Addition of R-HMA to R-DA-EPOCH Favourably Changes the Outcome in Patients with Untreated High-Grade Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: The First Results of Russian Prospective Multicenter Trial

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2708-2708
Author(s):  
Olga A. Gavrilina ◽  
Eugene E. Zvonkov ◽  
Elena N. Parovichnikova ◽  
Vera V. Troitskaya ◽  
Nelly G. Gabeeva ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Approximately 50% of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) are defined as high-grade by IPI. They are characterized by aggressive course and poor response to standard chemotherapy (CT): 5-years overall survival (OS) rate of less than 30%. R-DA-EPOCH has demonstrated very optimistic results (overall and progression-free survival (PFS) were 90%), but high-risk patients (IPI 3-4) showed only 43% of OS and PFS [1]. The addition of high-dose AraC (12 g/m2) to the upfront therapy of high-risk DLBCL has significantly improved the outcome on Hyper-CVAD/HMA and mNHL-BFM-90 protocols [2, 3]. But high toxicity of these protocols restricts their application. We suggested that addition of courses R-HMA in rotation with R-DA-EPOCH could improve the treatment outcome and decrease toxicity. Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of R-DA-EPOCH/R-HMA protocol in patients with untreated high-grade diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Patients and Methods: 33 untreated DLBCL patients from 4 centers were enrolled in a prospective study between August 2013 - July 2015; stage II-IV; ECOG 0-3; median age 55 years (27-76); age ≥60y/<60y 50%/50%; M/F 60%/40%; IPI: 48% high-intermediate and 52% high risk; 15% with bone marrow involvement. All patients underwent 4-8 courses (2-4 cycles) of chemotherapy: R-DA-EPOCH (standard dose and scheme), R-HMA (R 375 mg/m2 d1, MTX 1000 mg/m2 24 hours d 2, AraC 3000 mg/m2 q 12 hrs d 3-4). For patients older than 60 year dose of R-HMA was reduced (R 375 mg/m2 d1, MTX 500 mg/m2 24 hours d 2, AraC 1000 mg/m2 q 12 hrs d 3-4). In 4 cases of DLBCL with bone marrow involvement BEAM conditioning and autologous stem cell transplantation were applied. Results: The median follow-up is 12 months (4-24). There was no mortality associated with toxicity. The main non-hematological toxicities of R-HMA were infections (mucositis, pneumonia, sepsis, enteropathy) grades 1-2 and 3-4 in 90% and 10%, respectively. Hematological toxicity grade 4 for less than 4 days we observed only after courses R-HMA. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 29 (88%) patients. In 2 patients we observed progression of the disease after first cycle of chemotherapy, in another 2 cases - partial remission after 2-3 cycles and following progression of disease. In patients older than 60 years with doses reduction in R-HMA failures were absent, except one later relapse after 13 month CR. With a median follow 12 months overall and disease-free survival of 33 patients constituted 90,5% and 74% , respectively. In a group of patients older than 60 years results of therapy seemed to be better than in young patients: OS were 100% vs 85,6% (p=0,1), DFS were 80% vs 74,9% (p=0,2), respectively. So the combination of R-DA-EPOCH/R-HMA may be considered as optimal intensive approach in the older patients. Conclusions: TheR-DA-EPOCH/R-HMA protocol demonstrated acceptable toxicity and high efficacy in patients with high-grade DLBCL. This protocol has shown optimistic results in the elderly patients and it could be recommended for further investigation in that group. Ññûëêè: 1. Salit RB, Fowler DH, Wilson WH, et al. Dose-adjusted EPOCH-rituximab combined with fludarabine provides an effective bridge to reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in patients with lymphoid malignancies.J Clin Oncol. 2012. 10;30(8):830-6. 2. Oki Y, Westin JR, Vega F, et al. Prospective phase II study of rituximab with alternating cycles of hyper-CVAD and high-dose methotrexate with cytarabine for young patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Br J Haematol 2013; 163(5):611-20. 3. Magomedova AU, Kravchenko SK, Kremenetskaia AM, et al. Nine-year experience in the treatment of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphosarcoma. Ter Arkh. 2011;83(7):5-10. Figure 1. Figure 1. Figure 2. Figure 2. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 21-21
Author(s):  
Marek Trneny ◽  
Robert Pytlik ◽  
David Belada ◽  
Katerina Kubackova ◽  
Ingrid Vasova ◽  
...  

