Retrospective analysis of CD5-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (CD5+ DLBCL) treated with chemotherapy with or without rituximab

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8551-8551
Author(s):  
K. Miyazaki ◽  
M. Yamaguchi ◽  
R. Suzuki ◽  
N. Niitsu ◽  
D. Ennishi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Bone Marrow Involvement ◽  
Elevated Serum ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cns Relapse ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Large B Cell

8551 Background: CD5+ DLBCL comprises 5–10% of DLBCL, and shows a high incidence of central nervous system (CNS) relapse. It has been included in the 4th WHO classification as an immunohistochemical subgroup. To clarify the prognosis and incidence of CNS relapse of CD5+ DLBCL in the rituximab-era, we conducted a multicenter retrospective study. Methods: We analyzed 313 patients (pts) with CD5+ DLBCL who received chemotherapy with (n=164) or without rituximab (n=149). The current series includes 107 out of 120 pts described in our previous study (Haematologica, 2008). Intravascular large B-cell lymphoma, primary CNS DLBCL, and secondary CD5+ DLBCL were excluded from the study population. Results: 313 pts showed the following clinical features: median age, 67 (range: 15–93); M:F=163:150; elevated serum LDH level, 71%; stage III/IV, 64%; IPI HI/H, 53%. No significant difference in clinical background such as the IPI and its five components, B symptom, male sex, and bone marrow involvement was found between pts who were treated with and without rituximab. Pts treated without rituximab received more dose-intensive chemotherapies (CHOP14, third-generation regimen, and high dose cytarabine-based regimen) than those treated with rituximab (24% vs. 7%, P<0.0001). The CR rate was higher in pts received rituximab than those without (81% vs. 65%; P=0.0014). The median follow-up was 28 months in pts who received rituximab (range: 7–77) and 68 months in those who did not (range: 6–187). Overall survival (OS) was significantly superior for pts with rituximab than for those without (2-yr OS: 68% vs. 54%, P=0.003). Multivariate analysis revealed that the use of rituximab was favorably associated with OS (HR=1.81, 95% CI: 1.26–2.58, P=0.001), but dose-intensive chemotherapies did not affect OS. However, the incidence of CNS relapse was not different between the two groups (2-yr CNS relapse rate: 11.9% vs. 11.4%, P=0.91). 16 of the 20 pts (80%) with CNS relapse in the rituximab group had brain parenchymal disease. Conclusions: Our data show that rituximab improves OS of pts with CD5+ DLBCL, but does not prevent CNS relapse. Future prospective studies to decrease CNS disease for CD5+ DLBCL are warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Treatment of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma with Rituximab, Intensive Induction and High-Dose Consolidation: The Final Analysis of the Czech Lymphoma Study Group (CLSG) R-MegaCHOP-ESHAP-BEAM (R-MEB) Trial.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 21-21
Author(s):  
Marek Trneny ◽  
Robert Pytlik ◽  
David Belada ◽  
Katerina Kubackova ◽  
Ingrid Vasova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Bone Marrow Involvement ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Bulky Disease ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract Background. Combined immunochemotherapy with CHOP and rituximab have improved the outcome of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). and related diseases. However, the cure rate of patients with IPI 3–5 or aaIPI 3 is still only about 50% with this regimen. Given the feasibility of previous CLSG regimens based on high-dose CHOP-ESHAP induction and BEAM consolidation, we have conducted a phase II trial combining this approach with rituximab immunotherapy. Patients and methods. Patients aged 18–65 years with DLBCL and age-adjusted IPI (aaIPI) 2–3 were treated with three cycles of high-dose CHOP (MegaCHOP - cyclophosphamide, 3 g/m2, vincristine 2 mg, adriamycin, 75 mg/m2, and prednisone, 300 mg/m2) with G-CSF every 3 weeks, followed by three cycles of ESHAP (etoposide, 240 mg/m2, cisplatin, 100 mg/m2, methylprednisolone, 2000 mg and Ara-C 2000 mg/m2) every 3 weeks. Four to six doses of rituximab 375 mg/m2 were administered on day 1 of each cycle of induction therapy. High-dose therapy (BEAM) followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) was used as consolidation. Radiotherapy was given to residual masses or sites of bulky disease. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and feasibility of the treatment. Results. From April 2002 to October 2006, 105 consecutive patients from 10 centers were recruited. 58% were men and 42% women with median age 46 years (19–63 years). 74% of patients had stage IV disease, 92% had elevated LDH, 53% had performance status &gt;1, 55% had B symptoms and 19% had bone marrow involvement. aaIPI was 2 in 62% of patients and 3 in 38% of patients. 68% of patients received the whole treatment according to the protocol, including ASCT and radiotherapy. Stem cells mobilization according to the protocol was performed in 90% of patients and was successful in 86% of mobilized patients (77% of all patients). 73% of patients ultimately received ASCT (including 3 patients transplanted after ammended treatment) and 51% of patients received planned radiotherapy. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 83% of all patients and partial remission (PR) in 2%. Early toxic death rate was 6% and 9% patients had primary refractory disease. Of patients who achieved CR or PR, only 6 subsequently relapsed (7%) and two suffered late toxic death (2%). With a median follow-up of 32 months for living patients, the estimated 2-year PFS is 77% and 2-year OS is 81%. Age less than median (46 years) was strongest predictor of favorable outcome (p = 0,00006 for PFS and p = 0,00013 for OS), while there was no effect of stage, LDH, performance status or aaIPI (2-year PFS 79% for aaIPI 2 and 77% for aaIPI 3, 2-year OS 81% for aaIPI 2 and 80% for aaIPI 3). Delivery of ASCT or radiotherapy did not significantly affected PFS in patients who did not suffered early progression or early toxic death, but radiotherapy modestly improved OS of these patients (p = 0,03). Conclusion. R-MEB has proved to be an effective treatment strategy for younger patients with high-risk aggressive B-cell lymphoma. Currently, CLSG is testing whether utilization of early PET scan may decrease toxicity and improve treatment tolerance while maintaining the efficacy of this regimen.

