A phase I study evaluating a novel schedule of oral eniluracil (EU) combined with escalating doses of oral 5-fluorouracil (5- FU)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2560-2560
Author(s):  
J. R. Infante ◽  
S. F. Jones ◽  
M. Lawton ◽  
P. Wing ◽  
R. K. Malik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Proportional Increase ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

2560 Background: 5-FU, a commonly utilized cytotoxic, is rapidly catabolized by dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), and requires anabolic conversion for anti-tumor activity. It has poor oral bioavailability due to DPD in the GI tract and liver, and toxicities such as hand-foot skin reaction. In addition, high levels of DPD are associated with 5-FU resistance. EU is a mechanism-based irreversible inactivator of DPD. Early studies in combination with oral 5-FU demonstrated activity; however, 3 Phase 3 studies were negative, due to an unrecognized inhibition of 5-FU anabolic activation by EU (Fourie et al; 2006 ASCO Proceedings; a 2058). Lower doses of eniluracil given 12–20 hrs prior to 5- FU preserves the desired DPD inhibition, without inhibiting these anabolic enzymes. Methods: The objectives are to determine the dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and DPD activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) following administration of a fixed dose of EU in combination with escalating doses of 5-FU. The combination of oral 5.0 mg EU 12 to 20 hours prior to oral 5-FU, is given qW for 3 weeks in 28 day cycles. Results: Twenty subjects have been enrolled, at 5-FU doses of 30, 40, 50, 60, and 70 mg. A total of 39 cycles have been administered, with 4 patients currently on study. The oral combination of EU and 5-FU has been well tolerated. All toxicities have been grade 1 or 2 with the exception of two grade 3 toxicities reported at the 50mg dose (anemia and neutropenia). The grade 3 neutropenia is the only observed DLT and resulted in a 1 week delay in initiation of cycle 2. No CR or PR noted, but 4 patients (2 previously treated with 5-FU) with 4 cycles of SD. 95–100% of DPD inhibition achieved at the time of 5-FU dosing and PK results demonstrate a dose proportional increase in 5-FU Cmax and AUC, and a half life of ∼3.5 hours. Conclusions: The oral combination of 5mg of EU given 12–20 hrs prior to 5-FU has been well tolerated and achieves full functional inhibition of DPD in all patients. The MTD is not yet defined and the next cohort is enrolling at the 80mg dose. EU in combination with 5-FU may provide a promising therapeutic option for patients with tumors known to be resistant to 5-FU due to high levels of DPD. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase I clinical and pharmacologic study of eniluracil plus fluorouracil in patients with advanced cancer.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 1450-1457 ◽  
Author(s):  
R L Schilsky ◽  
J Hohneker ◽  
M J Ratain ◽  
L Janisch ◽  
L Smetzer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Washout Period ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear ◽  
Period 2 ◽  
Daily Schedule ◽  
Starting Dose ◽  
Dose Levels

