Phase III study of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel or docetaxel given every 3 weeks or weekly in operable breast cancer: Results of Intergroup Trial E1199

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 516-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Sparano ◽  
M. Wang ◽  
S. Martino ◽  
V. Jones ◽  
E. Perez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Grade 3

516 Background: Evidence suggests that docetaxel is more effective than paclitaxel, and paclitaxel is more effective when given weekly than every 3 weeks in metastatic breast cancer (BC). Methods: Eligibility included axillary lymph node positive or high-risk (tumor at least 2 cm) node-negative BC. All patients received 4 cycles of AC (doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2) every 3 weeks, followed by either: (1) paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 every 3 weeks × 4 (P3), (2) paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 weekly × 12 (P1), (3) docetaxel 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks × 4 (D3), or (4) docetaxel 35 mg/m2 weekly × 12 (D1). The primary comparisons included taxane (P vs. D) and schedule (every 3 weeks vs. weekly), and secondary comparisons included P3 vs. other arms. The trial had 86% power to detect a 17.5% decrease in disease-free survival (DFS) for either primary comparison, and 80% power to detect a 22% decrease for the secondary comparisons (2-sided nomimal 5% level tests corrected for multiple comparisons). Results: A total of 4,950 eligible patients were accrued. There was no difference in the primary comparisons afer 856 DFS events and 483 deaths after a median follow-up of 46.5 months at the 4th interim analysis ( www.sabcs.org , abstract 48). This is the final pre-specified analysis for the primary comparisons after 1,042 DFS events and 650 deaths (with 1,020 DFS events at this time, to be updated at the meeting). After a median followup of 60.2 months, there remains no significant difference in the hazard ratio (HR) for the taxane (1.02; p=0.73) or schedule (1.07; p=0.30) (as in the first analysis). In secondary comparisons of the standard arm (P3) with the other arms (HR > 1 favoring the experimental arms), the HRs were 1.30 (p = 0.003) for arm P1, 1.24 (p=0.02) for arm D3, and 1.09 (p=0.33) for arm D1. Analysis of interaction by hormone-receptor status will be presented. The incidence of worst grade toxicity (grade 3/4) was 24%/6% for arm P3, 24%/3% for arm P1, 21%/50% for arm D3, and 38%/6% for arm D1. Conclusions: There were no differences in DFS when comparing taxane or schedule overall. DFS was significantly improved in the weekly paclitaxel and every 3-week docetaxel arms compared with the every 3-week paclitaxel arm. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals 15-year Follow-up of Comparing Mastoscopic and Conventional Axillary Dissection in Breast Cancer: A Multicentres, Randomized Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chengyu Luo ◽  
Guang Cao ◽  
wenbin Guo ◽  
Jie Yang ◽  
Qiuru Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Disease Free

Abstract Backgroud: Longer follow-up was necessary to testify the exact value of mastoscopic axillary lymph node dissection (MALND).Methods：From January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2005,1027 patients with operable breast cancer were randomly assigned to two groups: MALND and CALND. 996 eligible patients were enrolled. The end points are disease free survival and overall survival.Results：The final cohort of 996 patients was followed for an average of 184 months. The distribution of all events was fairly similar between two groups of patients. The incidence of local in-breast events did not differ in a significant manner between two cohorts. Similarly, the rate of distant metastases was not significantly different with 30.0% in MLND and 32.6% in CALND. And no significant difference was observed in other primary tumor between two groups (p=0.46). Patients who remain alive with no event comprise a total of 37.2% in MALND and 35.4% in CALND. Other primary cancers and deaths from other causes were distributed equally between two groups. The 15-year disease-free survival rates were41.1 percent for the MALND group and 39.6 percent for the CALND group (p=0.79). MALND was found to be not inferior for overall survival (P =0.54). The 15-year overall survival rates were 49.5 percentafter MALND and 51.2 percentafter CALND (p=0.86). Probability of overall survival was not significantly different between two groups.Conclusions：MALND does not increase unfavorable events, and also does not affect the long-term survival of patients. Therefore, MALND should be one of the preferred approaches for breast cancer surgery.

scholarly journals Concurrent Doxorubicin Plus Docetaxel Is Not More Effective Than Concurrent Doxorubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide in Operable Breast Cancer With 0 to 3 Positive Axillary Nodes: North American Breast Cancer Intergroup Trial E 2197

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (25) ◽  
pp. 4092-4099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lori J. Goldstein ◽  
Anne O'Neill ◽  
Joseph A. Sparano ◽  
Edith A. Perez ◽  
Lawrence N. Shulman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Operable Breast Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Negative Tumor ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Disease Free

