies such as the anthracenediones (e.g. mitoxantrone) and the anthracyclines (e.g. doxorubicin). This first-in-man clinical trial was designed to assess the safety profile of C-1311 and determine the recommended dose upon weekly administration for 3 consecutive weeks, within a 28-day cycle. Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to conventional therapy were enrolled. The dose escalation scheme was divided into 2 phases: an initial accelerated phase of cohorts of 1 patient at doubling doses and a modified Fibonacci phase of cohorts of 3 pts at 25–33% dose increments. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as the dose at which 2/3 or 2/6 pts experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). The recommended dose (RD) was defined as the dose level below the MTD, confirmed by expansion of the cohort to 9 pts. Results: 16 pts received doses of 15, 30, 60, 120, 240, 480 and 640 mg/m2/wk. The 2 pts treated at 640 mg/m2 experienced a DLT (grade 3 neutropenia preventing the administration of the 2nd and 3rd dose of the first cycle respectively). The RD was defined as 480 mg/m2/wk (cohort of 9 pts). Six additional pts were treated at the RD in an extension study in which one of the first 2 doses was given orally. Overall, 2 serious adverse events have been reported as possibly drug-related, both consisting of post-infusion fever without evidence of infection, resolving within 24 hours. Transient neutropenia was the only recurring grade 3 or 4 drug-related adverse event (AE). Grade 1 or 2 AEs most commonly reported as drug-related were nausea, asthenia, vomiting and diarrhea. Stable disease was observed in 3 patients with advanced malignancy. One pt had a stable course over > 8 cycles, and two had stable courses over 4 cycles. Plasma drug concentrations were linear and proportional to dose. Conclusions: The recommended phase 2 dose of 480 mg/m2, weekly × 3 q 28 days, offers a predictable safety profile and excellent tolerability. [Table: see text]

Evaluation of the safety of C-1311 administered in a phase 1 dose-escalation trial as a 1-hour infusion once every 3 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12005-12005 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Thomas ◽  
A. Anthoney ◽  
S. Ahmed ◽  
M. Drouin ◽  
A. Major ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Recommended Dose ◽  
Active Member ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Advanced Malignancy ◽  
Drug Concentrations

12005 Background: C-1311 (Symadex) is the most active member of a new series of anti-cancer agents, the imidazoacridinones, specially designed compounds developed from research on the structure-activity relationships of existing cancer therapies. This clinical trial was designed to assess the safety profile of ascending doses of C-1311 and to determine the recommended dose when administered every 3 weeks (Q3W). Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to conventional therapy were enrolled. The dose escalation scheme was divided into 2 phases with different schedules. Initially, C-1311 was given as a 1-hour daily infusion over 5 consecutive days. Following review of pre-clinical data, coupled with preliminary results of a parallel weekly study, a day 1 only schedule was explored. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is defined as the dose at which 2/3 or 2/6 pts experience a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). The recommended dose (RD) is defined as the dose level below the MTD, confirmed by expansion of the RD cohort to 9 pts. Results: The first 5 patients were treated at doubling doses of 6, 12, 24, 48 and 96 mg/m2 on a schedule of 1-hour daily infusions over 5 consecutive days, repeated every 3 weeks; no DLTs were seen. The 6th pt received the same total dose as the 5th (480 mg/m2) but on day 1 only, following which a modified Fibonacci design with cohorts of 3 pts and 33% dose increments was utilized. Subsequently, pts received C-1311 at doses of 640 mg/m2 (3 pts), 850 mg/m2 (3 pts) and 1100 mg/m2 (5 pts); 2/5 pts treated at 1100 mg/m2 experienced an identical DLT (grade 4 neutropenia for ≥7 days with grade 4 thrombocytopenia), defining this as the MTD. The 850 mg/m2 cohort was expanded to confirm this as the RD. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia and fatigue have been reported as drug-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs). Grade 1 or 2 AEs most commonly described as drug-related are fatigue, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. Stable disease was observed in two patients with advanced malignancy. A pt had a stable disease over 8 cycles and one over 6 cycles. Plasma drug concentrations are linear and proportional to dose. Conclusions: A C-1311 dose of 850 mg/m2 administered once every 3 weeks offers a predictable and tolerable safety profile. [Table: see text]

