EPIC: Phase III Trial of Cetuximab Plus Irinotecan After Fluoropyrimidine and Oxaliplatin Failure in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (14) ◽  
pp. 2311-2319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto F. Sobrero ◽  
Joan Maurel ◽  
Louis Fehrenbacher ◽  
Werner Scheithauer ◽  
Yousif A. Abubakr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Severe Toxicity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Post Trial

PurposeTo determine whether adding cetuximab to irinotecan prolongs survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) previously treated with fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin.Patients and MethodsThis multicenter, open-label, phase III study randomly assigned 1,298 patients with epidermal growth factor receptor–expressing mCRC who had experienced first-line fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin treatment failure to cetuximab (400 mg/m2day 1 followed by 250 mg/m2weekly) plus irinotecan (350 mg/m2every 3 weeks) or irinotecan alone. Primary end point was overall survival (OS); secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), and quality of life (QOL).ResultsMedian OS was comparable between treatments: 10.7 months (95% CI, 9.6 to 11.3) with cetuximab/irinotecan and 10.0 months (95% CI, 9.1 to 11.3) with irinotecan alone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.975; 95% CI, 0.854 to 1.114; P = .71). This lack of difference may have been due to post-trial therapy: 46.9% of patients assigned to irinotecan eventually received cetuximab (87.2% of those who did, received it with irinotecan). Cetuximab added to irinotecan significantly improved PFS (median, 4.0 v 2.6 months; HR, 0.692; 95% CI, 0.617 to 0.776; P ≤ .0001) and RR (16.4% v 4.2%; P < .0001), and resulted in significantly better scores in the QOL analysis of global health status (P = .047). Cetuximab did not exacerbate toxicity, except for acneform rash, diarrhea, hypomagnesemia, and associated electrolyte imbalances. Neutropenia was the most common severe toxicity across treatment arms.ConclusionCetuximab and irinotecan improved PFS and RR, and resulted in better QOL versus irinotecan alone. OS was similar between study groups, possibly influenced by the large number of patients in the irinotecan arm who received cetuximab and irinotecan poststudy.

Addition of Aflibercept to Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Irinotecan Improves Survival in a Phase III Randomized Trial in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Previously Treated With an Oxaliplatin-Based Regimen

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (28) ◽  
pp. 3499-3506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
Josep Tabernero ◽  
Radek Lakomy ◽  
Hans Prenen ◽  
Jana Prausová ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
The United States ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Survival Times ◽  
Previously Treated

Purpose Treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) commonly involves a fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy regimen such as infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) or fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin, often combined with bevacizumab or an epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody. We studied the effect of adding the novel antiangiogenic agent aflibercept (also known as ziv-aflibercept in the United States) to FOLFIRI in patients with mCRC previously treated with oxaliplatin, including patients who received prior bevacizumab. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned to receive aflibercept (4 mg/kg intravenously; 612 patients) or placebo (614 patients) every 2 weeks in combination with FOLFIRI. Treatment was administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was overall survival. Results Adding aflibercept to FOLFIRI significantly improved overall survival relative to placebo plus FOLFIRI (hazard ratio [HR], 0.817; 95.34% CI, 0.713 to 0.937; P = .0032) with median survival times of 13.50 versus 12.06 months, respectively. Aflibercept also significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS; HR, 0.758; 95% CI, 0.661 to 0.869; P < .0001), with median PFS times of 6.90 versus 4.67 months, respectively. The effects on overall survival and PFS exhibited a consistent trend across prespecified subgroup analyses, including bevacizumab pretreated patients. Response rate was 19.8% (95% CI, 16.4% to 23.2%) with aflibercept plus FOLFIRI compared with 11.1% (95% CI, 8.5% to 13.8%) with placebo plus FOLFIRI (P = .0001). Adverse effects reported with aflibercept combined with FOLFIRI included the characteristic anti–vascular endothelial growth factor effects and also reflected an increased incidence of some chemotherapy-related toxicities. Conclusion Aflibercept in combination with FOLFIRI conferred a statistically significant survival benefit over FOLFIRI combined with placebo in patients with mCRC previously treated with oxaliplatin.

