Vatalanib (V) for patients with previously untreated advanced malignant mesothelioma (MM): A phase II study by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 30107)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7081-7081 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. M. Jahan ◽  
L. Gu ◽  
X. Wang ◽  
R. A. Kratzke ◽  
A. Z. Dudek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factor ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Tyrosine Kinases ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Vegf Inhibitors ◽  
Baseline Serum

7081 Background: Targeting both vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and platelet derived growth factor (PDGF) may be an appropriate therapeutic strategy in MM. MM express VEGF, PDGF, and their receptors, suggesting autocrine growth-stimulating loops. VEGF inhibitors and PDGF inhibitors have in vitro activity in MM. In MM patients (pts), high VEGF levels correlate with poor outcome. Vatalanib inhibits VEGF and PDGF receptor tyrosine kinases. Methods: We conducted a phase II trial of V in pts with unresectable, histologically-confirmed MM, measurable disease, no prior therapy, ECOG performance status (PS) 0–1. Primary endpoint: 3-month (mo) progression-free survival (PFS). V 1250 mg, was given orally daily. CT scans were obtained Q6 weeks. Baseline serum VEGF, PDGF were determined. Results: 47 eligible pts (46 evaluable) enrolled at 19 sites from 7/03–11/04. Pt characteristics: male 92%, median age 75 (range 51–92; 64% were >70). Histology: epithelial 80%, sarcomatoid 11%, biphasic 9%. Site of origin: pleura 87%, peritoneum 6%, other 6%. PS 0/1: 21%/ 79%. 261 cycles were administered, median 3, range 1–32; 2 pts continue treatment. Grade 3/4 toxicities: neutropenia 2%, lymphopenia 2%, nausea/vomiting 15%/9%, increased ALT/AST 9%/6%, hypertension 2%, gastrointestinal bleed 2%. Partial response: 11% (5 pts), stable disease 66%. 3-mo PFS: 55% (95% CI: 40%, 68%), median PFS: 4.1 mo; median survival 10.0 mo. Median baseline serum levels in 40 pts: VEGF 425 pg/mL, PDGF 22754 pg/mL. There was no correlation between baseline VEGF or PDGF levels and response, PFS, or survival. Conclusions: The study did not achieve the protocol-specified 3-mo PFS of 75%. However, the objective response rate of 11% and median survival of 10 months are similar to other active single-agents for MM, which suggests that V may warrant further study in this disease. [Table: see text]

TRICC-c: BIBF 1120 versus placebo in patients receiving oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil and leucovorin (mFOLFOX6) for advanced, chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)—A multicenter, randomized phase II trial in progress.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3636-TPS3636
Author(s):  
Andreas Berger ◽  
Thomas Ettrich ◽  
Angela Marten ◽  
Thomas Seufferlein
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Survival Duration ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Double Blind

TPS3636 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in western countries. With advances in the treatment of metastatic CRC (mCRC) in the last decade using combination chemotherapy and bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody against the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), progression free survival (PFS) in first and second line setting was substantially improved. Tumour angiogenesis is also driven by other factors but VEGF including Platelet Derived Growth Factor (PDGF) and Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF). BIBF1120 is a potent, orally available triple angiokinase inhibitor that blocks the receptor tyrosine kinase activity of human VEGFR1-3, FGFR1 and -3 and PDGFRα and -β. Thus, BIBF1120 could be an exciting addition to the treatment of patients with chemorefractory CRC. Methods: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase II trial of BIBF1120 (orally, 200 mg, bid, d1-d14, Arm A) vs. placebo (Arm B) in patients receiving mFOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m2, fluorouracil, 400 mg/m2 bolus and 2400 mg/m2 over 46 h, leucovorin, 200 mg/m2) q14 d for patients (ECOG performance status 0-1) with chemorefractory mCRC who received one prior line of chemotherapy. Scheduled are 90 patients per treatment arm. Primary endpoint: PFS, Secondary endpoints: objective response, overall survival, duration of overall response, safety. Additionally there will be an explorative analysis of predictive biomarkers for BIBF1120. 4 of planned 180 patients have been enrolled. We expect the last patient out in June 2013. (Trial identifier: NCT01362361.)

