A phase III study of Æ-941 with induction chemotherapy (IC) and concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for stage III non- small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (NCI T99–0046, RTOG 02–70, MDA 99–303)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7527-7527 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Lu ◽  
J. J. Lee ◽  
R. Komaki ◽  
R. S. Herbst ◽  
W. K. Evans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Stage Iiib ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Type I ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Unresectable Stage ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Stage Iii Nsclc

7527 Background: Æ-941 is a shark cartilage extract with antiangiogenic properties. We conducted a placebo-controlled trial testing Æ-941, with IC and CRT, in unresectable stage III NSCLC. Methods: Eligibility criteria included performance status (PS) < 2, weight loss < 10%. Subjects received one of two treatment regimens depending on site of enrollment: carboplatin (C) (AUC 6) and paclitaxel (P) (200 mg/m2) × 2 cycles followed by CRT (60 Gy/30 fractions) with weekly C (AUC 2) and P (45 mg/m2) × 6 doses or cisplatin (CDDP) (75 mg/m2, d1) and vinorelbine (V) (30 mg/m2, d1 and 8) × 2 cycles followed by CRT (60 Gy/30 fractions) with CDDP (75 mg/m2, day 1) and V (15 mg/m2, d1 and 8) × 2 cycles. Subjects were randomized to receive Æ-941 (Arm A) or placebo (Arm B), 120 mL orally twice daily, at the start of IC and continuing after CRT as maintenance therapy. Randomization was stratified for stage, gender, and type of chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), with a planned sample size of 756 subjects providing 80% power to detect a 25% difference in OS, assuming a control arm median survival time (MST) of 13 months, type I error 0.05. Results: Between 6/00 and 2/06, 384 subjects were enrolled onto the trial and randomized. In 2/06 the trial was closed to new patient entry due to insufficient accrual. This final analysis is based on 379 randomized and eligible subjects (188 arm A, 191 arm B). Subject characteristics: 60% male, median age 63 years (range 37–84), 56% stage IIIB, 58% C-based chemotherapy, median follow-up 3.7 years. There was no significant difference in OS between arms A and B, with MSTs of 14.4 (95% CI 12.6–17.9) and 15.6 (95% CI 13.8–18.1) months, respectively (log-rank p=0.73). OS by pre-specified stratification factors: stage IIIB vs IIIA (MST 13.9 vs. 17.4 months, p=0.25), C vs. CDDP chemotherapy (MST 14.4 vs. 16.7 months, p=0.13), and male vs. female (MST 15.7 vs. 15.1 months, p=0.74). The study drug was well tolerated. Fewer subjects in arm A experienced grade 3 or higher adverse events (66% vs. 77%, p=0.018). Conclusions: The addition of Æ−941 to IC and CRT does not improve OS in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Five-year survival outcomes with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in unresectable stage III NSCLC: An update from the PACIFIC trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8511-8511
Author(s):  
David R. Spigel ◽  
Corinne Faivre-Finn ◽  
Jhanelle Elaine Gray ◽  
David Vicente ◽  
David Planchard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Unresectable Stage ◽  
The Pacific ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Stage Iii Nsclc