Central Nervous System Relapse in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Analysis of Incidence and Prognostic Factors

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1666-1666
Author(s):  
Masahiro Uni ◽  
Yuki Kagoya ◽  
Yasuhito Nannya ◽  
Fumihiko Nakamura ◽  
Mineo Kurokawa
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Initial Diagnosis ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cns Involvement ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cns Relapse ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract The addition of rituximab to CHOP (R-CHOP; CHOP, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone) has significantly improved the outcome of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, its secondary involvement in the central nervous system (CNS) is still a fatal event, and optimal therapeutic strategies have remained to be established. Combined immunochemotherapy with rituximab, methotrexate, procarbazine, and vincristine (R-MPV) followed by consolidation reduced-dose whole-brain radiotherapy and high-dose cytarabine is currently in use for patients with CNS relapse, though treatment outcome has not been evaluated enough. In the present study, we aimed to analyze the incidence and prognosis of CNS relapse of aggressive B-cell lymphoma in comparison with those of systemic relapse in the era of rituximab-containing regimens. We also estimated the risk factors and prognostic factors for CNS relapse. We retrospectively analyzed 278 consecutive adult patients (≥16 years old) who were diagnosed as DLBCL or primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMLBL) at The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, from August 2003 through August 2013. We excluded patients who had CNS or intraocular involvement at diagnosis since those patients had received high-dose methotrexate-based therapy instead of R-CHOP. Four to six courses of intrathecal administration of methotrexate were performed in patients with adrenal gland, testis or breast involvement as prophylaxis for CNS relapse. The median follow-up period was 42 months, and the median age was 66 years (range, 23-91). Overall, 67 patients (24.1%) had relapse at any site, of which 24 patients (35.8%) had CNS involvement. The median interval between initial diagnosis and the occurrence of secondary CNS involvement was 212 days, and 15 of the 24 patients (62.5%) had CNS relapse within 1 year from the initial diagnosis. Multivariate analysis revealed that multiple or diffuse extranodal involvement at initial diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR] 3.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-10.91; P<0.01) was associated with the development of CNS relapse against non-CNS relapse. Chromosomal abnormality was investigated in 112 patients, of which 38 had abnormal karyotypes as identified by G-banding analysis for lymph nodes. Patients with CNS relapse more frequently harbored chromosomal abnormalities compared with those without relapse in univariate analysis (P=0.01). We also analyzed the survival of patients with primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) as a control. Only two (7%) of 27 patients with PCNSL died during the follow-up period. Five-year OS from initial diagnosis was 92.3% (95% CI: 82.5-100.0%), and was significantly better than that for patients with CNS relapse (33.9%, 95% CI: 17.3-66.3%, P<0.01). Among 24 patients with CNS relapse, eight (33%) had systemic lesions other than CNS when diagnosed as CNS relapse, and four (17%) patients newly developed systemic lesions while treated for CNS relapse. Patients without concurrent systemic lesions attained a rather good prognosis by chemo-radiotherapy, while those harboring concurrent systemic lesions had dismal outcome (one-year OS after the diagnosis of relapse: 74.0% versus 12.4%, P<0.01, Figure 1, systemic relapse was treated as a time-dependent covariate). These results indicate that controlling systemic lesions as well as CNS ones is essential for treating patients with secondary CNS involvement of DLBCL. CNS lesions would be well controlled with R-MPV implementation as salvage therapy, nevertheless we should be careful for concurrent systemic lesions which might require different therapeutic strategies. Disclosures Nannya: Chugai Pharmaceutical　CO., LTD: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding. Kurokawa:Chugai Pharmaceutical　CO., LTD: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer Japan Inc.: Research Funding.