AGENT: An open-label phase III study of arfolitixorin versus leucovorin in modified FOLFOX-6 for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS268-TPS268
Author(s):  
Heinz-Josef Lenz ◽  
Peter Gibbs ◽  
Sebastian Stintzing ◽  
Gerald W. Prager ◽  
Peter Nygren ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metabolic Activation ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

TPS268 Background: 5-fluorouracil (5FU), in combination with folates, is an established cornerstone of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment. All folates currently approved for mCRC need to be metabolically activated to [6R]-5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolic acid ([6R]-MTHF), the active thymidylate synthase co-substrate that potentiates the effect of 5FU. Arfolitixorin does not require multi-step metabolic activation, and may produce higher, and less inter- and intraindividually variable, concentrations of [6R]-MTHF than leucovorin. Methods: The phase III AGENT trial (NCT03750786) is a randomized, multicenter, parallel-group study comparing the efficacy of arfolitixorin versus leucovorin in mCRC patients treated with first-line 5FU, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab. Patients are randomized (1:1) to the investigational arm (arfolitixorin + 5FU + oxaliplatin [ARFOX] + bevacizumab) or the comparator arm (leucovorin + 5FU + oxaliplatin [modified FOLFOX-6] + bevacizumab), and treated until disease progression based on RECIST 1.1 criteria. Recruitment is ongoing, and aims to randomize 440 patients in 18 months. Eligibility criteria include non-resectable mCRC; eligibility for 5FU, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab therapy; ECOG PS 0 or 1. The study will be conducted across approximately 100 sites in Australia, Austria, Canada, France, Germany, Greece, Japan, Spain, Sweden, and USA. The primary endpoint is objective response rate. Key secondary endpoints are progression-free survival and duration of response. Additional secondary endpoints include overall survival, quality of life, safety and tolerability, and number of patients undergoing curative metastasis resection. A translational program will evaluate expression levels of several folate metabolism- and transportation-related genes in mCRC tumor biopsies to determine their relationship to treatment outcome. A broad array of genes will analyzed, including ATP-binding cassette C3 (ABCC3) transporter, methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase 2 (MTHFD2), proton-coupled folate transporter (PCFT), and serine hydroxymethyltransferase 1 (SHMT1). Interim data are expected in mid 2020. Clinical trial information: NCT03750786.

scholarly journals Bevacizumab in combination with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 14 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. 47-53
Author(s):  
S Whyte ◽  
A Pandor ◽  
M Stevenson ◽  
A Rees
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Absolute Difference ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Study ◽  
Free Survival

This paper presents a summary of the evidence review group (ERG) report into the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab in combination with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer based on the manufacturer’s submission to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) as part of the single technology appraisal (STA) process. Evidence was available in the form of one phase III, multicentre, multinational, randomised, open-label study (NO16966 trial). This two-arm study was originally designed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of oral capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) compared with 5-fluorouracil plus folinic acid plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX)-4 in adult patients with histologically confirmed metastatic colorectal cancer who had not previously been treated. Following randomisation of 634 patients, the open-label study was amended to include a 2 × 2 factorial randomised (partially blinded for bevacizumab) phase III trial with the coprimary objective of demonstrating superiority of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone. Measured outcomes included overall survival, progression-free survival, response rate, adverse effects of treatment and health-related quality of life. The manufacturer’s primary pooled analysis of superiority (using the intention-to-treat population) showed that after a median follow-up of 28 months, the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival and overall survival compared with chemotherapy alone in adult patients with histologically confirmed metastatic colorectal cancer who were not previously treated [median progression-free survival 9.4 vs 7.7 months (absolute difference 1.7 months); hazard ratio (HR) 0.79, 97.5% confidence interval (CI) 0.72 to 0.87; p = 0.0001; median overall survival 21.2 vs 18.9 months (absolute difference 2.3 months); HR 0.83, 97.5% CI 0.74 to 0.93; p = 0.0019]. The NO16966 trial was of reasonable methodological quality and demonstrated a significant improvement in both progression-free survival and overall survival when bevacizumab was added to XELOX or FOLFOX. However, the size of the actual treatment effect of bevacizumab is uncertain. The ERG believed that the modelling structure employed was appropriate, but highlighted several key issues and areas of uncertainty. At the time of writing, NICE was yet to issue the guidance for this appraisal.

