A randomized phase II study (VEG108838) of lapatanib plus pazopanib (L+P) versus lapatanib (L) in patients with ErbB2+ inflammatory breast cancer (IBC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 531-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimo Cristofanilli ◽  
Stephen R. D. Johnston ◽  
Alexey Manikhas ◽  
Henry Leonidas Gomez ◽  
Oleg Gladkov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Meaningful Improvement ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Dose Reductions

531 Background: ErbB2 amplification is frequently reported in IBC and there is evidence of positive association between ErbB2 and VEGF expression. We evaluated the combination of anti ErbB2 and VEGF therapy in ErbB2+ IBC. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, randomized clinical trial for patients (pts) with relapsed ErbB2+ IBC. Cohort 1: Pts stratified (prior trastuzumab; cutaneous disease only vs systemic) and randomized 1:1 to receive L 1500 mg + placebo or L 1500 mg + P 800 mg, QD. Due to high incidence of Grade 3/4 diarrhea in pts treated with L 1500 mg+ P 800 mg in another study, Cohort 1 was closed after 76 pts randomized. Cohort 2 (87 pts ): Pts were stratified (prior trastuzumab) and randomized 5:5:2 to receive L 1500 mg + placebo or L 1000 mg + P 400 mg (double-blind) or P 800 mg (open-label), respectively, QD. Treatment continued until PD, unacceptable toxicity or death. Primary endpoint was ORR. Secondary endpoints included PFS, OS, and safety. Results: Cohort 1: 76 pts were randomized and treated: L, n=38; L+P, n=38. ORR was 29% for the L arm, and 45% for the L+P arm. Median PFS was 16.1 and 14.3 wks, respectively, for the L and L+P arms. The most frequent Grade ≥3 AEs were diarrhea (0% vs 18%) vomiting (0% vs 8%), ALT increased (0% vs 8%), neutropenia (3% vs 13%), and bilirubin increased (0% vs 5%). Dose reductions due to AE were 3% and 21% and dose interruptions due to AE were 11% and 55% in the L and L+P arms, respectively. Cohort 2: 88 pts were randomized (87 treated): L, n=36; P, n=14; L+P, n=38. The ORR was 47%, 31%, and 58% for the L, P, and L+P arms, respectively. Median PFS was 16.0, 11.4, and 16.0 wks for the L, P, and L+P arms, respectively. The most frequent Grade ≥3 AEs were ALT increased (0%, 0%, 21%), AST increased (0%, 0%, 18%), diarrhea (3%, 8%, 8%), and fatigue (3%, 8%, 8%). Dose reductions due to AE occurred in 0%, 0%, and 13% of pts and dose interruptions due to AE occurred in 22%, 23%, and 39% of pts in the L, P, and L+P arms, respectively. Conclusions: This prospective, randomized study confirmed the clinical activity of lapatinib single agent in metastatic ErbB2+ IBC. Furthermore, we demonstrated increased toxicity associated with the combination without a clinically meaningful improvement in efficacy.

Results of a phase Ib trial evaluating the safety and clinical activity of sapanisertib (TAK 228) in combination with serabelisib (TAK 117) and paclitaxel in patients with advanced ovarian, endometrial, or breast cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3604-3604
Author(s):  
Casey B. Williams ◽  
Kirstin Anne Williams ◽  
Amy K. Krie ◽  
Pradip De ◽  
Nandini Dey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Results ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Effective Treatment Option ◽  
Taxane Resistance ◽  
Phase 2 Study ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Pretreated Patients ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Reductions

