Phase I, pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic study of paricalcitol [19-nor-1 alpha, 25-(OH)2 D2] in combination with gemcitabine [2’,2’ difluorodeoxycytidine] in patients with advanced malignancies

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12010-12010
Author(s):  
D. Trump ◽  
M. Javle ◽  
J. Muindi ◽  
L. Pendyala ◽  
W. Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Cytidine Deaminase ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Unknown Primary ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear

12010 Background: Calcitriol+ gemcitabine (gem) combination results in synergistic anti-tumor effect in preclinical models. Cytidine deaminase (CDD) inactivates gem into 2’,2’-difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU) and its overexpression may lead to gem resistance. Calcitriol decreases CDD activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBM). Paricalcitol is cytotoxic in vitro and synergistic with several chemotherapeutic agents, including gem. We are conducting a phase I study of paricalcitol + fixed-dose gem. Objectives: The primary aim is to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination in patients (pts) with advanced cancer. Secondary aims are to evaluate toxicity, the effect of paricalcitol on gem PK, CDD activity in PBM and clinical outcome. Methods: Each cycle is 4 weeks: Gem 800 mg/m2 (over 80 min) weekly × 3, starting day 1; paricalcitol weekly, 24 h prior to gem, starting day 7. Standard 3+3 dose-escalation schema is used. Planned paricalcitol doses are 0.24, 0.72, 1.20, 1.8, 2.4 μg/kg, and 25% increments till MTD. Gem PK and CDD activity (PBM) are studied on days 1 and 8. Paricalcitol PK studies are obtained on day 7. Results: Fourteen pts with the following cancers: pancreatic (n=3), colon (n=3), lung (n=5), esophageal (n=1), bladder (n=1) and unknown primary (n=1) have been enrolled. No dose limiting toxicities have occurred. Median of 2 cycles were delivered (range 1–9). Grade 3 toxicities: anemia (n=3 pts), neutropenia (n=5), thrombocytopenia (n=3), thrombosis (n=2), anorexia (n=1), hypophosphatemia (n=1), dehydration (n=1), syncope (n=1), pneumonia (n=1) and chills (n=1). Grade 4 toxicities: anemia (n=1) and neutropenia (n=1). Hypercalcemia (> grade 1) did not occur. Stable disease occurred in 2 and progressive disease in 3. Conclusions: MTD was not reached at 1.8 μg/kg of paricalcitol with gem 800 mg/m2/week. Dose escalation is ongoing. PK data will be presented at meeting. Supported by NIH grants CA67267 and CA85142. [Table: see text]

Phase I trial of panobinostat (P) and imatinib (IM) in patients with treatment-refractory gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10032-10032
Author(s):  
Sebastian Bauer ◽  
Ralf A. Hilger ◽  
Florian Grabellus ◽  
James Nagarajah ◽  
Mathias Hoiczyk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Metabolic Response ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Plasma Concentrations ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear

10032^ Background: Panobinostat (LBH589; P) is a pan-deacetylase-inhibitor that has preclinical activity in combination with IM in GIST models in vitro and in vivo. Aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of escalating doses of P in combination with IM in patients with GIST who have failed IM and sunitinib treatment. Methods: This was a two-center phase I study using a 3+3 design with a prespecified expansion of the MTD cohort. IM was administered at a dose of 400mg qd. Following a 7 day run-in phase, escalating doses of P were added. The starting dose for P was 20 mg given as a three-times-per-week (MWF schedule) oral dose for 3 out of 4 weeks. Doses were increased by 10 mg if no dose limiting toxicities emerged. Blood samples were drawn for PK and biomarker assessments of IM, its main metabolite N-desmethyl-IM, and P using a validated RP-HPLC method. Acetylation of histone A3 was evaluated in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNC) as pharmacodynamic marker for P activity. Metabolic response using PET (EORTC-PET study criteria) was assessed on day 7 of IM run-in and after 3 weeks of combined treatment with IM and P. Results: In total 12 extensively pretreated (median 5 pretreatments) pts (4 f, 8 m; median age 56 y, 34-75 y) received study treatment at 2 dose levels (DL). 2 dose-limiting toxicities (grade 4 thrombocytopenia) occurred at DL 2 (30 mg). Most common AEs were thrombocytopenia, anemia, fatigue, nausea, emesis, diarrhea, creatinine elevation, abdominal cramping, and weight loss. DL 1 (20mg) was declared MTD, and 5 additional pts were enrolled at DL1. Analysis of P and IM PK revealed mean peak concentration of 14.8 +/- 9.5 ng/ml for P (20 mg). IM plasma concentrations with 400 mg once-daily administration were 2.8 ± 1.1 μg/mL at peak and 1.2 ± 0.4 μg/mL at trough. Histone A3 acetylation was demonstrated in PBMNC from pts treated at DL 1. 11 pts were evaluable for PET response: 1 had mPR, 7 had mSD and 3 had mPD. Longest treatment duration was 17 weeks (median: 6wks). Conclusions: P in combination with IM is moderately tolerated. Evidence of target inhibition at the MTD was associated with limited clinical activity in heavily pretreated pts with GIST.