Abstract Background. Combined immunochemotherapy with CHOP and rituximab have improved the outcome of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). and related diseases. However, the cure rate of patients with IPI 3–5 or aaIPI 3 is still only about 50% with this regimen. Given the feasibility of previous CLSG regimens based on high-dose CHOP-ESHAP induction and BEAM consolidation, we have conducted a phase II trial combining this approach with rituximab immunotherapy. Patients and methods. Patients aged 18–65 years with DLBCL and age-adjusted IPI (aaIPI) 2–3 were treated with three cycles of high-dose CHOP (MegaCHOP - cyclophosphamide, 3 g/m2, vincristine 2 mg, adriamycin, 75 mg/m2, and prednisone, 300 mg/m2) with G-CSF every 3 weeks, followed by three cycles of ESHAP (etoposide, 240 mg/m2, cisplatin, 100 mg/m2, methylprednisolone, 2000 mg and Ara-C 2000 mg/m2) every 3 weeks. Four to six doses of rituximab 375 mg/m2 were administered on day 1 of each cycle of induction therapy. High-dose therapy (BEAM) followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) was used as consolidation. Radiotherapy was given to residual masses or sites of bulky disease. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and feasibility of the treatment. Results. From April 2002 to October 2006, 105 consecutive patients from 10 centers were recruited. 58% were men and 42% women with median age 46 years (19–63 years). 74% of patients had stage IV disease, 92% had elevated LDH, 53% had performance status &gt;1, 55% had B symptoms and 19% had bone marrow involvement. aaIPI was 2 in 62% of patients and 3 in 38% of patients. 68% of patients received the whole treatment according to the protocol, including ASCT and radiotherapy. Stem cells mobilization according to the protocol was performed in 90% of patients and was successful in 86% of mobilized patients (77% of all patients). 73% of patients ultimately received ASCT (including 3 patients transplanted after ammended treatment) and 51% of patients received planned radiotherapy. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 83% of all patients and partial remission (PR) in 2%. Early toxic death rate was 6% and 9% patients had primary refractory disease. Of patients who achieved CR or PR, only 6 subsequently relapsed (7%) and two suffered late toxic death (2%). With a median follow-up of 32 months for living patients, the estimated 2-year PFS is 77% and 2-year OS is 81%. Age less than median (46 years) was strongest predictor of favorable outcome (p = 0,00006 for PFS and p = 0,00013 for OS), while there was no effect of stage, LDH, performance status or aaIPI (2-year PFS 79% for aaIPI 2 and 77% for aaIPI 3, 2-year OS 81% for aaIPI 2 and 80% for aaIPI 3). Delivery of ASCT or radiotherapy did not significantly affected PFS in patients who did not suffered early progression or early toxic death, but radiotherapy modestly improved OS of these patients (p = 0,03). Conclusion. R-MEB has proved to be an effective treatment strategy for younger patients with high-risk aggressive B-cell lymphoma. Currently, CLSG is testing whether utilization of early PET scan may decrease toxicity and improve treatment tolerance while maintaining the efficacy of this regimen.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5386-5386
Author(s):  
Olga A. Gavrilina ◽  
Eugene E. Zvonkov ◽  
Elena N. Parovichnikova ◽  
Nelly G. Gabeeva ◽  
Vera V. Troitskaya ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The number of elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in our aging society continues to rise. Median of age for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is 60. Approximately 50% of older patients with DLBCL are defined as high-grade by IPI and these forms are characterized by aggressive course and poor response to standard chemotherapy (CT). Intensive protocols cannot be performed due to their toxicity for older patients with comorbidity. Addition of R-HMA to R-DA-EPOCH favourably changes the outcome in patients with untreated high-grade diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and didn't have higher toxicity [ASH 2015 # 2708]. Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of R-EPOCH/R-HMA protocol in older patients with untreated high-grade diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Patients and Methods: 19 untreated older DLBCL patients from 4 centers were enrolled in a prospective study between August 2013 - July 2016; stage II-IV; ECOG 0-3; median age 66 years (60-78); age ≥70y/60<70y 21%/79%; M/F 52%/48%; IPI: 52% high-intermediate and 48% high risk; 26% with bone marrow involvement. Severe comorbidity was diagnosed in 8 (42%) patients (coronary heart disease, hypertonic disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and arrhythmia). All patients underwent 4-6 courses (2-3 cycles) of chemotherapy: R-EPOCH (standard dose and scheme), R-HMA (R 375 mg/m2 d1, MTX 500 mg/m2 24 hours d 2, AraC 1000 mg/m2 q 12 hrs d 3-4). In 3 cases of DLBCL with bone marrow involvement BEAM conditioning and autologous stem cell transplantation were applied. Results: The median follow-up is 18 months (3-37). There was no mortality associated with toxicity. The main non-hematological toxicities of R-HMA were infections (mucositis, pneumonia, sepsis, enteropathy) grades 1-2 and 3-4 in 90% and 10%, respectively. Hematological toxicity grade 4 for less than 4 days we observed only after courses R-HMA. