Results of a phase III randomized controlled trial of the safety and efficacy of atrasentan in men with nonmetastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5018-5018 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. B. Nelson ◽  
J. L. Chin ◽  
W. Love ◽  
C. Schulman ◽  
D. Sleep ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Nasal Congestion ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Bone Alkaline Phosphatase ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Hormone Refractory ◽  
To Receive

5018 Introduction: Atrasentan is a potent oral, selective endothelin A receptor antagonist with biological activity in patients with HRPC. This randomized phase III trial of atrasentan vs placebo was conducted in 941 men with nonmetastatic HRPC whose prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was rising despite adequate androgen suppression. Methods: 467 patients were randomized to receive atrasentan 10 mg and 474 patients were randomized to receive placebo daily. Primary efficacy endpoints were time to disease progression (TTP) and progression-free survival, with progression defined as the onset of metastases. Secondary endpoints were overall survival, time to PSA progression, change from baseline in bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), and PSA doubling time (PSADT). Results: In the intent-to-treat population, median TTP was 764 days with atrasentan and 671 days with placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.915; G1,1 P=0.288). More placebo- treated patients (267, 56.3%) than atrasentan-treated patients (227, 48.6%) experienced disease progression. Overall, 278 patients (29.5%) discontinued before reaching a protocol-defined endpoint (155, 40.8% US vs 123, 21.6% non-US). More placebo-treated patients (210, 44.3%) than atrasentan-treated patients (169, 36.2%) experienced new skeletal lesions. Median survival was 1,477 days for the atrasentan group and 1,403 days for the placebo group (HR, 0.909; G1,1 P=0.176). Mean change from baseline to final BAP was -1.51 IU/L with atrasentan compared with +2.20 IU/L with placebo (P<0.001). PSADT was lengthened with atrasentan relative to placebo (P<0.031). The incidence of peripheral edema, nasal congestion, headache, dyspnea, anemia, and heart failure was significantly greater in the atrasentan group (P<0.05). Most of these events were mild and nonserious and did not result in study discontinuation. Conclusions: Data from this study did not show a statistically significant difference in time to progression between atrasentan and placebo. However, the high discontinuation rate, especially among US patients, may have compromised the ability of the study to accurately determine the treatment effect of atrasentan in this population. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) analysis comparing lapatinib plus capecitabine compared to capecitabine for metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1026-1026 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Sherrill ◽  
A. Allshouse ◽  
M. Amonkar ◽  
S. Stein
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Health State ◽  
Utility Analysis ◽  
Health States ◽  
Significant Difference

1026 Background: Data for this analysis is from a Phase III randomized study that was stopped early by the IDMC since a planned interim analysis demonstrated the primary endpoint had been achieved i.e. longer time to disease progression for patients taking lapatinib plus capecitabine (L+C) versus capecitabine (C) alone. The study included women with refractory advanced or ErbB2+ MBC who had received prior therapy which included anthracyclines, taxanes and trastumuzab. The Q-TWiST method was used to compare the trade-off between toxicities and delayed progression. Methods: The area under overall survival curves for each treatment group was partitioned into three health states: toxicity (TOX), time without toxicity or disease progression (TWiST), and the period until death or end of follow-up following disease progression (REL). TOX is time spent with grade ¾ adverse events (AEs) during progression-free survival (PFS) time. TWiST is the remaining time prior to progression in which no serious AEs were experienced. The utility-weighted sum of the mean health state durations was derived and treatment comparisons of Q-TWiST were made at varying combinations of the utility weights using a threshold utility analysis. Results: The ITT population included 399 subjects ages 26–83 [L+C group N=198, C group N=201]. Overall median survival was 67 weeks based on data through 3APR2006. There was not a significant difference between groups in mean duration of serious AEs prior to progression. (L+C 1.7 weeks, C 1.5 weeks). Using utility weights of 0.5 for both TOX and REL, i.e. counting 2 days of TOX or REL as 1 day of TWiST, resulted in a 7-week difference in quality-adjusted survival favoring L+C (p = 0.0013). The Q-TWiST difference was significant across an entire matrix of possible utility weights. Results were robust in sensitivity analyses including all AEs. An observed-utility analysis based on EQ-5D scores is in progress. Conclusions: The longer time to disease progression with L+C versus C was achieved without increased time with serious AEs, resulting in more quality-adjusted survival for patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

An updated overall survival analysis with correction for protocol-planned crossover of the international, phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of regorafenib in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors after failure of imatinib and sunitinib (GRID).