Sequences of topotecan and cisplatin: phase I, pharmacologic, and in vitro studies to examine sequence dependence.

1996 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 3074-3084 ◽  
Author(s):  
E K Rowinsky ◽  
S H Kaufmann ◽  
S D Baker ◽  
L B Grochow ◽  
T L Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
In Vitro Studies ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Studies ◽  
Sequence Dependence ◽  
Renal Tubular

PURPOSE A phase I and pharmacologic study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of administering the topoisomerase I (topo I) inhibitor topotecan (TPT) in combination with cisplatin (CDDP) in minimally pretreated adults with solid tumors. The study was designed to evaluate the magnitude of the toxicologic and pharmacologic differences between the two sequences of drug administration. MATERIALS AND METHODS TPT was administered as a 30-minute infusion daily for 5 days and CDDP was given either before TPT on day 1 or after TPT on day 5. Each patient was treated with both schedules on an alternating basis every 3 weeks. Sequential dose escalation of TPT or CDDP resulted in three dosage permutation of TPT/CDDP (mg/m2): 0.75/50, 1/50, and 0.75/75. After the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) level was achieved, the feasibility of using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to permit further dose escalation was studied. To examine the interaction of TPT and CDDP in vitro, human A549 lung cancer cells were exposed to these agents concurrently and sequentially. RESULTS Dose-limiting neutropenia and thrombocytopenia resulted after the doses of TPT or CDDP were increased to greater than 0.75 and 50 mg/m2, respectively, without and with G-CSF. The sequence of CDDP before TPT induced significantly worse neutropenia and thrombocytopenia than the alternate sequence. In vitro studies failed to provide any evidence for the differences in the cytotoxicity of these two sequences. Instead, pharmacokinetic studies suggested that the differences in toxicity were due, in part, to lower TPT clearance and exposure when CDDP preceeds TPT, possibly due to subclinical renal tubular toxicity induced by CDDP. CONCLUSION The sequence of CDDP before TPT at doses of 50 and 0.75 mg/m2, respectively, is recommended for subsequent clinical trials in tumor types in which both agents have significant single-agent activity. The potential for sequence-dependent cytotoxic, toxicologic, and pharmacologic effects should be evaluated in concurrent clinical and laboratory studies in the course of developing combination chemotherapy regimens that consist of topo I-targeting agents and other antineoplastic agents, particularly DNA-damaging agents.

