First-line docetaxel (Dx) and capecitabine (Cap) in advanced head and neck cancer

16505 Background: Dx and Cap are useful drugs in head and neck cancer. Our purpose was to establish the efficacy and safety of this combination in non selected patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic (M1) head and neck cancer. Methods: : Between Apr 2005 and Nov 2006, 33 pts with squamous cell locally advanced or M1 head and neck cancer received the following chemotherapy (Ct) schedule: Dx 75 mg/m2 day 1 and Cap 950 mg/m2/12h days 2–14, every 3 weeks.30 pts (90.9%) had received previous local radiotherapy, 11 of them with concomitant Ct. Results: Mean age was 60 years old (range 46–75). M/F: 32/1. PS 0/1/2: 1/29/3. Location of disease: only local 49%; local and M1 36%; only M1 15% (Main M1 site: lung 76.5%, nodes 11.8%, bone 5.9%, soft tissue 5.9%). Mean number of Ct cycles: 4 (range 1–7). Worst hematologic toxicities per patient G3/G4 (%): neutropenia 6/39; febrile neutropenia 36/0; anemia 3/0; trombopenia 3/3. Non-hematologic toxicities G2/G3 (%): vomiting 3/3; neuropathy 6/0; asthenia 33/6; diarrhea 21/3; mucositis 33/18; nail changes 12/0; hand foot syndrome 3/12. Other events to remark: 4 pts had neumonia (2 toxic deaths), 1 pts had angor and required a different Ct schedule, 2 pts had massive hemorrage (1 exitus). There were 7 pts not evaluable for response (4 not yet evaluated, 1 early death due to massive hemorrage, 1 toxic death due to neumonia, 1 early disphagia). Among the evaluated pts, responses were: 2 CR (7.7%), 10 PR (38.5%), 9 SD (34.6%) and 5 PD (19.2%). Median TTP was 21 weeks (95%CI 17.5 - 24.2). Median OS was 39.8 weeks (95%CI 32.4 - 47.4) by Kaplan-Meier method. Conclusions: This combination appears to be active in pts with advanced or M1 head and neck cancer. Main toxicities were neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, mucositis and asthenia. Global toxicity was important with two toxic deaths documented No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text

Beyond race: The impact of ethnicity on the treatment outcome of locally advanced head and neck cancer

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.16500 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽

pp. 16500-16500

Author(s):

C. J. Calfa ◽

M. Escalon ◽

S. Zafar ◽

E. Lopez ◽

V. Patel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Head And Neck Cancer ◽

Head And Neck ◽

Neck Cancer ◽

Statistical Significance ◽

Locally Advanced ◽

Disease Free Survival ◽

Advanced Head ◽

Kaplan Meier ◽

The Impact

16500 Background: Self identified racial groups share an unequal burden of head and neck cancer . Recent evidence suggests that outcome among races is different and the causes are multifactorial. Nonetheless, differences among ethnic groups have not been reported. Herein, we decided to analyze differences in treatment response and outcome among our white and Hispanic patient population treated for locally advanced head and neck cancer. Methods: Patients were identified using the tumor registry. We reviewed retrospectively the data from medical records. 100 white Hispanics (WH) and 50 white non-Hispanics (WNH) diagnosed with locally advanced head and neck cancer and treated at our institution from 2004 to 2005, were eligible for the study. Standard statistical analysis, including Kaplan-Meier survival curve and Cox proportional hazard models were used. P value of <0.05 was considered for statistical significance. Results: Preliminary results reveal that, in our study population, median age at diagnosis, gender, performance status (ECOG 0–2) and squamous cell histology did not differ significantly between the two groups. Stage 4 at diagnosis was more commonly observed in Hispanics as opposed to WNH (85.7% vs 68.6%) (P = 0.1). Surgery was more commonly used as an initial treatment option in Hispanics than WNH (42.8% vs 28.6%) (P = 0.18) while chemotherapy was less likely to be used (78.6% vs. 91.4%) (P = 0.15). Hispanics were more likely to smoke than WNH (P = 0.0003) and were equally exposed to chronic alcohol use. Patients from the Hispanic group were more likely to respond to therapy than whites by Chi-squared analysis but this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.09). No differences were seen in disease free survival. Kaplan-Meier estimate of median overall survival was 16 months for Hispanics vs. 25 months for whites but this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.26). Final analysis will be available at the time of the annual meeting. Conclusion: In our experience, a trend for decrease overall survival was noted in the Hispanic ethnic group. This may be in part due to more advanced stage at presentation. Nonetheless, in order to definitively answer this question, further research is warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text

Autoimmune-related encephalitis during treatment with nivolumab for advanced head and neck cancer: a case report

Tumori Journal ◽

10.1177/0300891620951262 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 106 (6) ◽

pp. NP23-NP28

Author(s):

Alessandro Guidi ◽

Martina Violati ◽

Miriam Blasi ◽

Elettra Ferrari ◽

Andrea Luciani ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Head And Neck Cancer ◽