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 18 (100%) patients and 1 patient in the treatment now. There are four failures in patients older than 60 years: three relapses (after 6 and two after 14 month CR) and one death after 7 month CR by reasons not related with DLBCL. With a median follow 18 months overall and event-free survival of 19 older patients constituted 93,8% and 75,9%, respectively (Fig.1). There is no difference in older patients according to stage, IPI, LDH level, ECOG status for OS and EFS. So the combination of R-EPOCH/R-HMA may be considered as optimal intensive approach in older patients. Conclusions: TheR-EPOCH/R-HMA protocol demonstrated acceptable toxicity and high efficacy in older patients with high-grade DLBCL. Figure 1 Overall (A) and Event-free (B) survival in elderly patients with DLBCL. Figure 1. Overall (A) and Event-free (B) survival in elderly patients with DLBCL. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2646-2646
Author(s):  
Olga A. Gavrilina ◽  
Eugene E. Zvonkov ◽  
Elena N. Parovichnikova ◽  
Valeri G. Savchenko

Abstract Background: Except multiple myeloma secretion of monoclonal paraprotein may be associated with several malignant conditions (lymphomas), they are produced by abnormally expanded single clone of plasma cells in an amount that can be detected in serum, urine, or rarely in other body fluids. A secretion of monoclonal paraprotein related to the neoplastic clone, was detected in more than 10% of newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). M-protein in DLBCL might be easily missed, the rarity of associated clinical signs and the rapid fading during treatment. This group of DLBCL showed homogeneous morphologic and immunohistochemical features consistent with the non GCB-type. FISH analysis was negative for c-MYC gene rearrangements. M-protein in DLBCL patients, might be related to a very poor non GCB-type subset who should be given upfront intensified therapies [ASH 2012, abstract 2659]. The role and biological relevance of monoclonal paraprotein in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is unknown. Aims: to compare the clinical and biological features of DLBCL patients with and without secretion of paraprotein. Patients and methods: We included in the study 86 high-risk DLBCL patients, diagnosed between July 2007 and September 2014. All patients were treated with intensified therapy (mNHL-BFM-90 or R-DA-EPOCH/R-HMA). 14 cases (16%) with monoclonal secretion paraprotein was identified. The Hans algorithm was used in order to classify cases of DLBCL as GCB-type and non GCB-type at the moment of diagnosis. Bone marrow involvement was identified by histological and B-cell clonality study. Results: We detected different types of protein in DLBCL: Mk (in 5 patients), Bence-Jones k (3 pts), Gk (2 pts), Ak (1 pts), Mλ (2 pts), Bence-Jones λ (2 pts), Gλ (2 pts), Aλ (1 pts). Four cases have shown 2 different clones simultaneously. Secretion ranged from trace to 27,1 g/l. 12 of 14 cases with monoclonal secretion were classified as non-GCB-type DLBCL. Characteristic of patients with monoclonal secretion were: stage III-IV; ECOG 2-3; median age 57 years (28-71); age ≥60y/<60y 43%/47%; M/F 71%/29%; IPI: 21% high-intermediate and 79% high risk; 93% with bone marrow involvement. We grouped the patients depending of bone marrow involvement, and according to the long-rank analysis only detection of monoclonal secretion of immunoglobulins was associated with bone marrow involvement in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (Table 1). Conclusions: Our study has shown that monoclonal secretion of paraprotein was associated with bone marrow involvement in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Detection of secretion of paraprotein could help to suspect the cases with bone marrow involvement before the results of histology and when histology not informative. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with bone marrow involvement is characterized by aggressive course and poor response to standard chemotherapy. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8551-8551
Author(s):  
K. Miyazaki ◽  
M. Yamaguchi ◽  
R. Suzuki ◽  
N. Niitsu ◽  
D. Ennishi ◽  
...  

