scholarly journals Assessing Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in the Patient With Cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (29) ◽  
pp. 4839-4847 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alok A. Khorana ◽  
Gregory C. Connolly

PurposePatients with cancer are increasingly at risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Rates of VTE, however, vary markedly among patients with cancer.DesignThis review focuses on recent data derived from population-based, hospital-based, and outpatient cohort studies of patients with cancer that have identified multiple clinical risk factors as well as candidate laboratory biomarkers predictive of VTE.ResultsClinical risk factors for cancer-associated VTE include primary tumor site, stage, initial period after diagnosis, presence and number of comorbidities, and treatment modalities including systemic chemotherapy, antiangiogenic therapy, and hospitalization. Candidate predictive biomarkers include elevated platelet or leukocyte counts, tissue factor, soluble P-selectin, and D-dimer. A recently validated risk model, incorporating some of these factors, can help differentiate patients at high or low risk for developing VTE while receiving chemotherapy.ConclusionIdentifying patients with cancer who are most at risk for VTE is essential to better target thromboprophylaxis, with the eventual goal of reducing the burden as well as the consequences of VTE for patients with cancer.

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1182-1182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marion K Mateos ◽  
Toby N. Trahair ◽  
Chelsea Mayoh ◽  
Pasquale M Barbaro ◽  
Rosemary Sutton ◽  
...  

Abstract Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is an unpredictable and life-threatening toxicity that occurs early in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) therapy. The incidence is approximately 5% in children diagnosed with ALL [Caruso et al. Blood. 2006;108(7):2216-22], which is higher than in other pediatric cancer types [Athale et al. Pediatric Blood & Cancer. 2008;51(6):792-7]. Clinical risk factors for VTE in children during ALL therapy include older age and the use of asparaginase. We hypothesized that there may be additional risk factors that can modify VTE risk, beyond those previously reported [Mitchell et al. Blood. 2010;115(24):4999-5004]. We sought to define early predictive clinical factors that could select a group of children at highest risk of VTE, with possible utility in an interventional trial of prophylactic anticoagulation. We conducted a retrospective study of 1021 Australian children, aged 1-18 years, treated between 1998-2013 on successive BFM-based ALL therapies. Patient records were reviewed to ascertain incidence of VTE; and to systematically document clinical variables present at diagnosis and during induction/consolidation phases of therapy. The CTCAE v4.03 system was used for grading of VTE events. Multivariate logistic and cox regression were used to determine significant clinical risk factors associated with VTE (SPSS v23.0). All P values were 2-tailed, significance level <.05. The incidence of on-treatment VTE was 5.09% [96% ≥Grade 2 (CTCAE v4.0)]. Age ≥10 years [P =.048, HR 1.96 (95% confidence interval= 1.01-3.82)], positive blood culture in induction/consolidation [ P =.009, HR 2.35 (1.24-4.46)], extreme weight at diagnosis <5th or >95th centile [ P =.028, HR 2.14 (1.09-4.20)] and elevated peak gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) >5 x upper limit normal in induction/consolidation [ P =.018, HR 2.24 (1.15-4.36)] were significantly associated with VTE in multivariate cox regression modeling. The cumulative incidence of VTE, if all 4 clinical risk factors in our model were present, was 33.33%, which is significantly greater than the incidence of VTE for a patient without any risk factors (1.62%, P <.001). These 4 clinical factors could be used as a basis for assigning thromboprophylaxis in children with ALL. Our model detected 80% (42/52) of all VTE events by incorporating one or more risk factors. An equal proportion of patients eventually developing VTE could be predicted by weight and age ≥10 years; or later bacteremia and elevated GGT. Bacteremia, when present as a risk factor, preceded VTE in 80% of cases (20/25 cases) at a median of 29 days before VTE (range 3-668 days). The negative predictive value (NPV), specificity and sensitivity for the 4 risk factor model were 98.38%, 98.70% and 28.57% respectively. If 3 specified risk factors were included in the algorithm, such as 2 baseline and one treatment-related variable, the incidence of VTE was ≥25%, NPV 98.38%, specificity ≥96.19% and sensitivity 80%. The high NPV and high specificity mean the model can successfully exclude children who are not at increased risk of VTE. The challenge is to balance unnecessary exposure to anticoagulation against the risk of development of VTE. We have identified novel clinical risk factors in induction/consolidation - positive blood culture, hepatic enzymatic elevation and extreme weight at diagnosis- that may highlight risk mechanisms related to VTE pathogenesis. Our predictive model can define a group at highest risk of VTE who may benefit from randomized trials of prophylactic anticoagulation in childhood ALL therapy. Acknowledgments: The authors acknowledge support from the Kids Cancer Alliance (a Translational Cancer Research Centre of Cancer Institute NSW), Cancer Institute New South Wales, Royal Australasian College of Physicians - Kids Cancer Project Research Entry Scholarship, Cancer Therapeutics CRC (CTx) PhD Clinician Research Top-Up Scholarship, The Kids Cancer Project, Australian and New Zealand Children's Haematology Oncology Group, ASSET study members, data managers and clinical research associates at each site. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2000 ◽  
Vol 160 (22) ◽  
pp. 3431 ◽  
Author(s):  
James D. Douketis ◽  
Gary A. Foster ◽  
Mark A. Crowther ◽  
Martin H. Prins ◽  
Jeffrey S. Ginsberg