Phase Ib study of the anti-TGF-β monoclonal antibody (mAb) NIS793 combined with spartalizumab (PDR001), a PD-1 inhibitor, in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2509-2509
Author(s):  
Todd Michael Bauer ◽  
Chia-Chi Lin ◽  
Richard Greil ◽  
Maria-Elisabeth Goebeler ◽  
Marie Luise Huetter-Kroenke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Target Engagement ◽  
Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Immune Exclusion ◽  
Tumor Biopsies

2509 Background: TGF-β plays a key role in regulating the tumor microenvironment. Emerging evidence suggests TGF-β is a key activator of cancer-associated fibroblasts, leading to fibrotic network development and immune exclusion. Preclinical data in murine models showed that TGF-β blockade alleviates intratumoral fibrosis, augmenting the efficacy of PD-1 immunotherapy. NIS793 is a human IgG2 mAb that binds to TGF-β. This study investigates NIS793 + spartalizumab in pts with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Pts initially received NIS793 (0.3–1 mg/kg Q3W) monotherapy; following evaluation of two dose levels, dose escalation continued with NIS793 + spartalizumab (NIS793 0.3–30 mg/kg Q3W + spartalizumab 300 mg Q3W; or NIS793 20–30 mg/kg Q2W + spartalizumab 400 mg Q4W) in pts with/without prior anti-PD-(L)1 therapy. In dose expansion, pts with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) resistant to prior anti-PD-(L)1 or pts with microsatellite stable colorectal cancer (MSS-CRC) were treated at the recommended dose for expansion (RDE). Paired tumor biopsies were required from all pts. The primary objectives were to characterize safety and tolerability of the combination and determine the RDE. Results: By December 1, 2020, 60 pts were treated in the dose-escalation phase, mainly with NIS793 + spartalizumab (n = 49), and 60 pts were treated in dose expansion (MSS-CRC: n = 40; NSCLC: n = 20). Two pts were still receiving treatment. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed, and the RDE was established as 30 mg/kg (2100 mg) NIS793 + 300 mg spartalizumab Q3W. Overall 50% pts experienced ≥1 treatment-related AE (TRAE). The most common were rash (n = 15/120), pruritus (n = 10/120), fatigue (n = 9/120), and nausea (n = 8/120). Grade 3/4 TRAEs occurred in 11% pts, with rash (3%) being the most common. Treatment-related serious AEs were reported in 8 pts; 6 were grade 3/4 in severity. No deaths occurred due to AEs; 3 (2.5%) pts discontinued due to AEs. PK for NIS793 was linearly dose proportional with no obvious correlation between exposure and response. Two pts achieved a partial response (PR; one confirmed in clear cell renal cell carcinoma and one unconfirmed in NSCLC) during dose escalation of the combination. Two confirmed PRs were achieved in the MSS-CRC dose-expansion group. Biomarker data showed evidence of target engagement through increased TGF-β/NIS793 complexes and depleted active TGF-β in peripheral blood. Gene expression and protein analyses in tumor biopsies displayed decreased TGF-β target genes, decreased TGF-β signatures and increased immune signatures suggesting modulation of the TGF-β pathway and preliminary evidence of biological activity. Conclusions: Data showing target engagement and TGF-β pathway inhibition supported the proof of mechanism of NIS793. The RDE of the combination was established and well tolerated in pts with advanced solid tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT02947165.

