Clinical and prognostic significance of serum carcinoembryonic antigen level in patients with IIIB and IV stage lung cancer: A prospective study

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18063-18063
Author(s):  
A. Martinez-Velazco ◽  
D. Flores-Estrada ◽  
J. C. Silva-Godinez ◽  
F. Javier ◽  
G. Enrique ◽  
...  

18063 Previous studies have shown pre and post-operative serum CEA levels are a prognostic factor in patients with lung cancer (LC). We prospectively investigated the clinical and pathological characteristics, as well as, prognostic significance of patients with IIIB and IV stage LC and the CEA serum elevation. From March of 2005 to January of 2007, 307 patients with IIIB and IV stage were included; several chemotherapy protocols including gemcitabine, vinorelbine or paclitaxel combined with cisplatin, carboplatin, or erlotinib were used. Serum CEA levels were obtained before and after 2 cycles of treatment. Stage was determined by CT and bone scans; 120 patients had brain CT scan at diagnosis due to neurological symptoms. 28.6% of the patients were stage IIIB and 61.4% stage IV and 18% of patients had CNS metastasis at diagnosis. Histology was adenocarcinoma in 69.1% and epidermoid in 30.9%. Mean CEA was 11.3 ng/ml ± 24.5 with median of 6.7 (range 0.2 to 4,578). Patients with CEA levels > 10, 20, 50 and 100 were 43.6, 32.5, 24 and 17.9%; respectively. Associated factors with CEA >20 were age >62 (p=0.02), stage (p=0.05), CNS metastasis (p=0.0001) and histology (p=0.01). However, in the logistic regression analysis the only associated factors were histology (p=0.0001) and CNS metastasis (p=0.0001). Patients with CEA elevation >20 had a hazard ratio of 26.3 (CI 11.2 to 61.6) for the development of brain metastases. Overall survival associated factors were poor status performance (p=0.006), tobacco use (p=0.05), CEA elevation (p=0.0022), CNS metastases (p=0.01), male gender (p=0.08). There were no differences between stage IIIB, IV and CNS metastasis. The associated factors with survival by Cox proportional hazards regression multivariate analysis were poor performance status (p=0.05) and CEA elevation (p=0.008). The independent factors associated with CEA elevation were histology adenocarcinoma and brain metastasis. Patients with CEA >20 without neurological symptoms could benefit from early CT brain scan with stage IIIB and IV. In this group of patients, the 2 most important independent factors for survival were poor performance status and CEA elevation. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. e227299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huda Gafer ◽  
Quincy de Waard ◽  
Annette Compter ◽  
Michel van den Heuvel

Oral anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have shown significant benefit in the management of ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, almost all patients will experience disease progression after front-line ALK-TKIs such as crizotinib. Treatment with third generation ALK-TKI lorlatinib can have a significant clinical impact following disease progression, even in patients with a very poor performance status. Here, we review two clinical cases with metastatic ALK-rearranged NSCLC who had pulmonary disease control with first-generation ALK inhibitor. However, disease progressed rapidly in the central nervous system with severe neurological symptoms. Treatment with lorlatinib, a third-generation ALK-TKI, led to a rapid radiological and clinical cerebral response in both patients. Lorlatinib can overcome ALK resistance to crizotinib, and the presented cases suggest a potential role for lorlatinib in patients with rapidly progressive cerebral and leptomeningeal metastases.


BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiao-En Wu ◽  
Ching-Fu Chang ◽  
Chen-Yang Huang ◽  
Cheng-Ta Yang ◽  
Chih-Hsi Scott Kuo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Afatinib is one of the standard treatments for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, data on the use of afatinib in patients with poor performance status (PS ≥ 2) are limited. This study aimed to retrospectively review the clinical outcomes and safety of afatinib treatment in EGFR-mutation-positive (EGFRm+) NSCLC patients with PS ≥ 2. Methods The data for 62 patients who were treated at Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital from January 2010 to August 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients’ clinicopathological features were obtained, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify possible prognostic factors. Data on adverse events were collected to evaluate general tolerance for afatinib therapy. Results Until February 2020, the objective response rate, disease control rate, median progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 58.1% (36/62), 69.4% (43/62), 8.8 months, and 12.9 months, respectively. The absence of liver metastasis (PFS: p = 0.044; OS: p = 0.061) and good disease control (p < 0.001 for PFS and OS) were independent favorable prognostic factors for PFS and OS. Bone metastasis (p = 0.036) and dose modification (reduction/interruption, p = 0.021) were predictors of disease control. Conclusion Afatinib demonstrated acceptable efficacy and safety in the current cohort. This study provided evidence to support the use of afatinib as a first-line treatment in EGFRm+ NSCLC patients with poor PS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document