Assessment of performance measures for patients with the myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) in the United States.

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6002-6002
Author(s):  
G. A. Abel ◽  
B. A. Neville ◽  
J. C. Weeks ◽  
R. M. Stone
1992 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Higgs

Relying on standard measures of macroeconomic performance, historians and economists believe that “war prosperity” prevailed in the United States during World War II. This belief is ill-founded, because it does not recognize that the United States had a command economy during the war. From 1942 to 1946 some macroeconomic performance measures are statistically inaccurate; others are conceptually inappropriate. A better grounded interpretation is that during the war the economy was a huge arsenal in which the well-being of consumers deteriorated. After the war genuine prosperity returned for the first time since 1929.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 526-526
Author(s):  
Alex Spyropoulos ◽  
Mohamed Hussein ◽  
Jay Lin ◽  
David Battleman

Abstract Introduction: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) constitutes a major healthcare burden in the United States (US), despite being effectively prevented by VTE prophylaxis. However, many patients at risk for VTE receive inadequate prophylaxis, and this has prompted the development of national performance measures to help improve prescribing practices. This study investigates the rates of post-operative VTE prevention in a real-world population of commercially-insured US surgical patients, and identifies VTE risk factors in this group. Methods: Discharges from the PharMetrics database (January 2001–December 2005) that had ICD-9 codes for orthopedic or abdominal surgery and were aged ≥18 years were included in the study. Patients aged ≥65 years and not in a Medicare Risk group and those without complete records or health plan coverage were excluded. The primary outcome measure for this study was the rate of (and time to) symptomatic VTE following surgery (as identified by ICD-9 codes), and the secondary outcome measure was the identification of independent VTE risk factors using logistic regression analysis to control for patient and hospital characteristics. Results: 172,320 discharges met the study criteria, of which 23.9% underwent orthopedic surgery and 76.1% underwent abdominal surgery. Primary outcome measures are shown in Table 1. In summary, orthopedic discharges had a higher incidence of clinically symptomatic VTE (4.7%) than abdominal discharges (3.1%). Both types of surgery had a similar distribution of VTE into deep-vein thrombosis (DVT, 72.5–75.0% of all VTE respectively), pulmonary embolism (PE, 22.5–25.0% of all VTE respectively), or both DVT and PE (2.5% of all VTE). The median time to a VTE event was shorter in orthopedic discharges (median 30 days) than their abdominal surgery counterparts (median 65 days). When considering all discharges in a logistic regression analysis, a prior history of VTE was found to be the strongest independent predictor of VTE (odds ratio [OR] 10.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] 9.2–11.4; p<0.001). Other significant variables associated with VTE outcomes included orthopedic surgery rather than abdominal surgery (OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.4–1.6), increasing age (per year) (OR 1.02; 95% CI 1.01–1.02), male gender (OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.09–1.28), increasing index hospitalization length of stay (per day) (OR 1.06; 95% CI 1.05–1.06), and pre-index Charlson comorbidity index (OR 1.12; 95% CI 1.09–1.14). Conclusions: Many patients undergoing orthopedic or abdominal surgery are at risk for VTE, with approximately 1 in 25 patients in this analysis experiencing a clinical VTE event. Improved implementation of national performance measures may help reduce the overall burden of VTE in the United States. Table 1 – VTE event rates Total (N=172,320) Orthopedic Surgery (N=41,139) Abdominal Surgery (N=131,181) Event, n (%) VTE 5956 (3.5) 1944 (4.7) 4012 (3.1) DVT 4367 (2.5) 1458 (3.5) 2909 (2.2) PE 1439 (0.8) 438 (1.1) 1001(0.8) DVT + PE 150 (0.1) 48 (0.1) 102 (0.1) Time to VTE Event: (days, median) VTE 51 30 65 DVT 70 34 83 PE 46 20 26 DVT+PE 31 17 27.5


Author(s):  
Luming Shang ◽  
Ahmed M. Abdel Aziz

Roadway safety is an important aspect of all transportation facilities. With operation and maintenance becoming contracted roles under public-private partnerships (PPP), it is expected that safety rates will improve beyond those experienced in traditional delivery. The international experience shows that PPPs experienced mechanisms designed to provide safer roads. In the United States, PPP is gaining momentum and several states initiated PPP projects. While studies show the potential of PPPs for improving cost efficiency and expediting the delivery time, few researches investigated the correlation between PPP and roadway safety. To fill the gap, this study investigated seventeen PPP projects through content analysis of their agreement and procurement documents. The findings show that PPP projects were lacking further consideration toward safety beyond what is normally available in traditional delivery. Safety was an objective in most (76%) of the projects, however, without direct mechanisms to implement such objective. Around half of the projects have mentioned safety as part of proposal evaluation but only two projects have assigned points/weights in the evaluation. None of the projects provided for a direct link between the compensation to the achievement of improvements in the safety rates. Generally, PPPs are meant to provide public agencies with means to achieve particular objectives. It is recommended to use the particulars of PPPs in performance measures and payment mechanisms to enforce roadway safety in highways infrastructure.


Author(s):  
Elina Reponen ◽  
Thomas G Rundall ◽  
Stephen M Shortell ◽  
Janet C Blodgett ◽  
Ritva Jokela ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Healthcare organizations around the world are striving to achieve transformational performance improvement, often through adopting process improvement methodologies such as Lean management. Indeed, Lean management has been implemented in hospitals in many countries. But despite a shared methodology and the potential benefit of benchmarking lean implementation and its effects on hospital performance, cross-national Lean benchmarking is rare. Healthcare organisations in different countries operate in very different contexts, including different healthcare system models, and these differences may be perceived as limiting the ability of improvers to benchmark Lean implementation and related organisational performance. However, there is no empirical research available on the international relevance and applicability of Lean implementation and hospital performance measures. To begin to understand the opportunities and limitations related to cross-national benchmarking of Lean in hospitals, we conducted a cross-national case study of the relevance and applicability of measures of Lean implementation in hospitals and hospital performance. Methods We report an exploratory case study of the relevance of Lean implementation measures and the applicability of hospital performance measures using quantitative comparisons of data from Hospital District of XX XX University Hospital in Finland and a sample of 75 large academic hospitals in the United States. Results The relevance of Lean-related measures was high across the two countries: almost 90% of the items developed for a US survey were relevant and available from XX. A majority of the US-based measures for financial performance (66.7%), service provision/utilisation (100.0%), and service provision/care processes (60.0%) were available from XX. Differences in patient satisfaction measures prevented comparisons between XX and the US. Of 18 clinical outcome measures, only four (22%) were not comparable. Clinical outcome measures were less affected by the differences in healthcare system models than measures related to service provision and financial performance. Conclusions Lean implementation measures are highly relevant in healthcare organisations operating in the United States and Finland, as is the applicability of a variety of performance improvement measures. Cross-national benchmarking in Lean healthcare is feasible, but a careful assessment of contextual factors, including the healthcare system model, and their impact on the applicability and relevance of chosen benchmarking measures is necessary. The differences between the US and Finnish healthcare system models is most clearly reflected in financial performance measures and care process measures.


2007 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 958-966 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey J. Fadrowski ◽  
Diane Frankenfield ◽  
Sandra Amaral ◽  
Tammy Brady ◽  
Gregory H. Gorman ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 180 (6) ◽  
pp. 898-901 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana C. Xavier ◽  
Matthew Kutny ◽  
Luciano J. Costa

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document