Bevacizumab (B) plus erlotinib (E) for patients (pts) with recurrent ovarian (OC) and fallopian tube (FT) cancer: Preliminary results of a multi-center phase II trial

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5018-5018 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Friberg ◽  
A. M. Oza ◽  
R. J. Morgan ◽  
E. E. Vokes ◽  
D. R. Gandara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factor ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Bowel Perforation ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Ca 125 ◽  
Efficacy Evaluation ◽  
Ecog Performance Status

5018 Background: The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) are commonly over-expressed in OC and correlate with poor prognosis. The anti-VEGF antibody B and the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor E have each demonstrated activity in OC. Dual inhibition with BE may overcome mechanisms of resistance encountered with either agent alone. Methods: We are conducting a 2-stage phase II trial of BE in pts with recurrent OC, primary peritoneal, and FT cancer. Eligible pts had ≤ 2 prior chemo regimens for recurrent or refractory disease; no prior VEGF or EGFR inhibitors; ECOG performance status (PS) 0–2; measurable disease; normal organ function; no proteinuria (<1000 mg/24 hours). B 15 mg/kg was given IV on day 1 every 21 days and daily E 150 mg PO was given continuously. CT scans were obtained every 9 weeks. 2 responses are required in the first stage to justify accrual into a second stage. Results: 13 pts enrolled at 3 centers from 7/05 to 10/05. Median age: 56 (range 45–70). PS (N with 0/1/2): 6/4/3. Primary site (N): OC 11, FT 2. Primary platinum response (N): refractory 4, resistant (<12 mo PFS) 2, sensitive (≥12 mo) 7. Total prior chemo regimens (N with 1/2/3): 1/8/4. 55 cycles of BE have been delivered (median 4, range 1–8). 12 pts are evaluable for response (1 too early). There has been 1 major response (8%). 8 patients (67%) had stable disease (SD). 1 pt with SD met 75% CA-125 response criteria. 8 pts remain on study. Median PFS has not been reached (median f/u 2.2 months). Attributable toxicities (N with grade 1/2/3/4): rash 4/7/0/0, diarrhea 6/1/2/0, stomatitis 3/1/0/0, myalgias 4/0/0/0, proteinuria 3/0/0/0, bilirubin 0/2/0/0. There were 2 bowel perforations (grade 3/4): both had 2 prior regimens, peritoneal implants >1 cm, 3 doses of B (last was 10 and 42 days prior), and small bowel obstructions in the preceding 28 days. Conclusions: The first stage of accrual is complete and further enrollment is on hold pending continued efficacy evaluation. There appeared to be an increased rate of bowel perforation, and identification of potential risk factors for this event would be critical for further development of this combination. Updated results will be presented. Supported by NCI Grant N01-CM-17102. [Table: see text]

A phase II trial of irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with previously untreated advanced colorectal cancer (CRC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14599-14599
Author(s):  
N. Lee ◽  
S. Bae ◽  
S. Lee ◽  
D. Kim ◽  
K. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Continuous Infusion ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