PurposeThe combination of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) is a standard adjuvant regimen. Doxorubicin and docetaxel (AT) is one of the most active cytotoxic regimens for metastatic breast cancer. The purpose of this trial was to determine whether adjuvant AT improved disease-free survival compared with AC in operable breast cancer.Patients and MethodsWomen with invasive breast cancer were eligible if there were one to three positive lymph nodes or if the node-negative tumor was greater than 1 cm. Patients were randomly assigned after surgery to receive doxorubicin (60 mg/m2) plus either cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2; AC) or docetaxel (60 mg/m2; AT) given every 3 weeks for four cycles, followed by hormone therapy for patients with estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR)–positive tumors.ResultsThere were 2,882 eligible patients enrolled. After a median follow-up of 79.5 months, there was no significant difference in disease-free survival (DFS; 85% in both arms) or overall survival (91% v 92%) at 5 years. The hazard ratio for AC versus AT was 1.02 (95% CI for DFS, 0.86 to 1.22; P = .78). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified stratification factors by ER and PR expression there were trends toward improved DFS for AT in ER/PR-negative disease. Grade 3 neutropenia associated with fever or infection occurred more often with AT (26% v 10%; P < .05).ConclusionAT did not improve DFS or overall survival in this population, and was associated with more toxicity.

scholarly journals Rationale and description of a lifestyle intervention programme to achieve moderate weight loss in women with non-metastatic breast cancer: the lifestyle intervention part of the SUCCESS C Study

2020 ◽  
pp. bmjnph-2020-000119
Author(s):  
Dagmar Hauner ◽  
Brigitte Rack ◽  
Thomas Friedl ◽  
Philip Hepp ◽  
Wolfgang Janni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Lifestyle Intervention ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Intervention Programme ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Free

ObjectiveThere is growing evidence from observational studies that lifestyle factors such as obesity, an unhealthy diet and lack of physical activity are associated with poor long-term outcome in women with breast cancer. The primary objective of the lifestyle modification part of the Simultaneous Study of Docetaxel Based Anthracycline Free Adjuvant Treatment Evaluation, as well as Life Style Intervention Strategies (SUCCESS C) Trial is to investigate the effect of an individualised lifestyle intervention programme aiming at moderate weight loss on disease-free survival in women with HER2/neu-negative breast cancer. Secondary objectives include the effect of the intervention on body weight, cardiovascular risk and quality of life.MethodsThe SUCCESS C Trial is an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled phase III study using a 2×2 factorial design in women with newly diagnosed HER2/neu-negative intermediate-risk to high-risk breast cancer. The first randomisation served to compare disease-free survival in patients treated with two different chemotherapy regimens (3642 participants). The second randomisation served to compare disease-free survival in patients with a body mass index of 24–40 kg/m² (2292 participants) receiving either a telephone-based individualised lifestyle intervention programme for moderate weight loss or general recommendations for a healthy lifestyle for 2 years. Outcome analyses will be conducted after 5 years of follow-up.PerspectiveThis study will provide information on the efficacy and safety of a comprehensive lifestyle intervention programme on disease-free survival in a large cohort of women with breast cancer. EU Clinical Trials Identifier: 2008-005453-38.

Adjuvant CAF versus AC followed by paclitaxel for operable breast cancer with 4 or more involved axillary lymph nodes: Retrospective analysis

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10610-10610
Author(s):  
J. Ahn ◽  
S. Kim ◽  
B. Son ◽  
S. Ahn ◽  
W. Kim
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Axillary Lymph Nodes ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
Node Positive ◽  
Axillary Nodes ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

10610 Background: Recently, adjuvant AC followed by paclitaxel has improved disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS) of node-positive breast cancer. Although adjuvant TAC, as compared with FAC, significantly improves DFS and OS rate in node-positive breast cancer, AC→T has not been yet compared with FAC. Since 2001, we discussed the options of adjuvant CAF versus AC→T with patients who had 4 or more positive axillary nodes. We evaluated the efficacies of adjuvant CAF and AC→T, retrospectively. Methods: Between September 2001 and July 2004, a total of 1,394 patients underwent surgery and received adjuvant chemotherapy. Among them, 253 (18.1%) patients had 4 or more than axillary nodes and received either six cycles of CAF (n = 116) or 4 cycles of AC→T) (n = 137). The medical records and pathologic data of these patients were reviewed, retrospectively. Results: Median age of all patients was 46 years (range, 22∼76 years). The two groups were well balanced in terms of demographic and tumor characteristics. With a median follow-up period of 24 months (range, 6∼90 months), 49 (19.4%) patients had disease recurrence including 27 (23.3%) in CAF group and 22 (16.1%) in AC→T group (p = 0.155). The 3 year-DFS rate was 68.3% in CAF group and 71.1% in AC→T group (p = 0.9366), and the estimated 3-year OS rate was 90.3% and 92.3%, respectively (p = 0.8237). There was no significant difference in 3-year DFS rate according to hormone-receptor status. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 11 (9.6%) patients in CAF group and 7 (5.1%) patients in AC→T group (p = 0.222). Conclusion: Our data suggest that there is no significant difference in DFS or OS rates between six cycles of CAF and 4 cycles of AC followed by 4 cycles of paclitaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with 4 or more than involved axillary nodes. However, long-term follow-up period and prospective studies are needed to define better regimen. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Gemcitabine plus docetaxel versus docetaxel in patients (pts) with HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC): A randomized phase III study