Phase 1 dose escalation study of MGC018, an anti-B7-H3 antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2631-2631
Author(s):  
Sekwon Jang ◽  
John D. Powderly ◽  
Alexander I. Spira ◽  
Ouiam Bakkacha ◽  
Deryk Loo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Melanoma Patients ◽  
Tumor Types

2631 Background: MGC018 is an investigational ADC with a duocarmycin payload linked to an anti-B7-H3 monoclonal antibody (mAb). B7-H3 is expressed on multiple solid tumors with limited normal tissue expression. It is hypothesized that MGC018 may exert activity against B7-H3-expressing tumors with an acceptable safety profile. Studies demonstrate that B7-H3 is a significant factor in progression and events of metastasis of multiple tumor types, including melanoma. Methods: This phase 1 study characterizes safety, maximum tolerated or maximum administered dose, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and tumor response per RECIST v1.1 of MGC018 in a 3+3+3 dose escalation design in patients with advanced solid tumors. MGC018 was administered intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks. Results: The study enrolled 29 patients of multiple tumor types, which included 3 melanoma patients refractory to ≥2 prior lines of checkpoint therapy. The study completed 5 of 6 planned dose cohorts (0.5 mg/kg - 4 mg/kg) as of the data cutoff of 21 January 2021. The final cohort of 4 mg/kg has 3 patients with ongoing treatment and follow-up at the date of submission. Dosing MGC018 IV every 3 weeks resulted in minimal serum accumulation. At least 1 treatment emergent adverse event occurred in 29 patients (100.0%); most common (≥25%) were anemia, neutropenia, fatigue, hyperpigmentation, infusion related reaction, nausea, and palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia. Two dose-limiting toxicities occurred; one grade 4 neutropenia (2 mg/kg) and one grade 3 fatigue lasting 7 days (4 mg/kg). No febrile neutropenia was reported. The 3 melanoma patients had reductions in target lesion sum of 24.4%, 27.5%, and 35% (unconfirmed partial response) and remain on treatment as of the data cutoff. The recommended phase 2 dose was determined to be 3 mg/kg. Conclusions: Results to date demonstrate a manageable safety profile, with early evidence of clinical activity in pretreated metastatic melanoma. Cohort expansion is ongoing using a recommended phase 2 dose of 3 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks. The planned enrollment includes advanced metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer, melanoma, triple-negative breast cancer, and non-small cell lung cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT03729596.

A phase 1b, open-label, dose-escalation study to evaluate camidanlumab tesirine (Cami) as monotherapy in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2556-2556
Author(s):  
Igor Puzanov ◽  
Patricia LoRusso ◽  
Kyriakos P. Papadopoulos ◽  
Christopher T. Chen ◽  
Yvan LeBruchec ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Treatment Withdrawal ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Grade 3

2556 Background: Depletion of tumor-infiltrating CD25+ regulatory T cells (Tregs), which inhibit tumor-specific immune responses, could contribute to tumor eradication. Cami (ADCT-301), an anti-CD25, pyrrolobenzodiazepine-based antibody-drug conjugate, targets CD25+ Tregs. A mouse surrogate has shown potent antitumor activity in solid tumor models. Here we report preliminary data from the monotherapy arm of a phase 1b trial of Cami in pts with selected advanced solid tumors. Methods: The monotherapy dose-escalation part of this open-label study enrolled pts (aged ≥18 years) with selected advanced solid tumors and no suitable existing therapy. The primary objective was to characterize safety and tolerability, and to identify the recommended phase 2 dose of Cami monotherapy. Secondary and exploratory objectives included evaluation of preliminary antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and immunogenicity. Pts received Cami every 3 weeks (1 cycle) with dose escalation per a 3+3 design. Disease control rate (DCR) was assessed (complete and partial responses [CR, PR] and stable disease). Results: At data cut-off (Dec 17, 2020), 44 pts were enrolled, with primary tumor types (stage IVA/B: 27 pts; 61.4%) of colorectal (15 pts; 34.1%), pancreatic (14 pts; 31.8%), head and neck, ovarian/fallopian tube, and renal cell carcinoma (all 3 pts; 6.8%), non-small cell lung cancer (2 pts; 4.5%), gastric, esophageal/GEJ, melanoma, and triple-negative breast cancer (each 1 pt; 2.3%). Median (range) age was 60.5 (33–82) years; median (range) number of prior systemic therapies was 4 (1–9). Pts received a median (range) of 2 (1–6) Cami cycles at doses of 20–150 µg/kg. Median (range) treatment duration was 22 (1–178) days. No dose-limiting toxicities were reported. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached. All-grade treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in ≥20% pts were nausea (18 pts; 40.9%), decreased appetite and fatigue (each 16 pts; 36.4%), constipation (13 pts; 29.5%), abdominal pain (11 pts; 25%), and rash (10 pts; 22.7%). The only Grade ≥3 TEAE in ≥10% pts was anemia (5 pts; 11.4%). Grade 3 autoimmune AEs (colitis, immune-mediated AE, systemic inflammatory response syndrome) and neurologic AEs (dysphagia and asthenia, but not GBS) were reported in 3 (6.8%) and 2 (4.5%) pts, respectively. 1 (2.3%) Cami-related TEAE led to treatment withdrawal; no Cami-related TEAEs were fatal. DCR was 25% (95% CI: 11.1, 34.7); 11/44 pts attained stable disease. No pts had CR or PR. Conclusions: Dose escalation of Cami monotherapy is complete. The safety profile is encouraging and MTD was not reached. PK/PD data will be presented. 150 µg/kg is the highest dose investigated for single-agent Cami and the highest to be investigated combined with pembrolizumab in selected advanced solid tumors in the current protocol. Funding: ADC Therapeutics SA NCT03621982. Clinical trial information: NCT03621982.