14599 Background: We prospectively conducted a phase II trial to test the efficacy and safety of irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) regimens for the first-line treatment of previously untreated patients with recurrent or metastatic advanced CRC. Methods: Thirty-four previously untreated patients with advanced CRC were enrolled in this study from June 2001 to December 2006. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma, no prior systemic therapy in palliative setting, ECOG PS = 2, adequate organ function, written informed consent and at least one measurable disease. The patients received either irinotecan 180 mg/m2 on day 1 with a LV bolus of 200 mg/m2 and a FU bolus of 400 mg/m2, and this was followed by a FU continuous infusion of 600 mg/m2 on day 1 and day 2 (the classic FOLFIRI regimen), or they were treated with a LV bolus of 400 mg/m2 and a FU bolus of 400 mg/m2 followed by a FU continuous infusion of 2,400 mg/m2 for 46 hours (the simplified FOLFIRI regimen), and these treatments were repeated every 2 weeks until disease progression. Results: There were 13 females and 21 males with median age of 54 years (range: 41–79). The most common metastatic sites were lung and liver. A total of 262 cycles were administrated with median 6 cycles per patient (range: 1–22). All pts were evaluable for toxicity, and 30 pts for response to the treatment. The objective response rate was 26.4% with 2 complete responses respectively. Sixteen (47%) pts had stable disease and 7 (20.5%) had a progression. The tumor control rate was 73.4%. The median TTP was 5.3 months, and the overall survival was 10.1 months. The prognostic factor for longer TTP and survival was the ECOG performance status (PS). The type of regimens was not affected on response rate, TTP and survival. The chemotherapy was generally well tolerated and the most common grade 3–4 toxicities were neutropenia, diarrhea. The non- hematological toxicities were similar for both treatment groups, with more frequent grade =3 neutropenia being noted for the simplified FOLFIRI regimen. Conclusions: The FOLFIRI regimen was demonstrated to have a moderate antitumor activity with acceptable toxicity profiles, and tend to show more favorable outcome for patients with good ECOG PS. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II single institution study of sequential biochemotherapy (BCT) for patients (pts) with stage IV melanoma (M)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8580-8580
Author(s):  
P. R. Bojanapally ◽  
D. T. Alexandrescu ◽  
V. Rusciano ◽  
P. H. Wiernik ◽  
J. P. Dutcher
Keyword(s):  
Median Survival ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Experimental Therapy ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Maximum Benefit ◽  
Prospective Phase ◽  
Metastatic Sites

8580 Background: The utility of BCT for M remains controversial. A prospective phase II study was conducted to assess the clinical benefit of BCT in patients with stage IV M. Methods: Between March 2005 and March 2006 11 pts (6 Male and 5 Female with a median age of 54 (range 36 - 82)) with metastatic M were treated with paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 via continuous 24 hour IV infusion every 3 wks for 4 cycles or maximum benefit followed by HD IL2, 1.33 mg/m2 every 8 hours for 5 days of wk1 and wk3 based on pts tolerance to a maximum of 12 doses per wk. 2 Male pts received IL2 followed by paclitaxel. Pts had a ECOG performance status of 0 - 2, with a median time of 60 months since diagnosis of disease (range 7 to 240 months). 11 pts (92%) had multiple metastatic sites (50% had lung mets, 58% had liver mets) and 4 pts (33%) had prior chemotherapy or immunotherapy. Results: Of the 13 assessable pts one achieved a PR after paclitaxel and CR after IL2 continuing at 20+ months. One had SD for 1 year after receiving HD IL2 and SD for 6 months while on paclitaxel independently, One had PR for 6 months on paclitaxel and one had MR with paclitaxel for 3 months. 9 pts (69%) had PD on paclitaxel and again on IL2, with a median survival from treatment of 7 months, 2 of these got no IL2 due to rapid PD. An overall response rate of 30% (1 CR on paclitaxel + IL2 , 1 PR on paclitaxel, 2 SD (including MR) on paclitaxel) was seen with a median survival from treatment of 15 months. Conclusions: In this study there may be prolonged survival among responders, which may be due to synergy of sequential BCT, or may reflect single agent activity of each drug. BCT should still be considered as an experimental therapy and further evaluated. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II study of irinotecan and paclitaxel for patients with recurrent small cell lung cancer (SCLC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18011-18011
Author(s):  
T. K. Owonikoko ◽  
S. Ramalingam ◽  
J. Forster ◽  
Y. Shuai ◽  
T. Evans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Stage Design ◽  
Prior Chemotherapy Regimen ◽  
Version 2.0