Head And Neck ◽

Neck Cancer ◽

Locally Advanced ◽

Review Of The Literature ◽

Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy ◽

First Line ◽

First Case ◽

Life Threatening ◽

One Year

Introduction: Head and neck cancer represents a variety of tumors involving different organs in the cervical district, burdened by poor prognosis when diagnosed in an advanced stage. Immunotherapy with both anti-PD-1 nivolumab and pembrolizumab has the aim of increasing overall survival for patients with this malignancy. We report the first case of immune-related encephalitis caused by nivolumab in this setting of disease and present a brief review of the literature. Case description: A 60-year-old woman had been treated with concomitant chemoradiotherapy for a locally advanced human papillomavirus–negative squamous cell carcinoma of the tonsil. After local recurrence, she was treated with platinum-based first-line chemotherapy, followed by nivolumab at further progression within 6 months. Nivolumab was administered for 19 weeks, then discontinued due to the occurrence of immune-related hypothyroidism and grade 2 diarrhea. A month after the onset of the endocrinopathy, the patient also developed steroid-responsive encephalitis, considered as a consequence of anti-PD-1 therapy. One year after discontinuation of immunotherapy, toxicities have resolved and the patient is maintaining a complete radiologic response. Conclusions: Immunotherapy is a relatively new and promising therapy in the field of oncology. Its mechanism of action, which aims to stimulate the immune system against cancer cells, is not comparable to systemic and cytotoxic chemotherapy, which directly attacks and destroys malignant cells. Despite these differences, immunotherapy is not to be considered free from side effects, sometimes life-threatening.

Download Full-text

Radiosensitization with a COX2 inhibitor with chemoradiation for head and neck cancer

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.5582 ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽

pp. 5582-5582 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

P. Prellop ◽

G. Peters ◽

W. Carroll ◽

L. Nabell ◽

S. Spencer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Head And Neck Cancer ◽

Febrile Neutropenia ◽

Head And Neck ◽

Local Control ◽

Neck Cancer ◽

Survival Data ◽

Locally Advanced ◽

Radiation Dermatitis ◽

Published Data ◽

Cox2 Inhibitor

5582 Background: Cyclo-oxygenase 2 (COX2) inhibitors have shown promise as radio- and chemosensitizers. We conducted a phase IB/II study to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of celecoxib, a selective COX2 inhibitor, administered concurrently with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and radiation for locally advanced or recurrent head and neck cancer. Methods: Patients with stage III/IV or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, oral cavity, hypopharynx, or larynx were eligible. Primary endpoints were toxicity, local control and survival. Patients were treated with weekly carboplatin (AUC = 2.0), paclitaxel (30 mg/m2) and concurrent radiation (70 Gy). Celecoxib (400 mg bid) was started 1 week prior to the initiation of radiotherapy and was given for a total of 2 years. In 12/04, the study closed due to concerns of cardiotoxicity with COX-2 inhibitors. Celecoxib was discontinued in all patients. The study restarted in 5/06 with the modification that celecoxib would be given only during radiation. Results: Between 12/02 and 1/06, a total of 28 patients were enrolled: 89% were male, median age was 56.5, 3 with recurrent cancer and 25 treated definitively. Five patients have been treated on the modified study. Grade 3/4 toxicities include: mucositis (35% G3), dermatitis (18% G3; 7% G4), febrile neutropenia (21% G3; 3% G4), dysphagia (57% G3), nausea/vomiting (29% G3). Thirty percent did not complete prescribed chemotherapy due to myelosuppression. Acturarial 2 year outcomes in the 20 evaluable, definitively treated patients: 65% survival, 76% local control. Conclusions: Compared to published data using carbo/taxol and RT, an unexpectantly high incident of febrile neutropenia was observed but no increase in radiation dermatitis or mucositis. Two year survival data is comparable to published data. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text

Current and Emerging Molecular Therapies for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Cancers ◽

10.3390/cancers13215471 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (21) ◽

pp. 5471

Author(s):

Farzaneh Kordbacheh ◽

Camile S. Farah

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trials ◽

Head And Neck Cancer ◽

Head And Neck ◽

Metastatic Disease ◽

Neck Cancer ◽

Locally Advanced ◽

Survival Rates ◽

Response To Therapy ◽

First Line ◽

Molecular Therapies

Head and neck cancer affects nearly 750,000 patients, with more than 300,000 deaths annually. Advances in first line surgical treatment have improved survival rates marginally particularly in developed countries, however survival rates for aggressive locally advanced head and neck cancer are still poor. Recurrent and metastatic disease remains a significant problem for patients and the health system. As our knowledge of the genomic landscape of the head and neck cancers continues to expand, there are promising developments occurring in molecular therapies available for advanced or recalcitrant disease. The concept of precision medicine is underpinned by our ability to accurately sequence tumour samples to best understand individual patient genomic variations and to tailor targeted therapy for them based on such molecular profiling. Not only is their purported response to therapy a factor of their genomic variation, but so is their inclusion in biomarker-driven personalised medicine therapeutic trials. With the ever-expanding number of molecular druggable targets explored through advances in next generation sequencing, the number of clinical trials assessing these targets has significantly increased over recent years. Although some trials are focussed on first-line therapeutic approaches, a greater majority are focussed on locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic disease. Similarly, although single agent monotherapy has been found effective in some cases, it is the combination of drugs targeting different signalling pathways that seem to be more beneficial to patients. This paper outlines current and emerging molecular therapies for head and neck cancer, and updates readers on outcomes of the most pertinent clinical trials in this area while also summarising ongoing efforts to bring more molecular therapies into clinical practice.

Download Full-text