MAVERICC: A randomized phase II study of mFOLFOX6-bevacizumab (BV) versus FOLFIRI-BV with prospective biomarker stratification in previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3635-TPS3635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sachdev P. Thomas ◽  
Suprith Badarinath ◽  
Richard H. Greenberg ◽  
Sang Y. Huh ◽  
Kulumani M Sivarajan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Hepatic Metastases ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Snp Markers ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
The Impact

TPS3635^ Background: The identification of prognostic and predictive biomarkers could significantly improve the risk-benefit ratio and cost-effectiveness of 1st-line mCRC regimens. This is the first prospective study of tumoral ERCC1 (chemo-resistance marker to platinum compounds) and plasma VEGF-A as potential biomarkers for oxaliplatin- and BV-containing regimens, respectively, in an effort to further define the optimal chemotherapy backbone with biologic therapies, including BV, for mCRC. Methods: In this randomized, open-label, global, phase II study, patients (N=360) with histologically or cytologically confirmed CRC and ≥1 measurable metastatic lesion are stratified at screening by tumoral ERCC1 mRNA expression (high vs low, cutoff of 1.7 [ERCC1/β-actin mRNA]). Eligibility criteria include completion of adjuvant therapy >12 months before screening and an ECOG performance status ≤1. Blood samples are collected to quantify plasma VEGF-A levels. Patients within each ERCC1 stratification group are randomized 1:1 to mFOLFOX6-BV or FOLFIRI-BV administered in 2-week cycles. BV will be given at a dose of 5 mg/kg IV q2w. Patients will remain on study treatment until disease progression (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. If oxaliplatin or irinotecan need to be discontinued, BV and 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine are to be continued until PD. The primary objectives are: 1) to assess ERCC1 and VEGF-A as biomarkers of progression-free survival (PFS) for oxaliplatin- and BV-containing regimens in 1st-line mCRC, and 2) within ERCC1 high patients, to test whether FOLFIRI-BV is associated with a prolonged 1st-line PFS compared to mFOLFOX6-BV. Secondary objectives include assessing the impact of these markers on overall survival, objective response, hepatic metastases resection, and safety. Exploratory endpoints include correlative analyses with additional tumor tissue, blood, and SNP markers. The first patient was enrolled in August 2011. An interim biomarker distribution assessment of the first 100 patients is planned, and the evaluation of the primary endpoints is estimated for early 2015. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01374425.

Phase II study of irinotecan and paclitaxel for patients with recurrent small cell lung cancer (SCLC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18011-18011
Author(s):  
T. K. Owonikoko ◽  
S. Ramalingam ◽  
J. Forster ◽  
Y. Shuai ◽  
T. Evans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Stage Design ◽  
Prior Chemotherapy Regimen ◽  
Version 2.0

18011 Background: Recurrent SCLC has a poor prognosis and is devoid of treatment options that improve overall survival. Irinotecan and paclitaxel are both active agents against SCLC, and have synergistic preclinical interactions. We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of irinotecan and paclitaxel for patients with recurrent SCLC. Methods: Patients with SCLC who relapsed following one prior chemotherapy regimen were eligible. Other pertinent inclusion criteria were: ECOG performance status 0–2, adequate bone marrow, hepatic and renal function and willingness to provide informed consent. Patients with untreated brain metastasis were excluded. Paclitaxel (75 mg/m2) and irinotecan (50 mg/m2) were administered on days 1 & 8 of every 3-week cycle. Treatment was continued until progression up to a maximum of 6 cycles or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was response rate. Toxicity was graded by CTC version 2.0. The simon two-stage design was utilized and the estimated sample size was 55 patients (stage I - 23 patients; stage 2 - 32 patients). The study has a 90% power to detect a response rate of 30%, with an alpha error rate of 10%. Results: 55 patients have been enrolled and complete data are available for 32 patients at the time of this report. Patient baseline characteristics are: male 53%, PS 0–44%; PS 1–47% and PS 2–6%. The median age is 61 years. Fifteen patients received ≥ 4 cycles. Salient grades 3–5 toxicities seen: neutropenia (13%), fatigue (13%); diarrhea (3%), hypersensitivity (3%) and hyponatremia (3%).The objective response rate is 37% (95% CI 19%-55%) with 9 PRs and 1 CR. Additional 8 patients (24%) had stable disease. The median survival is 19.6 weeks (95% CI 15.1–29.4) and the 1-year survival rate is 15%. Conclusions: The combination of irinotecan and paclitaxel is well tolerated and has promising anti-cancer activity in recurrent SCLC. Updated data on all 55 patients will be available at the time of the presentation. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A randomized noncomparative phase II study of maintenance therapy with multiepitope vaccine Tedopi (OSE2101) ± nivolumab or FOLFIRI after induction chemotherapy (CT) with FOLFIRINOX in patients (Pts) with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (aPDAC) (TEDOPaM–PRODIGE 63 GERCOR D17-01 study).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS4160-TPS4160
Author(s):  
Cindy Neuzillet ◽  
Vincent Hautefeuille ◽  
Aurélien Lambert ◽  
Marie-Line Garcia-Larnicol ◽  
Dewi Vernerey
Keyword(s):  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Vaccine Antigen ◽  
New Combination ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Open Label