Addition of R-HMA to R-DA-EPOCH Favourably Changes the Outcome in Patients with Untreated High-Grade Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: The First Results of Russian Prospective Multicenter Trial

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2708-2708
Author(s):  
Olga A. Gavrilina ◽  
Eugene E. Zvonkov ◽  
Elena N. Parovichnikova ◽  
Vera V. Troitskaya ◽  
Nelly G. Gabeeva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Bone Marrow Involvement ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract Background: Approximately 50% of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) are defined as high-grade by IPI. They are characterized by aggressive course and poor response to standard chemotherapy (CT): 5-years overall survival (OS) rate of less than 30%. R-DA-EPOCH has demonstrated very optimistic results (overall and progression-free survival (PFS) were 90%), but high-risk patients (IPI 3-4) showed only 43% of OS and PFS [1]. The addition of high-dose AraC (12 g/m2) to the upfront therapy of high-risk DLBCL has significantly improved the outcome on Hyper-CVAD/HMA and mNHL-BFM-90 protocols [2, 3]. But high toxicity of these protocols restricts their application. We suggested that addition of courses R-HMA in rotation with R-DA-EPOCH could improve the treatment outcome and decrease toxicity. Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of R-DA-EPOCH/R-HMA protocol in patients with untreated high-grade diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Patients and Methods: 33 untreated DLBCL patients from 4 centers were enrolled in a prospective study between August 2013 - July 2015; stage II-IV; ECOG 0-3; median age 55 years (27-76); age ≥60y/<60y 50%/50%; M/F 60%/40%; IPI: 48% high-intermediate and 52% high risk; 15% with bone marrow involvement. All patients underwent 4-8 courses (2-4 cycles) of chemotherapy: R-DA-EPOCH (standard dose and scheme), R-HMA (R 375 mg/m2 d1, MTX 1000 mg/m2 24 hours d 2, AraC 3000 mg/m2 q 12 hrs d 3-4). For patients older than 60 year dose of R-HMA was reduced (R 375 mg/m2 d1, MTX 500 mg/m2 24 hours d 2, AraC 1000 mg/m2 q 12 hrs d 3-4). In 4 cases of DLBCL with bone marrow involvement BEAM conditioning and autologous stem cell transplantation were applied. Results: The median follow-up is 12 months (4-24). There was no mortality associated with toxicity. The main non-hematological toxicities of R-HMA were infections (mucositis, pneumonia, sepsis, enteropathy) grades 1-2 and 3-4 in 90% and 10%, respectively. Hematological toxicity grade 4 for less than 4 days we observed only after courses R-HMA. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 29 (88%) patients. In 2 patients we observed progression of the disease after first cycle of chemotherapy, in another 2 cases - partial remission after 2-3 cycles and following progression of disease. In patients older than 60 years with doses reduction in R-HMA failures were absent, except one later relapse after 13 month CR. With a median follow 12 months overall and disease-free survival of 33 patients constituted 90,5% and 74% , respectively. In a group of patients older than 60 years results of therapy seemed to be better than in young patients: OS were 100% vs 85,6% (p=0,1), DFS were 80% vs 74,9% (p=0,2), respectively. So the combination of R-DA-EPOCH/R-HMA may be considered as optimal intensive approach in the older patients. Conclusions: TheR-DA-EPOCH/R-HMA protocol demonstrated acceptable toxicity and high efficacy in patients with high-grade DLBCL. This protocol has shown optimistic results in the elderly patients and it could be recommended for further investigation in that group. Ññûëêè: 1. Salit RB, Fowler DH, Wilson WH, et al. Dose-adjusted EPOCH-rituximab combined with fludarabine provides an effective bridge to reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in patients with lymphoid malignancies.J Clin Oncol. 2012. 10;30(8):830-6. 2. Oki Y, Westin JR, Vega F, et al. Prospective phase II study of rituximab with alternating cycles of hyper-CVAD and high-dose methotrexate with cytarabine for young patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Br J Haematol 2013; 163(5):611-20. 3. Magomedova AU, Kravchenko SK, Kremenetskaia AM, et al. Nine-year experience in the treatment of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphosarcoma. Ter Arkh. 2011;83(7):5-10. Figure 1. Figure 1. Figure 2. Figure 2. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Favorable Outcomes with Thiotepa/Busulfan-Based Conditioning and Autotransplant for Patients with Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma and Secondary CNS Involvement