A randomized phase III trial of S-1/oxaliplatin (SOX) plus bevacizumab versus 5-FU/l-LV/oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) plus bevacizmab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: The SOFT study.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3519-3519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daisuke Takahari ◽  
Yasuhide Yamada ◽  
Hiroshi Matsumoto ◽  
Hideo Baba ◽  
Kazuhiro Yoshida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
P Value ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

3519 Background: Several studies of oxaliplatin plus S-1 combination therapy (SOX) conducted in Asia have shown promising efficacy and safety for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), suggesting the potential to replace mFOLFOX6. We performed a randomized phase III trial to determine whether SOX plus bevacizmab (SOX+Bev) is non-inferior to mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizmab (mFOLFOX6+Bev) in terms of progression-free survival (PFS). Methods: The SOFT study was a randomized, open-label, phase III trial. Chemotherapy-naïve patients (pts) with mCRC, an ECOG PS of 0-1, and adequate organ functions were randomized to receive either mFOLFOX6+Bev (5 mg/kg of bevacizumab, followed by 200 mg/m2 of l-leucovorin given simultaneously with 85 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin, followed by a 400 mg/m2 bolus of 5-FU on day 1 and then 2,400 mg/m2 of 5-FU over 46 h, every 2 weeks) or SOX+Bev (7.5 mg/kg of bevacizumab, 130 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin on day 1, and 40−60 mg of S-1 twice daily for 2 weeks, followed by a 1-week rest). The primary endpoint was PFS. A sample size of 225 pts per group was estimated to be necessary based on a median PFS of 10.0 months in each group and an 80% power to demonstrate non-inferiority of SOX+Bev with a 2.5-month margin (hazard ratio, HR = 1.33) and a 2-sided alpha of 0.05. Results: A total of 512 pts were enrolled from February 2009 to March 2011. Data were analyzed after confirming >388 events as planned. Demographic factors were well balanced. Pts received a median of 12 cycles (1 cycle = 2 weeks) of mFOLFOX6+Bev and 8 cycles (1 cycle = 3 weeks) of SOX+Bev (range: 1−16). Median PFS was 11.5 months (95% CI: 10.7−13.2) with mFOLFOX6+Bev and 11.7 months (95% CI: 10.7−12.9) with SOX+Bev. The adjusted HR for PFS was 1.043 (95% CI: 0.860−1.266), and the p value for non-inferiority was 0.0139. Response rate was 62.7% with mFOLFOX6+Bev and 61.5% with SOX+Bev. Grade 3/4 toxicities (%) with mFOLFOX6+Bev/SOX+Bev were leukopenia 8.4/2.4, neutropenia 33.7/8.8, anorexia 1.2/5.2, and diarrhea 2.8/9.2. Conclusions: SOX+Bev is non-inferior to mFOLFOX6+Bev with respect to PFS as 1st-line treatment for mCRC and thus can replace mFOLFOX6+Bev. Clinical trial information: JapicCTI-090699.