PURPOSE To determine the highest dose of fluorouracil (5-FU) that could be safely administered with Eniluracil (776C85; Glaxo Wellcome Inc, Research Triangle Park, NC), an inactivator of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), on a daily schedule for 5 days, and to define the toxicities of the combination and the pharmacokinetics of 5-FU when administered with 776C85. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapy were enrolled at two institutions. The study consisted of three periods designed to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of 776C85 alone (period 1); the effects of 776C85 on the pharmacokinetics of 5-FU (period 2); and the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of 5-FU, with or without leucovorin, that could be safely administered with 776C85 (period 3). Cohorts of at least three patients each received oral 776C85 alone at doses of 3.7 mg/m2/d, 18.5 mg/m2/d and 0.74 mg/m2/d. After a 14-day washout period, each patient then received 776C85 daily for 3 days, with a single intravenous (i.v.) bolus dose of 5-FU 10 mg/m2 on day 2. After a second washout period, patients were treated with 776C85 daily for 7 days and 5-FU i.v. bolus on days 2 through 6. The starting dose of 5-FU 10 mg/m2/d was escalated until the MTD was determined. After determination of the MTD of 5-FU given with 776C85, oral leucovorin 50 mg/d on days 2 through 6 was added to determine the MTD of 5-FU with leucovorin in the presence of 776C85. Near the completion of the study, additional cohorts of patients were treated with 776C85 at 50 mg/d and oral 5-FU with or without leucovorin. RESULTS Sixty-five patients were enrolled onto the study and 60 were assessable for toxicity and response. Bone marrow suppression was the primary and dose-limiting toxicity of this regimen. Other toxicities included diarrhea, mucositis, anemia, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, and fatigue. 776C85 suppressed DPD activity in peripheral-blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) by at least 90% for at least 24 hours at all dose levels tested. In the presence of 776C85, 5-FU half-life was prolonged, clearance was reduced, and the drug displayed linear pharmacokinetics. Recommended doses for further testing on a daily for 5-day schedule are 776C85 10 mg/d with i.v. 5-FU 25 mg/m2/d; 776C85 10 mg/d with i.v. 5-FU 20 mg/m2/d plus leucovorin 50 mg/d; 776C85 50 mg/d with 5-FU given orally at 15 mg/m2/d with leucovorin at 50 mg/d. CONCLUSION 5-FU can be safely administered with 776C85; however, the MTDs are considerably lower than those conventionally used, caused, at least in part, by marked alterations in 5-FU plasma pharmacokinetics.

A phase I study of mesothelin-targeted immunotoxin LMB-100 in combination with nab-paclitaxel for patients with previously treated advanced pancreatic cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 307-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Campo Alewine ◽  
Raffit Hassan ◽  
M. Iqra Ahmad ◽  
Jane B Trepel ◽  
Cody Peer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Drug Exposure ◽  
Bowel Perforation ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Elongation Factor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Pseudomonas Exotoxin A ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

307 Background: LMB-100 is a Pseudomonas exotoxin A-based immunotoxin that targets mesothelin (MSLN). MSLN is expressed by >75% of pancreatic adenocarcinomas (PDAC). LMB-100 kills MSLN-expressing cells by irreversibly modifying elongation factor-2 to halt protein synthesis. Phase I studies of LMB-100 defined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 140 mcg/kg IV given on D1, 3 and 5 of a 21-day cycle. Development of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) limited patient drug exposure beyond cycle 2. Our pre-clinical data showed that combination of LMB-100 with a taxane resulted in synergistic anti-tumor activity. Methods: We conducted a phase I single center study (standard 3+3 design) to determine the MTD of LMB-100 given with nab-paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced PDAC. LMB-100 was given on D1, 3 and 5 of a 21-day cycle, and nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) on D1 and D8. Initial patients could receive a maximum of 4 cycles, but subsequently a 2-cycle maximum was employed. Results: Fourteen patients (median age 58) were enrolled. Two of 6 patients experienced DLTs at the 100 mcg/kg dose of LMB-100 (myalgia- 2 pts, fatigue- 1 pt, hypotension- 1 pt; all grade 3). One of 8 patients had DLT at the 65 mcg/kg dose (edema, urine output decrease- both grade 3). Other toxicities related to LMB-100 included hypoalbuminemia, edema-associated weight gain, hyponatremia, fatigue, drug fever, infusion-related reaction, hypophosphatemia, nausea and anorexia. One patient died on treatment from complications of bowel perforation attributed to cancer. All patients achieved detectable serum levels of LMB-100 during the first cycle, even those with pre-existing ADAs, and 5 of 8 did so during cycle 2. One patient receiving the 65 mcg/kg dose had a confirmed partial response, and CA 19-9 dropped by > 50% in 5 of 8 evaluable patients. Conclusions: MTD of LMB-100 is 65 mcg/kg given with nab-paclitaxel on this schedule. Anti-tumor activity was observed. A phase II cohort is currently being accrued. Clinical trial information: NCT02810418.