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2912-2912
Author(s):  
Robert Puckrin ◽  
Neil Chua ◽  
Mona Shafey ◽  
Douglas A. Stewart
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cns Involvement ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cns Relapse ◽  
Large B Cell ◽  
Aggressive B Cell Lymphoma

Abstract Introduction : Central nervous system (CNS) relapse is a devastating complication affecting ~5% of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The optimal management is unknown and survival rates are ~20% in contemporary series. Thiotepa/busulfan-based high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) and autotransplant (ASCT) has demonstrated efficacy in primary CNS lymphoma, but there have been fewer studies of this conditioning regimen in secondary CNS lymphoma (SCNSL). Methods : This multicenter retrospective study included all consecutive patients ≥18 years old with aggressive B-cell lymphoma and secondary CNS involvement treated with thiotepa/busulfan-based HDT/ASCT at the University of Calgary and University of Alberta since 2005. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) from the time of ASCT. Data collection is underway for all consecutively diagnosed SCNSL patients at our institutions to evaluate frequency and predictors of HDT/ASCT use. Results : This study included 57 patients with DLBCL (n=45), double-hit lymphoma (n=6), high-grade B-cell lymphoma NOS (n=2), intravascular large B-cell lymphoma (n=2), or T-cell/histiocyte-rich large B-cell lymphoma (n=2). Two (4%) had previously treated indolent B-cell lymphoma and 1 (2%) had multiply relapsed DLBCL. Median International Prognostic Index was 4 (range 0-5) at DLBCL diagnosis and median time to CNS relapse was 4 months (range 0-139). Median age was 58 years (range 20-73) and median ECOG was 3 (range 0-4) at diagnosis of SCNSL. CNS involvement was present at initial diagnosis in 20 (35%) patients or developed during frontline treatment in 10 (18%) or after completion of treatment in 27 (47%). For those without SCNSL at diagnosis, isolated CNS relapse occurred in 31 (84%) patients while 6 (16%) had concurrent CNS and systemic relapse. Most patients (n=54, 94%) received high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX)-based multiagent induction chemotherapy (median HD-MTX doses 4, range 1-5) followed by peripheral blood stem cell mobilization with rituximab, dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cisplatin (R-DHAP) in 41 (72%). HDT conditioning regimens were thiotepa, busulfan, melphalan, rituximab (TBMR, n=52, 91%) or thiotepa, busulfan, cyclophosphamide (TBC, n=5, 9%). Median time from SCNSL diagnosis to ASCT was 116 days (range 7-201). Median time to neutrophil engraftment was 10 days (range 7-15) and to platelet engraftment 16 days (range 9-93). Overall response rates (ORR) for systemic/CNS disease were 93%/89% pre-ASCT and 95%/100% post-ASCT. Combined ORR pre-ASCT was 88%, with complete response in 21% and partial response in 67%. Two (4%) patients who developed CNS relapse immediately prior to ASCT achieved long-term remission after TBMR conditioning without any other systemic chemotherapy. With a median follow-up time of 4.0 years (range 0.1-15.9), PFS was 75% (95% CI 61-85%), OS was 76% (95% CI 62-86%), and DSS was 79% (95% CI 64-88%) at 4 years after ASCT. Lymphoma recurred in 9 (16%) patients at median 88 days (range 54-346) after ASCT with CNS relapse (n=4), systemic relapse (n=3), or both (n=2). There were 2 (4%) deaths due to peri-transplant toxicity and 1 (2%) death at 1.5 years due to therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia; no other unexpected toxicities of HDT/ASCT were observed. Among the 45 (79%) patients achieving long-term disease-specific survival, none were treated with CNS radiation therapy and only 1 (2%) had persistent neurocognitive impairment. There were no significant differences in DSS with respect to timing of CNS relapse, concurrent presence of systemic disease, or TBMR versus TBC conditioning (78% vs 80%, p=0.87). Conclusion : In one of the largest studies of this conditioning regimen in SCNSL to date, we found that high-dose thiotepa/busulfan-based conditioning with ASCT is associated with favorable outcomes for patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma and secondary CNS involvement, with 4-year OS ~75% in this study. Although SCNSL has been historically associated with a poor prognosis, an increasing proportion of patients may achieve long-term survival after intensive therapy with HD-MTX-based induction and thiotepa/busulfan-based HDT and ASCT. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Chua: Eisai: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria. Stewart: Novartis: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria; Teva: Honoraria.

