A phase I study of the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of XMT-1001 given as an intravenous (IV) infusion once every three weeks to patients with advanced solid tumors

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2574-2574
Author(s):  
E. Sausville ◽  
L. Garbo ◽  
G. J. Weiss ◽  
S. Anthony ◽  
D. Shkolny ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Water Soluble ◽  
Therapeutic Window ◽  
Infusion Reactions ◽  
Dose Levels

2574 Background: XMT-1001 is a water soluble macromolecular conjugate of camptothecin (CPT). In this novel CPT pro- drug, CPT is conjugated with a 70 kDa biodegradable hydrophilic polyacetal, poly (1-hydroxymethylethylene hydroxymethylformal). XMT-1001 demonstrated an improved therapeutic window as compared with CPT and irinotecan in human tumor xenograft models, providing a compelling rationale for its clinical development. Methods: This is an open label, dose escalation study of XMT- 1001 administered as an IV infusion once every 3 weeks. The objectives of this phase I study are to determine the maximum tolerated dose and to assess safety and PK of XMT-1001. Initially 3 patients (pts) are entered at each dose level. The cohort is expanded to 6 pts if a patient experiences a dose limiting toxicity. Analyses of plasma and urine were performed for XMT-1001 (conjugated CPT), 2 major drug release products, and for unconjugated (free) CPT. Results: Thirty two pts with refractory solid tumors have received 82 cycles of XMT-1001 at 8 dose levels ranging from 1.0 to 20.5 mg CPT equivalents/m2. Two pts had Gr 3 infusion reactions consistent with hypersensitivity to study drug. Symptoms reversed upon discontinuation of study drug. After the introduction of new clinical trial material with an improved formulation, to date, no infusion reactions suggestive of hypersensitivity have occurred (11 patients, 22 cycles). No hemorrhagic cystitis or ≥ Gr 3 diarrhea was noted. Myelosuppression was observed in 3 pts treated at 15.4 mg CPT equiv/m2 dose level. Stable disease was observed in 7 pts with the following tumor types and dose levels expressed in mg CPT equivalents/m2: NSCLC (1.0 mg/m2, 6 wks), ovarian (4.9 mg/m2, 12 wks), pancreas (4.9 mg/m2, 36 wks), appendiceal (7.3 mg/m2, 12 wks), bile duct (9.1 mg/m2, 18 wks), basal cell (11.6 mg/m2, 6 wks), and colon (15.4 mg/m2, 6 wks). PK demonstrates dose proportional increases in plasma levels of XMT-1001 (conjugated CPT) and confirms the formation of its expected release products. To date, levels of free CPT in urine are low. Conclusions: 1. XMT-1001 can be given safely to patients; 2. XMT-1001 has a favorable PK profile; 3. Prolonged stable disease was observed in patients with refractory tumors. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Phase I Study of Rivoceranib, a Selective VEGFR-2 Angiogenesis Inhibitor, Administered Daily in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoon-Koo Kang ◽  
Min-Hee Ryu ◽  
Yong Sang Hong ◽  
Chang-Min Choi ◽  
Tae Won Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Angiogenesis Inhibitor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Potential Clinical Benefit ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Rivoceranib is a highly potent and selective inhibitor of VEGFR-2 and subsequent angiogenesis through this receptor signaling pathway. This phase I study was the first global study with rivoceranib outside of China in Korean and Caucasian patients and was designed to determine the safety profile (including maximum tolerated dose), pharmacokinetics, and efficacy in patients with advanced solid tumors. Thirty-one adult patients with advanced malignant solid tumors were enrolled to investigate 6 dose levels of rivoceranib. Twenty-five patients were initially enrolled to 5 dose levels of rivoceranib from 81 to 685 mg and an additional 6 patients were later enrolled in a supplemental study to evaluate the 805 mg dose level. Rivoceranib was very well tolerated. At the 805 mg dose level, 2 dose-limiting toxicities were observed but the 685 mg dose was well tolerated over multiple cycles of therapy. The maximum tolerated dose for rivoceranib was 685 mg (equivalent to 850 mg rivoceranib mesylate) and recommended for further study in patients with advanced solid tumors. The most common adverse events were hypertension (all grades %/≥G3%: 58/29), nausea (42/0), diarrhea (39/0), anorexia (32/3), and fatigue (29/6). Rivoceranib pharmacokinetics were proportional across all dose levels but interpatient variability was high. Of the 31 patients enrolled, 21 were evaluable for efficacy. In this evaluable group, partial response was recorded in 5 patients, stable disease in 10, and disease progression in 6. Results indicate the potential clinical benefit of daily rivoceranib in patients with advanced malignant solid tumors with a tolerable safety profile.Trial registration: NCT01497704 (ClinicalTrials.gov) registered on December 22, 2011 and NCT02711969 (ClinicalTrials.gov) registered on March 17, 2016.