Capecitabine, Bevacizumab, and Mitomycin in First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results of the Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group Randomized Phase III MAX Study

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (19) ◽  
pp. 3191-3198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niall C. Tebbutt ◽  
Kate Wilson ◽  
Val J. Gebski ◽  
Michelle M. Cummins ◽  
Diana Zannino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
The United Kingdom

Purpose To determine whether adding bevacizumab, with or without mitomycin, to capecitabine monotherapy improves progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in an open-label, three-arm randomized trial. Patients and Methods Overall, 471 patients in Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom with previously untreated, unresectable mCRC were randomly assigned to the following: capecitabine; capecitabine plus bevacizumab (CB); or capecitabine, bevacizumab, and mitomycin (CBM). We compared CB with capecitabine and CBM with capecitabine for progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), toxicity, response rate (RR), and quality of life (QOL). Results Median PFS was 5.7 months for capecitabine, 8.5 months for CB, and 8.4 months for CBM (capecitabine v CB: hazard ratio [HR], 0.63; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.79; P < .001; C v CBM: HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.75; P < .001). After a median follow-up of 31 months, median OS was 18.9 months for capecitabine and was 16.4 months for CBM; these data were not significantly different. Toxicity rates were acceptable, and all treatment regimens well tolerated. Bevacizumab toxicities were similar to those in previous studies. Measures of overall QOL were similar in all groups. Conclusion Adding bevacizumab to capecitabine, with or without mitomycin, significantly improves PFS without major additional toxicity or impairment of QOL.

scholarly journals Chemotherapy With or Without Anti-EGFR Agents in Left- and Right-Sided Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 805-811 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zi-Xian Wang ◽  
Hao-Xiang Wu ◽  
Ming-Ming He ◽  
Ying-Nan Wang ◽  
Hui-Yan Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Left And Right ◽  
Meta Analyses

AbstractBackground: Previous meta-analyses have suggested primary tumor location as a predictive factor for efficacy of anti–epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the recent phase III TAILOR trial addressing this issue was not included in those analyses. This meta-analysis incorporated data from the TAILOR trial to evaluate the efficacy of chemotherapy plus anti-EGFR agents (cetuximab [Cet] or panitumumab [Pani]) versus chemotherapy alone for RAS wild-type (wt) right- and left-sided mCRC. Patients and Methods: A PubMed-based literature search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studying the additional efficacy of Cet/Pani in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in RAS wt left- and right-sided mCRC. Study-level pooled analyses of hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and odds ratios (ORs) for objective response rate (ORR) were performed. Results: Three first-line RCTs (CRYSTAL, PRIME, and TAILOR) and one second-line RCT (20050181) were included. Significant OS benefits from Cet/Pani were observed in the left-sided (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.66–0.86) but not right-sided subgroups (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.78–1.27). However, the addition of Cet/Pani to chemotherapy significantly improved PFS and ORR in both the left-sided (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.57–0.86, and OR, 3.28; 95% CI, 1.95–5.51, respectively) and right-sided subgroups (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59–0.99, and OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.08–2.93, respectively). Conclusions: The addition of Cet/Pani to chemotherapy significantly benefits PFS and ORR in patients with RAS wt right-sided mCRC, indicating that anti-EGFR therapies may remain an option for selected patients.

Trifluridine/tipiracil or regorafenib in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients: An AGEO prospective “real life” study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4036-4036
Author(s):  
Clélia Coutzac ◽  
Isabelle Trouilloud ◽  
Pascal Artru ◽  
Julie Henriques ◽  
Thérese Masson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Metastatic Sites