Prior Therapy with Rituximab (R) in Patients (pts) with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Does Not Affect Disease-Free (DFS) or Overall Survival (OS) Following High Dose Therapy (HDT) and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT).

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3054-3054 ◽  
Author(s):  
Snehal G. Thakkar ◽  
John William Sweetenham ◽  
Lisa Rybicki ◽  
Ronald Sobecks ◽  
Steven Andresen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract The addition of R to first line chemotherapy regimens for DLBCL has resulted in improvements in DFS and OS. HDT and ASCT have been shown to improve outcome for pts with relapsed DLBCL compared with conventional dose salvage regimens. The effectiveness of HDT and ASCT in pts with DLBCL who have received prior therapy including R is unknown. We reviewed 257 consecutive pts with DLBCL treated with ASCT from 1/94–12/02. Of these, 161 (63%) had received R as part of their initial therapy and 65 (25%) had not received prior R. A third group (N = 31, 12%) who had been treated with R as part of salvage therapy prior to ASCT were excluded from further analysis. Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. All patients received a preparative regimen of Busulfan, Cyclophosphamide, and Etoposide. Greater than 75% of patients in both groups had evidence of disease at time of transplant. Univariable and multivariable analyses demonstrated no difference between the pts previously treated with R and those not treated with R. After median follow up of 76 months (13–142) no statistical difference in DFS or OS was observed between the two groups. Patients were then adjusted for age, gender, stage, prior chemotherapy/radiation, time from diagnosis to CR, IPI, and disease status and compared again. The matched propensity analysis also showed no significant difference in DFS (p=0.87) and OS (p=0.22) (Figures 1 and 2). Despite concerns that pts with DLBCL previously treated with regimens containing R may have more resistant disease at relapse, our results suggest that HDT and ASCT is equally effective for these pts compared with those who have not received prior R. A prospective analysis is needed to confirm these results. Table 1. Patient Characteristics Categories No Rituximab (n=65) Rituximab (n=161) Age-median (range) 48 (19–70) 53 (23–72) Gender (M/F) 42/23 93/68 Stage IV (n) 75% (49) 61% (98) Prior Chemo Regimens-median (range) 2 (1–4) 2 (1–6) Prior Radiation (n) 25% (16) 32% (51) IPI (Low/Low-Intermediate vs High-Intermediate/High) 66% vs 34% 55% vs 45% CD34 collection (x 10^6)-median (range) 8.3 (2.9–39.2) 4.4 (0–52.8) Time to Transplant (mos)-median (range) 14.7 (2.8–274.3) 14.5 (5.1–192.6) Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma - Matched Groups Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma - Matched Groups Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma - Matched Groups Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma - Matched Groups

scholarly journals Bone Marrow Biopsy Is Still Indispensable for Evaluating Bone Marrow Involvement in DLBCL Patients Even in the PET/CT Era