TPS4160 Background: FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil [5FU], folinic acid [FA], irinotecan [Iri], and oxaliplatin [Ox]) is a standard 1st-line treatment in fit Pts with aPDAC. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 as single agents have failed in PDAC so far and new combination immunotherapies are needed. Tedopi (OSE2101) is a multiple neoepitope vaccine restricted to HLA-A2 positive Pts, targeting 5 tumor-associated antigens (CEA, HER2, MAGE2, MAGE3, TP53) that are frequently expressed in PDAC. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of Tedopi alone and in combination with anti-PD-1 nivolumab, or FOLFIRI as maintenance therapy in Pts with aPDAC after FOLFIRINOX induction CT. Methods: TEDOPaM - PRODIGE 63 is a 3-arm, Fleming 2-stage, open-label, randomized, non-comparative phase II study. 156 Pts with locally advanced or metastatic, pathologically proven PDAC; ECOG performance status 0-1; HLA-A2 genotype; controlled disease (objective response or stable disease) after 8 cycles of (modified) FOLFIRINOX; and adequate organ functions, are randomized (1:1:1, stratified on center, tumor stage, and best response to FOLFIRINOX) into 3 arms: Clinical trial information: NCT03806309. In Arms B and C, FOLFIRI is reintroduced at disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint: overall survival rate at M12. Secondary endpoints: progression-free survival (CT-scan Q8W), duration of disease control, safety, objective response rate, RECIST v1.1/iRECIST comparison, HRQoL (EORTC QLQ-C30), Q-TWiST. An interim analysis is planned after inclusion of 20 Pts in each arm. Translational research will be performed on tumor tissue (initial FFPE biopsy and optional re-biopsy at inclusion): RNAseq (cancer and stroma), mutation burden, MMR status, immune infiltrates; and in blood (before and on-treatment): cytokine panel, PBMC phenotyping, vaccine-antigen specific T-cells, TCR repertoire, and extracellular vesicles, to explore biomarkers and pharmacodynamics effects of Tedopi ± nivolumab. Enrollment (12th Feb 2019): 1. ClinicalTrials Registration: NCT03806309.[Table: see text]

Phase II study of afatinib in recurrent and/or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (R/M ESCC) (KCSG HN14-18).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4051-4051
Author(s):  
Min Hee Hong ◽  
Yun-Gyoo Lee ◽  
Hyo Song Kim ◽  
Keon Uk Park ◽  
Hoon-Gu Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Clinical Investigation ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