8551 Background: CD5+ DLBCL comprises 5–10% of DLBCL, and shows a high incidence of central nervous system (CNS) relapse. It has been included in the 4th WHO classification as an immunohistochemical subgroup. To clarify the prognosis and incidence of CNS relapse of CD5+ DLBCL in the rituximab-era, we conducted a multicenter retrospective study. Methods: We analyzed 313 patients (pts) with CD5+ DLBCL who received chemotherapy with (n=164) or without rituximab (n=149). The current series includes 107 out of 120 pts described in our previous study (Haematologica, 2008). Intravascular large B-cell lymphoma, primary CNS DLBCL, and secondary CD5+ DLBCL were excluded from the study population. Results: 313 pts showed the following clinical features: median age, 67 (range: 15–93); M:F=163:150; elevated serum LDH level, 71%; stage III/IV, 64%; IPI HI/H, 53%. No significant difference in clinical background such as the IPI and its five components, B symptom, male sex, and bone marrow involvement was found between pts who were treated with and without rituximab. Pts treated without rituximab received more dose-intensive chemotherapies (CHOP14, third-generation regimen, and high dose cytarabine-based regimen) than those treated with rituximab (24% vs. 7%, P<0.0001). The CR rate was higher in pts received rituximab than those without (81% vs. 65%; P=0.0014). The median follow-up was 28 months in pts who received rituximab (range: 7–77) and 68 months in those who did not (range: 6–187). Overall survival (OS) was significantly superior for pts with rituximab than for those without (2-yr OS: 68% vs. 54%, P=0.003). Multivariate analysis revealed that the use of rituximab was favorably associated with OS (HR=1.81, 95% CI: 1.26–2.58, P=0.001), but dose-intensive chemotherapies did not affect OS. However, the incidence of CNS relapse was not different between the two groups (2-yr CNS relapse rate: 11.9% vs. 11.4%, P=0.91). 16 of the 20 pts (80%) with CNS relapse in the rituximab group had brain parenchymal disease. Conclusions: Our data show that rituximab improves OS of pts with CD5+ DLBCL, but does not prevent CNS relapse. Future prospective studies to decrease CNS disease for CD5+ DLBCL are warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8074-8074
Author(s):  
Sirpa Leppa ◽  
Minna Taskinen ◽  
Satu Koivula ◽  
Ping Chen ◽  
Riku Louhimo ◽  
...  