Bortezomib in Combination with Melphalan in the Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Phase I/II Study.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 209-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Berenson ◽  
H. Yang ◽  
R. Swift ◽  
K. Sadler ◽  
R. Vescio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Optimal Dose ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Full Potential ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Abstract Introduction: Bortezomib (VELCADE®) is a proteasome inhibitor that has demonstrated durable responses as monotherapy for the treatment of pts with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. In vitro, bortezomib has been shown to restore melphalan sensitivity to melphalan-resistant cell lines (U266-LR7) and to synergize with melphalan in killing myeloma cells, thereby allowing the use of lower concentrations of melphalan (Ma et al, Clin Cancer Res.2003;9:1136). The objective of this dose-escalation phase I/II study was to determine an optimal dose of combination bortezomib + melphalan, starting with doses below those usually recommended for each agent for pts with refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma. Dose limiting toxicities, safety, tolerability, and activity were assesed in a dose-escalation study. Methods : Bortezomib 0.7 mg/m2 was administered by IV push on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 in combination with oral melphalan (0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.25 mg/kg) on days 1–4 every 4 weeks for up to 8 cycles to 3-pt cohorts with active progressive disease. In the absence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), bortezomib was increased to 1.0 mg/m2 and melphalan co-administered using the original 5 escalating doses to subsequent cohorts. Results : Twenty six pts (50% male, median age 55 years, range 33–90 years) have been accrued to the study. The myeloma subtypes include IgG (16/26), IgA (4/26), IgM (2/26) and light chain only (4/26). The median ß2 microglobulin level was 5.0 mg/L (range 2.2–14 mg/L). In this heavily pretreated population (range 2–7 prior therapies), 12 patients received prior melphalan, 12 prior thalidomide, 7 prior CC-5013, 13 prior VAD, 2 prior bortezomib, and 8 prior autologous stem cell transplantation. Dose escalation has proceeded into the bortezomib 1.0 mg/m2 + melphalan 0.10 mg/kg cohort. Toxicities have been manageable. One DLT, grade 4 anemia, was observed at bortezomib 1.0 mg/m2 + melphalan 0.025 mg/kg, requiring expansion of that specific cohort. Grade 3 events were predominantly associated with myelosuppression (anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia) and were observed only among pts with baseline cytopenia. Among the 12 pts with baseline peripheral neuropathy (PN), symptoms worsened transiently in 1 pt, resolved in 1 pt, and remained stable in the other pts. Treatment-related PN (grade 1) developed de novo in 2 pts. Responses were observed in 67% (16/24 evaluable) of pts: 1 CR, 1 near CR, 6 PR, and 8 MR. The CR and near CR occurred in pts receiving bortezomib 1.0 mg/m2 in combination with melphalan .025 mg/kg. PR or better was independent of prior type of therapy and was also observed among pts who had previously received melphalan or bortezomib. Median time to progression was 1-18 mo. Six active pts out of 26 total pts remain progression-free for 2-8+ mo. Conclusion : Combination bortezomib plus oral melphalan is a promising regimen for the treatment of relapsed, refractory myeloma. The responses that were observed in pts who had previously received either drug serve as preliminary confirmation of preclinical evidence that the combination of low-dose bortezomib and melphalan has the capacity for chemosensitization and suggest possible synergy. Dose escalation with melphalan plus a fixed dose of bortezomib 1.0 mg/m2 is continuing in order to explore the full potential of this combination.

Combination of 5-azacytidine (5-AZA) and valproic acid (VPA) in advanced solid cancers: A phase I study

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3547-3547 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. O. Soriano ◽  
F. Braiteh ◽  
G. Garcia-Manero ◽  
L. H. Camacho ◽  
D. Hong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Histone Acetylation ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Neutropenic Fever ◽  
Dna Hypomethylation ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear ◽  
Western Blots