3604 Background: The link between taxane resistance and activation of PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling suggests that by inhibiting this pathway in combination with anti-microtubule agents like paclitaxel may improve treatment outcomes in many malignancies. To investigate this further we combined the TORC 1/2 inhibitor sapanisertib (TAK-228), the PI3Kα isoform inhibitor serabelisib (TAK-117), and paclitaxel in a phase I trial to determine the safety, efficacy, and RP2D. Methods: Open label, cohort study using a traditional 3+3 dose escalation design with a maximum of 5 dosing cohorts. A dose expansion of cohort 4, the recommended RP2D, is planned for February 2020. Results: Enrollment to the DLT evaluation has been completed and the clinical results are summarized in Table. Sixteen patients have been enrolled; a majority were heavily pretreated and resistant to paclitaxel. Overall, the combination was safe and tolerable. One DLT occurred due to renal dysfunction in cohort 5. 360 adverse events have been reported, but only 28 (8%) grade 3 or 4 events. The most common events were leukopenia and non-febrile neutropenia. Two patients required dose reductions as a result of pneumonitis. The ORR is currently 46% in 13 evaluable patients. CBR is 69% and PFS is currently at 10 months. Two patients achieved a CR and three patients remain on treatment. Conclusions: The combination proved to be well tolerated in the doses and schedules used in cohorts 1-4 and exhibited very promising clinical activity in heavily pretreated patients. This regimen could prove to be a highly effective treatment option and a phase 2 study is warranted at the RP2D. Clinical trial information: NCT03154294 . [Table: see text]

A phase Ib trial of IPI-926, a hedgehog pathway inhibitor, plus gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 213-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald Anthony Richards ◽  
Joe Stephenson ◽  
Brian M. Wolpin ◽  
Carlos Becerra ◽  
John Turner Hamm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Reductions

213 Background: IPI-926 is a novel, natural product-derived small molecule that targets the Hedgehog (Hh) pathway by inhibiting smoothened. In preclinical models of pancreatic cancer, repressing activation of the Hh pathway diminishes tumor-associated desmoplasia and improves chemotherapy delivery. Methods: This is the final report of the Phase 1b portion of a Phase 1b/2 trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of IPI-926 plus gemcitabine. Eligible patients (pts) with untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer and ECOG status 0-1 were administered oral IPI-926 daily (QD) for 28-day cycles, in 3 to 6 pt dose cohorts. Gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2) was administered IV weekly for 3 weeks with 1 week off. DLTs were evaluated during Cycle 1. Results: 16 pts (median age 69 years; range 58-86) were enrolled at IPI-926 doses of 110, 130 or 160 mg QD (single agent MTD). Pts received a median of 5 cycles (1-13). Two pts remain on trial. No IPI-926-related serious AEs have been observed. One DLT of Grade 3 AST increase was observed (130 mg dose cohort) and was asymptomatic; it resolved with dose interruption, and did not recur with dose reduction. The most common AEs occurring were fatigue (75% total, 6% ≥ Grade 3), thrombocytopenia (63%, 25%), anemia (56%, 13%), nausea (50%, 0%), diarrhea (44%, 0%), vomiting (44%, 0%), peripheral edema (44%, 0%), pyrexia (44%, 0%), and AST increase (44%, 13%). Dose reductions of IPI-926 occurred in 3 (19%) pts. Dose reductions of gemcitabine occurred in 11 (69%) pts, primarily for thrombocytopenia (9 pts). One pt (6%) discontinued due to an AE (microangiopathic hemolytic anemia). Five (31%) radiographic partial responses were observed (1/3 at 110 mg, 2/6 at 130 mg, 2/7 at 160 mg). Median progression-free survival is > 7 months. 74% of pts were alive 6 months after study entry. Conclusions: IPI-926 plus gemcitabine is well tolerated in pts with untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer, with evidence of activity and no unexpected toxicity. Complete Phase 1b data, including final overall survival, will be presented. Clinical evaluation of this combination continues in the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2 portion of the trial.