8074 Background: Identification of biological prognostic factors that could be used to define poor risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients is a main concern. Methods: Study population consisted of 38 de novo high risk DLBCL patients less than 65 years old. The patients were treated in the Nordic phase II protocol with six courses of R-CHOEP14 followed by systemic central nervous system prophylaxis with one course of high dose methotrexate and one course of high dose cytarabine. Exon array-based profiling was used to screen signaling pathways and differentially expressed genes between the clinically high risk patients, who had relapsed or remained in remission in response to dose dense chemoimmunotherapy. At the time of the analysis, median follow up was 34 months, progression free survival (PFS) 78% and overall survival (OS) 78%. Results: The screen between relapsed patients and the patients in remission using criteria of p ≤ 0.05 and fold change ≥ 1.6 revealed 566 differentially expressed genes (131 protein coding), of which 24 were likely to be involved in conventional signaling pathways, including those regulating antigen processing and presentation (CIITA, HLA-DQA2, HLA-DQB1, RFXAP), Jak-STAT signaling (SOCS3), Notch signaling (NOTCH1) and Toll-like receptor signalling (IRF5). In cox univariate analysis, 12 of 24 genes were found to associate with PFS (p<0.05). Of these, high expression of CIITA, DLL4, HLA-DQA2, HLA-DQB1, IRF5, NOTCH1, PER1, RFXAP, SEMA4D and ZFP36 had a favorable impact on PFS, whereas high levels of ENPP3 and PRKAR2B were associated with adverse outcome. Differential expression of four genes was confirmed by quantitative PCR, and prognostic value of six genes validated using Lymphoma/Leukemia Molecular Profiling Project microarray data set. Immunohistochemical validation of the findings in a larger patient cohort is ongoing. Germinal centre B-cell signature did not predict survival in this cohort. Conclusions: The results provide evidence that exon-based transcriptome profiling can identify biologically relevant signaling pathways and genes that discriminate the outcome of homogenously treated young high risk DLBCL patients.


2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1855-1864 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koen van Besien ◽  
Mohammed Kelta ◽  
Pranay Bahaguna

PURPOSE: Primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBL) is recognized as a separate disease entity in the REAL classification. There is uncertainty about the relevance and especially the optimal management of this disorder. In this review, we discuss clinical presentation, pathology, pathobiology, and management of PMBL in order to provide a platform for initiation of further clinical and biologic studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Studies were identified through a MEDLINE search and from the bibliographies of relevant articles. RESULTS: PMBL is a tumor of young adults who present with a rapidly proliferating tumor. At diagnosis, the tumor is usually limited to intrathoracic organs. Spread to parenchymal organs such as liver, kidneys, and CNS is common at recurrence. Fibrosis and the presence of so-called clear cells are distinctive morphologic features of PMBL, although they are not pathognomonic or even necessary for diagnosis. On the other hand, biologic features relating to oncogene rearrangement and overexpression as well as cytogenetic features clearly differentiate PMBL from other types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Phase II studies and retrospective series indicate cure rates that range from 38% to 88%. The role of chemotherapy, radiation, and high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue in the management of PMBL is reviewed. CONCLUSION: PMBL has unique clinical and biologic characteristics that are radically different from those of other types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Although relatively rare, its aggressive growth and its occurrence in young patients increase the clinical relevance of this entity. The consistent recognition and study of PMBL will allow the development of new approaches to its management.


2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (19) ◽  
pp. 3166-3175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corrado Tarella ◽  
Manuela Zanni ◽  
Michele Magni ◽  
Fabio Benedetti ◽  
Caterina Patti ◽  
...  

Purpose To investigate the impact of adding rituximab to intensive chemotherapy with peripheral-blood progenitor cell (PBPC) autograft for high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLB-CL) and follicular lymphoma (FL). Patients and Methods Data were collected from 10 centers associated with Gruppo Italiano Terapie Innnovative nei Linfomi for 522 patients with DLB-CL and 223 patients with FL (median age, 47 years) who received the original or a modified high-dose sequential (HDS) chemotherapy regimen. HDS was delivered to 396 patients without (R−) and to 349 patients with (R+) rituximab; 154 (39%) and 178 patients (51%) in the R− and R+ subsets, respectively, underwent HDS for relapsed/refractory disease. Results A total of 355 R− (90%) and 309 R+ patients (88%) completed the final PBPC autograft. Early treatment-related mortality was 3.3% for R− and 2.8% for R+ (P = not significant). Two parameters significantly influenced the outcome: disease status at HDS, with 5-year overall survival (OS) projections of 69% versus 57% for diagnosis versus refractory/relapsed status, respectively, and rituximab addition, with 5-year OS of 69% versus 60% in the R+ versus R− groups, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, these two variables maintained an independent prognostic value. The marked benefit of rituximab was evident in patients receiving HDS as salvage treatment: the 5-year OS projections for R+ versus R− were, respectively, 64% versus 38%, for patients with refractory disease or early relapse and 71% versus 57%, for patients with late relapse, partial response, or second/third relapse. Conclusion The results of this large series indicate that rituximab should be included in the current practice of PBPC autograft for DLB-CL and FL.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 891-891 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuela Zanni ◽  
Massimo Di Nicola ◽  
Caterina Patti ◽  
Claudia Castellino ◽  
Alessandra Pescarollo ◽  
...  