4036 Background: Regorafenib (R) and trifluridine/tipiracil (T) have proved their efficacy in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory to standard chemotherapy and targeted therapies. However, it remains unclear which drug should be administered first. Methods: This observational study was prospectively conducted in 13 centers between 6/2017 and 9/2019 in France. All consecutive pts with chemoresistant mCRC and receiving T and/or R were eligible. The aim of this study was to describe efficacy and tolerability of T and/or R. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of pts receiving T then R (T/R) and the opposite sequence (R/T) were also assessed. Results: A total of 237 pts (25% R and 75% T) were enrolled (109 male, median age: 67 years (32-91), mean previous lines of treatment: 2.5 (1-7)). Baseline ECOG PS was 0-1 in 77% of pts. As compared to R pts, T pts were significantly older (68 years vs 63; p = 0.033) and with > 3 metastatic sites (44% vs 30%, p = 0.018). Median OS were 6.6 and 6.2. months in the T and R group, respectively (NS). Median PFS were 2.4 and 2.1 months in the T and R group, respectively (NS). After matching 46 paired pts according to primary tumor resection, age and number of metastatic sites, a trend to a longer OS (9.5 vs 6.8 months; p = 0.17) and a significantly longer PFS (2.8 vs 2 months; p = 0.048) were observed in the T group. Among the overall population, 24% of pts received R/T or T/R sequence. Median OS from first treatment were 10.7 months in the R/T group and 9.8 months in the T/R (NS). Treatment sequence was not an independent prognostic factor for OS or PFS in multivariable analysis. Tolerability profiles were similar to previously published data, but dose reductions were more frequent in the R group (44 vs 27%, p = 0.008). Conclusions: Efficacy and safety results in this real life prospective study are in line with those published phase III trials. Both treatments seem similar in term of efficacy favoring T for clinical use as shown by the higher number of patients receiving this drug.

Randomized, Phase III Trial of Panitumumab With Infusional Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) Versus FOLFOX4 Alone As First-Line Treatment in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The PRIME Study

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (31) ◽  
pp. 4697-4705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Yves Douillard ◽  
Salvatore Siena ◽  
James Cassidy ◽  
Josep Tabernero ◽  
Ronald Burkes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
End Point

Purpose Panitumumab, a fully human anti–epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody that improves progression-free survival (PFS), is approved as monotherapy for patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The Panitumumab Randomized Trial in Combination With Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer to Determine Efficacy (PRIME) was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of panitumumab plus infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) versus FOLFOX4 alone as initial treatment for mCRC. Patients and Methods In this multicenter, phase III trial, patients with no prior chemotherapy for mCRC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2, and available tissue for biomarker testing were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive panitumumab-FOLFOX4 versus FOLFOX4. The primary end point was PFS; overall survival (OS) was a secondary end point. Results were prospectively analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis by tumor KRAS status. Results KRAS results were available for 93% of the 1,183 patients randomly assigned. In the wild-type (WT) KRAS stratum, panitumumab-FOLFOX4 significantly improved PFS compared with FOLFOX4 (median PFS, 9.6 v 8.0 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.97; P = .02). A nonsignificant increase in OS was also observed for panitumumab-FOLFOX4 versus FOLFOX4 (median OS, 23.9 v 19.7 months, respectively; HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.02; P = .072). In the mutant KRAS stratum, PFS was significantly reduced in the panitumumab-FOLFOX4 arm versus the FOLFOX4 arm (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.62; P = .02), and median OS was 15.5 months versus 19.3 months, respectively (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.57; P = .068). Adverse event rates were generally comparable across arms with the exception of toxicities known to be associated with anti-EGFR therapy. Conclusion This study demonstrated that panitumumab-FOLFOX4 was well tolerated and significantly improved PFS in patients with WT KRAS tumors and underscores the importance of KRAS testing for patients with mCRC.

Colorectal Cancer Metastatic dMMR Immuno-Therapy (COMMIT) Study: A randomized phase III study of atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy versus mFOLFOX6/bevacizumab/atezo in the first-line treatment of patients (pts) with deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) or microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)—NRG-GI004/SWOG-S1610.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3618-TPS3618
Author(s):  
Michael J. Overman ◽  
Greg Yothers ◽  
Samuel A. Jacobs ◽  
Hanna Kelly Sanoff ◽  
Deirdre Jill Cohen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dna Mismatch ◽  
Best Response

