Irestatin, a potent inhibitor of IRE1α and the unfolded protein response, is a hypoxia-selective cytotoxin and impairs tumor growth

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3514-3514 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Feldman ◽  
A. C. Koong
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Growth ◽  
Er Stress ◽  
Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Luciferase Activity ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Luciferase Reporter ◽  
Unfolded Protein ◽  
The Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Protein Response ◽  
Cells Cultured

3514 Background: The unfolded protein response (UPR) is an adaptive response to the toxic accumulation of misfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and is activated in solid tumors. IRE1a is a core component of the UPR and responds to ER stress through activation of its dual kinase and endonuclease domains. The IRE1a endonuclease splices the mRNA for XBP-1, generateing a potent transcription factor that is required for tumor growth. Methods: We developed a fibrosarcoma cell line expressing a fusion of unprocessed XBP-1 inserted upstream of firefly luciferase. Under ER stress, IRE1a catalyzes the removal of a 26-nt intronic sequence from the XBP-1 mRNA, introducing a shift in reading frame that permits translation of luciferase. We screened a chemical library of 66,000 small molecules for inhibitors of XBP-luciferase activity and identified 12 molecules, termed irestatins, which consistently inhibited the IRE1a signaling module without affecting the activity of a control CMV-luciferase reporter. We pursued several of the most potent irestatins, including irestatin 9389, which inhibited XBP-luciferase activity with an IC50 of ∼25 nM. Results: Irestatin-mediated inhibition of the IRE1a endonuclease impairs the growth of malignant myeloma cells and inhibits the survival of oxygen-starved tumor cells in vitro. Exposure to irestatin 9389 (2.5 μM) had a negligible effect on the survival of HT1080 cells cultured under normal oxygen conditions. However, in cells cultured under hypoxia for 48 hours, irestatin 9389 inhibited colony formation by nearly 80-fold (48% vs. 0.62%). A two-week course of treatment with single-agent irestatin 9389 (50 mg/kg) administered every other day by i.p. bolus injection was well tolerated and strongly inhibited the growth of subcutaneous HT1080 tumor xenografts (1790 ± 380 mm3 vs. 480 ± 210 mm3; P<0.01). Conclusion: Irestatins define a novel class of hypoxia- and ER stress-selective agents targeted to the underlying physiological response to the tumor microenvironment. Intratumoral inhibition of the UPR can potentiate cell death and impair tumor growth. Molecular intervention against central components of the UPR may represent an effective therapeutic strategy in cancer treatment. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Parallel signaling through IRE1α and PERK regulates pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor growth and survival

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul C. Moore ◽  
Jenny Y. Qi ◽  
Maike Thamsen ◽  
Rajarshi Ghosh ◽  
Justin Peng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Growth ◽  
Er Stress ◽  
Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Cultured Cells ◽  
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Growth And Survival ◽  
Unfolded Protein ◽  
The Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Protein Response

AbstractMaster regulators of the unfolded protein response (UPR)—IRE1α and PERK— promote adaptation or apoptosis depending on levels of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. While the UPR is activated in many cancers, its effects on tumor growth remain unclear. Derived from endocrine cells, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) universally hypersecrete one or more peptide hormones, likely sensitizing these cells to high ER protein-folding stress. For the nearly 1,500 Americans diagnosed with PanNETs annually, surgery is the only potentially curative treatment; however the five-year survival is extremely low for those who develop metastatic disease. To assess whether targeting the UPR is a viable therapeutic strategy, we analyzed human PanNET samples and found evidence of elevated ER stress and UPR activation. We then used genetic and pharmacologic approaches to modulate IRE1α and PERK in cultured cells and xenograft and spontaneous genetic (RIP-Tag2) mouse models of PanNETs. We found that UPR signaling is optimized for adaptation and that inhibiting either IRE1α or PERK leads to hyperactivation and apoptotic signaling through the reciprocal arm, thereby halting tumor growth and survival. Our results provide a strong rationale for therapeutically targeting the UPR in PanNETs and other cancers experiencing elevated ER stress.SignificanceThe unfolded protein response (UPR) is upregulated in human pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and its genetic or pharmacological inhibition significantly reduces tumor growth in preclinical models, providing strong rationale for targeting the UPR in neoplasms with elevated ER stress.

scholarly journals Effectors Targeting the Unfolded Protein Response during Intracellular Bacterial Infection

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 705
Author(s):  
Manal H. Alshareef ◽  
Elizabeth L. Hartland ◽  
Kathleen McCaffrey
Keyword(s):  
Bacterial Infection ◽  
Er Stress ◽  
Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Host Defense ◽  
Effector Proteins ◽  
Dual Nature ◽  
Unfolded Protein ◽  
Bacterial Replication ◽  
The Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Protein Response

The unfolded protein response (UPR) is a homeostatic response to endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress within eukaryotic cells. The UPR initiates transcriptional and post-transcriptional programs to resolve ER stress; or, if ER stress is severe or prolonged, initiates apoptosis. ER stress is a common feature of bacterial infection although the role of the UPR in host defense is only beginning to be understood. While the UPR is important for host defense against pore-forming toxins produced by some bacteria, other bacterial effector proteins hijack the UPR through the activity of translocated effector proteins that facilitate intracellular survival and proliferation. UPR-mediated apoptosis can limit bacterial replication but also often contributes to tissue damage and disease. Here, we discuss the dual nature of the UPR during infection and the implications of UPR activation or inhibition for inflammation and immunity as illustrated by different bacterial pathogens.