18011 Background: Recurrent SCLC has a poor prognosis and is devoid of treatment options that improve overall survival. Irinotecan and paclitaxel are both active agents against SCLC, and have synergistic preclinical interactions. We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of irinotecan and paclitaxel for patients with recurrent SCLC. Methods: Patients with SCLC who relapsed following one prior chemotherapy regimen were eligible. Other pertinent inclusion criteria were: ECOG performance status 0–2, adequate bone marrow, hepatic and renal function and willingness to provide informed consent. Patients with untreated brain metastasis were excluded. Paclitaxel (75 mg/m2) and irinotecan (50 mg/m2) were administered on days 1 & 8 of every 3-week cycle. Treatment was continued until progression up to a maximum of 6 cycles or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was response rate. Toxicity was graded by CTC version 2.0. The simon two-stage design was utilized and the estimated sample size was 55 patients (stage I - 23 patients; stage 2 - 32 patients). The study has a 90% power to detect a response rate of 30%, with an alpha error rate of 10%. Results: 55 patients have been enrolled and complete data are available for 32 patients at the time of this report. Patient baseline characteristics are: male 53%, PS 0–44%; PS 1–47% and PS 2–6%. The median age is 61 years. Fifteen patients received ≥ 4 cycles. Salient grades 3–5 toxicities seen: neutropenia (13%), fatigue (13%); diarrhea (3%), hypersensitivity (3%) and hyponatremia (3%).The objective response rate is 37% (95% CI 19%-55%) with 9 PRs and 1 CR. Additional 8 patients (24%) had stable disease. The median survival is 19.6 weeks (95% CI 15.1–29.4) and the 1-year survival rate is 15%. Conclusions: The combination of irinotecan and paclitaxel is well tolerated and has promising anti-cancer activity in recurrent SCLC. Updated data on all 55 patients will be available at the time of the presentation. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

MAVERICC: A randomized phase II study of mFOLFOX6-bevacizumab (BV) versus FOLFIRI-BV with prospective biomarker stratification in previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3635-TPS3635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sachdev P. Thomas ◽  
Suprith Badarinath ◽  
Richard H. Greenberg ◽  
Sang Y. Huh ◽  
Kulumani M Sivarajan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Hepatic Metastases ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Snp Markers ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
The Impact

TPS3635^ Background: The identification of prognostic and predictive biomarkers could significantly improve the risk-benefit ratio and cost-effectiveness of 1st-line mCRC regimens. This is the first prospective study of tumoral ERCC1 (chemo-resistance marker to platinum compounds) and plasma VEGF-A as potential biomarkers for oxaliplatin- and BV-containing regimens, respectively, in an effort to further define the optimal chemotherapy backbone with biologic therapies, including BV, for mCRC. Methods: In this randomized, open-label, global, phase II study, patients (N=360) with histologically or cytologically confirmed CRC and ≥1 measurable metastatic lesion are stratified at screening by tumoral ERCC1 mRNA expression (high vs low, cutoff of 1.7 [ERCC1/β-actin mRNA]). Eligibility criteria include completion of adjuvant therapy >12 months before screening and an ECOG performance status ≤1. Blood samples are collected to quantify plasma VEGF-A levels. Patients within each ERCC1 stratification group are randomized 1:1 to mFOLFOX6-BV or FOLFIRI-BV administered in 2-week cycles. BV will be given at a dose of 5 mg/kg IV q2w. Patients will remain on study treatment until disease progression (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. If oxaliplatin or irinotecan need to be discontinued, BV and 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine are to be continued until PD. The primary objectives are: 1) to assess ERCC1 and VEGF-A as biomarkers of progression-free survival (PFS) for oxaliplatin- and BV-containing regimens in 1st-line mCRC, and 2) within ERCC1 high patients, to test whether FOLFIRI-BV is associated with a prolonged 1st-line PFS compared to mFOLFOX6-BV. Secondary objectives include assessing the impact of these markers on overall survival, objective response, hepatic metastases resection, and safety. Exploratory endpoints include correlative analyses with additional tumor tissue, blood, and SNP markers. The first patient was enrolled in August 2011. An interim biomarker distribution assessment of the first 100 patients is planned, and the evaluation of the primary endpoints is estimated for early 2015. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01374425.

Phase II efficacy and safety study of nintedanib versus sunitinib in previously untreated renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4506-4506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Eisen ◽  
Yaroslav Shparyk ◽  
Robert Jones ◽  
Nicholas James MacLeod ◽  
Graham Temple ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Similar Efficacy ◽  
Qtc Interval ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Interval Change ◽  
First Line Therapy

