Salvage surgery for local recurrence after breast conservation therapy—Is re-lumpectomy an appropriate treatment?

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 608-608
Author(s):  
T. Ofuchi ◽  
A. Amemiya ◽  
M. Ono ◽  
J. Hatayama ◽  
A. Takeda

608 Background: Since 1983 through 2005, 2439 clinical stage I or II patients (pts) were treated with lumpectomy and postoperative irradiation. During median follow-up of 75 months, 142 patients experienced local recurrence as first and sole event were judged as candidate for further local therapy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcome of salvage treatment, with specific reference to feasibility of second breast conservation surgery. Methods: Among those with operable local recurrences, 73 pts who requested conservation of their breasts and whose recurrences were judged to be small enough to be locally re-excised with adequate margins underwent second lumpectomy (Re-LMP). 51 pts were treated by mastectomy with or without immediate reconstruction (MAS). Adjuvant systemic therapy of limited duration was given at the discretion of patients and therapists. Survival and local re-recurrence after salvage surgery were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Age of patients ranged from 28–69 (mean: 41). Median follow-up length after salvage surgery was 53 months (6–194 months). Patient/Tumor characteristics were similar in Re-LMP and MAS groups. Local re-recurrence: Re-LMP: 31 pts developed in-breast re-recurrence (34% at 3yrs, 49% at 5yrs). MAS: 6 pts experienced chest wall recurrence (11% at 3yrs, 11% at 5yrs, p=0.0005). Independent risk factor for re-recurrence was not identified. Survival: In initial clinical stage I patients, 3 pts treated with Re-LMP died after salvage surgery and all treated with MAS survived (94% and 100% at 5yrs, p=0.2). In clinical stage II patients, 6 in Re-LMP and 8 patients in MAS died (89%, 57% at 5yrs after salvage surgery, p=0.02). Poor prognostic factors for both groups were initial stage and stage at the time of local failure. Conclusions: For an isolated in-breast recurrence, salvage mastectomy with or without immediate reconstruction provides excellent local control. At the present time, mastectomy should be offered as 1st treatment option. Although survival is not jeopardized, Re-LMP alone does not offer adequate local control. Additional local therapy i.e. re-radiotherapy or aggressive systemic therapy may improve this poor result. Prospective studies should be initiated. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

2013 ◽  
Vol 154 (33) ◽  
pp. 1291-1296 ◽  
Author(s):  
László Romics Jr. ◽  
Sophie Barrett ◽  
Sheila Stallard ◽  
Eva Weiler-Mithoff

Introduction: (Pre)malignant lesion in the breast requiring mastectomy conventionally may be treated with breast conservation by using oncoplastic breast surgical techniques, which is called therapeutic mammaplasty. However, no reliable data has been published so far as regards the oncological safety of this method. Aim: The aim of the authors was to analyse the oncological safety of therapeutic mammaplasty in a series of patients. Method: 99 patients were treated with therapeutic mammaplasty and data were collected in a breast surgical database prospectively. Results were analysed with respect to intraoperative, postoperative and long-term oncological safety. Results: Incomplete resection rate was 14.1%, which correlated with tumour size (p = 0.023), and multifocality (p = 0.012). Time between surgery (therapeutic mammaplasty) and chemotherapy was similar to time between conventional breast surgeries (wide excision, mastectomy, mastectomy with immediate reconstruction) and chemotherapy (mean 29–31 days; p<0.05). Overall recurrence rate was 6.1%, locoregional recurrence rate was 2% during 27 month (1–88) mean follow-up. Conclusions: Since literature data are based on relatively short follow-up and low patient number, it is highly important that all data on therapeutic mammaplasty is collected in a prospectively maintained breast surgical database in order to determine true recurrence after long-follow-up. Orv. Hetil., 2013, 154, 1291–1296.


1997 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 321-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariël E. Gels ◽  
Jan Marrink ◽  
Petra Visser ◽  
Dirk Th. Sleijfer ◽  
Jos H. J. Droste ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 620-624
Author(s):  
Toshiteru Tokunaga ◽  
Masahiko Higashiyama ◽  
Ayako Fujiwara ◽  
Takashi Kanou ◽  
Jiro Okami ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 736-741 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kendall H. Backstrand ◽  
Andrea K. Ng ◽  
Ronald W. Takvorian ◽  
Ellen L. Jones ◽  
David C. Fisher ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of mantle radiation therapy alone in selected patients with early-stage Hodgkin’s disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 1988 and June 2000, 87 selected patients with pathologic stage (PS) IA to IIA or clinical stage (CS) IA Hodgkin’s disease were entered onto a single-arm prospective trial of treatment with mantle irradiation alone. Eighty-three of 87 patients had ≥ 1 year of follow-up after completion of mantle irradiation and were included for analysis in this study. Thirty-seven patients had PS IA, 40 had PS IIA, and six had CS IA disease. Histologic distribution was as follows: nodular sclerosis (n = 64), lymphocyte predominant (n = 15), mixed cellularity (n = 3), and unclassified (n = 1). Median follow-up time was 61 months. RESULTS: The 5-year actuarial rates of freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) and overall survival were 86% and 100%, respectively. Eleven of 83 patients relapsed at a median time of 27 months. Nine of the 11 relapses contained at least a component below the diaphragm. All 11 patients who developed recurrent disease were alive without evidence of Hodgkin’s disease at the time of last follow-up. The 5-year FFTF in the 43 stage I patients was 92% compared with 78% in the 40 stage II patients (P = .04). Significant differences in FFTF were not seen by histology (P = .26) or by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer H-5F eligibility (P = .25). CONCLUSION: Mantle irradiation alone in selected patients with early-stage Hodgkin’s disease is associated with disease control rates comparable to those seen with extended field irradiation. The FFTF is especially favorable among stage I patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 101-B (8) ◽  
pp. 1024-1031 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Fujiwara ◽  
M. R. Medellin ◽  
A. Sambri ◽  
Y. Tsuda ◽  
J. Balko ◽  
...  

