Oncologic outcomes for node-positive patients undergoing robotic radical cystectomy.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 290-290
Author(s):  
C. Mmeje ◽  
R. Nunez-Nateras ◽  
R. Pruthi ◽  
M. E. Nielsen ◽  
E. Wallen ◽  
...  

290 Background: Previous studies have shown robot assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) to have equivalent perioperative outcomes to open radical cystectomy. There are few reports that have examined the oncologic results of RARC specifically with respect to node-positive patients. We report the outcomes of node-positive patients who have undergone RARC with medium-term (at least 1 year) follow-up. Methods: A total of 275 patients underwent RARC at two institutions for invasive bladder cancer between 2005-present. We examined the 50 patients with node-positive disease that had a minimum of one year follow-up. Oncologic outcomes, recurrence free survival (RFS), and disease specific survival (DSS) were analyzed and compared to the open literature. Results: Mean clinical follow up in this case series was 29 months (range 12–64 months). The mean number of lymph nodes removed was 18 (range 5–35), and mean number of positive LNs was 3.1 (range 1–12). Overall rate of LN positivity was 26%. Mean LN density was 18%. Seventeen (34%) patients had ≤ pT2 disease and 33 (66%) pT3/T4 disease. At this follow-up, 29 patients have recurred, 21 patients died of disease, giving a RFS and DSS of 42% and 58%, respectively. Mean (median) time to recurrence was 10.2 months (9 months). A total of 60% of patients received peri-operative chemotherapy in this cohort. These findings are consistent with prior reports of such oncologic outcomes in node-positive patients in open series. Conclusions: The oncologic follow-up of patients undergoing RARC with LN positive disease appears to have acceptable outcomes during medium term (mean 29 months) follow-up. As our follow-up increases, we expect to continue to accurately define the long-term clinical suitability and oncologic success of this procedure in this high-risk population. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 288-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Mmeje ◽  
R. Nunez-Nateras ◽  
R. Pruthi ◽  
M. E. Nielsen ◽  
E. Wallen ◽  
...  

288 Background: We report our experience with robot assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with regard to medium-term (at least 2 year) oncologic outcomes. Methods: A total of 275 patients have undergone RARC and urinary diversion at two institutions for invasive bladder cancer between 2005-present. We performed a retrospective analysis of the 139 patients who underwent RARC with a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Medium term oncologic outcomes including recurrence rates, time to recurrence, recurrence free survival (RFS), disease specific survival (DSS) were analyzed. Follow-up was measured from time of surgery to time of most recent clinical follow-up. Results: This cohort of patients consisted of 108 men (78%) and 31 women (22%) at a mean age of 67.3 years (range 45-86 years). Sixty-one (44%) patients had ≤ pT2 disease, 38 (27%) pT3/T4 disease, and 40 (29%) N+ disease. The mean number of lymph nodes removed was 18 (range 3-41). The average clinical follow up in this case series was nearly 3 years with a mean of 35.9 months (range 24-64 months). At this follow-up, 39 patients have recurred, 27 patients died of disease, and 5 patients died of other causes giving an overall RFS, DSS, and OS rates of 80%, 71%, and 68%, respectively. The mean (median) time to recurrence was 12.3 months (10 months). These findings are consistent with prior reports of the oncologic outcomes for open radical cystectomy. Conclusions: The oncologic follow-up of patients undergoing RARC appears to be favorable with acceptable outcomes in the medium-term (mean – 3 years). As our follow-up increases, we should expect to truly define the long-term clinical appropriateness and oncologic success of this procedure. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 225-226
Author(s):  
F. Chessa ◽  
A. Möller ◽  
R. Schiavina ◽  
M. Borghesi ◽  
O. Laurin ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110474
Author(s):  
Orli Friedman-Eldar ◽  
Christina Layton ◽  
Iago De Castro Silva ◽  
Mecker G Moller ◽  
Ahkeel Allen ◽  
...  

Background For selected patients with early-stage breast cancer (BC), intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) has emerged as a convenient alternative to standard whole breast irradiation (WBI). We report a single institution experience with IORT in terms of oncologic outcomes, toxicities, and cosmesis. Methods Clinicopathological and perioperative outcomes of patients who underwent IORT for early-stage BC at a public hospital from 2017 to 2020 were retrospectively retrieved. Toxicity was categorized to acute or chronic based on 6 months post-IORT cutoff. Results 85 patients underwent IORT and had complete data, aged 49‐85 years (mean 62). Intraoperative radiation therapy added 23 minutes on average to the total operative time. Final stage was 0, I, and II in 40%, 58.9%, and 1.1% of patients, respectively. Mean tumor size was 0.8 cm (range .1-2.1), with ductal histology comprising 94% of cases. Surgical margins were positive in 2 patients, and adjuvant WBI was required in 5 patients. After a median follow‐up of 17 months (range 3-41), none of the patients had local recurrence and no mortality was recorded. Early wound complications included wound dehiscence (n = 1), seroma/hematoma (n = 15), and re-operation with loss of nipple-areola complex (n = 1). Chronic skin toxicities were reported in 10 (12%) patients and good or excellent cosmetic outcome was reported in 93% of patients. Conclusions Utilizing IORT among low-risk early BC patients may be a safe and more convenient alternative to traditional WBI, with low toxicity rate, acceptable cosmetic results, and good oncologic outcomes at 17 months. Longer follow-up and further prospective controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings.


2021 ◽  
pp. 205141582110414
Author(s):  
Francesco Chiancone ◽  
Francesco Persico ◽  
Marco Fabiano ◽  
Maurizio Fedelini ◽  
Clemente Meccariello ◽  
...  

Objective: We aimed to evaluate perioperative outcomes and complications of a modified technique of ileal conduit diversion. Methods: Forty-seven cases of radical cystectomy with modified ileal conduit diversion were performed at our institution from January 2015 to January 2020. After radical cystectomy, a segment of ileum was used to pack the conduit and was placed below the digestive anastomosis. Then, the mesentery window of the ileo-ileal anastomosis was sutured. The ureters were anastomosed on their native side on single loop ureteral stents. All procedures were performed by a single surgical team. Intra- and postoperative complications were classified and reported according to the Satava and Clavien–Dindo grading systems. Results: The mean age of population was 66.40±10.14 years, and 76.6% were male. Concomitant diabetes was found in 31.9% of patients. About three quarters of patients had T2G3 bladder cancer. Mean blood loss was 449.36±246.50 ml, and hospitalization was 10.32±5 days. With a mean follow-up of 17.36±12.63 months, the recurrence rate was 17%, and 14.9% of patients died of bladder cancer. Out of the 47 patients, three (4.3%) experienced intraoperative complications, while 15 (31.9%) had postoperative complications. Of these, only three patients experienced Clavien–Dindo complications ⩾grade 3. Multivariate logistic regression model showed that diabetes ( p=0.023) and higher blood loss ( p=0.010) were significantly associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications. We reported one case of ureterointestinal anastomosis stenosis on the left side and none on the right side. Despite our results being promising, larger randomized trials with longer follow-up are needed to explore further the feasibility of this technique on a larger scale. Conclusion: We describe a safe and simple surgical technique with a similar postoperative complications rate and a lower incidence of ureteroileal anastomosis stenosis compared to the standard technique. Level of evidence 4.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document