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 110-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
George D. Demetri ◽  
Peter Reichardt ◽  
Yoon-Koo Kang ◽  
Jean-Yves Blay ◽  
Heikki Joensuu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Failure Time ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

110 Background: The GRID study showed that regorafenib improves progression-free survival compared with placebo in patients with advanced GIST after failure of at least imatinib and sunitinib (HR 0.27; 1-sided p<0.0001; Demetri 2013). At the time of the primary analysis, no significant difference in the secondary endpoint of overall survival (OS) was observed (HR 0.77; p=0.199), but this result may have been confounded by the high rate of crossover to regorafenib (85%) of placebo patients at progression. We conducted exploratory analyses of updated OS data to assess the effect of correcting for this protocol-planned crossover. Methods: The data cut-off for this updated OS analysis was 31 January 2014 (2 years after the primary analysis). OS was corrected using two randomization-based methods: rank preserving structural failure time (RPSFT) and iterative parameter estimation (IPE); both methods are considered as best choice among all correction analytics. Hazard ratios and 95% CI were derived using the Cox model. Results: A total of 139 deaths had occurred at the time of data cut-off: 91 events (68.4% of patients) in the regorafenib group and 48 (72.7%) in the placebo group. A total of 22 patients remained on regorafenib treatment (median duration 2.1 years, range 0.9–2.4). The updated hazard ratio for OS favored regorafenib (0.85, 95% CI: 0.60 - 1.21; p=0.18). Median OS was estimated as 17.4 months in both groups, with crossover from placebo. The corrected HRs for OS are less than the uncorrected HR (Table). Conclusions: The updated analysis of OS in the GRID trial is consistent with the primary analysis. An exploratory analysis correcting for the impact of cross-over on OS suggests a survival benefit for regorafenib in GIST. Clinical trial information: NCT01271712. [Table: see text]

Is RECIST-defined progression free-survival a meaningful endpoint in the era of immunotherapy?

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 488-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sukhvinder Johal ◽  
Irene Santi ◽  
Justin Doan ◽  
Saby George
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Apparent Lack ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Treatment Beyond Progression ◽  
Significant Difference

488 Background: Progression-free survival (PFS) is often used as a primary endpoint in oncology clinical trials as a surrogate for overall survival. Traditionally, the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) have defined disease progression as a significant increase in the size of tumor lesions and the development of new lesions. However, some patients starting immunotherapy have shown initial increased size of tumor lesions followed by tumor regression, due to the unique mechanism of action of immunotherapies. This initial “pseudo-progression” could be classified inaccurately as disease progression, as evidenced by benefit from the treatment beyond progression approach ( JAMA Oncol 2016). The phase III CheckMate 025 trial of nivolumab versus everolimus in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma allowed treatment beyond progression if there was investigator-assessed clinical benefit and tolerability. The purpose of our study was to test if treatment duration for an immunotherapy was different from RECIST-defined PFS, and as such, could potentially explain the apparent lack of correlation between RECIST progression and overall survival shown in CheckMate 025. Methods: Using 1-year data from CheckMate 025, Kaplan–Meier methodology was used to estimate the median duration of PFS and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD). Stratified log-rank test was used to assess the difference in treatments. Results: For all patients, the median PFS with nivolumab was 4.6 months (95% CI, 3.7–5.4 months) and median TTD was 6.2 months (95% CI, 5.6–7.7 months). For everolimus, the median PFS was 4.4 months (95% CI, 3.7–5.5 months) and median TTD was 3.9 months (95% CI, 3.7–4.6 months). Conclusions: Patients in CheckMate 025 had significantly longer survival with nivolumab than with everolimus, but with similar PFS. Our analysis demonstrated that while PFS was similar to TTD with everolimus, there was a significant difference between the 2 measures for nivolumab, suggesting that RECIST-defined PFS may not be the proper endpoint to define progression for immunotherapies. Further evaluation of the association of TTD and other immune-related progression endpoints with overall survival is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT01668784.

