Causes of suboptimal colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) in U.S. immigrants.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 380-380
Author(s):  
N. C. Shahidi ◽  
B. Homayoon ◽  
W. Y. Cheung

380 Background: Research shows that CRCS in U.S. immigrants is low, but causes for this poor uptake are unclear. Our aims were to 1) compare CRCS among U.S. born citizens (USB), naturalized citizens (NAC) and non-citizens (NOC), 2) evaluate clinical factors associated with CRCS, and 3) explore health system barriers to CRCS for immigrants. Methods: Screening eligible patients were identified from the 2007 California Health Interview Survey. CRCS was defined as a fecal occult blood test within 1 year, a sigmoidoscopy within 5 years or a colonoscopy within 10 years. Using logistic regression, we determined the effect of immigrant status and other clinical factors on CRCS. We devised a 3-point composite scoring system based on survey responses to questions about health system barriers (where 0=worst and 3=best). Stratified analyses based on residence (urban vs rural), healthcare coverage (insured vs uninsured), English proficiency (good vs. poor), and composite score were conducted to assess their relationship with CRCS. Results: We identified 30,434 respondents: USB 83%, NAC 13%, NOC 4%; mean age 66, 65, 61 years; male 39%, 41%, 48%; white 85%, 38%, 29%, respectively. Only 67% of USB, 61% of NAC and 46% of NOC underwent CRCS (p<0.001). Old age, male, high income earners, non-smokers, being married and those who visited their physicians frequently were more likely to receive CRCS (all p<0.05). When compared to USB, NAC and NOC were associated with decreased odds of CRCS (OR 0.88, 95%CI 0.73-1.05 and OR 0.67, 95%CI 0.52-0.87, respectively; global p=0.009). Stratified analyses revealed that the association between immigrants and decreased CRCS was more evident for immigrants who lived in rural areas, lacked insurance, or those who were not proficient in English (Table). Immigrants with a composite score ≤2 also reported worse CRCS. Conclusions: CRCS remains suboptimal, especially in new U.S. immigrants. Inferior healthcare access and language barriers are potential drivers of this disparity. Addressing these system issues for immigrants may promote CRCS in this population. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Byung Chang Kim ◽  
Minjoo Kang ◽  
Eunjung Park ◽  
Jeong-Im Shim ◽  
Shinhee Kang ◽  
...  

Background: The compliance with the follow-up examination after a positive fecal occult blood test (FOBT) is lower than expected. We aimed to evaluate the adherence rate to the follow-up examination in patients with a positive FOBT and to identify the clinical factors associated with this adherence. Methods: The study population comprised adults aged ≥50 years who participated in the National Cancer Screening Program for colorectal cancer (CRC) in 2013. Compliance was defined as undergoing follow-up examination within 1 year of a positive FOBT. Results: From 214,131 individuals with a positive FOBT, 120,911 (56.5%) were in the compliance group and 93,220 (43.5%) were in the non-compliance group. On multivariate analysis, good compliance was associated with men (odds ratio (OR) = 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.09–1.15)), younger ages (70–79 years, OR = 2.19 (2.09–2.31); 60–69 years, OR = 3.29 (3.13–3.46); 50–59 years, OR = 3.57 (3.39–3.75) vs. >80 years), previous experience of CRC screening (a negative FOBT, OR = 1.18 (1.15–1.21); a positive FOBT, OR = 2.42 (2.31–2.54)), absent previous experience of colonoscopy or barium enema (OR = 2.06 (1.99–2.13)), higher economic income (quartile, 75%, OR = 1.14 (1.11–1.17); 100%, OR = 1.22 (1.19–1.25)), current smokers (OR = 1.12 (1.09–1.15)), alcohol intake (OR = 1.03 (1.01–1.05)), active physical activity (≥3 times/week, OR = 1.13 (1.11–1.15)), depression (OR = 1.11 (1.08–1.14)), and present comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index, ≥1). Conclusion: This study identified clinical factors, namely, male, younger ages, prior experience of fecal test, absent history of colonoscopy or double-contrast barium enema (DCBE) within 5 years, and high socioeconomic status to be associated with good adherence to the follow-up examination after a positive FOBT.


2021 ◽  
Vol 160 (6) ◽  
pp. S-423-S-424
Author(s):  
Thanita Thongtan ◽  
Anasua Deb ◽  
Ashley Maveddat ◽  
Paibul Suriyawongpaisal ◽  
Passisd Laoveeravat ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 785-790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emelie M de Boer ◽  
David Pincock ◽  
Sander Veldhuyzen van Zanten

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ‘natural history’ of outpatients who were referred to the Division of Gastroenterology at the University of Alberta Hospital (Edmonton, Alberta) for gastrointestinal problems and were subsequently declined.METHODS: Patients were tracked for 12 months after they were referred and declined for the following indications: abdominal pain, rectal bleeding, fecal occult blood test-positive stools and iron deficiency. For each patient, data regarding consultations by other gastroenterologists or surgeons working in the region, clinically relevant diagnoses and the number of gastrointestinal-related x-rays performed were obtained.RESULTS: Of a total sample size of 230 patients, 110 (47.8%) were seen by another gastroenterologist or surgeon after decline. A significant diagnosis was made in 21 patients (9.1%), which had immediate clinical consequences in 29%. Forty per cent of patients underwent one or more gastointestinal-related x-rays before being declined, which increased to 55% after decline.CONCLUSION: Approximately 50% of declined patients were seen by other gastroenterologists or surgeons in the region. In 9.1% of these patients, a clinically important diagnosis was made, of which one-quarter had immediate medical consequences.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document