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1015-1015
Author(s):  
D. L. Nielsen ◽  
S. T. Langkjer ◽  
K. Bjerre ◽  
S. Cold ◽  
L. Stenbygaard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Her 2 ◽  
Grade 3

1015 Background: Gemcitabine (G), either as a single agent or in combination with taxanes, has demonstrated efficacy in MBC in phase II and III studies. We conducted a phase III study to compare time to progression (TTP) of G plus docetaxel (T) versus (vs.) T alone. The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and toxicity. Methods: Females with HER-2-negative locally advanced or MBC and a WHO performance status ≤ 2 were randomized to GT (G 1,000mg/m2 day 1 + 8; T 75mg/m2 day 1) or T (100mg/m2 day 1) every 21 days. Pts were previously untreated, had prior anthracycline-based (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy or had received a single prior anthracycline-bsed chemotherapy regimen for MBC. Time-to-event endpoints were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was applied for comparisons between regimens. The planned sample size was 254 evaluable pts with α I and β of 0.05 and 0.90, respectively. Results: A total of 336 pts were randomized (170 GT; 166 T), data from one centre are yet missing and the present evaluation is based on data from 306 pts (155 GT; 151 T). The pts had a median age of 58 years in both regimens; range 36–73 years and 30–74 years, respectively. The median TTP was 7.5 months for the GT regimen vs. 6.5 months for the T regimen. The GT arm demonstrated an ORR of 44% vs. 38% in the T arm with 4 and 3 % complete responses, respectively. The OS was 13.4 vs. 13.2 months in the GT and T arm, respectively. Hematologic toxicity was common, especially grade 3–4 neutropenia (GT = 69%; T = 61%); infection was reported in 22 and 20% of the pts, respectively (none of the pts received G-CSF). The most commonly reported non-hematologic toxicities of grade 3–4 included mucositis (GT = 2%; T = 5%), diarrhea (GT = 4%; T = 7 %), fatigue (GT = 6%; T = 11%), oedema (GT = 10%; T = 3%), and peripheral neuropathy (GT = 9%; T = 28%). Conclusions: Preliminary data of GT as first- or second-line chemotherapy demonstrates a TTP advantage among HER-2-negative pts with advanced breast cancer. Updated results and proper statistical analyses will be presented. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

10-yr follow-up results of NSABP B-32, a randomized phase III clinical trial to compare sentinel node resection (SNR) to conventional axillary dissection (AD) in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1000-1000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas B. Julian ◽  
Stewart J. Anderson ◽  
David N. Krag ◽  
Seth P. Harlow ◽  
Joseph P. Costantino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Absolute Difference ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
M Estimates