Adding oral talactoferrin to first-line NSCLC chemotherapy safely enhanced efficacy in a randomized trial

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7095-7095 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Wang ◽  
D. Raghunadharao ◽  
G. Raman ◽  
D. Doval ◽  
S. Advani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Strong Association ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Anti Cancer ◽  
Evaluable Population ◽  
Cancer Activity

7095 Background: Talactoferrin alfa (TLF) is an oral immunomodulatory protein with a novel mechanism. TLF showed preclinical anti-cancer activity alone and in combination with chemotherapy. In Phase I/II trials, TLF was safe with apparent single-agent anti-cancer activity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: 110 chemo-naive patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC were randomized (1:1) in a multi-center trial to carboplatin/paclitaxel (C/P) therapy plus either TLF or placebo. Starting the day after C/P (C:AUC 5 mg/mL/min; P:175 mg/m2) in chemo-cycles 1, 3 and 5, oral TLF (1.5 g BID) or placebo was administered in 35-day cycles for up to three cycles or until progression. Primary endpoint was Confirmed Response Rate (RR; PR+CR) by CT using RECIST. Secondary endpoints included Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS). Results: Baseline patient and disease characteristics were comparable in both groups. All 110 patients were included in the Intent To Treat (ITT) population. 100 patients with at least one CT scan after starting treatment were prospectively defined as the Evaluable population. Adding oral TLF to C/P enhanced efficacy on all endpoints examined including RR, PFS and OS. Confirmed RR in the 100 evaluable patients significantly increased from 29% to 47% (P = 0.05). Confirmed RR in the 110 ITT patients improved from 27% to 42% (P = 0.08). Median PFS in both evaluable and ITT patients improved by 2.8 months (67%). Median OS improved by 31% and 18% in evaluable and ITT patients, respectively. A landmark analysis comparing survival in patients with and without a PR showed a significant difference (P < 0.01), suggesting a strong association between RR and survival. TLF appeared to be very safe and well tolerated with no drug-related SAEs. Fewer AEs were observed in the TLF arm than in the placebo arm, 346 and 432 AEs, respectively (P = 0.0023). The number of Grade 3/4 AEs was also lower in the TLF arm, 60 versus 91 (P = 0.0144). Conclusions: Adding oral TLF to standard C/P chemotherapy in NSCLC was safe and increased efficacy in a randomized, multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, with apparent improvements in RR, PFS and OS. Results with TLF compare favorably to other anti-cancer agents. Oral TLF will be further evaluated in a Phase III trial. [Table: see text]

A phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial comparing the investigational agent orteronel (TAK-700) plus prednisone (P) with placebo plus P in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) that has progressed during or following docetaxel-based therapy.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS4693-TPS4693 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Dreicer ◽  
David B. Agus ◽  
Joaquim Bellmunt ◽  
Johann Sebastian De Bono ◽  
Daniel Peter Petrylak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Fusion Gene ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Investigational Agent ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
To Receive

