Predicting Chemotherapy Toxicity in Older Adults and the Importance of Geriatric Assessment

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 560-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joep Lagro ◽  
Stephanie A. Studenski ◽  
Marcel G.M. Olde Rikkert
2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (25) ◽  
pp. 3457-3465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arti Hurria ◽  
Kayo Togawa ◽  
Supriya G. Mohile ◽  
Cynthia Owusu ◽  
Heidi D. Klepin ◽  
...  

Purpose Older adults are vulnerable to chemotherapy toxicity; however, there are limited data to identify those at risk. The goals of this study are to identify risk factors for chemotherapy toxicity in older adults and develop a risk stratification schema for chemotherapy toxicity. Patients and Methods Patients age ≥ 65 years with cancer from seven institutions completed a prechemotherapy assessment that captured sociodemographics, tumor/treatment variables, laboratory test results, and geriatric assessment variables (function, comorbidity, cognition, psychological state, social activity/support, and nutritional status). Patients were followed through the chemotherapy course to capture grade 3 (severe), grade 4 (life-threatening or disabling), and grade 5 (death) as defined by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Results In total, 500 patients with a mean age of 73 years (range, 65 to 91 years) with stage I to IV lung (29%), GI (27%), gynecologic (17%), breast (11%), genitourinary (10%), or other (6%) cancer joined this prospective study. Grade 3 to 5 toxicity occurred in 53% of the patients (39% grade 3, 12% grade 4, 2% grade 5). A predictive model for grade 3 to 5 toxicity was developed that consisted of geriatric assessment variables, laboratory test values, and patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. A scoring system in which the median risk score was 7 (range, 0 to 19) and risk stratification schema (risk score: percent incidence of grade 3 to 5 toxicity) identified older adults at low (0 to 5 points; 30%), intermediate (6 to 9 points; 52%), or high risk (10 to 19 points; 83%) of chemotherapy toxicity (P < .001). Conclusion A risk stratification schema can establish the risk of chemotherapy toxicity in older adults. Geriatric assessment variables independently predicted the risk of toxicity.


2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 227-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanya M. Wildes ◽  
Alexander P. Ruwe ◽  
Chloe Fournier ◽  
Feng Gao ◽  
Kenneth R. Carson ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1286-1286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanya M Wildes ◽  
Brittany Depp ◽  
Ravi Vij ◽  
Keith Stockerl-Goldstein ◽  
Graham Colditz

Abstract Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a disease of aging, with a median age at diagnosis of 71. Geriatric assessment, a multi-dimensional assessment of the health of an older adult, has been shown to be feasible, predictive of chemotherapy toxicity, and prognostic in patients with solid tumors. However, the feasibility of geriatric assessment and the frequency of geriatric syndromes in older adults with newly diagnosed MM are not known. Methods: We undertook a pilot prospective cohort study of adults over age 65 with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Eligible patients were within 3 months of diagnosis, understood spoken and written English, and had a life-expectancy of ≥ 6 months. Participants completed the primarily self-administered Cancer and Aging Research Group geriatric assessment tool (Hurria et al, JCO, 2011), including measures of functional status, falls, comorbidities, medications, psychological state, social support, cognition and physical performance. Results: From August 2012 – June 2014, 29 patients enrolled at Washington University School of Medicine. The median age was 70 (range 65-84); 79.3% were white, 13.8% black, 3.4% Asian, and 3.4% reported Hispanic ethnicity. ISS stages were as follows: I (10.3%), II (34.5%), III (34.5%), unknown (20.7%). The geriatric assessment was feasible in the clinic setting, and acceptable to participants: 89.7% of patients felt that there were no items on the questionnaire which were difficult to understand and were satisfied with the length. Only 2 participants (6.9%) reported that there were items that upset them in the geriatric assessment (items on sexual health and dying). Most (58.6%) were able to complete the assessment with no assistance. The median clinician-reported Karnofsky-Performance Status (KPS) was 80% (range 50-90%), as was the patient-reported KPS (median 80%, range 30-100%). Requiring assistance with daily activities was extremely common: 57.1% of patients required some or complete assistance with one or more instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), most commonly with housework (61.7%), transportation (37.9%), meal preparation (34.5%), shopping (27.5%), and taking medications (21.5%). Patients frequently reported limitation in performing vigorous activities (89.6%), in moderate activities (72.4%), in walking several blocks (65.5%), or in walking up one flight of stairs (55.1%). Half of participants (48.3%) reported limitation in walking one block. Nearly one-third (31%) required assistance with self-care (bathing or dressing). Patients commonly reported one or more comorbidities, including arthritis (42.9%), emphysema/chronic bronchitis (10.7%), hypertension (32.1%), heart disease (14.3%), diabetes (14.3%), chronic liver or kidney disease (14.8%), and depression (28.6%). Polypharmacy was extremely common. The median number of medications taken on a scheduled and as needed basis was 10 (range 2-23). Sensory impairments were common: 31% reported their vision was fair or worse; 24% reported their hearing was fair or worse. Three patients (10.3%) screened positive for cognitive impairment on the Blessed Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test, while none reported a clinical diagnosis of dementia. Of the 26 patients who completed the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), the median time to complete was 11.3 seconds (range 7.2-19.8 seconds); 26.9% required >13.5 seconds to complete the TUG, which is associated with an increased risk for falls. One in five (21.4%) participants reported one or more falls in the 6 months prior to assessment. Conclusions: A brief, primarily self-administered geriatric assessment was feasible and satisfactory to the participants. Geriatric syndromes including comorbidities, functional dependence, polypharmacy, sensory impairment and falls were common in this cohort, despite most patients having a KPS which is considered “good” in clinical practice. Future study is needed to examine whether the presence of geriatric syndromes in older adult with myeloma is predictive of chemotherapy toxicity, as it is in solid tumors, and whether interventions based on impairments identified in a geriatric assessment can improve outcomes in older adults with myeloma. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2021 ◽  
pp. 089826432199332
Author(s):  
Wanda Rietkerk ◽  
Jannet de Jonge-de Haan ◽  
Joris P. J. Slaets ◽  
Sytse U. Zuidema ◽  
Debby L. Gerritsen