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5403-5403
Author(s):  
Yusuke Saiki ◽  
Naoto Tomita ◽  
Akiko Uchida ◽  
Satoshi Yokoi ◽  
Yuji Nishio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Bone Marrow Biopsy ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Bone Marrow Involvement ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract Background: Initial staging by positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is recommended for lymphoma of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid histology, such as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Although both PET/CT and bone marrow biopsy (BMB) are usually performed to determine the bone marrow involvement in DLBCL, whether PET/CT alone is sufficient remains controversial. While previous reports discussing this point have used data based on medical records, here we performed a systematic review of untreated DLBCL patients, for whom a radiologist and a hematopathologist separately performed blind reviews. Methods: The subjects had DLBCL diagnosed between 2008 and 2017 for which both PET/CT and BMB were performed for staging before initiation of treatment. We excluded cases in which BMB specimens were qualitatively and/or quantitatively insufficient to determine the presence or absence of bone marrow involvement. To exclude follicular lymphoma, we did not include patients whose diagnostic specimens of lymphoma included any degree of nodular growth pattern. All PET/CT scans were performed in a single institution. In PET/CT, cases with score 4 or 5 in the Deauville criteria in bone marrow were classified as positive. In the review of BMB, we used both hematoxylin-eosin staining and CD20 immunostaining specimens in all cases to determine the involvement. We treated the presence of bone marrow involvement by BMB as a reference, and the involvement type was classified as either concordant or discordant pattern. Survival curves were compared by the log-rank test. A P-value less than 0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference. Results: The study included 87 untreated patients with DLBCL (82 DLBCL, NOS; 3 intravascular large B-cell lymphoma; and 2 primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma), comprising 46 males and 41 females. The median age at the time of diagnosis was 71 (range, 19 to 87 years). The number of positive cases in PET/CT and BMB was 17 (20%) and 24 (28%), respectively (Table). Nine (10%) cases had both positive results. Among BMB-positive cases, there were18 concordant and 6 discordant involvements. When considering BMB results as a reference, PET/CT showed 38% sensitivity and 87% for specificity. The positive and negative predictive values were 53% and 79%, respectively. In 61 patients initially treated with R-CHOP, there was no significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) between positive and negative cases in PET/CT (P = 0.16) , but PFS was significantly worse for BMB-positive cases than BMB-negative cases (P = 0.03). Conclusion: BMB is still mandatory in patients with untreated DLBCL and predicts outcome in the era of PET/CT. Routine CD20 immunostaining might be helpful in detecting lymphoma involvement in BMB specimens. Table. Table. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Ineffectiveness of High‐Dose Methotrexate for Prevention of CNS Relapse in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Puckrin ◽  
Haidar El Darsa ◽  
Sunita Ghosh ◽  
Anthea Peters ◽  
Carolyn Owen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Dose Methotrexate ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Dose Methotrexate ◽  
Cns Relapse ◽  
Large B Cell

scholarly journals Prophylaxis with intrathecal or high-dose methotrexate in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and high risk of CNS relapse

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabela Bobillo ◽  
Erel Joffe ◽  
David Sermer ◽  
Patrizia Mondello ◽  
Paola Ghione ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Relapse Risk ◽  
Cns Prophylaxis ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cns Relapse ◽  
Large B Cell

AbstractAlthough methotrexate (MTX) is the most widely used therapy for central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the optimal regimen remains unclear. We examined the efficacy of different prophylactic regimens in 585 patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL and high-risk for CNS relapse, treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) or R-CHOP-like regimens from 2001 to 2017, of whom 295 (50%) received prophylaxis. Intrathecal (IT) MTX was given to 253 (86%) and high-dose MTX (HD-MTX) to 42 (14%). After a median follow-up of 6.8 years, 36 of 585 patients relapsed in the CNS, of whom 14 had received prophylaxis. The CNS relapse risk at 1 year was lower for patients who received prophylaxis than patients who did not: 2% vs. 7.1%. However, the difference became less significant over time (5-year risk 5.6% vs. 7.5%), indicating prophylaxis tended to delay CNS relapse rather than prevent it. Furthermore, the CNS relapse risk was similar in patients who received IT and HD-MTX (5-year risk 5.6% vs. 5.2%). Collectively, our data indicate the benefit of MTX for CNS prophylaxis is transient, highlighting the need for more effective prophylactic regimens. In addition, our results failed to demonstrate a clinical advantage for the HD-MTX regimen.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document