Author(s):  
David A. Kolin ◽  
Scott Kulm ◽  
Olivier Elemento

BACKGROUNDBoth clinical and genetic factors drive the risk of venous thromboembolism. However, whether clinically recorded risk factors and genetic variants can be combined into a clinically applicable predictive score remains unknown.METHODSUsing Cox proportional-hazard models, we analyzed the association of risk factors with the likelihood of venous thromboembolism in U.K. Biobank, a large prospective cohort. We created a novel ten point clinical score using seven established clinical risk factors for venous thromboembolism. We also generated a polygenic risk score of 21 single nucleotide polymorphisms to quantify genetic risk. The genetic score was categorized into high risk (top two deciles of scores), intermediate risk (deciles three to eight), and low risk (lowest two deciles). The discrete clinical score led to the following approximate decile categorizations: high risk (5 to 10 points), intermediate risk (3 to 4 points), and low risk (0 to 2 points).RESULTSAmongst the 502,536 participants in the U.K. Biobank, there were 4,843 events of venous thromboembolism. Analyses of established clinical risk factors and the most commonly used medications revealed that participants were at decreased risk of venous thromboembolism if they had ever used oral contraceptive pills (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79 to 0.99) or if they currently used bendroflumethiazide (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.95), cod liver oil capsules (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.99), or atenolol (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.91). Participants were at significantly increased risk of venous thromboembolism if they were at high clinical risk (hazard ratio, 5.98; 95% CI, 5.43 to 6.59) or high genetic risk (hazard ratio, 2.28; 95% CI, 2.07 to 2.51) relative to participants at low clinical or genetic risk, respectively. Combining clinical risk factors with genetic risk factors produced a model that better predicted risk of venous thromboembolism than either model alone (P<0.001). Participants at high clinical and genetic risk in the combined score had over an eightfold increased risk of venous thromboembolism relative to participants at low risk (hazard ratio, 8.27; 95% CI 7.59 to 9.00).CONCLUSIONSBy assessing venous thromboembolic events in over 500,000 participants, we identified several known and novel associations between risk factors and venous thromboembolism. Participants in the high risk group of a combined score, consisting of clinical and genetic factors, were over eight times more likely to experience venous thromboembolism than participants in the low risk group.


2019 ◽  
Vol 156 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew T. Kunzmann ◽  
Marisa Cañadas Garre ◽  
Aaron P. Thrift ◽  
Úna C. McMenamin ◽  
Brian T. Johnston ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document