4051 Background: Afatinib, an irreversible pan-ErbB kinase inhibitor showed anti-tumor activity against esophageal cancer in phase I trial. In this multicenter, open-label, single arm phase II study, we aimed to evaluate the activity and safety of afatinib in R/M ESCC. Methods: Patients (pts) who had ECOG PS 0-2 and had progressed on platinum-based chemotherapy for R/M ESCC were enrolled. Pts were treated with afatinib 40mg/day until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient’s refusal. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1. The estimated sample size was 49, using a two-stage minimax design to evaluate incremental response rate from 5 to 15%. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and safety profile. Additionally, we try to identify biomarker to predict efficacy of afatinib with target capture sequencing and gene expression profile as exploratory endpoints. Results: In a total of 49 enrolled pts (median age 60; range 44 -84), ORR and DCR were 14.3 % and 73.3%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 6.6 months, median PFS and OS was 3.4 months (95% CI 2.2-4.6) and 6.6 months (95% CI 5.2-8.0). Median treatment duration and duration of response were 2.8 months (range, 0.4-15.3) and 7.1 months (range, 2.5-13.9), respectively. Dose reduction and interruption occurred in 19 (38.8%) and 15 (30.6 %) pts. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) occurred in 33 pts (67.3%) with most common TRAEs being diarrhea (n=22, 44.9%) and acneiform rash (n=12, 24.5%). G3-4 TRAEs were rare, occurring in 7 pts (14.3 %). Conclusions: Afatinib demonstrated modest efficacy with manageable toxicity in platinum-resistant R/M ESCC patients. Given the modest response rate, identification of predictive biomarkers is essential for further clinical investigation of afatinib in R/M ESCC. Those biomarkers are being analyzed and will be presented in the conference (NCT02353936). Clinical trial information: NCT02353936. [Table: see text]

Axitinib (AG-013736; AG) in patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell cancer (RCC) refractory to sorafenib

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5032-5032 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. I. Rini ◽  
G. T. Wilding ◽  
G. Hudes ◽  
W. M. Stadler ◽  
S. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Alternative Hypothesis ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Metastatic Rcc

5032 Background: Sunitinib and sorafenib, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of the VEGF and PDGF receptors (VEGFR, PDGFR), are FDA-approved treatments for advanced RCC. AG is a potent inhibitor of VEGFRs 1, 2 & 3 and showed substantial efficacy in a previous phase II study in pts with cytokine-refractory RCC (Rini et al. ASCO 2005). The activity of AG in metastatic RCC patients refractory to prior TKI therapy is of interest. Methods: Pts with sorafenib-refractory RCC were enrolled in this multicenter, open-label, phase II study. Eligibility criteria included measurable disease, ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, controlled CNS metastases (if present) and adequate organ function. All pts received a starting dose of AG 5 mg orally BID, titrated according to tolerance. The primary endpoint was RECIST-defined objective response (OR) with a null hypothesis of OR = 8% versus = 20% under the alternative hypothesis. Pts underwent radiographic staging at baseline and every 8 weeks and were treated until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. Results: All planned 62 pts have been enrolled. Median age of 42 evaluable pts was 60 years (range 35–77); 29 pts (69%) were male; 41 pts (98%) had prior nephrectomy. Median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1–8); all pts had received prior sorafenib and 9 pts also received prior sunitinib. Partial response was observed in 6/42 evaluable pts (14%; 95% CI: 5–29%), stable disease in 15 pts (36%), 12 pts (29%) experienced progressive disease, and 9 pts (21%) withdrew due to adverse events. Overall, 57% of pts experienced some degree of tumor regression. With a median follow-up of 5.3 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached. Preliminary analysis indicates overall median PFS > 7.1 months. No ORs have yet been observed in patients with prior sunitinib treatment, although tumor regression was demonstrated in 55% of pts with median PFS > 6.1 months. Treatment-related grade 3/4 AEs included hypertension (16%), fatigue (14%) and hand foot syndrome (14%). Overall, 36 pts remain on study. Conclusions: AG has substantial antitumor activity in pts with sorafenib-refractory, metastatic RCC. Toxicity is typical of TKI VEGFR inhibitors and generally manageable. [Table: see text]

Tremelimumab in combination with durvalumab in first or second-line mesothelioma patients: Safety analysis from the phase II NIBIT-MESO-1 study.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8558-8558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luana Calabro ◽  
Aldo Morra ◽  
Diana Giannarelli ◽  
Giovanni Amato ◽  
Erica Bertocci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Liver Toxicity ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Safety Analysis ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Ecog Performance Status