Mature overall survival (OS) results from the LUME-Meso study of nintedanib (N) + pemetrexed/cisplatin (PEM/CIS) vs placebo (P) + PEM/CIS in chemo-naïve patients (pts) with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8506-8506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna K. Nowak ◽  
Federica Grosso ◽  
Nicola Steele ◽  
Silvia Novello ◽  
Sanjay Popat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Abl Kinases ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
To Receive

8506 Background: LUME-Meso is a Phase (Ph) II/III, double-blind, randomized study. N targets MPM by inhibiting VEGFR 1–3, PDGFR α/β, FGFR 1–3, Src and Abl kinases. Primary analysis of the Ph II data demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio [HR]=0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34–0.91; p=0.017). Mature Ph 2 OS and updated PFS results are reported here. Methods: Pts with unresectable MPM (ECOG PS 0–1) were stratified by histology (epithelioid/biphasic) and randomized 1:1 to receive ≤6 cycles PEM (500 mg/m2)/CIS (75 mg/m2) Day 1 + N or P (200 mg bid, Days 2–21), followed by N or P monotherapy until progression or toxicity. The primary endpoint was PFS. The primary OS analysis and updated PFS analysis were performed as predefined. Results: 87 pts were randomly assigned (N=44, P=43). OS benefit favored N over P treatment (HR=0.77; 95% CI 0.46–1.29; p=0.319; 62 [71%] OS events) and was greatest in epithelioid pts (HR=0.70; 95% CI 0.40–1.21; p=0.197) with a median (m) OS gain of 5.4 months (mOS [95% CI]: 20.6 [16.2–28.8] N vs 15.2 [12.2–23.6] P). Updated PFS results (HR=0.54; 95% CI 0.33–0.87; p=0.010) also showed greatest benefit for epithelioid pts (HR=0.49; 95% CI 0.30–0.82; p=0.006) with a mPFS gain of 4.0 months (mPFS [95% CI]: 9.7 [7.2–12.4] N vs 5.7 [5.5–7.0] P). Improved forced vital capacity, objective response rates and duration of response were also observed with N treatment. Drug-related adverse events (AEs) in N- vs P-treated pts were 97.7% vs 97.6%. Grade ≥3 AEs of note included neutropenia (27.3% vs 4.9%), ALT (11.4% vs 0) and GGT (6.8% vs 0) elevations, and diarrhea (6.8% vs 0). AEs led to trial discontinuation in only 3 (6.8%) N vs 7 (17.1%) P pts. Conclusions: Mature Ph II OS data show that adding N to standard 1st-line treatment gives a strong signal towards improved OS. Updated PFS confirmed the primary analysis; AEs were manageable. The greatest clinical benefit was observed in pts with epithelioid histology. Median survival of 20.6 months in epithelioid pts treated with N is unprecedented in advanced MPM trials. Ph III is actively recruiting in this pt population. Clinical trial information: NCT01907100.

GLIAVAX: A stratified phase II clinical trial of avelumab and axitinib in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2034-2034 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bart Neyns ◽  
Laila Ben Salama ◽  
Gil Awada ◽  
Jennifer De Cremer ◽  
Julia Katharina Schwarze ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 5 ◽  
Phase 2 Clinical Trial ◽  
Prior Surgery ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Tumor Types