3547 Background: 5-AZA is a DNA hypomethylating agent. VPA is a histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACI). The combination of hypomethylating agents and HDACI has synergistic anticancer activity in vitro and in vivo. Based on this, we conducted a phase I study of the combination of 5-AZA and VPA in patients with advanced solid cancers. Methods: 5-AZA was administered SQ daily for 10 days. VPA was given orally daily titrated to 75–100 mcg/ml. Cycles were 28 days long. 5-AZA was started at 20 mg/m2 and escalated using an adaptive algorithm based on toxicity in the prior cohort. Each cohort included 6 patients (pts). Global DNA methylation was estimated with the LINE pyrosequencing assay in peripheral blood mononuclear cells on days 1 and 10 of each cycle. Histone H3 and H4 acetylation was assessed with western blots. Results: Forty seven patients were evaluable. Median age was 60 years (15–77). 5- AZA dose levels included 20, 25, 37.5, 47, 59, 75 and 94 mg/m2. One DLT occurred at 37.5 (Neutropenic fever (NF)). At 75 mg/m2, 1 grade 3 NF and at 94 mg/m2, 3 DLTs (2 NF and 1 thrombocytopenia) were observed. The MTD was 75 mg/m2 SQ daily for 10 days. Other toxicities included drowsiness (N=6), tremor (N=6), hypomagnesemia (N=1), anemia (N=2) and vomiting (N=1). Stable disease (SD) was observed in 16 pts (34%). One pt with rapidly progressive renal cell carcinoma had SD for 6 months (mos). Two pts with leiomyosarcoma of the uterus had SD for 8 and 6 mos. One pt with melanoma and two pts with uveal melanoma had SD for 4 mos. One pt with sinus adenoid cystic carcinoma and 1 with thymic carcinoma had SD for 4 mos. SD was also observed in pts with colon (N=3), sarcoma (N=2), papillary thyroid (N=2) and breast cancer (N=1). Global DNA hypomethylation was demonstrated in all of the doses of 5- AZA. Median LINE methylation pretreatment was 65% (59–70%), it declined to 61% (53–63%) by day 10 (p=0.001) and returned to baseline by day 0 of the next cycle. Histone acetylation was observed in 53% of the pts. Conclusions: The combination of 5-AZA and VPA in patients with advanced solid tumors is safe. The MTD of 5-AZA in combination with VPA was 75 mg/m2 SQ daily for 10 days. DLTs were neutropenic fever and thrombocytopenia. Clinical benefit (SD) was observed in 16 pts (34%). Transient global hypomethylation and histone acetylation were demonstrated. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase I, dose-escalation, multicenter study of ACT-PFK-158, 2HCl in patients with advanced solid malignancies explores a first-in-human inhibitor of glycolysis.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS494-TPS494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Ann Redman ◽  
Paula Raffin Pohlmann ◽  
Michael R. Kurman ◽  
Gilles Tapolsky ◽  
Jason Chesney
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Hypoxia Inducible Factor ◽  
Therapeutic Index ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear ◽  
Activating Mutations ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity

TPS494 Background: In human cancers, loss of PTEN, stabilization of hypoxia inducible factor-1α, and activation of Ras and AKT converge to increase the activity of a regulator of glycolysis, 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase (PFKFB3). This enzyme synthesizes fructose-2,6-bisphosphate (F2,6BP), which is an activator of 6-phosphofructo-1-kinase, a crucial step of glycolysis that is tightly controlled by multiple metabolic feedback mechanisms and dictates the rate of glycolytic flow. The vast majority of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas and approximately 50% of colon adenocarcinomas harbor activating mutations in Ras and these tumors have been reported to be highly glycolytic. PFK158 is a potent small molecule inhibitor of PFKFB3 that is selectively cytotoxic to Ras-transformed epithelial cells and displays broad anti-tumor activity causing ~80% growth inhibition in several mouse models of human-derived tumors and syngeneic murine models of colon cancer. Importantly, IND-enabling safety and toxicity studies have demonstrated that PFK158 is well tolerated in rats and dogs with an expected good therapeutic index, lending support for a phase 1 trial that is now underway. Methods: The primary objective of the study is to describe the dose limiting toxicity and to determine either the maximum tolerated dose or biological effective dose of PFK-158 in a “3+3” cohort-based dose escalation design that follows a modified Fibonacci scheme. Multiple secondary endpoints have been incorporated to assess the effects of PFK-158 on peripheral blood mononuclear cell F2,6BP activity and on glucose uptake using FDG-PET imaging. This trial is currently enrolling at two US sites; Cohort 1 has been completed without dose-limiting toxicity and Cohort 2 is enrolling with two subjects under treatment as of September 2014. In conclusion, PFK158 is the first-in-man and first-in-class PFKFB3 inhibitor to be examined in a phase I trial and may have significant clinical utility either as a monotherapy or when combined with other targeted agents. Clinical trial information: NCT02044861.