TPS4693 Background: The investigational agent orteronel is a selective inhibitor of 17,20-lyase, a key enzyme in the testosterone synthesis pathway. In a phase 1/2 study in men with mCRPC, orteronel reduced prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, and inhibited testosterone and DHEA-S consistent with potent 17,20-lyase inhibition (Agus D, et al. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:s5 abst 98). Docetaxel-based chemotherapy is an effective but noncurative therapy for mCRPC that has progressed on hormonal therapy; new therapeutic options are needed. Methods: This double-blind, multicenter study is assessing orteronel + P vs placebo + P in men with mCRPC (NCT01193257; C21005). Patients must have evidence of disease progression during or after receiving a total of ≥360 mg/m2 docetaxel within a 6-mo period. Patients who are clearly intolerant to docetaxel or have progressive disease before receiving ≥360 mg/m2 are also eligible if they have received at least 225 mg/m2 of docetaxel within a 6-mo period and meet the other inclusion criteria. Other eligibility criteria include radiographically documented metastatic disease and baseline testosterone <50 ng/dL following surgical or medical castration. Prior adrenal-targeted therapies are not permitted. Men may have opioid-requiring bone pain. The planned sample size is 1083; men will be randomized 2:1 to receive orteronel 400 mg twice daily (BID) plus P 5 mg BID or placebo plus P. The primary endpoint is overall survival; other endpoints are radiographic progression-free survival, PSA decrease of ≥50% at 12 wks, pain response at 12 wks, safety, time to PSA progression, objective response by RECIST, circulating tumor cell and endocrine marker changes, and patient-reported outcomes. After disease progression, men may continue to receive study drug. Tumor specimens will be analyzed for biomarkers that may predict orteronel antitumor activity, including the TMPRSS2:ERG fusion gene. The same regimens are being evaluated in a concurrent phase 3 study in chemotherapy-naïve men with mCRPC (NCT01193244).

Phase III Trial in Metastatic Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma with Fluorouracil, Leucovorin Plus Either Oxaliplatin or Cisplatin: A Study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (9) ◽  
pp. 1435-1442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salah-Eddin Al-Batran ◽  
Joerg Thomas Hartmann ◽  
Stephan Probst ◽  
Harald Schmalenberg ◽  
Stephan Hollerbach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Time To Treatment Failure ◽  
Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Reduced Toxicity ◽  
To Receive

Purpose This study was designed to compare fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Patients and Methods Patients with previously untreated advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction were randomly assigned to receive either fluorouracil 2,600 mg/m2 via 24-hour infusion, leucovorin 200 mg/m2, and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 (FLO) every 2 weeks or fluorouracil 2,000 mg/m2 via 24-hour infusion, leucovorin 200 mg/m2 weekly, and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 every 2 weeks (FLP). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results Two hundred twenty patients (median age, 64 years; metastatic, 94%) were randomly assigned. FLO was associated with significantly less (any grade) anemia (54% v 72%), nausea (53% v 70%), vomiting (31% v 52%), alopecia (22% v 39%), fatigue (19% v 34%), renal toxicity (11% v 34%), thromboembolic events (0.9% v 7.8%), and serious adverse events related to the treatment (9% v 19%). FLP was associated with significantly less peripheral neuropathy (22% v 63%). There was a trend toward improved median PFS with FLO versus FLP (5.8 v 3.9 months, respectively; P = .077) and no significant difference in median overall survival (10.7 v 8.8 months, respectively). However, in patients older than 65 years (n = 94), treatment with FLO resulted in significantly superior response rates (41.3% v 16.7%; P = .012), time to treatment failure (5.4 v 2.3 months; P < .001), and PFS (6.0 v 3.1 month; P = .029) and an improved OS (13.9 v 7.2 months) as compared with FLP, respectively. Conclusion FLO reduced toxicity as compared with FLP. In older adult patients, FLO also seemed to be associated with improved efficacy.

PICASSO III: A Phase III, Placebo-Controlled Study of Doxorubicin With or Without Palifosfamide in Patients With Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (32) ◽  
pp. 3898-3905 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher W. Ryan ◽  
Ofer Merimsky ◽  
Mark Agulnik ◽  
Jean-Yves Blay ◽  
Scott M. Schuetze ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
To Receive

Purpose Palifosfamide is the active metabolite of ifosfamide and does not require prodrug activation, thereby avoiding the generation of toxic metabolites. The PICASSO III trial compared doxorubicin plus palifosfamide with doxorubicin plus placebo in patients who had received no prior systemic therapy for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive doxorubicin 75 mg/m2 intravenously day 1 plus palifosfamide 150 mg/m2/d intravenously days 1 to 3 or doxorubicin plus placebo once every 21 days for up to six cycles. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by independent radiologic review. Results In all, 447 patients were randomly assigned to receive doxorubicin plus palifosfamide (n = 226) or doxorubicin plus placebo (n = 221). Median PFS was 6.0 months for doxorubicin plus palifosfamide and 5.2 months for doxorubicin plus placebo (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.08; P = .19). Median overall survival was 15.9 months for doxorubicin plus palifosfamide and 16.9 months for doxorubicin plus placebo (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.39; P = .74). There was a higher incidence of grade 3 to 4 adverse events in the doxorubicin plus palifosfamide arm (63.6% v 50.9%) including a higher rate of febrile neutropenia (21.4% v 12.6%). Conclusion No significant difference in PFS was observed in patients receiving doxorubicin plus palifosfamide compared with those receiving doxorubicin plus placebo. The observed median PFS and overall survival in this large, international study can serve as a benchmark for future studies of doxorubicin in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma.