Abstract Recent trials have shown that anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody Rituximab may be effectively employed in association with high-dose (hd) chemotherapy and peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) autograft in the management of high-risk B-cell lymphoma. Addition of Rituximab has a dual effect: increased tumour cytoreduction and in vivo purging prior to PBPC harvesting. We here report the results of a prospective, multicenter trial evaluating Rituximab-supplemented hd-sequential chemotherapy (R-HDS) as frontline treatment in patients with high-risk Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL). So far, 6 Italian Centres associated to GITIL have participated to the study. Eligibility criteria included: i. biopsy-proven DLBCL, with CD20+ phenotype; ii. no previous cytotoxic treatments; iii. age between 16–60 yrs.; iv. advanced stage disease with 2–3 aaIPI score. The R-HDS regimen includes an initial debulkying (3 APO courses) and then the sequential administration, at 15–20 day intervals, of: i. cyclophosphamide (CY) 7gr/sqm (day 1) + Rituximab 375mg/sqm (day +2 and +10), followed by PBPC harvest; ii. Ara-C 2gr/sqm b.i.d. for 6 days, reinfusion of 1–3x106 autologous CD34+ve cells/kg (day 7) and then Rituximab 375mg/sqm (day +8 and day +18); iii. etoposide 2.4gr/sqm day +1 + Cisplatin 100mg/sqm day +2; iv. a final myeloablative regimen (Mitoxantrone 60mg/sqm + L-Pam 180mg/sqm), with PBPC autograft (≥5x106 CD34+ve cells/kg) + Rituximab 375 mg/sqm (day +30 and +37); v. involved-field radiotherapy on areas of previous bulky lesions or residual lesions, within 2–3 mos. following autograft. Presently, 91 patients (median age: 48 yrs.) have been enrolled and are evaluable. They all had 2 (58) or 3 (33) aaIPI score; in addition, 63 (69%) presented with disease-related symptoms, 52 (57%) had extranodal disease, and 27 (30%) had BM involvement. There were 4 early toxic deaths (three due to sepsis following CY, Ara-C and autograft, respectively, and one due to leucoencephalopathy from JC-virus infection 2 mos. after autograft); one more toxic death due to pneumonia occurred at 10 mos. after R-HDS, for an overall TRM of 5.5%. In addition, 21 patients had CMV or VZV reactivation that resolved after antiviral therapy. Overall 73 patients (80 %) reached CR. So far, at a median follow-up of 24 mos., 76 patients (83.5%) are alive and 68 (75%) are in continuous CR (CCR), with 4.3-yr OS and and EFS projections of 80% and 74%, respectively. There was a trend towards a better outcome in aaIPI 2 vs. 3, although the difference was not statistically significative. Among 27 patients with BM+, 17 (63%) are presently in CCR, at a median follow-up of 25 mos. In conclusion, R-HDS was feasible at the multicenter level although the occurrence of severe infectious complications should not be underestimated. Nevertheless, both CR rate and survival curve projections compare favorably with the poor outcome usually observed in aaIPI 2–3 patients managed with conventional chemotherapy. The results here presented urge a comparative analysis between conventional vs. intensified Rituximab-supplemented chemoimmunotherapy in younger patients with high-risk DLBCL.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document