8558 Background: The anti-CTLA-4 tremelimumab at two different dose-schedules of administration showed promising activity in second-line malignant mesothelioma (MM) patients (Calabrò et al., Lancet Oncol, 2013; Calabrò et al., Lancet Respir Med, 2015). These initial results and the efficacy of targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis in different tumor types, prompted the NIBIT-MESO-1 study aimed at investigating the efficacy and safety of tremelimumab combined with the anti-PD-L1 durvalumab in mm patients. We report the safety analysis from the fully-enrolled NIBIT-MESO-1 study. Methods: The NIBIT-MESO-1 is a phase II, open-label, single Center study. Forty mm patients received tremelimumab at 1 mg/Kg i.v. every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 4 doses, and durvalumab at 20 mg/Kg i.v. Q4W for 13 doses. Primary objective is immune-related (ir)-objective response rate; secondary are safey, ir-disease control rate, ir-progression free survival, and overall survival. Tumor assessment per ir-modified RECIST or ir-RECIST 1.1 for pleural or peritoneal MM, respectively, was performed at baseline and q12 weeks. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded according to CTC v4.0. (ClinicalTrials.gov Id: NCT02588131). Results: From October 2015 to October 2016, 40 mm patients (38 pleural and 2 peritoneal), median age 64 years (range 41-80), ECOG performance status 0 (n = 19) or 1 (n = 21) were enrolled in the study. mm histology was epithelioid (n = 32), biphasic (n = 5), sarcomatoid (n = 2) or undefined (n = 1). As of January 2017, 12 first or 28 second-line mm patients received a median of 5.5 doses of therapy (range = 1-13). Twenty-four patients (60%) experienced any grade irAEs: 5 patients (12.5%) had grade 3-4 AEs, the most frequent being hepatotoxicity (7.5%). AEs were generally manageable and reversible per protocol guidelines. Three patients (7.5%) were discontinued due to treatment-related AEs (1 trombocytopenia, 1 limbic encephalitis, 1 liver toxicity). Conclusions: The combination of tremelimumab and durvalumab is safe and manageable in mm patients. Clinical trial information: NCT02588131.

SGN-30 (Anti-CD30 mAb) Has a Single-Agent Response Rate of 21% in Patients with Refractory or Recurrent Systemic Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (ALCL).

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2718-2718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andres Forero-Torres ◽  
STeven H. Bernstein ◽  
Ajay Gopal ◽  
Francine Foss ◽  
John P. Leonard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Cutaneous Lesions ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Good Tolerability ◽  
Poor Prognostic Factor

Abstract SGN-30 is a monoclonal antibody directed against the CD30 antigen expressed on some hematologic malignancies. Based on encouraging phase I data, a multicenter phase II study was conducted treating patients with refractory or recurrent CD30-positive ALCL with an ECOG performance status of ≤ 2. Thirty-nine patients (24M, 15F) with ALCL were enrolled, with a median age of 57 (range 23–82) and a median of 3 prior therapies (range 2–5). Nine patients had previously received a stem cell transplant. Eighty-five percent of tumors were negative for ALK, a poor prognostic factor. SGN-30 was administred at 6 mg/kg/wk (90 minute infusion, premedications were not required) for 6 consecutive weeks. After 24 patients were enrolled, the dose was escalated to 12 mg/kg/wk in subsequent patients. (Patients with stable disease or objective response were eligible to receive additional cycles of SGN-30. Five patients received ≥ 2 cycles of SGN-30.) Response assessments, as determined by CT scans, were performed 2 weeks after the last infusion. Best response is shown below: CR PR SD PD Pending Eval ORR *Both CRs have ongoing durations of >365 days; both patients received additional cycles of SGN-30. **PRs had durations of 27, 53, 139 and 167 days; two additional patients have ongoing durations of 86+ and 25+ days. ***Three SDs have ongoing durations of 96+, 365+, and 365+ days. Two additional patients had SD for 71 and 174 days. 2* 6** 5*** 24 2 21% Three drug-related toxicities ≥ Grade 3 were reported (each was considered possibly related to SGN-30): 1) lymphopenia, 2) catheter related infection and 3) urticaria. No other significant hematologic or biochemical toxicities have been observed. There was one definitely related serious adverse event (Grade 2) in a patient who experienced a transient exacerbation of his cutaneous lesions after 2 doses of SGN-30 but achieved a partial response after continuing on study. This phase II study represents one of the largest prospectively designed trials in relapsed/refractory ALCL and demonstrates good tolerability and clinically meaningful antitumor activity of SGN-30, especially in ALK negative patients who have a particularly poor prognosis.