Final results: A dose escalation phase I study of ARQ 197, a selective c-Met inhibitor, in patients with metastatic solid tumors

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3548-3548 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Mekhail ◽  
T. Rich ◽  
L. Rosen ◽  
F. Chai ◽  
Z. Semic-Suka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Tumor Cell Migration ◽  
Drug Concentrations ◽  
Arq 197 ◽  
Favorable Safety

3548 Background: ARQ 197 is a selective, non-ATP competitive inhibitor of c-Met, a receptor tyrosine kinase implicated in tumor cell migration, invasion, and proliferation. Methods: This phase I dose escalation study enrolled patients (pts) with metastatic solid tumors to determine the drug's safety profile, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), pharmacokinetics (PK), and preliminary antitumor activity. Dose escalation followed an accelerated titration design and was modified to the traditional escalation design (3+3 pts) once grade 2 toxicity was observed. ARQ 197 was initially administered orally twice daily (BID) for 2 weeks followed by 1 week off and then modified to evaluate continuous BID dosing based on favorable safety data. Intra-patient dose-escalation was allowed in this study. Additional pts were enrolled and treated at the 360 mg bid continuous dose, which was determined to be the RP2D in another phase I clinical trial. Results: To date, 65 pts (38 male/27 female; median age 61; 9 colon/colorectal, 8 renal cell carcinoma/kidney, 6 ovarian, 6 sarcoma, 5 lung cancer and 31 others) have been treated at 11 dose levels (10 mg bid to 360 mg bid). All treated pts achieved plasma drug concentrations significantly above in vitro IC50 values. The most common drug-related adverse events (AEs) were fatigue (18.5%) and nausea (12.3%). One case each of the following drug-related serious AEs were reported in 4 pts: anemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, dehydration, liver failure, abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. Three pts with neuroendocrine, prostate, or testicular cancer achieved a partial response (PR), 32 demonstrated stable disease (SD) and 13 progressed. The 3 PR pts were initially treated at 10, 40 or 90 mg BID respectively. Their doses were escalated to 50, 70, or 120 mg BID respectively after 18 to 33 weeks on treatment. An overall response rate of 6.3% and a disease control rate (CR+PR+SD) of 72.9% were demonstrated among 48 pts who are evaluable for efficacy. Conclusions: ARQ 197 has demonstrated a favorable safety profile up to the dose of 360 mg bid. Preliminary evidence of anti-cancer activity was observed. Final study data on drug safety, PK and efficacy will be presented. [Table: see text]