4506 Background: Sunitinib (S) is established as a standard first-line therapy for patients (pts) with advanced RCC. However, treatment can be limited by the occurrence of drug-related adverse events (AEs). This Phase II study assessed the efficacy and safety of nintedanib (N) – a potent, triple angiokinase inhibitor of VEGFR-1–3, PDGFR-α/β, and FGFR-1–3, as well as RET and Flt3 – vs S in previously untreated pts with RCC. Methods: Ninety-nine eligible pts (96 of whom were treated) with advanced, unresectable/recurrent clear cell RCC, an ECOG performance status of 0–1, and no prior systemic therapy were randomized 2:1 to receive N 200 mg twice daily (n=64; given in 4-week cycles) or S 50 mg once daily (n=32; 4 weeks on, 2 weeks off schedule). Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable drug-related AEs. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival at 9 months (PFS-9) and, in N-treated pts only, QTc interval change (baseline to day 15). Secondary endpoints included PFS, objective response rate (ORR; RECIST 1.1), overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), time to treatment failure (TTF), and AEs. Results: Baseline characteristics were balanced between the arms. PFS-9 was not statistically significantly different between N- and S-treated pts (43 vs 45%; p=0.85). There were also no statistically significant differences between N and S with regard to PFS (median: 8.44 vs 8.38 mo; hazard ratio: 1.16; 95% CI: 0.71–1.89; p=0.56), confirmed ORR (18.8 vs 31.3%; p=0.19), OS (median: 20.37 vs 21.22 mo; p=0.63), TTP (median: 8.48 vs 8.54 mo; p=0.52), and TTF (median: 8.41 vs 8.36 mo; p=0.46). Grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 47% of N-treated pts and 56% of S-treated pts. Common AEs (all grades; N vs S) included diarrhea (61 vs 50%), nausea (38 vs 34%), fatigue (both 25%), and vomiting (16 vs 22%). Dermatologic AEs (8 vs 47%) were less frequent with N than S. There was no increase from baseline in QTc >60 ms on days 1 or 15 in N-treated pts, and there was no relationship between N exposure and QT interval change. Conclusions: N demonstrated similar efficacy to S and had a manageable safety profile, including a lower incidence of dermatologic AEs vs S. In addition, N was not associated with QT prolongation. Clinical trial information: NCT01024920.

A phase II open-label randomized multicenter trial of TSU-68 in combination with S-1 and oxaliplatin versus S-1 in combination with oxaliplatin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 492-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang Joon Shin ◽  
Jeeyun Lee ◽  
Ik-Joo Chung ◽  
Tae Won Kim ◽  
Hoo Geun Chun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Baseline Serum ◽  
Biomarker Analysis ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

492 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Oxaliplatin-based treatment (FOLFOX, CapeOX) combined with bevacizumab is one of the standard chemotherapies for metastatic CRC. However, several clinical studies performed using S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) indicate that SOX is a treatment option for metastatic CRC. TSU-68 (orantinib) is an oral compound that inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor and has promising efficacy and high safety. The recommended phase II dose of TSU-68 plus SOX has been determined in a phase I study. This trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy of TSU-68 in combination with SOX. Methods: We performed an open-label multicenter randomized phase II trial in Korea. Treatment-naive metastatic CRC patients with a performance status 0 or 1 were randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to receive either TSU-68 plus SOX (group A) or SOX (group B). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: We randomized 105 patients (52 patients, group A and 53 patients, group B). Median PFS was 7.0 months in group A (hazard ratio [HR], 1.057) and 7.2 months in group B (P = 0.8401). The most frequent grade 3/4 events were thrombocytopenia (9.6% vs 26.4%), neutropenia (13.5% vs 15.1%), and anemia (3.8% vs 13.2%). We observed a difference between the 2 groups in all grades of anemia (15.4% vs 32.1%), diarrhea (30.8% vs 47.2%), vomiting (50.0% vs 26.4%), and chromaturia (23.1% vs 0.0%). Analysis using a COX proportional hazard model showed that baseline interleukin 6 (IL-6) level was associated with survival benefit of TSU-68 (P = 0.012). Conclusions: TSU-68 plus SOX showed a favorable safety profile. However, TSU-68 did not have a synergistic effect on the efficacy of SOX. Baseline serum IL-6 levels could be prognostic factors for TSU-68 efficacy. Further biomarker analysis is being performed to determine the efficacy of this treatment. Clinical trial information: JapicCTI-111403.

scholarly journals Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Motesanib in Combination with Panitumumab and Gemcitabine-Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced Cancer