Phase I study of sirolimus plus gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors: A Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas (GEIS) study.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3096-3096
Author(s):  
Juan Martin Liberal ◽  
Marta Gil ◽  
Laura Jimenez ◽  
Maria Ochoa de Olza ◽  
Carmen Munoz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Mtor Pathway ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Skin Biopsies ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

3096 Background: In preclinical studies, combination of sirolimus with gemcitabine enhances apoptosis in vitro and increases anti-tumor efficacy in vivo. Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors, age 18-70 years, no prior mTOR inhibitor or gemcitabine, ECOG PS 0-1, and adequate hematological, renal and hepatic function, were enrolled in this phase I study to assess safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and to identify the dose limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of the combination of sirolimus and gemcitabine. A 3+3 dose escalation design with cohorts of 3-6 patients was used. Sirolimus was given po continuously. Gemcitabine was given iv 10mg/m2/minute on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Dose levels 1, 2 and 3 corresponded to sirolimus 2, 2 and 5mg/24h plus gemcitabine 800, 1000 and 1000mg/m2 respectively. After observing DLTs at higher dose level and poorer mTOR signaling inhibition at lower doses, a new cohort of sirolimus 5mg/24h plus gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 was added. Skin biopsies pre and post treatment were performed to assess the inhibition of mTOR pathway. Results: 19 patients were enrolled: median age 51 years (36-70); gender 12M, 7F. Median number of cycles was 4. Patients were treated at 4 dose levels, the MTD was reached at level 3 and the RD was: sirolimus 5mg/24h and gemcitabine 800mg/m2. 3 DLTs were observed, 1 at dose level 2 and 2 at dose level 3: transaminitis grade 3, thrombocytopenia grade 3 and thrombocytopenia grade 4. Other toxicities grade 1-2 included anemia, neutropenia, asthenia, mucositis and high cholesterol levels. 2 patients achieved partial response (1 uterine cervix cancer and 1 colon cancer). Immunohistochemistry of pS6 in skin biopsies showed significative inhibition of mTOR pathway at RD. PK parameters estimated were in agreement with those previously reported in the literature. No influence of sirolimus administration on gemcitabine clearance was found. Conclusions: Combination of sirolimus and gemcitabine is feasible and safe, allowing administration of active doses of both agents and achieving mTOR signaling inhibition. A phase II study to assess the activity of this combination in sarcomas is ongoing.

Phase I study of the HSP90 inhibitor AUY922 in combination with capecitabine as treatment for patients with advanced solid tumors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3564-3564
Author(s):  
Shubham Pant ◽  
Lowell L. Hart ◽  
Johanna C. Bendell ◽  
Jeffrey R. Infante ◽  
Suzanne Fields Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Hsp90 Inhibition ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