Gefitinib in combination with paclitaxel (P) and carboplatin (C) as second-line therapy for ovarian, tubal or peritoneal adenocarcinoma: Final results of a phase II study

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5566-5566 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Pautier ◽  
F. Joly ◽  
P. Kerbrat ◽  
P. Bougnoux ◽  
P. Fumoleau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Resistant Refractory ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Egfr Expression

5566 Background: High EGFR expression occurs in 35–70% of primary ovarian tumors and is often associated with poor prognosis. This Phase II, open-label, non-comparative multicenter study investigated the efficacy and tolerability of gefitinib (Iressa) in combination with paclitaxel (P) and carboplatin (C) for second-line treatment of patients (pts) with ovarian, tubal or peritoneal adenocarcinoma. Methods: Women (>18 years) with platinum-resistant/refractory (relapsed <6 months after first-line platinum-based and P chemotherapy), or platinum-sensitive (relapsed >6 months) disease were enrolled. Pts received gefitinib (500 mg/day), P (175 mg/m2) and C (AUC 5) every 3 weeks for 6–8 cycles, after which pts could continue to receive gefitinib. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) assessed using RECIST or Rustin criteria. Results: Sixty-eight pts (26 resistant/refractory and 42 sensitive) were enrolled (median age [range]: 57 [34–72] years; ECOG performance status 0/1/2: 41/26/1). ORR and disease control rates were 19.2% and 69.2%, respectively, for resistant/refractory; and 61.9% and 81.0%, respectively, for sensitive pts (see table ). Grade 3/4 toxicities (in =10% pts) were neutropenia (59%), diarrhea (25%), leukopenia (22%), anemia (13%), and acne (13%). Two myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and one acute biphenotypic leukemia were observed during treatment. Another pt developed MDS 34 months after study treatment discontinuation. Conclusions: Gefitinib (Iressa) in combination with P and C has promising activity as second-line treatment for ovarian, tubal or peritoneal adenocarcinoma and is generally well tolerated. The hemopathies are under further investigation. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II study of combination therapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 (DCS) for advanced gastric cancer: (KDOG 0601)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4555-4555
Author(s):  
N. Nakayama ◽  
W. Koizumi ◽  
T. Sasaki ◽  
S. Tanabe ◽  
K. Nishimura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
High Response Rate ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Eligibility Criteria

4555 Background: Our previous phase I study (Oncology 2008, 75:1–7) provided evidence that combination chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 (DCS) is effective and well tolerated in patients with advanced gastric cancer. The present multicenter phase II study was conducted to confirm the efficacy and toxicity of DCS in advanced gastric cancer. Methods: Eligibility criteria included a histologically proved diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma with at least one measurable metastatic lesion, no previous treatment for gastric cancer except for surgery, an ECOG performance status of 0 to 2, and adequate organ function. Docetaxel (40 mg/m2) and cisplatin (70–60 mg/m2) were given intravenously on day 1, and S-1 was given orally at a dose of 40 mg/m2 twice daily from days 1 to day 14 of a 28-day cycle. Patients received a maximum of 6 cycles. Subsequently, patients were given repeated cycles of S-1 plus docetaxel (DS). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate. Results: 59 patients (47 men, 12 women) were enrolled. The median age was 62 (range: 35–75) years. PS 0/1/2 was 40/18/1. The median number of treatment cycles was 7 (DCS 6+DS 1: range, 1–20). Because myeloid suppression and renal dysfunction developed during the study, we lowered the recommended dose of cisplatin from 70 mg/m2 to 60 mg/m2. The dose of cisplatin was 70 mg/m2 in 19 patients and 60 mg/m2 in 40. The overall response rate was 81.3% (48/59; 95% CI, 80.7–91.2). The response rates with cisplatin 70 mg/m2 and 60 mg/m2 were 78.9% (95% CI, 60.5–97.2) and 82.5% (95% CI, 70.7–94.2), respectively. Tumor down-staging was achieved in 9 (18.7%) of the 48 patients who responded to treatment. The median survival time and median progression-free survival were not reached. Grade 3 or 4 major toxicity comprised leukopenia (44.0%), neutropenia (72.8%), anemia (15.2%), febrile neutropenia (13.5%), anorexia (6.7%), nausea (5.1%), vomiting (5.1%), fatigue (1.6%), and diarrhea (5.1%). There was one treatment-related death caused by the perforation of the primary tumor. This patient refused surgery. Conclusions: DCS was a well-tolerated regimen with a high response rate in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Cisplatin at a dose of 60 mg/m2 was considered adequately effective. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II study of dasatinib in the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6022-6022 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. D. Brooks ◽  
B. Glisson ◽  
C. Lu ◽  
A. Sabichi ◽  
F. Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Drug Discontinuation ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Efficacy Parameters

