scholarly journals Safety of Early Discharge for Low-Risk Patients With Febrile Neutropenia: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (30) ◽  
pp. 3977-3983 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Talcott ◽  
Beow Y. Yeap ◽  
Jack A. Clark ◽  
Robert D. Siegel ◽  
Elizabeth Trice Loggers ◽  
...  

PurposeFebrile neutropenia commonly complicates cancer chemotherapy. Outpatient treatment may reduce costs and improve patient comfort but risk progression of undetected medical problems.Patients and MethodsBy using our validated algorithm, we identified medically stable inpatients admitted for febrile neutropenia (neutrophils < 500/μL) after chemotherapy and randomly assigned them to continued inpatient antibiotic therapy or early discharge to receive identical antibiotic treatment at home. Our primary outcome was the occurrence of any serious medical complication, defined as evidence of medical instability requiring urgent medical attention.ResultsWe enrolled 117 patients with 121 febrile neutropenia episodes before study termination for poor accrual. We excluded five episodes as ineligible and three because of inadequate documentation of the study outcome. Treatment groups were clinically similar, but sociodemographic imbalances occurred because of block randomization. The median presenting absolute neutrophil count was 100/μL. Hematopoietic growth factors were used in 38% of episodes. The median neutropenia duration was 4 days (range, 1 to 15 days). Five outpatients were readmitted to the hospital. Major medical complications occurred in five episodes (8%) in the hospital arm and four (9%) in the home arm (95% CI for the difference, −10% to 13%; P = .56). No study patient died. Patient-reported quality of life was similar on both arms.ConclusionWe found no evidence of adverse medical consequences from home care, despite a protocol designed to detect evidence of clinical deterioration. These results should reassure clinicians who elect to treat rigorously characterized low-risk patients with febrile neutropenia in suitable outpatient settings with appropriate surveillance for unexpected clinical deterioration.

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 606-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda S. Elting ◽  
Charles Lu ◽  
Carmelita P. Escalante ◽  
Sharon H. Giordano ◽  
Jonathan C. Trent ◽  
...  

Purpose We retrospectively compared the outcomes and costs of outpatient and inpatient management of low-risk outpatients who presented to an emergency department with febrile neutropenia (FN). Patients and Methods A single episode of FN was randomly chosen from each of 712 consecutive, low-risk solid tumor outpatients who had been treated prospectively on a clinical pathway (1997-2003). Their medical records were reviewed retrospectively for overall success (resolution of all signs and symptoms of infection without modification of antibiotics, major medical complications, or intensive care unit admission) and nine secondary outcomes. Outcomes were assessed by physician investigators who were blinded to management strategy. Outcomes and costs (payer's perspective) in 529 low-risk outpatients were compared with 123 low-risk patients who were psychosocially ineligible for outpatient management (no access to caregiver, telephone, or transportation; residence > 30 minutes from treating center; poor compliance with previous outpatient therapy) using univariate statistical tests. Results Overall success was 80% among low-risk outpatients and 79% among low-risk inpatients. Response to initial antibiotics was 81% among outpatients and 80% among inpatients (P = .94); 21% of those initially treated as outpatients subsequently required hospitalization. All patients ultimately responded to antibiotics; there were no deaths. Serious complications were rare (1%) and equally frequent between the groups. The mean cost of therapy among inpatients was double that of outpatients ($15,231 v $7,772; P < .001). Conclusion Outpatient management of low-risk patients with FN is as safe and effective as inpatient management of low-risk patients and is significantly less costly.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. e0161493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Eva Laurencet ◽  
François Girardin ◽  
Fabio Rigamonti ◽  
Anne Bevand ◽  
Philippe Meyer ◽  
...  

1990 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 1998-2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
C A Mullen ◽  
G R Buchanan

Children with leukemia and solid tumors are often hospitalized for empiric broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy because of fever during periods of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Conventional practice dictates that parenteral antibiotics be continued until the patient is afebrile and has recovered from neutropenia, ie, until the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) exceeds 500 cells per cubic millimeter. However, the practice in our center has been to discontinue parenteral antibiotic therapy and discharge many such patients before resolution of neutropenia. Since the feasibility and safety of this approach has not been studied, we reviewed the records of 114 consecutive hospitalizations for fever and neutropenia in 61 patients during a 13-month period. Seventy-seven children (68%) were discharged to their homes while still neutropenic after they had been afebrile for 1 to 2 days on parenteral antibiotics, had negative blood cultures, appeared well, and usually had some evidence of bone marrow recovery. Five patients (4.4%) developed recurrent fever and required rehospitalization within 7 days of discharge. Only three of the 77 patients (3.9%) who were sent home with neutropenia had recurrent fever. Each had a brief and uneventful second hospitalization. Two of the 37 children discharged with an ANC over 500 cells per cubic millimeter required rehospitalization. A declining ANC and advanced malignancy were risk factors in predicting recurrence of fever following discharge. A rising monocyte count was a predictor of imminent recovery from neutropenia. These results suggest that "early" discharge of an afebrile yet still neutropenic patient is safe when the patient is in remission, has no evidence of serious infection, appears clinically stable, and has indications of bone marrow recovery. The conventional approach of routinely continuing the hospitalization until resolution of neutropenia may be unnecessary in such low-risk patients.


2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (16_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8116-8116
Author(s):  
L. Elting ◽  
C. Lu ◽  
C. Escalante ◽  
S. Giordano ◽  
J. Trent ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 715-719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shin Ahn ◽  
Yoon-Seon Lee ◽  
Yeon Hee Chun ◽  
Kyung Soo Lim ◽  
Won Kim ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 178-181
Author(s):  
Timothy Cooksley ◽  
◽  
Mark Holland ◽  
Jean Klastersky ◽  
◽  
...  

Patients with febrile neutropenia are a heterogeneous group with only a minority developing significant medical complications. Scoring systems, such as the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) score, have been developed and validated to identify low risk patients. Caring for patients with low risk febrile neutropenia in an ambulatory setting is proven to be safe and effective. Benefits include admission avoidance, cost savings and reduced risk of nosocomial infections, as well as improved patient experience and satisfaction. Implementation of an ambulatory pathway for low risk febrile neutropenia provides an excellent opportunity for Acute Physicians and Oncologists to collaborate in delivering care for this group of patients.


Author(s):  
Charles Nessle ◽  
Thomas Braun ◽  
Sung Won Choi ◽  
Rajen Mody

Risk stratification of pediatric febrile neutropenia (FN) is an established concept; the internal evaluation of a validated clinical decision rules (CDR) tool has not been well-described. In this study, restrictive criteria and procalcitonin were added to a recommended CDR for internal evaluation before implementation. Analysis of 577 FN episodes showed good sensitivity and negative predictive value in predicting blood stream infections (87.3%; 95.6%) and intensive care admissions (97.2%; 99.1%). There were no severe adverse events in low-risk patients with low procalcitonin; procalcitonin identified 3 low-risk patients with serious bacterial infections. The modified CDR with procalcitonin may assist in risk stratification.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document