8511 Background: In the placebo-controlled Phase III PACIFIC trial of patients with unresectable Stage III NSCLC whose disease had not progressed after platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT), durvalumab improved overall survival (OS) (stratified hazard ratio [HR] 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53–0.87; p=0.0025; data cutoff [DCO] Mar 22, 2018) and progression-free survival (PFS) (stratified HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.42–0.65; p<0.0001; DCO Feb 13, 2017) based on the DCOs used for the primary analyses, and the degree of benefit remained consistent in subsequent updates. Durvalumab was associated with a manageable safety profile, and did not detrimentally affect patient-reported outcomes, compared with placebo. These findings established consolidation durvalumab after CRT (the ‘PACIFIC regimen’) as the standard of care in this setting. We report updated, exploratory analyses of OS and PFS, assessed approximately 5 years after the last patient was randomized. Methods: Patients with WHO PS 0/1 (and any tumor PD-L1 status) whose disease did not progress after cCRT (≥2 overlapping cycles) were randomized (2:1) 1–42 days following cCRT (total prescription radiotherapy dose typically 60–66 Gy in 30–33 fractions) to receive 12 months’ durvalumab (10 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks) or placebo, stratified by age (<65 vs ≥65 years), sex, and smoking history (current/former smoker vs never smoked). The primary endpoints were OS and PFS (blinded independent central review; RECIST v1.1) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. HRs and 95% CIs were estimated using stratified log-rank tests in the ITT population. Medians and OS/PFS rates at 60 months were estimated with the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: Overall, 709/713 randomized patients received treatment in either the durvalumab (n/N=473/476) or placebo (n/N=236/237) arms. The last patient had completed study treatment in May 2017. As of Jan 11, 2021 (median follow-up duration of 34.2 months in all patients; range, 0.2–74.7 months), updated OS (stratified HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.59–0.89; median 47.5 vs 29.1 months) and PFS (stratified HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.45–0.68; median 16.9 vs 5.6 months) remained consistent with the results from the primary analyses. The 60-month OS rates were 42.9% and 33.4% with durvalumab and placebo, respectively, and 60-month PFS rates were 33.1% and 19.0%, respectively. Updated treatment effect estimates for patient subgroups will be presented. Conclusions: These updated survival analyses, based on 5-year data from PACIFIC, demonstrate robust and sustained OS plus durable PFS benefit with the PACIFIC regimen. An estimated 42.9% of patients randomized to durvalumab remain alive at 5 years and approximately a third remain both alive and free of disease progression. Clinical trial information: NCT02125461.

Safety assessment for the combination of docetaxel, carboplatin, and thoracic radiotherapy in unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A report of the first 100 patients treated with chemoradiation on D0410

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7701-7701
Author(s):  
J. R. Rigas ◽  
M. S. Rubin ◽  
J. M. Waples ◽  
K. H. Dragnev ◽  
D. M. Zimmerman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Safety Information ◽  
Data Monitoring Committee ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Efficacy Evaluation ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Total Lung Volume ◽  
Unresectable Stage ◽  
Stage Iii Nsclc ◽  
Grade 3

7701 Background: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (chemoRT) is the preferred treatment for patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC. Limited safety information is available on the use of concurrent docetaxel, carboplatin and thoracic RT. We report the safety information on the initial 100 patients (pts) treated with this chemoRT as part of an ongoing US randomized phase III trial (D0410) evaluating the role of erlotinib/placebo following this concurrent chemoRT treatment. The sample size is 400 pts and the primary endpoint is progression-free survival. Methods: Pts with unresectable pathologically confirmed stage III NSCLC are randomized to receive either erlotinib 150 mg or placebo orally daily for 2 years following concurrent chemoRT with docetaxel 20 mg/m2, carboplatin AUC=2 intravenously weekly for 6 wks with thoracic RT of at least 61 Gy in 33 fractions over 6.5 weeks. The planned total lung volume exceeding 20 Gy (V20) was less than 32%. Only the chemoradiation safety information is being reported. This data was reviewed by an independent safety and data monitoring committee. Results: Pt characteristics; 59% males, median age 69 years (range 38 to 86), 21% adenocarcinoma, 48% squamous cell, 94% ECOG PS0–1, 49% stage IIIA, 15% weight loss = 10%. Of 600 planned chemotherapy treatments, 492 were administered (93 wk 1, 85 wk 2, 82 wk 3, 81 wk 4, 77 wk 5, 74 wk 6). There were 25 chemotherapy dose reductions; most commonly for esophagitis (8), neutropenia (5), renal dysfunction (3), hypersensitivity (2). There were no treatment-related deaths. There were 25 grade 3 and 3 grade 4 treatment-related adverse events. The most common grade 3/4 events were esophagitis (6), fatigue (3), odynophagia (2), neutropenia (1), thrombocytopenia (1), dematitis (1). Conclusions: This concurrent chemoradiation regimen appears to be safe. Enrollment to the phase III trial continues. There is a planned interim efficacy evaluation at 150 events (deaths or disease progression). Funded in part by Sanofi- Aventis, Genentech, and OSI Pharmaceuticals. [Table: see text]