1000 Background: NSABP B-32, the largest surgical prospective randomized phase III trial was designed to compare overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and morbidity between SNR alone vs SNR + AD in SN negative (-) pts. We present 10 yr outcome data for primary endpoints as well as updated data on the effect of occult metastases, found later in the SN by central, detailed pathologic analysis. Methods: 5,611 women with operable, clinically N0, invasive breast cancer were randomized to SNR + AD (Group [Grp] 1) or to SNR alone with AD only if SNs were positive (Grp2). 3,989 (71.1%) of 5,611 pts were SN-. 3,986 (99.9%) of these SN- pts had follow-up information: Grp 1: 1,975, Grp 2:2,011. Median time on study was 9.4 yrs. Cox proportional hazard models adjusting for study stratification variables were used to compare OS and DFS between the two groups. Two-sided p values were used. HR values > 1 indicate a more favorable outcome in Grp 1 Results: At 10 yrs, there continues to be no significant difference in OS between the two groups (HR: 1.11, p = 0.27). 10 yr Kaplan-Meier (K-M) estimates for OS are 87.8% for SNR alone and 88.9% for SNR + AD. There continues to be no significant difference in DFS between the two groups (HR: 1.01, p=0.92). 10-yr K-M estimates for DFS were 76.9% for both groups. Occult nodal disease was originally detected in 3,884 pts (15.8%) with SN- on initial H and E analysis. Comparisons between the groups with and without occult disease yielded an adjusted HR for OS: 1.25 (p = 0.08) with an absolute difference at 10 yrs of 2.8% and a HR for DFS: 1.24 (p = 0.018) with an absolute difference of 4.1%. The cumulative incidences of local-regional events were low (10-yr values: SNR 4.0%, SNR+AD, 4.3%) and not significant (HR: 0.95, p = 0.77). Conclusions: At 10 yrs there continues to be no significant differences in OS and DFS between SNR and SNR + AD in pts with negative SN. The relative increase in risk of DFS and OS for pts with occult SN metastases remains stable. Support: PHS grants: NSABP: U10CA-12027, U10CA-37377, U10CA-69651, U10CA-69974; VT Ca Cntr: P30 CA22435; DNK: 5RO1CA074137 NCI Dpt HHS. Clinical trial information: NCT00003830.

Adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 after curative treatment in patients with head and neck cancer (ACTS-HNC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6004-6004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takahide Taguchi ◽  
Akira Kubota ◽  
Kunitoshi Yoshino ◽  
Kichinobu Tomita ◽  
Naoyuki Kohno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Curative Treatment ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
End Point ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
P 16 ◽  
Grade 3

6004 Background: To establish the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 (tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium) after curative treatment in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), we conducted a randomized phase III study to investigate whether S-1 is superior to UFT (uracil/tegafur). Methods: Patients with SCCHN who had received curative treatment and were confirmed to be tumor-free were randomly assigned to receive UFT (300 or 400 mg/day for 1 year) or S-1 (80, 100, or 120 mg/day for 1 year). The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary end points were overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and safety. We estimated that 500 patients were needed to establish the primary end point. Results: From April 2006 through November 2008, a total of 526 patients (262 assigned to UFT; 264 assigned to S-1) were enrolled. The 3-year DFS rate was 66.0% in the UFT group and 64.1% in the S-1 group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 1.16; [log-rank], P = .34). The 3-year OS rate was 75% in the UFT group and 82.9% in the S-1 group (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.94; [log-rank], P = .022). The 3-year RFS rate was 63.6% in the UFT group and 68.2% in the S-1 group (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.09; [log-rank], P = .16). There were no significant differences in 3-year DFS or RFS; however, the 3-year OS was significantly better in the S-1 group. The incidence of the following grade 3 or 4 events was significantly higher in the S-1 group: oral mucositis/stomatitis (2.4%), leukopenia (5.2%), neutropenia (3.6%), and thrombocytopenia (5.0%). Conclusions: S-1 was not demonstrated to be superior to UFT in terms of 3-year DFS; however, 3-year OS was significantly better with S-1 than with UFT. Clinical trial information: NCT00336947.

Paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus paclitaxel plus epirubicin as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer: Efficacy and safety results of a randomized, phase III trial.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1087-1087
Author(s):  
Zhongsheng Tong ◽  
Shufen Li ◽  
Yehui Shi ◽  
Xu Wang ◽  
Chen Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference

1087 Background: Paclitaxel/carboplatin combinations are highly active in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We conducted a randomized, phase III, non-inferiority trial comparing paclitaxel/carboplatin (TP) with paclitaxel/epirubicin (TE) as first-line therapy for MBC. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary efficacy endpoint. Secondary endpoints included response rate, overall survival, tolerability, and quality of life (QoL). Methods: From June 2009 to January 2015, 231 patients were randomly assigned, 115 of whom were randomized to TP and 116 to TE. Baseline characteristics were relatively well-balanced in the two treatments. Results: After a median follow-up of 29 months, no significant difference was observed between the two treatments in objective response rate (ORR) (38.3% vs. 39.7%, respectively). Both the progression-free survival (p=0.158) and overall survival (p=0.369) were very similar between the two treatments. Both regimens were well tolerated. The main toxicities were myelosuppression, gastrointestinal reactions, and alopecia. TP showed higher grades 3–4 alopecia and higher nausea (p<0.05). TE showed higher incidence of myelosuppression than TP (p<0.05) (Table). Those patients whose epirubicin cumulative dose was more than 1000 mg/m2 did not suffer worse cardiotoxicity. Conclusions: Our study suggests that TP arm is an effective therapeutic alternative for patients with MBC, especially in those previously exposed to epirubicin in the adjuvant setting. TP has some advantages, such as less cost and less side effects (myelosuppression and fatigue). Clinical trial information: NCT02207361. [Table: see text]