3564 Background: Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) is a molecular chaperone involved in the maintenance and function of client proteins, many of which are integral to key oncogenic processes. AUY922 is a competitive inhibitor of HSP90. Preclinical evidence suggests potential synergy between HSP90 inhibition and fluorouracil. This phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of AUY922 in combination with standard dose of capecitabine as treatment for patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Pts with refractory solid tumors received AUY922 with capecitabine in a standard 3+3 dose escalation. Dose levels were capecitabine 1000mg/m2 PO BID d 1-14 of 21-day cycles, with escalating doses of AUY922 IV days 1, 8, and 15; the 6th dose level combined the MTD of AUY922 with capecitabine 1250mg/m2. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), safety, and efficacy were evaluated. Results: 23 pts were treated at 6 dose levels: 22mg/m2 (n = 3); 28mg/m2 (n = 3); 40mg/m2 (n = 3); 55mg/m2 (n = 5); 70mg/m2 (n = 3); 70mg/m2 with capecitabine 1250mg/m2 (n= 6). No DLTs were observed until the 6th dose level (grade 3 diarrhea). Related adverse events (% grade 1/2; % grade 3/4) included: diarrhea (43%; 17%), fatigue (30%; 13%), nausea (39%; 0), hand-foot skin reaction (30%; 5%), anorexia (30%; 4%), vomiting (30%; 0), and darkening vision (26%; 0). Vision darkening, a class effect of HSP90 inhibitors, was reversible with drug hold and retreatment was possible. Two pts (9%) had hematologic G 3/4 events of neutropenia. Of the 19 pts evaluable for response, partial response was noted in 4 patients (colorectal, 2; breast, 1; stomach, 1); 2 had progressed on prior fluorouracil, and remained on treatment for 13-35 wks. Stable disease was noted in 8 pts (35% [colorectal, 5; pancreas, 2; breast, 1]) with a median duration of 25.5 wks (range: 11-44+). All 5 colorectal pts were refractory to 5-FU. Conclusions: The addition of AUY922 to standard dose capecitabine was well-tolerated at doses of up to 70mg/m2. Preliminary efficacy is encouraging, particularly as seen in pts previously resistant to fluorouracil, and warrants further investigation of this regimen. Clinical trial information: NCT01226732.

Phase I Study of XL-119, a Rebeccamycin Analog, in Patients with Refractory Hematological Malignancies.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 1969-1969
Author(s):  
Francis J. Giles ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Jorge Cortes ◽  
Zeev Estrov ◽  
Stefan Faderl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Hematological Malignancies ◽  
Leukemia Cell ◽  
Water Soluble ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Topo Ii ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract XL-119, a water soluble analog of the antibiotic agent rebeccamycin, has demonstrated broad spectrum antitumor activity in preclinical studies, including P388 and L1210 leukemia in murine models. XL-119 intercalates DNA, and inhibits topo II activity by a unique highly potent mechanism which renders it active in etoposide-resistant A549 and HCT 116 leukemia cell lines. On a Phase I study in patients with refractory hematological malignancies XL 119 was given as a 60 minute IV infusion, on D1–5 of 21 day cycles. The starting dose for the initial cohort was 140 mg/m2/d with planned escalation by 20% increments in the setting of a standard 3+3 design. A total of 28 patients (pts) have been treated to date. Three, 5, 3, 6, 3, and 8 have been enrolled to dose levels (DL) of 140, 160, 180, 200, 220 and 240 mg/m2/d, respectively. Median age was 57 years (range 19–82). Median ECOG status 1 (range, 0–2). Diagnoses included: AML (22 pts), MDS (1 pt) and ALL (5pts). AML was either primary refractory or at an advanced relapse state and had failed a median of 3 prior salvage treatments (range 1–10). The pt with MDS had received 4 prior therapies. Pts with ALL had received a median of 3 prior therapies. Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed in evaluable patients at the following dose levels: 1 patient at 200 mg/m2 experienced DLTs: grade 3 hand-foot syndrome and grade 4 mucositis. An expansion of this dose level yielded no further incidences of DLT. 1 patient at 240mg/m2 experienced DLT with grade 3 mucositis. The cohort was expanded without observation of additional DLTs. Dose level 260 mg/m2 is currently being explored with 2 patients too early for full evaluation. Two patients with refractory AML achieved a significant elimination of marrow blasts and received a second cycle of therapy. Twenty-four of 28 patients had transient reductions in peripheral blood blasts. XL 119 is a well-tolerated myelosuppressive agent which warrants further study in patients with hematological malignancies.