Phase I, pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic study of paricalcitol [19-nor-1 alpha, 25-(OH)2 D2] in combination with gemcitabine [2’,2’ difluorodeoxycytidine] in patients with advanced malignancies

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12010-12010
Author(s):  
D. Trump ◽  
M. Javle ◽  
J. Muindi ◽  
L. Pendyala ◽  
W. Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Cytidine Deaminase ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Unknown Primary ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear

12010 Background: Calcitriol+ gemcitabine (gem) combination results in synergistic anti-tumor effect in preclinical models. Cytidine deaminase (CDD) inactivates gem into 2’,2’-difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU) and its overexpression may lead to gem resistance. Calcitriol decreases CDD activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBM). Paricalcitol is cytotoxic in vitro and synergistic with several chemotherapeutic agents, including gem. We are conducting a phase I study of paricalcitol + fixed-dose gem. Objectives: The primary aim is to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination in patients (pts) with advanced cancer. Secondary aims are to evaluate toxicity, the effect of paricalcitol on gem PK, CDD activity in PBM and clinical outcome. Methods: Each cycle is 4 weeks: Gem 800 mg/m2 (over 80 min) weekly × 3, starting day 1; paricalcitol weekly, 24 h prior to gem, starting day 7. Standard 3+3 dose-escalation schema is used. Planned paricalcitol doses are 0.24, 0.72, 1.20, 1.8, 2.4 μg/kg, and 25% increments till MTD. Gem PK and CDD activity (PBM) are studied on days 1 and 8. Paricalcitol PK studies are obtained on day 7. Results: Fourteen pts with the following cancers: pancreatic (n=3), colon (n=3), lung (n=5), esophageal (n=1), bladder (n=1) and unknown primary (n=1) have been enrolled. No dose limiting toxicities have occurred. Median of 2 cycles were delivered (range 1–9). Grade 3 toxicities: anemia (n=3 pts), neutropenia (n=5), thrombocytopenia (n=3), thrombosis (n=2), anorexia (n=1), hypophosphatemia (n=1), dehydration (n=1), syncope (n=1), pneumonia (n=1) and chills (n=1). Grade 4 toxicities: anemia (n=1) and neutropenia (n=1). Hypercalcemia (> grade 1) did not occur. Stable disease occurred in 2 and progressive disease in 3. Conclusions: MTD was not reached at 1.8 μg/kg of paricalcitol with gem 800 mg/m2/week. Dose escalation is ongoing. PK data will be presented at meeting. Supported by NIH grants CA67267 and CA85142. [Table: see text]

Phase I Trial of 17-Allylamino-17-Demethoxygeldanamycin in Patients With Advanced Cancer

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 1078-1087 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew P. Goetz ◽  
David Toft ◽  
Joel Reid ◽  
Matthew Ames ◽  
Bridget Stensgard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Analysis ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumor ◽  
Hsp 70 ◽  
Tumor Patients ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear ◽  
Client Proteins ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

Purpose We determined the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG) when infused on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle in advanced solid tumor patients. We also characterized the pharmacokinetics of 17-AAG, its effect on chaperone and client proteins, and whether cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A5 and NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) polymorphisms affected 17-AAG disposition or toxicity. Patients and Methods An accelerated titration design was used. Biomarkers were measured in peripheral-blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) at baseline and on days 1 and 15, and pharmacokinetic analysis was performed on day 1 of cycle 1. CYP3A5*3 and NQO1*2 genotypes were determined and correlated with pharmacokinetics and toxicity. Results Twenty-one patients received 52 courses at 11 dose levels. DLTs at 431 mg/m2 were grade 3 bilirubin (n = 1), AST (n = 1), anemia (n = 1), nausea (n = 1), vomiting (n = 1), and myalgias (n = 1). No tumor responses were seen. 17-AAG consistently increased heat shock protein (Hsp) 70 levels in PBMCs. At the MTD, the clearance and half-life (t1/2) of 17-AAG were 11.6 L/h/m2 and 4.15 hours, respectively; whereas the active metabolite 17-aminogeldanamycin had a t1/2 of 7.63 hours. The CYP3A5*3 and NQO1*2 polymorphisms were not associated with 17-AAG toxicity. The CYP3A5*3 polymorphism was associated with higher 17-AAG clearance. Conclusion The MTD of weekly 17-AAG is 308 mg/m2. 17-AAG induced Hsp70 in PBMCs, indicating that Hsp90 has been affected. Further evaluation of 17-AAG is ongoing using a twice-weekly regimen, and this schedule of 17-AAG is being tested in combination with chemotherapy.