Phase III Trial of Concurrent or Sequential Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy After Conservative Surgery for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Final Results of the ARCOSEIN Trial

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 405-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alain Toledano ◽  
David Azria ◽  
Pascal Garaud ◽  
Alain Fourquet ◽  
Daniel Serin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Locoregional Recurrence ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Treatment Protocol ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference

Purpose In 1996, we initiated the French multicenter phase III randomized trial to compare the effect on disease-free survival (DFS) of concurrent versus sequential chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery for stages I and II breast cancer. This report presents the clinical results with a median follow-up of 60 months. Patients and Methods Between February 1996 and April 2000, 716 patients were entered onto this trial. Adjuvant treatment began within 6 weeks after surgery. Sequential treatment of CT administered first followed by RT was compared with concurrent treatment of CT administered with RT. The CT regimen consisted of mitoxantrone (12 mg/m2), fluorouracil (500 mg/m2), and cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2) on day 1, and it was repeated every 21 days for six courses. RT was delivered to the breast and, when indicated, to the regional lymphatics. Results There was no statistically significant difference in treatment in the 5-year DFS (80% in both groups; P = .83), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS; 92% in sequential v 95% in concurrent; P = .76), metastasis-free survival (87% in sequential v 84% in concurrent; P = .55), or overall survival (90% in sequential v 91% in concurrent; P = .76). Nevertheless, in the node-positive subgroup, the 5-year LRFS was statistically better in the concurrent arm (97% in concurrent v 91% in sequential; P = .02), corresponding to a risk of locoregional recurrence decreased by 39% (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.93). Conclusion This treatment protocol remains an appealing clinical option for many women with operable breast cancer at a high risk of recurrence. Combination treatments with new drugs for breast cancer are warranted.

Safety and effectiveness of dose dense neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II/III breast cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11566-e11566
Author(s):  
S. Koya ◽  
Y. Li ◽  
S. A. McDaniel ◽  
A. F. LoBuglio ◽  
H. Krontiras ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Axillary Lymph Nodes ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Dense

e11566 Background: NSABP B-18 randomized women with operable breast cancer to receive chemotherapy (AC) either pre- or postoperatively; in the study there was no significant difference in disease free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS) among patients in either group. Pathologic complete response rate (pCR) was directly proportional to DFS and OS. Dose dense adjuvant chemotherapy (ATC) has shown a statistically significant improvement in DFS and OS. Methods: We performed a single institution review of pts enrolled in a neoadjuvant trial and who received dose dense neoadjuvant chemotherapy (doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 IV Q2wks x4, paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 IV Q2wks x4, and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 IV Q2wks x4) to assess response rates, safety, and DFS. Women with newly diagnosed breast cancer, T ≥ 3cm, any N, M0 were enrolled. Results: Since 02/2003, 43 pts were enrolled (mean age 47.6, range 28–64) and received dose dense chemotherapy. 41.4% of the pts were triple negative and 14.6% were Her2+ by FISH or IHC. The median follow-up is 49 months (range 8–69). Two patients dropped out without finishing therapy. Forty one pts completed dose dense chemotherapy and proceeded to surgery. 17 pts (41.4%) achieved a pCR in the breast and of those 14 pts were also negative in the axillary lymph nodes (34.1% pCR in the breast and lymph nodes). 10 of the 17 pts with pCR in the breast (8 out of the 14 pts with pCR in breast and axillary lymph nodes) were triple negative. 18 pts (43.9%) achieved PR, 3 pts (7.31%) had SD and 3 pts (7.31%) had PD. Up to November 2008, 7 pts who did not have a pCR have relapsed (4 triple negative, 1 Her2+, 1 ER/PR positive and 1 ER negative, PR positive) with a relapsed free survival rate of 85%. Hematologic toxicity consisted of grade 3 anemia in 2 patients with no grade 4 anemia, no G4 thrombocytopenia and febrile neutropenia in 2 pts. Non-hematologic grade 3 or 4 toxicity consisted of mediport thrombosis in 2 pts, hyperglycemia in 2 pts, syncope in 1 pt, neuropathy in 1 pt, and varicella zoster in 1 pt. Conclusions: Our results show that dose dense neoadjuvant chemotherapy achieves a pCR (breast + node) in about 1/3 of patients (34%) with tolerable toxicity; although the number of patients is limited, our data suggest that triple negative breast cancer seems to be the most sensitive tumor to this regimen. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document