Objectives: Goal setting and motivational interviewing (MI) may increase well-being by promoting healthy behavior. Since we failed to show improved well-being in a proactive assessment service for community-dwelling older adults applying these techniques, we studied whether implementation processes could explain this. Methods: Goals set during the comprehensive geriatric assessment were evaluated on their potential for behavior change. MI and goal setting adherence wasassessed by reviewing audiotaped interactions and interviewing care professionals. Results: Among the 280 goals set with 230 frail older adults (mean age 77 ± 6.9 years, 59% women), more than 90% had a low potential for behavior change. Quality thresholds for MI were reached in only one of the 11 interactions. Application was hindered by the context and the limited proficiency of care professionals. Discussion: Implementation was suboptimal for goal setting and MI. This decreased the potential for improved well-being in the participating older adults.


2020 ◽  
pp. OP.20.00442
Author(s):  
William Dale ◽  
Grant R. Williams ◽  
Amy R. MacKenzie ◽  
Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis ◽  
Ronald J. Maggiore ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: For patients with cancer who are older than 65 years, the 2018 ASCO Guideline recommends geriatric assessment (GA) be performed. However, there are limited data on providers’ practices using GA. Therefore, ASCO’s Geriatric Oncology Task Force conducted a survey of providers to assess practice patterns and barriers to GA. METHODS: Cancer providers treating adult patients including those ≥ 65 years completed an online survey. Questions included those asking about awareness of ASCO’s Geriatric Oncology Guideline (2018), use of validated GA tools, and perceived barriers to using GA. Descriptive statistics and statistical comparisons between those aware of the Guideline and those who were not were conducted. Statistical significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: Participants (N = 1,277) responded between April 5 and June 5, 2019. Approximately half (53%) reported awareness of the Guideline. The most frequently used GA tools, among those aware of the Guideline and those who were not, assessed functional status (69% v 50%; P < .001) and falls (62% v 45%; P < .001). Remaining tools were used < 50% of the time, including tools assessing weight loss, comorbidities, cognition, life expectancy, chemotherapy toxicity, mood, and noncancer mortality risk. GA use was two to four times higher among those who are aware of the Guideline. The most frequent barriers for those who reported being Guideline aware were lack of resources, specifically time (81.7%) and staff (77.0%). In comparison, those who were unaware of the Guideline most often reported the following barriers: lack of knowledge or training (78.4%), lack of awareness about tools (75.2%), and uncertainty about use of tools (75.0%). CONCLUSION: Among providers caring for older adults, 52% were aware of the ASCO Guideline. Some domains were assessed frequently (eg, function, falls), whereas other domains were assessed rarely (eg, mood, cognition). Guideline awareness was associated with two to four times increased use of GA and differing perceived barriers. Interventions facilitating Guideline-consistent implementation will require various strategies to change behavior.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (22) ◽  
pp. 3488-3498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin A. Derman ◽  
Keriann Kordas ◽  
Jean Ridgeway ◽  
Selina Chow ◽  
William Dale ◽  
...  

Key Points GA to guide an MDC evaluation to optimize older adult candidates for hematopoietic cellular therapy is feasible and practical. An MDC evaluation for older adults before transplantation holds promise to mitigate transplant-related morbidity and mortality.


Author(s):  
Andrea Pérez-de-Acha-Chávez ◽  
Carolina Gómez-Moreno ◽  
José Carlos Aguilar-Velazco ◽  
María Luisa Moreno-García ◽  
Concepción Pérez-de-Celis-Herrero ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document