scholarly journals Phase I Trial of MK-0752 in Children With Refractory CNS Malignancies: A Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium Study

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (26) ◽  
pp. 3529-3534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Fouladi ◽  
Clinton F. Stewart ◽  
James Olson ◽  
Lars M. Wagner ◽  
Arzu Onar-Thomas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Pediatric Brain Tumor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Analysis ◽  
Population Pharmacokinetic ◽  
Gamma Secretase ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Cns Malignancies

PurposeTo estimate the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), describe dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and characterize pharmacokinetic properties of MK-0752, a gamma secretase inhibitor, in children with refractory or recurrent CNS malignancies.Patients and MethodsMK-0752 was administered once daily for 3 consecutive days of every 7 days at escalating dosages starting at 200 mg/m2. The modified continual reassessment method was used to estimate the MTD. A course was 28 days in duration. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed during the first course. Expression of NOTCH and hairy enhancer of split (HES) proteins was assessed in peripheral-blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) before and following treatment with MK-0752.ResultsTwenty-three eligible patients were enrolled: 10 males (median age, 8.1 years; range, 2.6 to 17.7 years) with diagnoses of brainstem glioma (n = 6), ependymoma (n = 8), medulloblastoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor (n = 4), glioblastoma multiforme (n = 2), atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (n = 1), malignant glioma (n = 1), and choroid plexus carcinoma, (n = 1). Seventeen patients were fully evaluable for toxicity. No DLTs occurred in the three patients enrolled at 200 mg/m2/dose. At 260 mg/m2/dose, DLTs occurred in two of six patients, both of whom experienced grade 3 ALT and AST. There were no grade 4 toxicities; non–dose-limiting grade 3 toxicities included hypokalemia and lymphopenia. Population pharmacokinetic values (% coefficient of variation) for MK-0752 were apparent oral clearance, 0.444 (38%) L/h/m2; apparent volume of distribution, 7.36 (24%) L/m2; and ka, 0.358 (99%) hr−1.ConclusionMK-0752 is well-tolerated in children with recurrent CNS malignancies. The recommended phase II dose using the 3 days on followed by 4 days off schedule is 260 mg/m2/dose once daily.

A phase I trial of AEG35156 (XIAP antisense) administered as a continuous intravenous infusion in patients with advanced tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3059-3059 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ranson ◽  
C. Dive ◽  
T. Ward ◽  
J. Cummings ◽  
K. Connolly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Continuous Infusion ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Antitumour Activity ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear ◽  
Grade 3

3059 Background: The X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP) is a potent anti-apoptotic protein. AEG35156 is a synthetic 2nd generation antisense oligonucleotide to human XIAP that enhances cancer cell apoptosis preclinically as a single agent and in combination with chemotherapeutics. Methods: The primary objective was to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of AEG35156 given as a 7-day continuous infusion every 3 weeks. Other objectives were to determine AEG35156 pharmacokinetics, XIAP inhibition in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and in tumour cells where feasible and document anti-tumour activity. Results: Sixteen adult patients have completed at least one 7-day infusion. Two dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were observed in five patients treated at 160 mg/m2/day: grade 3 thrombocytopenia for more than 7 days and grade 3 ALT and AST elevation. Seven patients have been treated at 125 mg/m2/day with one DLT of grade 3 transaminase elevation. An approximately 50% decrease in XIAP mRNA was seen in peripheral blood leucocytes three days after the start of infusions at 160mg/m2/day. One patient with small lymphocytic non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma had marked but short lived decreases in peripheral lymphoblasts during AEG35156 administration closely associated with XIAP mRNA knockdown. One patient with breast cancer had an unconfirmed partial response. The trial has now been amended to also determine the MTD of a 3-day continuous infusion every 3 weeks. Three patients have been treated with 3-day infusions at 160mg/m2/day every 3 weeks with no significant toxicities observed and patients are currently being accrued at 213mg/m2/day. Conclusions: AEG35156 can be safely delivered by continuous infusion and preliminary evidence of XIAP mRNA knockdown and antitumour activity has been observed. [Table: see text]