Dacarbazine, Cisplatin, and Interferon-Alfa-2b With or Without Interleukin-2 in Metastatic Melanoma: A Randomized Phase III Trial (18951) of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Melanoma Group

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (27) ◽  
pp. 6747-6755 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich Keilholz ◽  
Cornelis J.A. Punt ◽  
Martin Gore ◽  
Wim Kruit ◽  
Poulam Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Interferon Alfa ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
To Receive

Background Based on phase II trial results, chemoimmunotherapy combinations have become the preferred treatment for patients with metastatic melanoma in many institutions. This study was performed to determine whether interleukin-2 (IL-2) as a component of chemoimmunotherapy influences survival of patients with metastatic melanoma. Patients and Methods Patients with advanced metastatic melanoma were randomly assigned to receive dacarbazine 250 mg/m2 and cisplatin 30 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3 combined with interferon-alfa-2b 10 × 106 U/m2 subcutaneously on days 1 through 5 without (arm A) or with (arm B) a high-dose intravenous decrescendo regimen of IL-2 on days 5 through 10 (18 × 106 U/m2/6 hours, 18 × 106 U/m2/12 hours, 18 × 106 U/m2/24 hours, and 4.5 × 106 U/m2 for 3 × 24 hours). Treatment cycles were repeated in the absence of disease progression every 28 days to a maximum of four cycles. Results Three hundred sixty-three patients with advanced metastatic melanoma were accrued. The median survival was 9 months in both arms, with a 2-year survival rate of 12.9% and 17.6% in arms A and B, respectively (P = .32; hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.11). There was also no statistically significant difference regarding progression-free survival (median, 3.0 v 3.9 months) and response rate (22.8% v 20.8%). Conclusion Despite its activity in melanoma as a single agent or in combination with interferon-alfa-2b, the chosen schedule of IL-2 added to the chemoimmunotherapy combination had no clinically relevant activity.

De-intensified chemoradiotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on plasma EBV DNA: A phase 2 randomized noninferiority trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 110-110
Author(s):  
Hai-Qiang Mai ◽  
Xiao Yun Li ◽  
Hao-Yuan Mo ◽  
Guo Ling ◽  
Dong-Hua Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ebv Dna ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Cycle Group ◽  
To Receive