A multi-centre, open-label study to assess the safety of Stimuvax (BLP25 liposome vaccine or L-BLP25) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (pts) with unresectable stage III disease

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3075-3075
Author(s):  
D. Soulieres ◽  
C. Smith ◽  
P. M. Ellis ◽  
N. Murray ◽  
K. Jasas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Event ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iiib ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Stage Iiia ◽  
Monophosphoryl Lipid A ◽  
Unresectable Stage ◽  
System L

3075 Background: L-BLP25 is an innovative cancer vaccine that incorporates a synthetic MUC1 lipopeptide in a liposomal delivery system. L-BLP25 is expected to elicit an immune response to cancer cells that express MUC1. Previous clinical studies have demonstrated that L-BLP25 has the potential to extend survival of pts with stage IIIB locoregional NSCLC (Butts C et al., JCO 2005; 23:6674–6681). The present ph I-II study was designed to assess the safety of the current formulation of L-BLP25 using a monophosphoryl lipid A in pts with unresectable stage IIIA and stage IIIB NSCLC. Methods: Pts with stable disease or an objective response to upfront radical therapy with chemoradiation for unresectable stage III NSCLC, plus ECOG 0–1 were eligible. All pts were vaccinated according to a previously described schedule (1). Maintenance immunizations were administered every 6-wks until disease progression. Primary and secondary endpoints were safety and survival respectively. Results: Twenty-two pts were recruited at 7 sites in Canada. 16 pts were evaluated for this interim safety analysis (8 stage IIIA, 8 stage IIIB, median age; 57, ECOG 0 56%, concurrent chemotherapy; 93.8%). Thirteen pts had a partial response and 3 had stable disease following chemoradiation. Thirteen pts experienced an adverse event (AE) during the first 4 vaccinations of which 7 pts had a L-BLP25 related adverse event. Grade 1/2 AEs related to L-BLP25 ≥10% included fatigue, dyspnea, insomnia, anorexia, headache, diarrhea, paresthesia, abdominal pain, influenza-like illness, urinary tract infection and peripheral neuropathy. No pts discontinued L-BLP25 due to an AE and no grade 3/4 AEs related to L-BLP25 were reported. Six pts (37.5%) had an injection site reaction. As of September 2006, 10 pts were still on study treatment. Conclusions: This formulation of L-BLP25 was well tolerated and the side effect profile was similar to that seen in previous studies (1). A controlled global multi-center phase III trial is underway to further evaluate L-BLP25 in this patient population. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II study of TS-1 (S) plus cisplatin (P) with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18070-18070
Author(s):  
F. Ohyanagi ◽  
N. Yamamoto ◽  
A. Horiike ◽  
T. Horai ◽  
K. Gomi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Fourth Generation ◽  
Unresectable Stage ◽  
Stage Iii Nsclc ◽  
Grade 3

18070 Background: Although combined chemoradiotherapy is the standard of care in stage III NSCLC, the optimal chemotherapy regimen is not established. S-1, a fourth-generation oral fluoropyrimidine is an active new agent for NSCLC and the combination with cisplatin has a favorable toxicity profile. The objective of this study was to evaluate feasibility and efficacy of S plus P with concurrent radiation for unresectable stage III NSCLC. Methods: Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed NSCLC, 20 to 75 years in age, performance status 0–1, with no prior chemotherapy were eligible for the study. Patients were treated with P (60 mg/m2 on day 1) and S (orally at 40 mg/m2/dose bid (80 mg/m2/d), on days 1 to 14) repeated every 3–4 weeks for 4 cycles and TRT (60 Gy/30 fr over 6 weeks starting on day 2). The primary endpoint was the response rate (RR), and planned sample size for this phase II study was 28 patients (Simon’s two-stage minimax design, P0=70%, P1=90%, a =0.1, β = 0.1). Results: Of 28 patients enrolled between August 2005 and October 2006, 28 were evaluable. There were 24 males and 4 females, median age of 63 (range 40–74) and 11 IIIA and 17 IIIB. Chemoradiotherapy was well tolerated; 2 cycles of SP and 60 Gy of TRT were administered in all patients and 24 (86%) patients received 4 cycles of SP. During concurrent chemoradiotherapy, grade 3 toxicities were neutropenia (8 pts), leukopenia (6 pts), fatigue (6 pts), anorexia (5 pts), febrile neutropenia (4 pts) and, esophagitis (4 pts). Only one grade 4 leukopenia were observed. During consolidation therapy, grade 3–4 neutropenia, anemia, esophagitis, and pneumonitis were developed in 4, 1, 1 and 2 patients, respectively. No toxic deaths have occurred. Overall RR was 85.7% (95% CI: 79.1- 98.7%) with 4 SDs and 24 PRs. The median progression-free survival and median survival is not mature enough to estimate as only 4 progression and no deaths have occurred. Conclusions: This chemoradiotherapy regimen produced promising response rate in patients with stage III NSCLC and it seems to be well-tolerated. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Cisplatin and docetaxel plus concurrent three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy in unresectable stage III A/B NSCLC