Phase 1b study defining the optimal dosing combinations of the mTOR inhibitor AP23573 and Paclitaxel (PTX)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3509-3509 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Cresta ◽  
D. Tosi ◽  
C. Sessa ◽  
L. Viganò ◽  
M. Maur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mtor Inhibitor ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Combined Therapy ◽  
Dose Finding ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear ◽  
Mtor Inhibition ◽  
Skin Biopsies ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

3509 Background: AP23573 is a novel mTOR inhibitor with demonstrated anti-tumor activity in clinical trials. In vitro, AP23573 exhibits at least additive anti-proliferative activity in combination with a variety of agents including taxanes. This trial studied the combination of AP23573 and paclitaxel (PTX) in patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: This was a modified, sequential (3+3) dose finding study with starting doses of 25 mg AP23573 i.v. and 80 mg/m2 PTX i.v. as Dose Level 1 (DL1) on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28 day cycle. Doses of either drug were adjusted in successive cohorts. Blood samples and skin biopsies were collected for pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) studies. Dose limiting toxicity definitions included neutrophils <500/μL; thrombocytopenia = Grade 3 (CTC), any non- hematologic toxicities = Grade 2; missing 2 consecutive doses due to any toxicity. For PK and PD analysis, AP23573 and PTX were administered one day apart at the start of Cycle 1, reversing the sequence at Day 8. Results: Enrollment is complete and 29 patients with a variety of tumors (sarcoma, pancreatic, H&N, melanoma, thymoma) have been treated. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia and Grade 2 mouth sores were seen at DL1 as well as missed doses due to moderate (Grade 2) neutropenia. Adverse events include mouth sores and fatigue which were mild and reversible. Available PK data for AP23573 and PTX suggest no interaction. PD analysis in peripheral blood mononuclear cells demonstrates no interference by PTX on mTOR inhibition by AP23573. PD data in skin biopsies are forthcoming. Both 12.5 mg AP23573/80mg/m2 PTX and 37.5mg AP23573/60mg/m2 PTX are maximal dose combinations that appear to be well tolerated. Activity has been observed at multiple AP23573 mg/PTX mg/m2 dose levels (25/60, 12.5/80, 25/80). Five patients have been on study for >4 cycles, including 2 patients with partial responses (H&N and pancreatic). Conclusions: Combined therapy with AP23573 and PTX is safe. It is notable that evidence of anti-tumor activity was observed at modest doses of each drug when in combination. Combinations of these agents at both doses cited would be recommended for evaluation in trials examining efficacy in specific tumors. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals CD14+ monocytes repress gamma globin expression at early stages of erythropoiesis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Heshusius ◽  
Esther Heideveld ◽  
Marieke von Lindern ◽  
Emile van den Akker
Keyword(s):  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Globin Genes ◽  
Beta Globin ◽  
Hematopoietic Progenitors ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear ◽  
Temporal Regulation ◽  
Gamma Globin ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Adult Hemoglobin