Phase I study of AMG 479, a fully human monoclonal antibody against the type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF-1R), in Japanese patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 318-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Doi ◽  
N. Fuse ◽  
T. Yoshino ◽  
H. Murakami ◽  
N. Yamamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Grade 3

318 Background: AMG 479 is a fully human monoclonal antibody against human IGF-1R that inhibits the survival and proliferative signals driven by IGF-1 and -2. Methods: Patients (Pts) were enrolled into 1 of 3 dose cohorts (6, 12 or 20 mg/kg) of single-agent AMG 479 administered intravenously Q2W. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was assessed for the first 28 days. The primary objectives were to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of AMG 479 in Japanese pts with advanced solid tumors. An exploratory pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis was done to investigate the relationship between exposure and changes in the level of circulating factors in IGF-1R pathway (IGFBP-3 and total IGF-1). Results: Nineteen pts with ECOG 0-1 (6 in cohort 1 and 3, 7 in cohort 2) received at least 1 dose of AMG 479. Median age was 58.0 years. Tumor types included: breast (4), gastric (3), rectal (2), NSCL (2), thymic (2), and other cancers (6). Enrollment has been completed; 5 pts remained on study as of 15 March 2010. No DLTs were observed. Three serious adverse events (SAE) were reported, only respiratory tract haemorrhage in a subject with thymic carcinoma was considered by the investigator to be related to AMG 479. The most common grade ≥3 AEs were neutropenia (21%), leukopenia (16%) and lymphopenia (11%). There was a trend of dose-dependency on severity of thrombocytopenia, but not on that of neutropenia. No neutralizing anti-AMG 479 antibodies were detected. PK was dose-linear and similar to PK in non-Japanese pts. Tumor response data were available for 17 pts. Stable disease (defined as a lack of progression at the first 8-week assessment) as best response was reported in 6 pts and progressive disease was reported in 11 pts. Exploratory PD marker analysis demonstrating exposure dependent changes will be presented. Conclusions: AMG 479 up to 20 mg/kg was tolerable in Japanese pts with advanced solid tumors. The AE and PK profiles were similar to those previously observed in non-Japanese pts. An international phase 3 study in metastatic pancreatic cancer pts is planned based on the promising results from phase 1b/2 study (ASCO 2010, Abs 4035). [Table: see text]

Phase I dose-escalation study to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of CEP-9722 (a PARP1-2 inhibitor) as single‑agent and in combination with temozolomide in patients with advanced solid tumors (NCT00920595).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3052-3052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Campone ◽  
Ruth Plummer ◽  
Peter Stephens ◽  
Zahir Brakchi ◽  
Louiza Aissat-Daudigny ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Recommended Dose ◽  
Parp Inhibition ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Pharmacokinetics And Pharmacodynamics ◽  
Grade 3

3052 Background: Poly-ADP-ribose (PAR) polymerases (PARPs) are essential in cellular processing of DNA damage via the base excision repair pathway. CEP-9722, an orally available PARP1-2 inhibitor, demonstrated single-agent antitumor activity and synergy with temozolomide (TMZ) in xenograft models. This phase I study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of CEP-9722 in monotherapy and combination with TMZ. Methods: Adult patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled in cohorts of 3-6 patients to receive a 14-day cycle of CEP-9722 (days 1-5), followed by 28-day cycles of CEP-9722 (days 1-5) plus TMZ (150 mg/m2 days 1-5). The dose of CEP-9722 was 150 mg/day in the first cohort and was escalated depending on the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during cycles 1 and 2. The safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics (PAR levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells) of CEP-9722 were analyzed. Results: Overall, 26 patients (18F,8 M) 18 to 71 years of age were enrolled in 5 cohorts of 3-9 patients and treated with CEP-9722 at 150-1000 mg/day. The MTD of CEP-9722 in combination with TMZ (150 mg/m2) was reached at 1000 mg/day. The recommended dose was 750 mg/day. A total of 9 patients were treated at the recommended dose. DLTs were observed in 2 patients during cycle 1 (1 grade 3 myositis at 750 mg/day and 1 grade 3 asthenia at 1000 mg/day) and 2 patients during cycle 2 (1 grade 3 asthenia at 300 mg/day and 1 persistent grade 2 weight loss at 1000 mg/day). Overall during this study, 4 grade 3 treatment-related adverse events were observed. The pharmacokinetics showed high intra- and inter-patient variability at all doses. The pharmacodynamic analysis demonstrated PARP inhibition at all doses, but the high inter- and intra-patient variability prevented any conclusion regarding a dose / PARP inhibition relationship. Conclusions: TheMTD of CEP-9722 when administered with TMZ was 1000 mg days 1-5 and the combination CEP-9722/TMZ was well tolerated. In addition, a clear signal of PARP inhibition was demonstrated.