Aims The aim of this study was to determine the risk of local recurrence and survival in patients with osteosarcoma based on the proximity of the tumour to the major vessels. Patients and Methods A total of 226 patients with high-grade non-metastatic osteosarcoma in the limbs were investigated. Median age at diagnosis was 15 years (4 to 67) with the ratio of male to female patients being 1.5:1. The most common site of the tumour was the femur (n = 103) followed by tibia (n = 66). The vascular proximity was categorized based on the preoperative MRI after neoadjuvant chemotherapy into four types: type 1 > 5 mm; type 2 ≤ 5 mm, > 0 mm; type 3 attached; type 4 surrounded. Results Limb salvage rate based on the proximity type was 92%, 88%, 51%, and 0% for types 1 to 4, respectively, and the overall survival at five years was 82%, 77%, 57%, and 67%, respectively (p < 0.001). Local recurrence rate in patients with limb-salvage surgery was 7%, 8%, and 22% for the types 1 to 3, respectively (p = 0.041), and local recurrence at the perivascular area was observed in 1% and 4% for type 2 and 3, respectively. The mean microscopic margin to the major vessels was 6.9 mm, 3.0 mm, and 1.4 mm for types 1 to 3, respectively. In type 3, local recurrence-free survival with limb salvage was significantly poorer compared with amputation (p = 0.025), while the latter offered no overall survival benefit. In this group of patients, factors such as good response to chemotherapy or limited vascular attachment to less than half circumference or longitudinal 10 mm reduced the risk of local recurrence. Conclusion The proximity of osteosarcoma to major blood vessels is a poor prognostic factor for local control and survival. Amputation offers better local control for tumours attached to the blood vessels but does not improve survival. Limb salvage surgery offers similar local control if the tumour attachment to blood vessels is limited. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1024–1031.


1994 ◽  
Vol 80 (5) ◽  
pp. 362-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Ondruš ◽  
M. Horňak

Aims and background Surveillance after orchiectomy alone has gained great popularity in the management of stage I NSGCTT. Preliminary results were enthusiastic, but critical voices have been raised against general use of this option as routine management. In an effort to identify patients at high risk of relapse, there has been a search for adverse prognostic factors of stage I nonseminomatous germ cell testicular tumors (NSGCTT). The aim of the study was to identify those patients in whom a surveillance policy is less likely to be successful. Methods Eighty patients with stage I NSGCTT were followed for at least 5 years. They were assigned to their respective clinical stage on the basis of physical examination, chest X-ray, CT of the retroperitoneum and post-orchiectomy tumor markers. The criteria for inclusion in clinical stage I were normal results of these examinations. The policy of surveillance consisted of regular follow-up with tumor markers, chest X-ray and CT of the retroperitoneum. Patients who relapsed were treated with cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. In all patients, diagnostic delay, pre-orchiectomy tumor markers, T staging category, size, histopathology and vascular invasion in the primary tumor, and semen analysis were recorded. Results Follow-up revealed that 51 of the 80 patients (63.7%) were free of disease 61-110 months (mean, 83.1) after orchiectomy. Relapse was detected in 29 patients (36.3%) 3-58 months (mean, 13) after orchiectomy. The overall survival rate was 95%. The main risk factors of relapse were: vascular invasion, a major embryonal carcinoma and a minor teratoma component in the primary tumor, and low sperm count before orchiectomy. Conclusions The authors recommend the following risk-adapted treatment procedures: retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in patients with vascular invasion and a major teratoma component, adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with vascular invasion and a major embryonal carcinoma component, and surveillance policy in patients without vascular invasion.


2008 ◽  
Vol 87 (11) ◽  
pp. 634-643 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian D. Lawenda ◽  
Michelle G. Arnold ◽  
Valerie A. Tokarz ◽  
Joshua R. Silverstein ◽  
Paul M. Busse ◽  
...  