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18503-e18503
Author(s):  
L. Arcangeli ◽  
B. Orlandini ◽  
M. Torre ◽  
C. Carbonini ◽  
A. Sbarufatti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Conformal Radiotherapy ◽  
Stage Iiib ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Stage Iiia ◽  
Weekly Docetaxel ◽  
Unresectable Stage ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Thoracic Radiation ◽  
Stage Iii A

e18503 Background: Concurrent chemoradiation is standard of care for most patients with unresectable stage III A/B NSCLC but no standard chemotherapy regimen/schedule has been established. We conducted an experience to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a combination consisting of weekly docetaxel/cisplatin and radiotherapy in patients with unresectable stage III A/B NSCLC. Methods: Unresectable stage III A/B NSCLC pts with a good performance status (ECOG PS 0–1) were eligible. Patients with stage IIIB were chemonaive, while patients with stage IIIA were inoperable after a first line platinum-based chemotherapy. Treatment consisted of docetaxel 25 mg/m2 IV infusion followed by cisplatin 25 mg/m2 IV infusion was administered weekly during concurrent thoracic radiotherapy. Concurrent 3D-conformal RT thoracic radiation consisted of 45 Gy (1.8 Gy fractions 5 days/wk for first five weeks. Results: From 2006/01 to 2008/04, 16 pts were enrolled and all were evaluable for toxicity and response. Pt. characteristics: median age- 68 years (54–77), 80% males. Nine pts had stage IIIA (56%) and 7 patients had stage IIIB (44%).Histology subtypes included epidermoid (25%) and adenocarcinoma (75%). Radiologic response was seen in 11 patients (68%). Four patients had a stable disease (25%). Disease progression has occurred in 1 pt. Six patients undergone surgery after chemo-radiotherapy (37%). Four patients (25%) underwent a radical resection without residual mediastinal malignant disease. Toxicity was mild. Conclusions: Weekly docetaxel/cisplatin with concurrent 3D-conformal RT thoracic radiation plus is a well-tolerated out-patient regimen. and is feasible by multi-physicians collaboration group. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

START: A phase III study of L-BLP25 cancer immunotherapy for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7500-7500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Andrew Butts ◽  
Mark A. Socinski ◽  
Paul Mitchell ◽  
Nick Thatcher ◽  
Libor Havel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Immunotherapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Unresectable Stage ◽  
Clinical Hold ◽  
Stage Iii Nsclc ◽  
Symptom Progression