Dose escalation and expansion cohort study for DS-8895a in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 99-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taroh Satoh ◽  
Kohei Shitara ◽  
Satoru Iwasa ◽  
Kensei Yamaguchi ◽  
Kei Muro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Igg1 Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Expansion Cohort

99 Background: Erythropoietin-producing hepatocellular receptor A2 (EPHA2) is overexpressed on the cell surface of many tumors and is associated with poor prognosis, suggesting EPHA2 as a target for cancer therapy. DS-8895a is an afucosylated, humanized anti-EPHA2 IgG1 monoclonal antibody with potent cytotoxicity. We report results from a phase I clinical trial to determine safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of DS-8895a in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors (NCT02004717). Methods: Step 1 (dose escalation cohort) had patients with advanced solid tumors and comprised of six dose levels (0.1–20 mg/mL, intravenous infusion, every 2 weeks [Q2W]) with a 28-day dose limiting toxicity (DLT) evaluation period. Step 2 (expansion cohort) patients had gastric or esophageal cancer confirmed to be EPHA2 positive by immunohistochemistry. Dose level in Step 2 was determined based on results obtained in Step 1. We evaluated safety, PK, potential biomarkers including circulating NK cells and cytokines, and tumor response. Results: Maximum tolerated dose was not reached in Step 1 (n = 22). DS-8895a was administered at 20 mg/kg Q2W in Step 2 (n = 15). Among 37 patients in the safety analysis set, adverse events (AEs) were reported in 97.3% (64.9% drug-related); 35.1% presented grade ≥ 3 AEs (8.1% drug-related). Dose delay and study discontinuation due to AEs (treatment related: grade 4 platelet decrease, hypoesthesia, hypotension, peripheral coldness, nausea, and vomiting) were observed in one and four patients (20 mg/kg), respectively. Infusion-related reactions occurred in 51.4% of patients resulting in 10 dose interruptions with one discontinuation. Serum inflammatory cytokines were transiently increased 4 h from the end of infusion drug administration. Serum DS-8895a maximum and trough concentrations increased dose-dependently. Biomarkers had no apparent relationship to best overall response. Seven patients in Step 1 achieved stable disease; in Step 2, six patients achieved stable disease and one patient achieved partial response. Conclusions: DS-8895a was safe and well tolerated up to 20 mg/kg. The PK of DS-8895a was dose-dependent as expected. Clinical trial information: NCT02004717.