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive epidermal cancer. We conducted a retrospective study and literature review to investigate the impact that radiation therapy has on local, regional, and distant control as part of the oncologic management of MCC of the head and neck and to further elucidate the role of radiation therapy with regard to regional control for the clinically uninvolved neck. We reviewed all registered cases of head and neck MCC that had occurred at four institutions from January 1988 through December 2005. Treatment and outcomes data were collected on patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage I, II, and III tumors. Local, regional, and distant control rates were calculated by comparing variables with the Fisher exact test; Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to report actuarial control data. Stage I to III head and neck MCC was identified in 36 patients— 22 men and 14 women, aged 43 to 97 years (mean: 71.6) at diagnosis. Patients with stage I and II tumors were combined into one group, and their data were compared with those of patients with stage III tumors. Twenty-sixpatients(72%) had clinical stage I/II disease and 10 patients (28%) had clinical stage III disease. Median follow-up was 41 months for the stage I/II group and 19 months for the stage III group. Based on examination at final follow-up visits, local recurrence was seen in 7 of the 36 patients (19%), for a local control rate of 81 %. The 2-year actuarial local control rate for all stages of MCC was 83%; by treatment subgroup, the rates were 95% for those who had undergone radiation therapy to the primary site and 69%) for those who had not— a statistically significant difference(p = 0.020). Based on information obtained at final follow-ups, 10 of the 36 patients (28%) experienced a regional recurrence, for a regional control rate of 72%. The 2-year actuarial regional control rate among all patients was 70%; by subgroup, rates were 82%) for patients who had undergone regional node radiation therapy and 60% for those who had not— not a statistically significant difference (p = 0.225). Nine patients (25%) overall developed a distant metastasis, for a distant control rate of 75%. Salvage therapies included chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy to the metastatic site, but neither had any significant effect on survival. Regardless of treatment, the Kaplan-Meier survival curves leveled off at 30 months with 82% survival for the stage I/II group and at 19 months with 60% survival for the stage III group. We conclude that radiation therapy to the primary tumor site (either following resection or definitively) results in a local control rate of more than 90% in patients with head and neck MCC. We also found a trend toward improved regional control of the clinically negative neck with the addition of radiation therapy.


Author(s):  
Monica Morrow

Overview: Attitudes regarding the appropriate extent of surgery for breast cancer and the effect of surgery on breast cancer–specific survival have varied over time. Failure to maintain local control is associated with decreased survival, but the extent of surgery necessary for local control has decreased as other treatment modalities, such as radiotherapy and systemic therapy, have become more widely used. Both endocrine therapy and chemotherapy considerably reduce rates of local recurrence in the breast, as well as the incidence of contralateral breast cancer, and as efficacy in reducing metastatic disease increases, so does the benefit in reducing local recurrence. The excellent rates of local control in the ACOSOG Z11 trial after elimination of axillary dissection in patients with positive sentinel nodes receiving whole-breast irradiation and systemic therapy are a model for reducing surgical morbidity in the era of multimodality therapy.


1989 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 1239-1251 ◽  
Author(s):  
P P Rosen ◽  
S Groshen ◽  
P E Saigo ◽  
D W Kinne ◽  
S Hellman

Prognostic factors have been examined in 644 patients with tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage T1 breast carcinoma treated by mastectomy and followed for a median of 18.2 years. Overall, 148 patients (23%) died of recurrent breast carcinoma. Eighteen (3%) were alive with recurrent disease and 478 (74%) were alive or died of other causes without recurrence. Unfavorable clinicopathologic features were larger tumor size (1.1 to 2.0 cm v less than or equal to 1 cm), perimenopausal menstrual status, the number of axillary lymph node metastases, poorly differentiated grade, presence of lymphatic tumor emboli (LI) in breast tissue near the primary tumor, blood vessel invasion (BVI), and an intense lymphoplasmacytic reaction around the tumor. Median survival after recurrence for the entire series was 2 years. This was not significantly influenced by tumor size, the number of axillary nodal metastases, the type of treatment for recurrence, or the interval to recurrence. The proportions surviving 5 and 10 years after recurrence were 17% and 5%, respectively. Among T1N0M0 cases, the chance of a local recurrence was 2.8% within 20 years. Median survival of T1N0M0 cases after local recurrence (4.5 years) was significantly longer than after systemic recurrence (1.5 years). A similar trend (3.7 v 2.0 years), not statistically significant, was seen in T1N1M0 patients, who had a 6.5% chance of local recurrence within 20 years. Median survival following systemic recurrence detected 10 or more years after diagnosis in T1N0M0 and in T1N1M0 patients was significantly longer than the median survival for systemic recurrences found in the first decade of follow-up. This difference did not apply following local recurrence in either T1N0M0 or T1N1M0 cases. It is evident that patients with T1 breast carcinoma can be subdivided into differing prognostic groups and this must be taken into account when considering the role of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage I disease. Systemic adjuvant treatment may prove to be beneficial for patients with unfavorable prognostic factors, while women with an especially low risk for recurrence (eg, T1N0M0 tumor 1.0 cm or less) might be spared such treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document