2034 Background: Patients (pts) with recurrent glioblastoma (rGB) have a poor prognosis, and no treatment option demonstrated to improve survival in a randomized trial. Axitinib (AXI), an oral VEGFR 1-3 inhibitor has demonstrated single agent activity in rGB and reduces the need for corticosteroids (CS). Avelumab (AVE) is a fully human anti-PD-L1 IgG1 antibody with clinical activity in various tumor types. Combination of AXI and AVE may improve the outcome of pts with rGB. Methods: This open-label, dual-strata, single-center phase 2 clinical trial investigated the activity of AXI plus AVE in adult pts with rGB following prior surgery, RT and temozolomide. Pts were stratified according to their baseline use of CS. Pts without baseline need for CS initiated treatment with AXI (5 mg oral BID) plus AVE (10 mg/kg IV Q2W) (cohort-1). Pts in need of CS initiated AXI as a monotherapy; AVE could be added to AXI after 6 wks if the CS dose could be tapered to a physiologic dose level or less (cohort-2). Six-month-PFS served as the primary endpoint (with a prespecified threshold of ≥ 50% for cohort-1) according to Fleming one-stage design. Results: Between Jun 2017 and Aug 2018, 54 pts (27 per cohort) were enrolled (med age 55 y [range 19-75]; 63% male; 91% WHO PS 0-1). All pts in cohort-1 and 16 pts (59%) in cohort-2 received at least 1 dose of AVE. The 6-month-PFS was 18% (95% CI 4-33) in both cohorts. At the time of analysis, 2 pts were progression-free and continuing study treatment. Median OS in cohort-1 and -2 was respectively 26 wks (95% CI 21-32) and 18 wks (95% CI 14-22). No clear relation was found between baseline cognitive functioning (Cogstate subtests) and PFS/OS. The best overall response rate (iRANO) was 41% and 26% respectively for pts in cohort-1 and -2. The most frequent all-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were dysphonia (67%), lymphopenia (50%), diarrhea (48%), hypertension (48%), and fatigue (46%). The incidence of grade 3-4 TRAE was 30%; there were no grade 5 AE. Conclusions: The combination of AVE plus AXI is sufficiently well tolerated but did not meet the threshold for activity justifying further investigation in an unselected population of patients with rGB. Clinical trial information: NCT03291314.

A Phase I Study of Vorinostat in Combination with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3705-3705 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Siegel ◽  
Donna Weber ◽  
Constantine S. Mitsiades ◽  
Syed Rizvi ◽  
Jose Garcia-Vargas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Therapeutic Potential ◽  
Hematologic Malignancy ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Tumor Types

Abstract Introduction: Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematologic malignancy after non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and despite recent advances in therapy, including the introduction of thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide, remains incurable. Vorinostat is an inhibitor of Class I and II histone deacetylases, which play key roles in the regulation of both transcriptional and post-transcriptional activity in a variety of tumor types, including MM. This histone deacetylase inhibitor has demonstrated anti-proliferative activity as monotherapy and synergistically with other agents in a variety of tumor types, including MM, where it was well tolerated in Phase I trials. Lenalidomide is a potent structural analog of thalidomide and demonstrates clinical efficacy in the treatment of MM as a single agent and to a larger degree, in combination with dexamethasone. Preclinical data suggest that the addition of vorinostat to lenalidomide and dexamethasone has at least additive, and possibly synergistic, therapeutic potential, with the anti-tumor mechanisms of vorinostat and dexamethasone being distinct from the immunomodulatory effects of lenalidomide. This Phase I, multicenter, open-label, non-randomized study assessed the safety and tolerability of vorinostat in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory MM. Methods: The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary and exploratory objectives included: assessment of safety and tolerability; determination of clinical activity of the combination, and evaluation of in vivo molecular and biologic effects of the combination in patients with MM through analysis of gene expression. Patients aged ≥18 years with an established diagnosis of relapsed or refractory MM were enrolled sequentially into 1 of 5 dosing levels (table). Patients received vorinostat daily, administered orally for 14 days with 7 days on (Days 1–7 and 15–21), combined with oral lenalidomide daily for 21 days, and oral dexamethasone 40 mg/day (Days 1, 8, 15, and 22; cycles were repeated every 28 days); use of concomitant prophylactic acetylsalicylic acid was recommended. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were assessed in the first treatment cycle. Barring DLT, dose escalation continued until the MTD was established. Response, safety, and tolerability were evaluated. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded throughout the study. Dosing Regimen Dose Level Vorinostat Dose (mg q.d.) 7 days on 7 days off (Days 1–7 and Days 15–21) in each 28-day cycle Lenalidomide Dose (mg q.d.) × 21 days (Day 1 through Day 21) in each 28-day cycle Dexamethasone Dose (mg q.d.) On Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 in each 28-day cycle 1 300 10 40 2 400 10 40 3 400 15 40 4 400 20 40 5 400 25 40 Results: Enrolment is ongoing and tolerability of treatment has been good so far. Of 7 patients assessed to date, 6 patients (86%) have reported ≥1 AE, and 3 patients’ (43%) AEs were considered drug-related. The most frequently reported AE was anemia (n=4, 57%). Serious AEs were reported by 2 patients (29%), none of which were considered drugrelated. No patients have discontinued due to AEs or SAEs, and no DLT has been observed to date. Of 6 evaluable patients, the best responses were: partial response in 1 patient, minimal response in 1 patient and stable disease in 2 patients and progressive disease in 2 patients. Currently, 4 patients remain on treatment and 3 patients have discontinued treatment due to progressive disease. Conclusion: Vorinostat with lenalidomide and dexamethasone represents a novel combination therapy for the treatment of relapsed or relapsed, refractory MM. Preliminary results suggest that the combination is well tolerated to date, is active and has the convenience of oral administration.

