Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 founder mutations in Brazilian hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 22108-22108 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. P. Ewald ◽  
F. R. Vargas ◽  
M. A. Moreira ◽  
C. M. Filho ◽  
D. R. da Cunha ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tu Nguyen-Dumont ◽  
Pawel Karpinski ◽  
Maria M. Sasiadek ◽  
Hayane Akopyan ◽  
Jason A. Steen ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose To characterize the spectrum of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic germline variants in women from south-west Poland and west Ukraine affected with breast or ovarian cancer. Testing in women at high risk of breast and ovarian cancer in these regions is currently mainly limited to founder mutations. Methods Unrelated women affected with breast and/or ovarian cancer from Poland (n = 337) and Ukraine (n = 123) were screened by targeted sequencing. Excluded from targeted sequencing were 34 Polish women who had previously been identified as carrying a founder mutation in BRCA1. No prior testing had been conducted among the Ukrainian women. Thus, this study screened BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the germline DNA of 426 women in total. Results We identified 31 and 18 women as carriers of pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) genetic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively. We observed five BRCA1 and eight BRCA2 P/LP variants (13/337, 3.9%) in the Polish women. Combined with the 34/337 (10.1%) founder variants identified prior to this study, the overall P/LP variant frequency in the Polish women was thus 14% (47/337). Among the Ukrainian women, 16/123 (13%) women were identified as carrying a founder mutation and 20/123 (16.3%) were found to carry non-founder P/LP variants (10 in BRCA1 and 10 in BRCA2). Conclusions These results indicate that genetic testing in women at high risk of breast and ovarian cancer in Poland and Ukraine should not be limited to founder mutations. Extended testing will enhance risk stratification and management for these women and their families.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13684-e13684
Author(s):  
Fei Ma ◽  
Lixi Li ◽  
Zongbi Yi ◽  
Jianming Shi ◽  
Hua Jiang ◽  
...  

e13684 Background: Pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition genes BRCA1/2 confer susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer and well-studied. But the characteristics of BRCA in other cancers is unknown, we identified and characterized BRCA germline variants in a large pan-cancer in China. Methods: NGS was performed on genomic DNA from 29,676 pan-cancer patients. Large fragment deletions were all verified by QPCR. We integrated guidelines of ACMG/AMP, ENIGMA and China expert consensus. Based on the in-house system, variants were interpreted one-by-one and classified into 5 grades: Benign (B), Likely Benign(LB), Variant of Uncertain significance(VUS), Likely pathogenic (LP), Pathogenic (P). Results: Among 29,676 patients, 300 BRCA1 mutations and 440 BRCA2 mutations were detected in our study. The proportion among P/LP/VUS/LB/B were 36.1%, 11.6%, 36.6%, 11.1% and 4.6%. Consistent with previous reports, the mutations spread around the whole genes. Missense and frameshift were most common types in BRCA1 (40%, 25.3%) and BRCA2 (42.3%, 29.3%). 192(25.9%) mutations were not reported in any of the databases. Among these newly reported mutations, 32 (16.7%) were classified as P, 62 (32.3%) LP and 98 (51%) VUS. Totally, 522 (1.8%) patients were identified with P/LP BRCA1/2 mutations. No founder mutations in Chinese population were defined, but BRCA1 5470_5477delATTGGGCA (I1824Dfs*3) and BRCA2 3109C > T (Q1037*) had the highest prevalence indicating the common P/LP mutations in Chinese. On the whole, BRCA-associated hereditary cancer harbored higher P/LP percent than other cancer types (11.1% vs 0.7%). Different distribution and percent were observed in BRCA1 and BRCA2, the P/LP mutations were found in double primary cancers of breast and ovary (76.9% vs 38.5%), followed by ovarian cancer (15.5% vs 6.3%), breast cancer(3.8% vs 4.0%), endometrial cancer(1.6% vs 2.4%), prostatic cancer(1.3% vs 1.9%), pancreatic cancer (0.3% vs 1.8%), biliary tract tumor (0% vs 1%), thyroid cancer (0% vs 0.9%), NSCLC(0.2% vs 0.5%) and colorectal cancer(0.08% vs 0.4%). Except for SNV/Indels, large range heterozygous deletions were found in 9 patients, including 4 (0.6%) OC, 4 (0.2%) BC and 1 NSCLC, almost all interfering with BRCA1. Conclusions: This analysis depicted a comprehensive landscape of germline BRCA1/2 variants in Chinese pan-cancer. Besides breast and ovarian cancer, lots of other cancers also harbor BRCA germline mutation, retrospective family history and hereditary cancer risk assessment needs further study.


2013 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard M Brohet ◽  
Maria E Velthuizen ◽  
Frans B L Hogervorst ◽  
Hanne EJ Meijers-Heijboer ◽  
Caroline Seynaeve ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-34
Author(s):  
Steven A Narod

Genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations has become an important part of the practice of medical oncology and clinical genetics over the past decade. Increasing numbers of women are requesting a genetic test so that they may better understand their personal risks of breast and ovarian cancer, and so that they may take appropriate measures to reduce the risk. Several of the risk factors can be modified, including breastfeeding and the use of oral contraceptives. A significant number of women opt for preventive mastectomy or oophorectomy, which will dramatically reduce the risks of breast and ovarian cancer. Chemoprevention with tamoxifen is still uncommon, largely due to women's fears of the side effects of the drug. A number of studies have shown that magnetic resonance imaging is superior to conventional mammography in terms of the early detection of breast cancer in the high-risk population. This article explores what is known about assessing genetic risk and the evidence supporting a range of preventive strategies.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suha Al-Oballi Kridli ◽  
Holly Austin

Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death among gynecological cancers. There are many risk factors that can increase a woman’s susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancers, some of which are modifiable.  However, non-modifiable risks for breast and ovarian cancer include the presence of genetic mutations (BRCA) increase the risk of these diseases. The purpose of this review was to identify factors, reported in the literature, known to affect women’s decision to get genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. A total of 31 studies that met the inclusion criteria were included in this review. Several internal and external factors, influencing women’s decision to getting tested for BRCA mutations, were identified and explained. Implications for clinical practice were provided.


2002 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 457-465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark E. Robson

Background Hereditary predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer, most commonly due to germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2, has been recognized for many years. The optimal clinical management of individuals with such a predisposition is not yet completely defined. Methods The current literature regarding the clinical management of individuals at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer was reviewed. Results Women with germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations are at substantially increased risk for breast and ovarian cancer, although the risks may not be as high as originally reported. Current surveillance options are restricted in their effectiveness by both host and tumor factors as well as limitations of the techniques. Surgical prevention options, while effective, may be complicated by physical or psychological morbidity. Nonsurgical prevention options are under development. Conclusions The ability to define women as being at hereditary risk for breast and ovarian cancer facilitates the use of specialized surveillance and prevention strategies. Genetic testing, which plays a role in defining risk, requires careful pre- and post-test counseling to discuss the limitations of testing itself and available management strategies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document