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard Burris ◽  
Joe Stephenson ◽  
Gregory A. Otterson ◽  
Mark Stein ◽  
Jesse McGreivy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factor ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Thromboembolic Events ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Venous Thromboembolic Events

Purpose. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and tolerability of motesanib (an orally administered small-molecule antagonist of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2, and 3, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and Kit) when administered in combination with panitumumab, gemcitabine, and cisplatin.Methods. This was an open-label, multicenter phase 1b study in patients with advanced solid tumors with an ECOG performance status ≤1 and for whom a gemcitabine/cisplatin regimen was indicated. Patients received motesanib (0 mg [control], 50 mg once daily [QD], 75 mg QD, 100 mg QD, 125 mg QD, or 75 mg twice daily [BID]) with panitumumab (9 mg/kg), gemcitabine (1250 mg/m2) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2) in 21-day cycles. The primary endpoint was the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs).Results. Forty-one patients were enrolled and received treatment (including 8 control patients). One of eight patients in the 50 mg QD cohort and 5/11 patients in the 125 mg QD cohort experienced DLTs. The maximum tolerated dose was established as 100 mg QD. Among patients who received motesanib (n=33), 29 had motesanib-related adverse events. Fourteen patients had serious motesanib-related events. Ten patients had motesanib-related venous thromboembolic events and three had motesanib-related arterial thromboembolic events, two of which were considered serious. One patient had a complete response and nine had partial responses as their best objective response.Conclusions. The combination of motesanib, panitumumab, and gemcitabine/cisplatin could not be administered consistently and, at the described doses and schedule, may be intolerable. However, encouraging antitumor activity was noted in some cases.

A phase II study of ABT-869 in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): Interim analysis

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4581-4581 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Toh ◽  
P. Chen ◽  
B. I. Carr ◽  
J. J. Knox ◽  
S. Gill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factor ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Tyrosine Kinases ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Phase 2 Trial

4581 Background: ABT-869 is a novel orally active, potent and selective inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet derived growth factor families of receptor tyrosine kinases. Results of an interim analysis of a phase 2 trial of ABT-869 in HCC are presented. Methods: An open-label, multicenter phase II trial (M06–879) of oral ABT-869 at 0.25 mg/kg daily in Child-Pugh A (C-PA) or QOD in Child-Pugh B (C-PB) patients (pts) until progressive disease (PD) or intolerable toxicity, is ongoing. Key eligibility criteria included unresectable or metastatic HCC; up to one prior line of systemic treatment; and at least one measurable lesion by computed tomography (CT) scan. The primary endpoint was the progression free (PF) rate at 16 weeks. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), time to progression (TTP), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). CT scans were assessed centrally and by the investigators; presented results are from central assessment. Results: 44 pts were enrolled from 09/07 to 08/08 at 6 centers internationally, with interim data available for 34 pts. There were 28 C-PA pts (median age, 63.5 y [range, 20- 81]) and 6 C-PB pts (median age, 64.5 y [range, 36–69]) and 73.5% received no prior systemic therapy. For the 19 evaluable C-PA pts included in the per-protocol interim analysis, 8 (42.1%) were progression free at 16 weeks [95% CI 20.3, 66.5]. The estimated ORR was 8.7% [95% CI, 1.1, 28] for the 23 C-PA pts and 0% for the 2 C-PB pts who had at least one post-baseline CT scan reviewed by central imaging. For all 34 pts, median TTP was 112 d [95% CI, 110, -], median PFS was 112 d [95% CI, 61, 168] and median OS was 295 d [95% CI, 182, 333]. The most common adverse events (AEs) for all pts were hypertension (41%), fatigue (47%), diarrhea (38%), rash (35%), proteinuria (24%), vomiting (24%), cough (24%) and oedema peripheral (24%). The most common grade 3/4 AEs for all pts were hypertension (20.6%) and fatigue (11.8%). Most AEs were mild/moderate and reversible with interruption/dose reductions/or discontinuation of ABT-869. Conclusions: ABT-869 appears to benefit HCC patients, with an estimated TTP of 112 days and an acceptable safety profile. Updated results from this ongoing study will be presented. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document