Safety and efficacy of MPDL3280A (anti-PDL1) in combination with bevacizumab (bev) and/or FOLFOX in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 704-704 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna C. Bendell ◽  
John D. Powderly ◽  
Christopher Hanyoung Lieu ◽  
S. Gail Eckhardt ◽  
Herbert Hurwitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Agent ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Activated T Cells ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Cell Immunity ◽  
Liver Biopsies ◽  
Prior Systemic Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

704 Background: Cancers can mediate immune evasion via upregulation of PD-L1; blocking PD-L1 may restore tumor-specific T-cell immunity. MPDL3280A, a human anti-PD-L1 mAb containing an engineered Fc domain, prevents PD-L1 binding to its receptors PD-1 and B7.1 on activated T cells. Single-agent MPDL3280A has shown clinical activity in various indications, including NSCLC, bladder cancer, RCC and CRC. VEGF blockade has shown immunomodulatory properties, and certain chemotherapies may have immunogenic effects. Therefore we examined the safety and efficacy of MPDL3280A + bev with or without FOLFOX. Methods: MPDL3280A + bev in refractory mCRC pts (Arm A) and MPDL3280A + bev + FOLFOX in oxaliplatin-naive mCRC pts (Arm B) were evaluated in an open-label, multicenter Phase Ib study. Arm A pts received MPDL3280A 20 mg/kg q3w and bev 15 mg/kg q3w. Arm B pts received MPDL3280A 14 mg/kg q2w, bev 10 mg/kg q2w and mFOLFOX6 at standard doses. Responses were assessed by RECIST v1.1. Potential biomarkers were assessed in pre- and on-treatment liver biopsies. The clinical data cutoff was July 7, 2014. Results: 14 mCRC pts in Arm A and 30 in Arm B were evaluable for safety. In Arm A, median age was 56 y, 29% were male and all had ≥3 prior systemic regimens. In Arm B, median age was 57 y, 53% were male and 70% had no prior systemic therapy. In Arm A, grade 3-4 AEs regardless of attribution were 64%, including abdominal pain, hyperbilirubinemia and pneumonia (14% each). 73% of Arm B pts had grade 3-4 AEs, including neutropenia (40%), diarrhea (13%), increased ALT (10%) and increased AST (10%). Grade ≥3 MPDL3280A-related AEs were 7% in Arm A and 20% in Arm B. For pts with ≥1 tumor assessment, the unconfirmed ORR was 8% (1/13) in Arm A and 36% (9/25) in Arm B. The unconfirmed ORR was 44% (8/18) for Arm B first-line pts. Minimum follow-up was 1.9 mo in Arm A and 2.2 mo in Arm B. Updated data, including biomarkers, will be presented. Conclusions: MPDL3280A + bev with or without FOLFOXwas well tolerated with no unexpected toxicities. Clinical activity was observed with both treatment combinations. Longer follow-up and randomized studies will be needed to estimate the potential benefit of adding MPDL3280A to chemotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT01633970.