A prostate cancer clinical trials consortium trial of disulfiram (D) in men with nonmetastatic recurrent prostate cancer (PCa).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 219-219
Author(s):  
Michael Thomas Schweizer ◽  
Aditya Bardia ◽  
Amanda L. Blackford ◽  
Jianqing Lin ◽  
Andrew J. Armstrong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Local Therapy ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear ◽  
Psa Progression

219 Background: Epigenetic silencing of tumor suppressor genes (TSG) by promoter methylation contributes to carcinogenesis and progression. Targeting these epigenetic changes in PCa has been hindered by a paucity of available agents. D potently inhibits PCa growth in vitro and can cause demethylation and re-expression of known TSGs in PCa cells lines. Methods: To determine if D leads to demethylation changes [i.e. decreased global 5meC DNA content from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC)] we conducted an open-label, dose escalation trial of D in men with non-metastatic recurrent PCa after local therapy. Dose escalation occurred if a demethylating “response” (i.e. >10% decrease in global 5meC content) in <3 patients was observed in cohort 1. Cohort 1 and 2 received D 250 mg and 500 mg daily respectively; 1 cycle equaled 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects with a demethylation response. Secondary endpoints included rate of PSA progression at 6 months (i.e. confirmed >50% rise over baseline and >2 ng/mL above nadir), changes in PSA doubling time (PSADT) and safety/tolerability. Results: Two patients out of 9 (22.2%) in cohort 1 met our primary endpoint. Cohort 2 accrued a total of 10 patients, 3 (30.0%) of which had >10% decrease in global 5meC content. Only 5 subjects were on trial for ≥6 months, all were in cohort 1 and all had PSA progression by 6 months. Median PSADT change post-treatment was not significantly different between responders and non-responders (266.9 vs -7.8 days, P=0.18) or between cohorts 1 and 2 (22.5 vs -39.7 days, P=0.54). While there were no grade (G) 4 adverse events (AE), the drug was poorly tolerated with 6 patients experiencing G3 AE (3 per cohort). There was a trend toward fewer median number of completed cycles in cohort 2 vs cohort 1 (5 vs 9 cycles, P=0.12). Common AE included: fatigue, GI toxicity, ataxia/dizziness, and constitutional symptoms. Conclusions: A minority of patients had global PBMC demethylation changes, consistent with D acting as a probable demethylating agent in those individuals. Given the toxicities associated with D and no significant clinical benefits, further development of this agent should not be pursued in this population. Clinical trial information: NCT01118741.

A phase I study to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and anti-tumor activity of oral COH29, a novel ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) inhibitor in adult patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS2600-TPS2600
Author(s):  
Joseph Chao ◽  
Timothy W. Synold ◽  
Paul Henry Frankel ◽  
Joanne E. Mortimer ◽  
Vincent M. Chung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Small Molecule ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Dose Finding ◽  
Parp Inhibition ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear

TPS2600 Background: Human RNR catalyzes the rate-limiting step in the formation of deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs) necessary for DNA repair and replication. Rapidly dividing tumor cells are especially sensitive to RNR inhibition due to elevated dNTP requirements. Overexpression of the RNR RRM2 subunit is also associated with neoplasia, metastasis, and poor prognosis. COH29 is an aromatically substituted thiazole compound that is a novel small molecule inhibitor of RNR activity, and exhibits unique mechanisms and target specificity that overcomes the weaknesses of other small molecule RNR inhibitors. Preclinically, it is more potent than hydroxyurea and gemcitabine, and is not associated with iron chelating-related toxicities such as hypoxia. Cell lines deficient in BRCA1 also exhibit greater sensitivity to COH29 than BRCA1 wildtype cell lines, implicating inhibition of DNA repair mechanisms in line with PARP inhibitors. Methods: In this Phase I, single site, dose escalation, safety study pts will receive oral COH29 twice a day for 21 days of a 28-day cycle. Eligible pts are age ≥ 18 years, ECOG ≤ 2, able to take oral medication, have adequate organ and marrow function, and diagnosed with any solid tumor refractory to standard therapies. Dose escalation will be pursued utilizing a Simon’s accelerated titration design, which allows skipping of dose levels (dose doubling) during the accelerated dose-finding phase. Primary objectives are to determine the maximum tolerated dose of COH29, toxicities per CTCAEv4, and PKs. Secondary objectives include assessment of objective response per RECIST 1.1 every 2 cycles. PD assessment includes measurement of plasma CK18 levels to determine degree of cellular apoptosis, evaluation of dNTP pool levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) to evaluate RNR inhibition, as well as measurement of PAR expression in PBMCs to assess PARP inhibition. Quantitation of tumor RRM2 expression using dual-color immunohistochemistry will be explored as a predictive biomarker of anti-tumor response to COH29. Clinical trial information: NCT02112565.