6022 Background: Dasatinib is a potent inhibitor of src-family kinases, ephA2, PDGFR, Abl, and c-kit. A single-center, open-label, phase II trial was conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy of dasatinib in recurrent or metastatic HNSCC. Methods: Pts with measurable disease by RECIST, who received 0 or 1 prior regimen for recurrent or metastatic HNSCC with an ECOG performance status 0–1 and tumor tissue appropriate for IHC and FISH were eligible. Dasatinib 100 mg bid was given for 28-day cycles. Primary endpoints were 12-wk progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). Pts who took at least 1 dose of dasatinib and who died or left study before 12 wks were counted as progressive disease (PD). A 2 stage design, closure after accrual of 15 pts was required if PFS was 45% or less and ORR was 0. Otherwise, planned accrual was 35. Response was assessed at 4 and 12 wks. PK was studied in pts receiving dasatinib per PEG. Biomarkers relevant to Src pathway were planned in tissue and blood. Results: Fifteen pts were accrued. To date, 13 pts are evaluable for response, and 15 pts for toxicity. No grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities were noted. Grade 2–4 nonhematologic toxicities(n): pleural effusion(2), nausea/vomiting(2), dehydration(1), diarrhea(1), dyspnea(1). Toxicity led to hospitalization of 4 pts and drug discontinuation in 5 pts. ORR was 0. One pt was stable at 12 wks (PFS: 7.6%). This pt stopped drug at 15 wks due to toxicity, but also had PD. One pt died on study and cause was deemed unlikely related. Conclusions: Dosed at 100mg bid, dasatinib led to a characteristic toxicity profile in this pt population. Rates of hospitalization and discontinuation for toxicity were fairly high. Final efficacy parameters are pending evaluation of 2 pts. Evaluation of PK and tissue/blood biomarkers is ongoing. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

TRICC-c: BIBF 1120 versus placebo in patients receiving oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil and leucovorin (mFOLFOX6) for advanced, chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)—A multicenter, randomized phase II trial in progress.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3636-TPS3636
Author(s):  
Andreas Berger ◽  
Thomas Ettrich ◽  
Angela Marten ◽  
Thomas Seufferlein
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Survival Duration ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Double Blind

TPS3636 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in western countries. With advances in the treatment of metastatic CRC (mCRC) in the last decade using combination chemotherapy and bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody against the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), progression free survival (PFS) in first and second line setting was substantially improved. Tumour angiogenesis is also driven by other factors but VEGF including Platelet Derived Growth Factor (PDGF) and Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF). BIBF1120 is a potent, orally available triple angiokinase inhibitor that blocks the receptor tyrosine kinase activity of human VEGFR1-3, FGFR1 and -3 and PDGFRα and -β. Thus, BIBF1120 could be an exciting addition to the treatment of patients with chemorefractory CRC. Methods: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase II trial of BIBF1120 (orally, 200 mg, bid, d1-d14, Arm A) vs. placebo (Arm B) in patients receiving mFOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m2, fluorouracil, 400 mg/m2 bolus and 2400 mg/m2 over 46 h, leucovorin, 200 mg/m2) q14 d for patients (ECOG performance status 0-1) with chemorefractory mCRC who received one prior line of chemotherapy. Scheduled are 90 patients per treatment arm. Primary endpoint: PFS, Secondary endpoints: objective response, overall survival, duration of overall response, safety. Additionally there will be an explorative analysis of predictive biomarkers for BIBF1120. 4 of planned 180 patients have been enrolled. We expect the last patient out in June 2013. (Trial identifier: NCT01362361.)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document