scholarly journals 412 First-in-human phase I/IIa trial to evaluate the safety and initial clinical activity of DuoBody®-PD-L1×4–1BB (GEN1046) in patients with advanced solid tumors

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A437-A437
Author(s):  
Elena Garralda ◽  
Ravit Geva ◽  
Eytan Ben-Ami ◽  
Corinne Maurice-Dror ◽  
Emiliano Calvo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Informed Consent ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Therapeutic Window ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Dose Levels

BackgroundAgonistic 4-1BB monoclonal antibodies were preclinically validated as promising cancer immunotherapies, both as monotherapy and as potentiators of the activity of PD-(L)1–blocking agents. However, toxicity and a narrow therapeutic window have hampered their clinical development. DuoBody-PD­-L1×4-1BB, a first-in-class, bispecific, next-generation checkpoint immunotherapy, was designed to overcome these limitations by activating T cells through conditional 4-1BB costimulation, while simultaneously blocking the PD-L1 axis. We present preliminary data from the ongoing, first-in-human, open-label, phase I/IIa trial of DuoBody-PD-L1×4-1BB in advanced solid tumors (NCT03917381).MethodsDuring dose escalation, patients with metastatic or unresectable solid tumors not eligible for standard therapy received flat-dose DuoBody-PD-L1×4-1BB (25–1200 mg) intravenously every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and adverse events (AEs). Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetic parameters and antitumor activity (RECIST 1.1). Pharmacodynamic biomarkers and antitumor activity (iRECIST) were assessed as exploratory endpoints.ResultsAs of June 22, 2020, 61 patients were enrolled (median age: 59 years). The most common cancer types were colorectal (19.7%), ovarian (14.8%), pancreatic (9.8%), and NSCLC (9.8%). Patients had previously received a median (range) of 3 (1–11) treatments; 44.2% had prior anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy. Patients received a median (range) of 4 (1–15) treatment cycles; Cmax was observed shortly after the end of infusion (mean T½: 2.3–10.3 days). Maximum tolerated dose was not reached; 6 patients experienced DLTs. The most common (=10%) treatment-related AEs (all grades; grades 3–4) were transaminase elevation (24.6%; 9.8%), hypothyroidism (16.4%; 1.6%), and fatigue (13.1%; 1.6%). Treatment-related grade-3 transaminase elevations decreased upon corticosteroid administration; no treatment-related bilirubin increases or grade-4 transaminase elevations occurred. Disease control, including stable disease at first assessment and partial responses in triple-negative breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)–pretreated NSCLC, occurred in 40/61 patients (65.6%). Pharmacologic activity, as measured by modulation of adaptive immunity mediators, was observed across a broad range of dose levels. Peripheral proliferating (Ki67+) CD8+ effector memory T cells and serum interferon-gamma levels showed maximum induction relative to baseline (p=0.01) 8 days following treatment.ConclusionsDuoBody-PD-L1×4-1BB demonstrated biologic activity and a manageable safety profile. Encouraging early clinical activity across different dose levels was observed in a heavily pretreated population with advanced solid tumors, including those resistant to prior immunotherapy or typically less sensitive to ICIs. Expansion cohorts of patients for whom DuoBody-PD-L1×4-1BB treatment could be relevant and biologically sound have started enrollment. Updated data will be presented.AcknowledgementsThe authors thank Manish Gupta, Lei Pang, and Thomas Breuer at Genmab A/S; Alice Bexon, Alexander Muik, and Friederike Gieseke at BioNTech SE; and Zuzana Jirakova (formerly at BioNTech SE) for their valuable contributions. This trial was funded by Genmab A/S and BioNTech SE.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials. gov; trial number: NCT03917381Ethics ApprovalThis trial is undertaken following full approval of the final protocol, amendments, informed consent form, applicable recruiting materials, and subject compensation programs by the Independent Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board.ConsentWritten informed consent, in accordance with principles that originated in the Declaration of Helsinki 2013, current ICH guidelines including ICH-GCP E6(R2), applicable regulatory requirements, and sponsor policy, was provided by the patients.