scholarly journals Surufatinib Plus Toripalimab in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: A Single-Arm, Open-Label, Phase 1 Trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanshuo Cao ◽  
Ming Lu ◽  
Yu Sun ◽  
Jifang Gong ◽  
Jie Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 1 Trial ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract BackgroundPreclinical studies have supported a potential synergistic antitumor activity between surufatinib and anti-programed death ligand-1 (PD-L1). We describe here the results of a single-arm, open-label phase 1 trial to evaluate the safety, preliminary efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) in patients with advanced solid tumors treated with surufatinib combined with toripalimab, an inhibitor of PD-L1.MethodsThis is an open-label, dose escalation and expansion study in patients with solid tumors who had failed standard therapies or had no effective treatment. In the dose escalation stage, 3 cohorts of patients were treated with surufatinib, at dose levels of 200, 250, or 300 mg once daily (QD) in combination with a fixed dose of toripalimab 240 mg, every 3 weeks (Q3W), to evaluate maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Additional patients were enrolled in the dose expansion phase to further assess the efficacy, safety, and PK profile.ResultsFrom April 1, 2019 to July 10, 2020, 31 patients were screened, of which 28 patients were enrolled. One patient in the 300 mg cohort experienced dose limited toxicity (DLT), a grade 3 hyperthyroidism. The top 3 most common treatment-related adverse events of ≥ grade 3 were transaminases increased (17.9%), hypertension (14.3%) and blood bilirubin increased (10.7%). No treatment-related death or treatment discontinuation was identified. The RP2D was determined to be surufatinib 250 mg QD plus toripalimab 240 mg Q3W. Overall objective response rate was 22.2% [95% confidential interval (CI) 8.6‒42.3], and disease control rate reached 81.5% (95% CI 61.9‒93.7). ConclusionsSurufatinib plus toripalimab was well-tolerated, with no unexpected safety signals, and showed promising antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors. Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov, NCT03879057; Registered March 18, 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03879057

A first-in-human phase I study of oral pan-CDK inhibitor BAY 1000394 in patients with advanced solid tumors: Dose escalation with an intermittent 3 days on/4 days off schedule.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3012-3012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rastislav Bahleda ◽  
Anas Gazzah ◽  
Andrea Varga ◽  
Prabhu Rajagopalan ◽  
David Andrew Henderson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Oral Solution ◽  
Tablet Formulation ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Cdk Inhibitor ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Antiemetic Treatment ◽  
Grade 3

3012 Background: BAY 1000394 (BAY) is an oral pan-CDK inhibitor targeting CDKs 1,2,4, 7 and 9 in the low nanomolar range. A phase I dose escalation study was initiated to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Methods: BAY was administered twice daily in a 3 days on / 4 days off schedule (cycle length 21 days, 3+3 design). PK was evaluated on cycle 1 day 1 and day 10. Response rate was assessed according to RECIST 1.1. PD markers included CK18 fragments in plasma. Results: As of Jan 08 2011, 34 pts were treated at doses of 0.6 (3 pts), 1.2 (4), 2.4 (3), 4.8 (3), 9.6 (3), 19.2 (6) mg per day as oral solution and at doses of 10 (4), 15 (6) and 20 (2) mg per day as tablet. Tumor types included 10 colorectal, 4 mesothelioma and 20 others. Cohort 9 (20 mg tablet) is ongoing. Frequent CTCAEv4 grade 1/2 drug related AEs occurring in more than 25% of patients up to cohort 8 were asthenia, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting and anorexia. DLTs (grade 3, 1 pt each) were hyponatremia, aphtous stomatitis at 19.2 mg solution and arterial thrombosis at 15 mg tablet. Aphthous stomatitis (20%) has not been observed with the tablet formulation. Other grade 3 related AEs were asthenia in 2 and nausea and vomiting in one pt each. Nausea and vomiting on treatment days were observed despite antiemetic treatment (aprepitant +/- setron). PK was dose proportional up to 9.6 mg, T1/2 was 10 hours, and relative bioavailability of tablet formulation was excellent; major metabolite levels were low (<10%). Levels of CK18 fragments did not correlate with dose or tumor response. Stable disease (SD) lasting for 2-4 months was observed in 9 patients, among others in 4 of 4 mesothelioma and 2 of 2 ovarian pts. One additional pt with cholangiocarcinoma has ongoing SD lasting for 5 months. One of the ovarian pts had a significant decline of CA125 lasting for 3 months. Conclusions: The tablet formulation of BAY 1000394 was better tolerated than oral solution. So far, doses up to a 15 mg per day with concomitant antiemetic treatment showed an acceptable tolerability. SD was observed in 10 of 25 heavily pretreated pts across cohorts 3 – 8.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document