AbstractIn β-hemoglobinopathies, reactivation of gamma- at the expense of beta-globin is a prominent therapeutic option. Expression of the globin genes is not strictly intrinsically regulated during erythropoiesis, supported by the observation that fetal erythroid cells switch to adult hemoglobin expression when injected in mice. We show cultured erythroblasts are a mix of HbA restrictive and HbA/HbF expressing cells and that the proportion of cells in the latter population depends on the starting material. Cultures started from CD34+ cells contain more HbA/HbF expressing cells compared to erythroblasts cultured from total peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Depletion of CD14+ cells from PBMC resulted in higher HbF/HbA percentages. Conversely, CD34+ co-culture with CD14+ cells reduced the HbF/HbA population through cell–cell proximity, indicating that CD14+ actively repressed HbF expression in adult erythroid cultures. RNA-sequencing showed that HbA and HbA/HbF populations contain a limited number of differentially expressed genes, aside from HBG1/2. Co-culture of CD14+ cells with sorted uncommitted hematopoietic progenitors and CD34-CD36+ erythroblasts showed that hematopoietic progenitors prior to the hemoglobinized erythroid stages are more readily influenced by CD14+ cells to downregulate expression of HBG1/2, suggesting temporal regulation of these genes. This possibly provides a novel therapeutic avenue to develop β-hemoglobinopathies treatments.

Phase 1/2 study of eprenetapopt (APR-246) in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with solid tumor malignancies.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3161-TPS3161
Author(s):  
Ecaterina Elena Dumbrava ◽  
Amit Mahipal ◽  
Xin Gao ◽  
Geoffrey Shapiro ◽  
Jason S. Starr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Tumor Growth Inhibition ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear

TPS3161 Background: The p53 pathway has been implicated in antitumor immunity, including antigen presentation and T-cell proliferation. Loss of p53 function can increase resistance to immunotherapy across many tumor types. Eprenetapopt (eprenet) is a small molecule that stabilizes the folded structure of p53, resulting in activation of mutant p53 and stabilization of wild-type (WT) p53. It also targets the cellular redox homeostasis, resulting in induction of apoptosis in tumor cells. In vivo, mice carrying supernumerary copies of the TP53 gene harbor a pro-inflammatory tumor microenvironment, an effect recapitulated in TP53 normal-copy mice treated with eprenetapopt. Combining eprenetapopt and anti-PD1 or anti-CTLA4 therapy resulted in enhanced tumor growth inhibition and improved survival in TP53 WT mice inoculated with B16 melanoma and MC38 colon adenocarcinoma cells . Based on these results, we hypothesized that eprenet-induced p53 stabilization may augment response to immunotherapy. To test this hypothesis, we are conducting a phase 1b/2 study of eprenet in combination with pembrolizumab (eprenet+pembro) in pts with solid tumors. Methods: The primary objectives are to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and to assess the safety and tolerability of eprenet+pembro in pts with advanced solid tumors. The secondary objectives are to estimate the anti-tumor activity and to describe the pharmacokinetics of the combination. Exploratory objectives include assessing predictive and pharmacodynamic markers of response. The study includes a safety lead-in with a 3+3 dose de-escalation design for pts with advanced solid tumors with known tumor TP53 mutation status ( TP53 WT is acceptable) (max 18 pts), followed by expansion cohorts in pts with NSCLC, gastric/GEJ and urothelial cancer (max 100 pts). In expansion, pts with urothelial and gastric cancers must be naïve to anti-PD-1/ L1 therapy. Eprenet is given IV once daily on Days 1–4 while pembro is administered on Day 3 of each 21-day cycle. The RP2D of eprenet+pembro is considered the dose at which ≤ 1 of 6 pts in a cohort has a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Primary endpoints are occurrence of DLTs, adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs with eprenet+pembro. Key secondary endpoints are best objective response, progression free survival and overall survival. Exploratory endpoints include gene mutations by next generation sequencing (including TP53), mRNA expression, multiplex immunohistochemistry and transcriptomics, multiplex flow cytometry on peripheral blood mononuclear cells and cytokines in serum. Continuous monitoring of toxicity will be conducted. The trial opened in May 2020 and is actively enrolling patients. Clinical trial information: NCT04383938.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document