Phase I Study of a Weekly Schedule of Irinotecan, High-Dose Leucovorin, and Infusional Fluorouracil as First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 907-907 ◽  
Author(s):  
Udo Vanhoefer ◽  
Andreas Harstrick ◽  
Claus-Henning Köhne ◽  
Wolf Achterrath ◽  
Youcef M. Rustum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Weekly Schedule ◽  
First Line ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of a weekly schedule of irinotecan (CPT-11), leucovorin (LV), and a 24-hour infusion of fluorouracil (5-FU24h) as first-line chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer and to assess preliminary data on the antitumor activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with measurable metastatic colorectal cancer were entered onto this phase I study. In the first six dose levels, fixed doses of CPT-11 (80 mg/m2) and LV (500 mg/m2) in combination with escalated doses of 5-FU24h ranging from 1.8 to 2.6 g/m2 were administered on a weekly-times-four (dose levels 1 to 4) or weekly-times-six (dose levels 5 to 6) schedule. The dose of CPT-11 was then increased to 100 mg/m2 (dose level 7). RESULTS: Seventy-nine cycles of 5-FU24h/LV with CPT-11 were administered in an outpatient setting. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed during the first cycle at dose levels 1 to 6, but diarrhea of grade 4 (National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria) was observed in three patients after multiple treatment cycles. Other nonhematologic and hematologic side effects, specifically alopecia and neutropenia, did not exceed grade 2. With the escalation of CPT-11 to 100 mg/m2 (dose level 7), diarrhea of grade 3 or higher was observed in four of six patients during the first cycle; thus, the MTD was achieved. Sixteen of 25 response-assessable patients (64%; 95% confidence interval, 45% to 83%) achieved an objective response. CONCLUSION: The recommended doses for further studies are CPT-11 80 mg/m2, LV 500 mg/m2, and 5-FU24h 2.6 g/m2 given on a weekly-times-six schedule followed by a 1-week rest period. The addition of CPT-11 to 5-FU24h/LV seems to improve the therapeutic efficacy in terms of tumor response with manageable toxicity.

scholarly journals Phase I study of DFP-11207, a novel oral fluoropyrimidine with reasonable AUC and low Cmax and improved tolerability, in patients with solid tumors

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 1763-1773
Author(s):  
Jaffer A. Ajani ◽  
Milind Javle ◽  
Cathy Eng ◽  
David Fogelman ◽  
Jackie Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Potent Inhibitor ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Analysis ◽  
Gastrointestinal Cancers ◽  
Chemotherapy Treatment ◽  
Favorable Safety ◽  
Combination Regimens

Summary 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and 5-FU derivatives, such as capecitabine, UFT, and S-1, are the mainstay of chemotherapy treatment for gastrointestinal cancers, and other solid tumors. Compared with other cytotoxic chemotherapies, these drugs generally have a favorable safety profile, but hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicities remain common. DFP-11207 is a novel oral cytotoxic agent that combines a 5-FU pro-drug with a reversible DPD inhibitor and a potent inhibitor of OPRT, resulting in enhanced pharmacological activity of 5-FU with decreased gastrointestinal and myelosuppressive toxicities. In this Phase I study (NCT02171221), DFP-11207 was administered orally daily, in doses escalating from 40 mg/m2/day to 400 mg/m2/day in patients with esophageal, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic or gallbladder cancer (n = 23). It was determined that DFP-11207 at the dose of 330 mg/m2/day administered every 12 hours was well-tolerated with mild myelosuppressive and gastrointestinal toxicities. The pharmacokinetic analysis determined that the 5-FU levels were in the therapeutic range at this dose. In addition, fasted or fed states had no influence on the 5-FU levels (patients serving as their own controls). Among 21 efficacy evaluable patients, 7 patients had stable disease (33.3%), of which two had prolonged stable disease of >6 months duration. DFP-11207 can be explored as monotherapy or easily substitute 5-FU, capecitabine, or S-1 in combination regimens.