110 Background: The cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), given at a dose of 100 mg/m2 for 3 cycles during radiotherapy, is the major treatment for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). As several retrospective studies showed that receiving a cumulative cisplatin dose of 200 mg/m2 can bring survival benefits to NPC patients, we sought to test the non-inferiority of 2-cycle concurrent cisplatin over 3-cycle in locoregionally advanced NPC with Epstein-barr virus (EBV) DNA levels < 4000 copies/ml. Methods: We did a non-inferiority, phase 2, randomised controlled trial. Patients were enrolled with stage III–IVB NPC, EBV DNA levels < 4000 copies/ml, aged 18–70 and adequate haematological, renal, and hepatic function. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 2 or 3 cycles of cisplatin-based CCRT. Patients in the 2-cycle group were scheduled to receive 100 mg/m2 cisplatin given every 3 weeks concurrently with radiotherapy, and patients in the 3-cycle group received 100 mg/m2 cisplatin given every 3 weeks for 3 cycles. Randomization was done by a computer-generated random number code with a block size of six, stratified by clinical stage III or IV. The primary endpoint was 3-year progression-free survival (PFS), with a non-inferiority margin of 10%. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, ID. NCT02871518. Results: Between September 2016 and October 2018, 342 patients were enrolled, of whom 332 were randomly assigned to receive 2 or 3 cycles of cisplatin. 314 (94.6%) patients completed protocol-defined cycles of chemotherapy. After median follow-up of 33.6 months, 20 (12.0%) patients in the 2-cycle group and 17 (10.2%) patients in the 3-cycle group had tumor progression, and the 3-year PFS rates were 88.0% and 90.4% respectively, with a difference of 2.4% (95%CI -4.3 to 9.1, Pnon-inferiority < 0.001). In the per-protocol analysis, 3-year PFS was 88.5% in the 2-cycle group and 90.6% in the 3-cycle group, with a difference of 2.1% (95% CI –4.7 to 8.9; Pnon-inferiority= 0.001). No significant difference was observed concerning OS, LRRFS and DMFS. The grade 3 or 4 acute adverse events were recorded in 113 (68.1%) patients in the 2-cycle group and 116 (69.9%) patients in the 3-cycle group. Patients in the 3-cycle group was observed to have significantly more hyponatremia. Besides, patients in the 3-cycle group presented with more grade 1 or 2 dry mouth, dysphagia, weight loss, fatigue, constipation, fever, mucositis and dermatitis. More grade 3 or 4 anorexia, mucositis and dermatitis were also recorded in the 3-cycle group. No patients died from treatment-related toxicities. Conclusions: IMRT plus 2 cycles of concurrent 100 mg/m2 cisplatin could be an alternative option for patients with low-risk locoregionally advanced NPC. Further phase III studies are needed to validate the findings of this study. Clinical trial information: NCT02871518.

Overall survival (OS) analysis of a phase II randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a poxviral-based PSA targeted immunotherapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5013-5013
Author(s):  
P. W. Kantoff ◽  
T. Schuetz ◽  
B. A. Blumenstein ◽  
M. M. Glode ◽  
D. Bilhartz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Viral Vectors ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Gm Csf

5013 Background: Therapeutic poxviral vaccines for prostate cancer are safe with preliminary evidence of clinical benefit in phase I/II studies. PROSTVAC-VF (PV) comprises 2 recombinant viral vectors (Vaccinia and Fowlpox), each encoding transgenes for prostate specific antigen (PSA) and 3 immune costimulatory molecules (B7.1, ICAM-1, and LFA3: TRICOM). PV is administered subcutaneously in a heterologous prime-boost regimen with concurrent low-dose GM-CSF. Methods: 122 patients (pts) were treated in a multi-center, double-blind, RCT of a vaccination series. Pts were randomized 2:1 to PV + GM-CSF vs. placebo empty vector + control saline injections (C). Vaccinia-based vector was used for priming followed by 6 planned Fowlpox-based vector boosts. The trial completed enrollment in July 2005. Eligible pts had metastatic disease, a rising PSA despite castrate testosterone levels, and a Gleason score of ≤7. Pts with a history of prior chemotherapy use, visceral metastasis, or narcotic use were excluded. The 1º endpoint was progression free survival (PFS), with progression defined as 2 new lesions on bone scan or RECIST-defined progression. Vaccination was discontinued after progression. Results: 82 pts received PV and 40 received C. Pt characteristics were similar (means): age (72PV/76C), PSA (134PV/188C), Alk-Phos (142PV/159C), LDH (207PV/218C), Hgb (13PV/13C), and number bone metastatic sites (5.3PV/6.5C). Mean number of vaccinations was 5.4 PV and 5.3 C. PFS was similar in the 2 groups (p = 0.56). However, at 3 years post study, PV patients had a better overall survival than C patients (25 alive, 30%, PV, versus 7 alive, 17%, C) and a longer median survival (24.5 months PV, versus 16 months C); estimated hazard ratio 0.6 (95% CI 0.4–0.9); stratified log rank p = 0.016. Conclusions: In a RCT, PV immunotherapy was associated with an 8.5 month improvement in median OS in men with mCRPC. These data provide evidence of prolonged anti-tumor activity, but need to be confirmed in a larger phase III study. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document