A Phase I, Multi-Center, Dose Escalation Study of Atiprimod in Patients with Refractory or Relapsed Multiple Myeloma (MM).

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 111-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Wang ◽  
Moshe Talpaz ◽  
Sundar Jagannath ◽  
Asher Alban Chanan-Khan ◽  
Raymond Alexanian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Treated Group ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
M Proteins ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Atiprimod (N-N-diethl-8, 8-dipropyl-2-azaspiro [4,5] decane-2-propanamine) is an orally bioavailable cationic amphilic compound that inhibited STAT 3 activation in MM cells. It effectively blocked the signaling pathway of interleukin-6, resulting in activation of caspase 3 and apoptosis (Amit-Vazina et al, Br J Cancer, 2005). Atiprimod has also induced cytotoxicity in dexamethasone, doxorubicin, and melphalan resistant MM cell lines (Hamasaki et al, Blood, 2005). Based on these encouraging in vitro data, we initiated a multi-center, phase I trial of atiprimod for patients (pts) with refractory or relapsed MM who had 2 prior lines of therapy and serum creatinine less than 2 mg/dl. Primary objectives were to evaluate the safety of atiprimod in MM pts and to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Each cycle of treatment consisted of 14 consecutive days of oral atiprimod followed by 14 consecutive days without treatment. A standard phase I dose escalation was used to determine MTD with atiprimod dose levels at 30 mg, 60 mg, 90 mg, 120 mg, and 180 mg. To date, 14 pts from 4 centers have been enrolled with evaluable data in 12 patients. Median age was 60 (range 44–64); median prior lines of therapy were 4 (range 3–7); median duration from initial treatment to registration to this trial was 36 months (range 19–76). Cohorts of 3 patients have been treated at 30, 60, 90,120 mg/day and 2 patients have been enrolled at the 180 mg/day level; no cohorts have been expanded because of dose-limiting toxicity. Median number of cycles received by MM pts was 2 (range 1–5). Common Grade 1 toxicity events included diarrhea, liver enzyme elevation and dyspepsia. There were two Grade 2 toxicity events with 1 neutropenia at the 90 mg/day level and 1 diarrhea at the 120 mg/day level. One pt had Grade 3 transaminase elevation (peak AST 402, ALT 469 units/L, bilirubin 0.5 mg/dl) during the second cycle that resolved on its own during the 14 day period off treatment. Two patients with rapidly rising serum M proteins prior to enrollment had a transient but clear reduction of their M proteins (30% and 80%) after the first 14 days of atiprimod. Two pts at higher dose levels noted subjective improvement in their bone pain. Atiprimod was generally well tolerated in this heavily treated group of MM pts. The MTD has not been reached. Although there has been no response to date, clinical activity is not expected until higher dose levels are evaluated (240 mg/day, 300 mg/day, and 360 mg/day). After the MTD has been established, the study of atiprimod combinations should be considered based on the in vitro assessment of synergy with other active agents.

scholarly journals Pediatric Phase I Trial and Pharmacokinetic Study of Vorinostat: A Children's Oncology Group Phase I Consortium Report