scholarly journals Phase I Study of ATR Inhibitor M6620 in Combination With Topotecan in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (16) ◽  
pp. 1594-1602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anish Thomas ◽  
Christophe E. Redon ◽  
Linda Sciuto ◽  
Emerson Padiernos ◽  
Jiuping Ji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Platinum Refractory

Purpose Our preclinical work identified depletion of ATR as a top candidate for topoisomerase 1 (TOP1) inhibitor synthetic lethality and showed that ATR inhibition sensitizes tumors to TOP1 inhibitors. We hypothesized that a combination of selective ATR inhibitor M6620 (previously VX-970) and topotecan, a selective TOP1 inhibitor, would be tolerable and active, particularly in tumors with high replicative stress. Patients and Methods This phase I study tested the combination of M6620 and topotecan in 3-week cycles using 3 + 3 dose escalation. The primary end point was the identification of the maximum tolerated dose of the combination. Efficacy and pharmacodynamics were secondary end points. Results Between September 2016 and February 2017, 21 patients enrolled. The combination was well tolerated, which allowed for dose escalation to the highest planned dose level (topotecan 1.25 mg/m2, days 1 to 5; M6620 210 mg/m2, days 2 and 5). One of six patients at this dose level experienced grade 4 thrombocytopenia that required transfusion, a dose-limiting toxicity. Most common treatment-related grade 3 or 4 toxicities were anemia, leukopenia, and neutropenia (19% each); lymphopenia (14%); and thrombocytopenia (10%). Two partial responses (≥ 18 months, ≥ 7 months) and seven stable disease responses ≥ 3 months (median, 9 months; range, 3 to 12 months) were seen. Three of five patients with small-cell lung cancer, all of whom had platinum-refractory disease, had a partial response or prolonged stable disease (10, ≥ 6, and ≥ 7 months). Pharmacodynamic studies showed preliminary evidence of ATR inhibition and enhanced DNA double-stranded breaks in response to the combination. Conclusion To our knowledge, this report is the first of an ATR inhibitor-chemotherapy combination. The maximum dose of topotecan plus M6620 is tolerable. The combination seems particularly active in platinum-refractory small-cell lung cancer, which tends not to respond to topotecan alone. Phase II studies with biomarker evaluation are ongoing.