TPS3618 Background: The superiority of inhibition of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) pathway in dMMR/MSI-H over chemotherapy with either anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFr) or anti- epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFr) antibodies in mCRC has been demonstrated in a phase III trial (N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2207). However, more patients had progressive disease as the best response in the anti-PD1 monotherapy arm (29.4% vs. 12.3%) with mean progression-free survival (PFS) of 13.7 months. Preclinical models have demonstrated synergistic interactions between FOLFOX, anti-VEGF, and anti-PD-1. We hypothesize that the dMMR/MSI-H mCRC patients may be more effectively treated by the combination of PD-1 pathway blockade and mFOLFOX6/bevacizumab (bev) rather than with anti-PD-L1 therapy (atezo) alone. Methods: Initially a three-arm study, the mFOLFOX6/bev arm was closed to new enrollment on 6-4-20 due to emerging data; the redesigned COMMIT trial was reactivated on 1/29/2021 as a prospective phase III open-label trial that randomizes (1:1) mCRC dMMR/MSI-H pts (N=211) to either atezo monotherapy or mFOLFOX6/bev+atezo combination. Stratification factors include BRAFV600E status, metastatic site, and prior adjuvant CRC therapy. Primary endpoint is PFS as assessed by site investigator. Secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), objective response rate (RECIST v1.1), safety profile, disease control rate, duration of response, and centrally-reviewed PFS. Health-related quality of life is an exploratory objective. Archived tumor tissue and blood samples will be collected for correlative studies. Key inclusion criteria are: mCRC without prior chemotherapy for advanced disease; dMMR tumor determined by local CLIA-certified IHC assay (MLH1/MSH2/MSH6/PMS2) or MSI-H by local CLIA-certified PCR or NGS panel; and measurable disease per RECIST. Clinical trial: NCT02997228. Support: U10CA180868, -180822, -180888, -180819, UG1CA189867, U24CA196067; Genentech, Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT02997228.

scholarly journals FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab versus FOLFOX plus bevacizumab for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and ≥3 circulating tumour cells: the randomised phase III VISNÚ-1 trial

ESMO Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. e000944 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrique Aranda ◽  
Jose Maria Viéitez ◽  
Auxiliadora Gómez-España ◽  
Silvia Gil Calle ◽  
Antonieta Salud-Salvia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

Purpose5-Fluorouracil/leucovorin, oxaliplatin, irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) plus bevacizumab is more effective than doublets plus bevacizumab as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer, but is not widely used because of concerns about toxicity and lack of predictive biomarkers. This study was designed to explore the role of circulating tumour cell (CTC) count as a biomarker to select patients for therapy with FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab.Patients and methodsVISNÚ-1 was a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase III study in patients with previously untreated, unresectable, metastatic colorectal carcinoma and ≥3 CTC/7.5 mL blood. Patients received bevacizumab 5 mg/kg plus FOLFOXIRI (irinotecan 165 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2 and 5-fluorouracil 3200 mg/m2) or FOLFOX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 then 2400 mg/m2) by intravenous administration every 2 weeks. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsThe intention-to-treat population comprised 349 patients (FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab, n=172; FOLFOX-bevacizumab, n=177). Median PFS was 12.4 months (95% CI 11.2 to 14.0) with FOLFOXIRI bevacizumab and 9.3 months (95% CI 8.5 to 10.7) with FOLFOX-bevacizumab (stratified HR, 0.64; 95% CI 0.49 to 0.82; p=0.0006). Grade≥3 adverse events were more common with FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab 85.3% vs 75.1% with FOLFOX-bevacizumab (p=0.0178). Treatment-related deaths occurred in 8 (4.7%) and 6 (3.4%) patients, respectively.ConclusionsFirst-line FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab significantly improved PFS compared with FOLFOX-bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and ≥3 CTCs at baseline, which indicate a poor prognosis. CTC count may be a useful non-invasive biomarker to assist with the selection of patients for intensive first-line therapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document