7500 Background: L-BLP25 is a MUC1 antigen specific cancer immunotherapy. We report results from the phase III START study of L-BLP25 in patients (pts) not progressing after primary chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for stage III NSCLC. Methods: From Jan 2007 to Nov 2011, 1513 pts with unresectable stage III NSCLC that did not progress after CRT (platinum based chemo and ≥50 Gy) were randomized (2:1; double-blind) to L-BLP25 (806 µg lipopeptide) or placebo (PBO) SC weekly x 8 then Q6 weeks until disease progression or withdrawal. Cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 x 1 or saline was given 3 days prior to first L-BLP25/PBO dose. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results: The primary analysis population (n=1239) was defined prospectively to try to account for a clinical hold by excluding pts randomized 6 months (m) before the hold. Arms were balanced for baseline characteristics. Median age was 61 y; 38.2% had stage IIIA and 61.3% IIIB; 65% had concurrent and 35% sequential CRT. Median OS was 25.6 m with L-BLP25 vs. 22.3 m with PBO (adjusted HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.75-1.03, p=0.123). Secondary endpoints time-to-progression and time-to-symptom-progression support consistency of results: HR 0.87 (95% CI 0.75-1.00, p=0.053) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.73-0.98, p=0.023). In predefined subgroup analyses, pts with concurrent CRT (n=806) had median OS of 30.8 m (L-BLP25) vs. 20.6 m (PBO; HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.64-0.95, p=0.016), while median OS with sequential CRT was 19.4 m (L-BLP25) vs. 24.6 m (PBO; HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.87-1.44, p=0.38; interaction p=0.032, Cox PH model). Sensitivity analyses revealed that there was no OS benefit in pts randomized 6 m before the hold (HR 1.09, CI 0.75-1.56, p=0.663). LEBLP25 was well tolerated with no safety concerns identified and no emergent evidence of immune related adverse events. Conclusions: L-BLP25 maintenance therapy in stage III NSCLC was well tolerated, but did not significantly prolong OS. Sensitivity analyses showed a smaller treatment effect due to the clinical hold, suggesting that longer uninterrupted treatment with L-BLP25 is required. Clinically meaningful prolongation of OS was observed in the predefined subgroup of pts with primary concurrent CRT. Clinical trial information: NCT00409188.

PACIFIC-2: Phase 3 study of concurrent durvalumab and platinum-based chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable, stage III NSCLC.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS8573-TPS8573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey D. Bradley ◽  
Makoto Nishio ◽  
Isamu Okamoto ◽  
Michael David Newton ◽  
Leonardo Trani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Additional Benefit ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Unresectable Stage ◽  
Stage Iii Nsclc ◽  
To Receive

TPS8573 Background: Durvalumab, a selective, high-affinity, engineered human IgG1 mAb that blocks PD-L1 binding to PD-1 and CD80, is approved in the US, Japan and several other countries, for the treatment of patients (pts) with unresectable, stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose disease has not progressed following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT). These approvals were based on results from the phase 3 PACIFIC study, in which durvalumab was given 1–42 days after completion of definitive cCRT and significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs placebo (median 16.8 vs 5.6 months; HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.42– 0.65; p<0.001) and overall survival (OS) vs placebo (stratified HR 0.68; 99.73% CI 0.47–0.997; p=0.0025). Increasing evidence suggests additional benefit when anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies are administered alongside cCRT. The PACIFIC 2 study therefore aims to assess whether durvalumab plus cCRT provides additional benefit, in terms of PFS and objective response rate (ORR), compared with cCRT alone. Methods: PACIFIC 2 is a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, international study. Approximately 300 pts with unresectable stage III NSCLC will be randomized (2:1) to receive either durvalumab (intravenous 1500 mg) every 4 weeks (q4w) + cCRT, or placebo q4w + cCRT. Eligible pts must have histologically or cytologically confirmed stage III disease; ECOG performance status 0 or 1; and life expectancy >12 weeks at randomization. Pts who discontinue treatment will be followed for safety and OS. Primary endpoints are PFS and ORR (RECIST v1.1) assessed via blinded independent central review. Secondary endpoints include OS; OS at month 24; complete response (CR) rate; duration of response; disease control rate; time to death/distant metastases; time from randomization to second progression; safety; and symptoms, functioning and global health status. Pts with a CR, partial response or stable disease will continue to receive durvalumab or placebo until clinical or RECIST v1.1-defined disease progression, or until another discontinuation criterion is met. Study enrollment began in March 2018 and recruitment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03519971.