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (22) ◽  
pp. 3623-3629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Fouladi ◽  
Julie R. Park ◽  
Clinton F. Stewart ◽  
Richard J. Gilbertson ◽  
Paula Schaiquevich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Drug Disposition ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Studies ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear ◽  
Higher Doses

Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), and pharmacokinetics of vorinostat administered as a single agent and in combination 13-cis retinoic acid (13cRA) in children with refractory solid tumors; to evaluate the tolerability of the solid tumor MTD in children with refractory leukemias; and to characterize the pharmacokinetics of a vorinostat suspension in children. Patients and Methods Vorinostat was administered orally daily starting at 180 mg/m2/d with escalations planned in 30% increments. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed with the initial dose. Acetyl-histone (H3) accumulation was assessed by Western blotting of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Results Sixty-four patients were enrolled on this multipart trial. In patients with solid tumors, the MTD was 230 mg/m2/d with dose-limiting neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and hypokalemia at 300 mg/m2/d. DLTs observed with the combination of 13cRA and vorinostat included thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, anorexia, and hypertriglyceridemia, resulting in a MTD of vorinostat 180 mg/m2/d 4 times per week and 13cRA 80 mg/m2/dose twice per day, days 1 through 14 every 28 days. Wide interpatient variability was noted in vorinostat disposition, with area under the concentration-time curves at 230 mg/m2/d for the capsule (range, 1,415 to 9,291 ng/mL × hr) and oral suspension (range, 1,186 to 4,780 ng/mL × hr). Significant accumulation of acetylated H3 histone in PBMC was observed after administration of vorinostat, particularly at higher doses. One patient with neuroblastoma experienced a complete response to the combination. Conclusion In children with recurrent solid tumors, vorinostat is well-tolerated at 230 mg/m2/d, with a modest dose reduction being required when combining vorinostat with 13cRA. Drug disposition is similar to that observed in adults.

Phase I study of panitumumab, chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for head and neck cancer (HNC): Early results

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6083-6083 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. J. Wirth ◽  
M. R. Posner ◽  
R. B. TIshler ◽  
R. I. Haddad ◽  
L. Goguen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy ◽  
Sequential Therapy ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Radiation Dermatitis ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Unknown Primary ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Egfr Antibody

6083 Background: Both chemotherapy and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody therapy improve outcomes in HNC when added to radiotherapy. This phase I study investigates the addition of the fully human anti-EGFR antibody, panitumumab, to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for HNC. Methods: Treatment naïve adults with stage III/IV HNC (primary sites include oropharynx and unknown primary) with normal hematologic, renal, and liver function are currently enrolling in a 2-part study. Part A determines the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel in 2 dose levels (DLs) (15 and 30 mg/m2 wkly×7 wks) with fixed-dose carboplatin and panitumumab (AUC of 1.5 and 2.5 mg/kg wkly, respectively) plus IMRT (70 Gy). Patients (pts) are enrolled in sets of 3. Part B determines the MTD of 5-FU in 2 DLs (800 and 900 mg/m2 days 1–4, Q21d) with fixed-dose docetaxel, cisplatin and panitumumab (75 mg/m2, 100 mg/m2 and 9 mg/kg, Q21d, respectively) for 3 cycles followed by panitumumab + CRT, as determined in Part A. Results: To date, 8 pts (n=3 at DL 1, n=5 at DL 2) have enrolled in Part A. One dose-limiting toxicity has occurred in DL 2: grade (gr) 4 febrile neutropenia. Other adverse events include gr 3/4 mucositis (n=6), gr 3/4 radiation dermatitis (n=6), gr 2 acneiform rash (n=6), gr 3 dysphagia (n=6) and gr 2 oral pain (n=6). Dose-reduction has not been necessary thus far. Enrollment will continue in a cohort of 10 pts in DL 2. Of 4 pts evaluated for response, 4 had complete response in the primary and neck, and 1 had a residual neck mass. This pt had 1 positive node on neck dissection. Conclusions: Preliminary results suggest that panitumumab can be added to CRT for treatment of HNC without magnifying the expected toxicities with CRT. Part B will investigate panitumumab + sequential therapy for HNC once the MTD of Part A is established. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document