scholarly journals Confounding Roles of ER Stress and the Unfolded Protein Response in Skeletal Muscle Atrophy

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 2567
Author(s):  
Yann S. Gallot ◽  
Kyle R. Bohnert
Keyword(s):  
Skeletal Muscle ◽  
Er Stress ◽  
Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Smooth Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Skeletal Muscle Atrophy ◽  
Unfolded Protein ◽  
The Individual ◽  
The Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Protein Response

Skeletal muscle is an essential organ, responsible for many physiological functions such as breathing, locomotion, postural maintenance, thermoregulation, and metabolism. Interestingly, skeletal muscle is a highly plastic tissue, capable of adapting to anabolic and catabolic stimuli. Skeletal muscle contains a specialized smooth endoplasmic reticulum (ER), known as the sarcoplasmic reticulum, composed of an extensive network of tubules. In addition to the role of folding and trafficking proteins within the cell, this specialized organelle is responsible for the regulated release of calcium ions (Ca2+) into the cytoplasm to trigger a muscle contraction. Under various stimuli, such as exercise, hypoxia, imbalances in calcium levels, ER homeostasis is disturbed and the amount of misfolded and/or unfolded proteins accumulates in the ER. This accumulation of misfolded/unfolded protein causes ER stress and leads to the activation of the unfolded protein response (UPR). Interestingly, the role of the UPR in skeletal muscle has only just begun to be elucidated. Accumulating evidence suggests that ER stress and UPR markers are drastically induced in various catabolic stimuli including cachexia, denervation, nutrient deprivation, aging, and disease. Evidence indicates some of these molecules appear to be aiding the skeletal muscle in regaining homeostasis whereas others demonstrate the ability to drive the atrophy. Continued investigations into the individual molecules of this complex pathway are necessary to fully understand the mechanisms.

Sequencing of Argonaute-bound miRNA/mRNA hybrids reveals regulation of the unfolded protein response by microRNA-320a

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher J Fields ◽  
Lu Li ◽  
Nicholas M Hiers ◽  
Tianqi Li ◽  
Peike Sheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Er Stress ◽  
Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Mirna Biogenesis ◽  
Unfolded Protein ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Cells ◽  
The Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Protein Response

MicroRNAs (miRNA) are short non-coding RNAs widely implicated in gene regulation. Most metazoan miRNAs utilize the RNase III enzymes Drosha and Dicer for biogenesis. One notable exception is the RNA polymerase II transcription start sites (TSS) miRNAs whose biogenesis does not require Drosha. The functional importance of the TSS-miRNA biogenesis is uncertain. To better understand the function of TSS-miRNAs, we applied a modified Crosslinking, Ligation, and Sequencing of Hybrids on Argonaute (AGO-qCLASH) to identify the targets for TSS-miRNAs in HCT116 colorectal cancer cells with or without DROSHA knockout. We observed that miR-320a hybrids dominate in TSS-miRNA hybrids identified by AGO-qCLASH. Targets for miR-320a are enriched in the eIF2 signaling pathway, a downstream component of the unfolded protein response. Consistently, in miR-320a mimic- and antagomir- transfected cells, differentially expressed genes are enriched in eIF2 signaling. Within the AGO-qCLASH data, we identified the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) chaperone Calnexin as a direct miR-320a target, thus connecting miR-320a to the unfolded protein response. During ER stress, but not amino acid deprivation, miR-320a up-regulates ATF4, a critical transcription factor for resolving ER stress. Our study investigates the targetome of the TSS-miRNAs in colorectal cancer cells and establishes miR-320a as a regulator of unfolded protein response.

scholarly journals The unfolded protein response in fission yeast modulates stability of select mRNAs to maintain protein homeostasis

eLife ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Kimmig ◽  
Marcy Diaz ◽  
Jiashun Zheng ◽  
Christopher C Williams ◽  
Alexander Lang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Er Stress ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Unfolded Protein ◽  
Er Chaperone ◽  
Stress Sensing ◽  
Transcription Activators ◽  
The Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Protein Response ◽  
Selective Decay

The unfolded protein response (UPR) monitors the protein folding capacity of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). In all organisms analyzed to date, the UPR drives transcriptional programs that allow cells to cope with ER stress. The non-conventional splicing of Hac1 (yeasts) and XBP1 (metazoans) mRNA, encoding orthologous UPR transcription activators, is conserved and dependent on Ire1, an ER membrane-resident kinase/endoribonuclease. We found that the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe lacks both a Hac1/XBP1 ortholog and a UPR-dependent-transcriptional-program. Instead, Ire1 initiates the selective decay of a subset of ER-localized-mRNAs that is required to survive ER stress. We identified Bip1 mRNA, encoding a major ER-chaperone, as the sole mRNA cleaved upon Ire1 activation that escapes decay. Instead, truncation of its 3′ UTR, including loss of its polyA tail, stabilized Bip1 mRNA, resulting in increased Bip1 translation. Thus, S. pombe uses a universally conserved stress-sensing machinery in novel ways to maintain homeostasis in the ER.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document