Sequential epirubicin-docetaxel-CMF as adjuvant therapy of early breast cancer: Results of the Taxit216 multicenter phase III trial
LBA520 Background: Docetaxel is among the most active drugs for advanced breast cancer and it has recently shown efficacy in the adjuvant setting too. This trial is aimed at comparing the efficacy and tolerability of a sequential approach of a chemotherapy combination regimen containing docetaxel to a standard anthracycline-based regimen as adjuvant therapy in node-positive (N+) early breast cancer. Methods: Between July 1998 and July 2002, 972 N+ early breast cancer patients were randomized to either arm A (E→CMF): Epirubicin (E) 120 mg/m2 iv d1 q21 × 4 cycles followed by Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 iv, Methotrexate 40 mg/m2 iv and Fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 iv (CMF) d1,8 q28 × 4 cycles; or armB (E→T→CMF) in which Docetaxel 100 mg/m2 iv (T) d1 q21 × 4 cycles was administered after the 4th cycle of E and before the 1st cycle of CMF. Treatment allocation was performed by a computer program using a dynamic balancing algorithm. Balancing factors were: center, lymph node involvement (1 to 3, 4 to 9, >10), estrogen receptor status (negative/positive/unknown), menopausal status (pre/post). During chemotherapy pts were subjected to physical examination and blood chemistry tests every 3 wks, hematology was repeated weekly. At the completion of treatment pts were followed up every 3 months for the first 2 years, every 6 months for years 3–5 and every 12 months for years 6–10. Primary endpoint was disease free survival (DFS) and secondary endpoints were tolerability and overall survival (OS). The study was designed to detect a hazard ratio of 0.70, assuming an α of 0.05 (two sided), a power of 0.80 and an expected DFS in Arm A of 0.65 at 5 years. This required 480 pts per Arm and 250 events. Results: As of March 27th 2006, 486 pts were enrolled in arm A and 486 in arm B, 252 primary events were recorded and the median follow up was 53 months. DFS at 5 years was 0.67 in arm A vs 0.74 in arm B with an estimated Hazard Ratio (HR) of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.62–1.03, p = 0.079). After adjustement by predefined balancing factors (ER, Nodal and menopausal status) the HR was 0.78 (95% CIs: 0.61–1.00; p = 0.05). As for OS, 117 deaths were observed with HR of 0.74 (95% CIs: 0.51–1.07, p = 0.10). Conclusions: Sequential E→T→CMF yields a borderline significant improvement of DFS. Follow up update is still ongoing. [Table: see text]