OPTiM: A randomized phase III trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) compared with subcutaneously (sc) administered GM-CSF for the treatment (tx) of unresectable stage IIIb, IIIc, and IV melanoma.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS8604-TPS8604
Author(s):  
Howard Kaufman ◽  
Volker Jean Wagner ◽  
Howard Goldsweig ◽  
Bin Yao ◽  
Robert Coffin
Keyword(s):  
Stage Iiib ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Fisher Exact Test ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Durable Response ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Gm Csf ◽  
Unresectable Stage

TPS8604 Background: T-VEC (formerly OncoVEXGM-CSF) is an oncolytic HSV1 that selectively replicates in tumors. The proposed MOA includes lytic destruction of injected tumors and induction of a systemic anti-tumor immune response enhanced by local GM-CSF expression. Intratumoral T-VEC tx in a 50-patient (pt) ph II study in advanced melanoma (Stage IIIc-IVM1c) was well tolerated and achieved a high rate and duration of response, including 20% CR (Senzer et al., JCO 2009; 27: 5763-71). As immune effects may be delayed, progressive disease (PD) often occurred before response. Based on the ph II data, a randomized ph III trial of T-VEC in unresectable melanoma (the OPTiM study; clinical trials registry NCT00769704) was designed taking into account the response patterns seen with T-VEC and other immunotherapeutic agents. T-VEC is the first "armed" oncolytic agent to enter pivotal testing worldwide. Methods: OPTiM compares the efficacy and safety of intratumoral T-VEC to sc GM-CSF in 430 pts with treated or untreated unresectable Stage IIIb-IVM1c melanoma stratified by typical prognostic factors. Pts are randomized 2:1 to T-VEC (priming dose of up to 4 x 106 pfu intratumorally then 3 wks later by up to 4 x 108 pfu Q2W) or GM-CSF 125 µg/m2 qd sc x 14 days every 28 days. Key eligibility criteria are ≥ 18 yrs old, ECOG 0-1, and at least 1 injectable cutaneous, sc, or nodal tumor. The primary endpoint is durable response rate (DRR: CR or PR continuously maintained for ≥ 6 mo initiating within 12 mo of starting tx; secondary endpoints include OS. Responses are subject to independent review. Pts are treated until wk 24, even with PD. Thereafter pts are treated until clinically significant PD, CR, or for 1 yr. The study has 90% power to show a 10% difference in DRR with 2-sided Fisher Exact Test (α = 5%). Enrollment closed in July 2011 with 439 pts randomized in the US, UK, S Africa, and Canada. Interim analysis in Dec 2010 on 75 pts on study > 9 mo concluded that the study should continue. Results are expected during 2012. Conclusions: T-VEC provides a novel potential tx for melanoma. This pivotal ph III study is expected to report during 2012.

Factors associated with receipt and overall survival of concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus single modality therapy in unresectable stage III NSCLC.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18191-e18191
Author(s):  
Jorge E. Gomez ◽  
Kellie Ryan ◽  
Priyanka J. Bobbili ◽  
Akanksha Dua ◽  
Maral DerSarkissian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Unresectable Stage ◽  
Stage Iii Nsclc ◽  
Single Modality

e18191 Background: While concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) is standard of care for patients (pts) with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), some pts receive single modality therapy. This study identified predictors of therapy and differences in overall survival (OS) in a Medicare population. Methods: This retrospective study used Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results -Medicare data (2009-2014). Stage III NSCLC pts aged ≥65 yrs, with ≥1 claim for systemic therapy or radiotherapy (RT) within 90 days of diagnosis were included. cCRT pts had overlapping claims for chemotherapy and RT ≤90 days from start of therapy; remaining pts were grouped by first therapy received. Sequential CRT patients and those with surgical resection of tumor were excluded from this analysis. Logistic regression was used to analyze predictors of cCRT. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare OS between therapies. Results: Of 4,544 pts identified, 51% received cCRT, 21% systemic therapy, and 27% RT. Across groups, cCRT patients were likely younger (p < 0.001), White (p < 0.001), male (p = 0.015), and with a good predicted performance status (PS) (p < 0.001). After adjustment, several variables were predictive of receiving cCRT (Table). Median OS was 14.7 months (mo) for cCRT vs. 10.9 mo for systemic therapy (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.24-1.49, p < 0.001) vs. 7.8 mo for RT (adjusted HR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.42-1.69, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Only 51% of pts received cCRT. Age, race, stage, PS and comorbidity index were predictive of cCRT. Given the survival benefit, physicians should be encouraged to pursue cCRT in all eligible pts. Further efforts to develop less morbid therapies are critical in this population. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document