A Phase I Trial of Sirolimus (Rapamycin) in Pediatric Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Leukemia.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 2834-2834 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan R. Rheingold ◽  
Nancy Sacks ◽  
Yueh J. Chang ◽  
Valerie I. Brown ◽  
David T. Teachey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Loading Dose ◽  
Mtor Inhibition ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Background: Downstream inhibition of the mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) pathway by sirolimus affects a variety of cellular functions including cap-dependent protein translation and cell cycle progression from the G1-to-S phase. Inhibition of mTOR also leads to dysregulation of the upstream signaling pathway that couples growth factor-receptor binding to mTOR activation through the PI-3 kinase/Akt pathway and may render PTEN-induced resistant lymphoblasts sensitive to agents that target the mTOR pathway. This hypothesis is supported by preclinical data which shows that sirolimus inhibits growth of ALL lines in vitro and has activity in a murine model of leukemia including ALL xenografts. Based upon these preclinical data we have piloted a Phase I trial of sirolimus in pediatric patients with relapsed acute leukemia. Methods: Pediatric patients with ≥ 2nd relapse of acute leukemia were enrolled in a Phase I dose escalation trial of oral daily sirolimus. We used a starting dose that is known to be well tolerated in pediatric renal transplant recipients and results in levels that inhibit ALL growth in vitro. At dose level 1, a loading dose of 9 mg/m2 was given on day 0, and 3 mg/m2 was given daily on days 1 to 21 or 28. Dose level 2 has a loading dose of 12 mg/m2 and daily dose of 4mg/m2. Sirolimus trough levels were obtained on days 3, 7, and end of cycle. Bone marrow aspirates (BM) were performed prior to therapy, and on day 7 (if no peripheral blasts) and day 21 or 28. Peripheral blood (PB) mononuclear cells and PB and/or BM lymphoblasts were obtained on days 0, 3, 7, 14, and 21/28 to evaluate the effect of sirolimus on intracellular targets, including ribosomal protein S6 (a pharmocodynamic marker of mTOR inhibition), 4e-BP1 and STAT5. Results: To date, 5 males and 3 females, ages 1–21, have been enrolled on study at the first 2 dose levels. Six patients had ALL, 1 infant had MLL(r) ALL, and 1 had AML. They had received 2–4 prior therapies. Three patients with ALL had stable disease at the end of the first cycle. One had a decrease in BM lymphoblasts from 39% to 12% by day 28 and a drop in absolute blast count (ABC) in the PB from 1134 to 290 but remained thrombocytopenic. The patient with MLL(r) infant ALL had a decrease in PB ABC from 62,415 to 0 by day 14 but had no change in BM lymphoblast % on day 21. Two of the 3 patients with stable disease progressed during their second cycle of therapy. The remaining 5 patients had progressive disease or were removed from study prior to the end of cycle 1 and were non-evaluable. At dose level 1 average trough level on day 7 was 10.9 (range 1–20.7) and at the end of the first cycle for non-progressors was 8.5 (range 5.8–12.2). There have been no DLTs attributable to sirolimus in any cycle to date. Preliminary immunoblots show hypophosphorylation of S6 in patients’ PB and BM after initiating sirolimus therapy. Conclusions: Sirolimus was well tolerated in pediatric patients due to its ease of administration and lack of toxicity. At the first and second dose levels there have been 2 patients and 1 patient with stable disease, respectively. Preliminary biologic data shows evidence of inhibition of mTOR, manifested by a decrease in phosphorylated S6, suggesting that S6 may be used as a biomarker for response to mTOR inhibition. Although sirolimus at these doses had a modest impact on the leukemia burden, it may be more effective when used in concert with other cytotoxic agents that inhibit cell growth and survival. Combined therapy is being investigated.

Phase I study of bortezomib and oxaliplatin (BOX) in solid tumors: Improved neurotoxicity (NT) profile with lower bortezomib (B) dose

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12007-12007
Author(s):  
R. A. Kosloff ◽  
J. Wright ◽  
P. Ivy ◽  
J. Escalon ◽  
B. Norwood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Major Contributor ◽  
Organ Function ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Adequate Organ Function ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Platinum Agents

12007 Background: B inhibits proteasome function and may be synergistic in causing apoptotic death with platinum agents. We were interested in combining B with OX but concerned with dose limiting (DL) NT based on our prior B phase I study [Hamilton et al., JCO 2005]: therefore this Phase I dose-escalation study (alternating increases of B and OX) focusing on NT was planned. Methods: Patients (pts) with metastatic solid tumors, PS 0–2, platinum or taxane naive, no peripheral neuropathy and adequate organ function, received B (D1, 4, 15, 18) and OX (D1, 15) every 28 days in a dose escalation design (see table ). Baseline and monthly assessments were performed by an independent neurologist. Results: 27 (18 gastrointestinal, 3 melanoma, 3 ovarian, 3 others) were accrued; pt characteristics: 14 male/13 female; median age 55 years (range 35–75); 2 median cycles (range 1–10). NT was not DL because it did not occur within the first cycle. Late and limiting NT was observed in levels 2–5 after 2–9 cycles, but serial neurologic evaluations showed reversible NT. With an amended new dose level to lower B to 1.0 mg/m2 (level 6) to avoid late NT, NT was not observed. Of 22 evaluable pts, there were 3 partial responses (ampullary, GE junction, biliary), 6 stable disease, and 13 disease progression by RECIST criteria. Conclusions: biweekly BOX is tolerable at B 1.0 mg/m2 and OX 85 mg/m2 with no DL NT. Additional observations on late NT are ongoing. This suggests B is a major contributor to NT observed in dose levels 2–5 and may potentiate the effects of OX. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document