A phase I, first-in-human, open-label, dose-escalation, safety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic study of oral TP-1287 administered daily to patients with advanced solid tumors.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3611-3611
Author(s):  
Ben George ◽  
Donald A. Richards ◽  
William Jeffery Edenfield ◽  
Steven L Warner ◽  
Lars Mouritsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Grade 3

3611 Background: TP-1287 is a an orally bioavailable phosphate prodrug of alvocidib, a cyclin dependent kinase 9 (CDK9) inhibitor. TP-1287 exhibits potent inhibition of intracellular kinases including CDK9. Inhibition of CDK9 leads to downregulation of the BCL-2 family member, MCL-1, which in turn inhibits tumor growth in preclinical animal models of prostate, breast, and lung carcinomas. Methods: This is a multicenter, Phase 1, dose escalation study using a standard 3+3 design with a modified Fibonacci scheme to examine the safety and clinical activity of TP-1287 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients will be added at the maximum tolerated dose (i.e. expansion cohort) to test TP-1287 as a single agent in patients with castrate resistant prostate cancer. Results: Twenty-two patients who were enrolled between December 2018 and January 2020 received a range of doses from 1 mg QD to 11 mg BID over 7 cohorts. Data are available for 20 patients as of the data cutoff date. TP-1287 plasma PK Cmax and AUC increased in near linear fashion over cohorts 1 thru 6, reaching 80 ng/mL and 499.3 ng*h/mL in cohort 6 for Cmax and AUC, respectively. TP-1287 treatment resulted in dose-dependent reductions of phospho-RNA Pol II, consistent with CDK9 inhibition, as measured by a flow cytometric assay assessing pharmacodynamic changes in phosphorylation state in PBMCs. The most frequently observed Grade 3 AE was unrelated anemia in 2 patients. All other events of Grade 3 (9 events/7 patients) and Grade 4 (1 event/seizure with new CNS mets) were unlikely related or unrelated. Clinical benefit was seen in one sarcoma patient with PR (15+cycles), one RCC patient with SD (7+cycles) and 2 bladder cancer patients with SD (6 and 8 cycles). Conclusions: These findings suggest that TP-1287 is tolerated as a monotherapy in patients with heavily pretreated, relapsed, refractory solid tumors and further clinical development in selected indications is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT03298984 .

Phase I/II study of durvalumab and tremelimumab in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): Phase I safety and efficacy analyses.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4073-4073 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Kate Kelley ◽  
Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa ◽  
Johanna C. Bendell ◽  
Tae-You Kim ◽  
Mitesh J. Borad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Hospice Care ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Immune Checkpoints ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Grade 3

4073 Background: Durvalumab and tremelimumab, investigational monoclonal antibodies against PD-L1 and CTLA-4 immune checkpoints, respectively, have shown efficacy in monotherapy and offer promise in combination for patients (pts) with HCC. This is a phase I/II, open-label, randomized study of durvalumab combined with tremelimumab in unresectable HCC. Methods: Phase I part of this study is a safety run-in cohort treated at the recommended phase II doses of the durvalumab/tremelimumab combination (20 and 1 mg/kg IV Q4W respectively for 4 doses followed by 20 mg/kg Q4W durvalumab alone) in pts with unresectable HCC with or without concomitant HBV or HCV infection who progress on, are intolerant to, or have refused sorafenib therapy. Secondary objectives include evaluation of antitumor activity. Here we present results of a preplanned analysis from the completed phase I part of the study. Results: As of 10 January 2017, 40 pts have been enrolled (11 HBV+, 9 HCV+, 20 uninfected). 30% had no prior systemic therapy; 93% were Child Pugh Class A. 24 (60%) had ≥1 treatment-related AE; 20% had ≥1 grade ≥3 related AE. Most common (≥15%) treatment-related AEs: fatigue (20%), increased ALT (18%), pruritus (18%), and increased AST (15%). Most common grade ≥3 related AE was asymptomatic increased AST (10%). 24 pts have discontinued treatment: 3 due to treatment-related AEs (grade 3 pneumonitis, grade 3 colitis/diarrhea, asymptomatic grade 4 elevated AST and ALT), 16 due to progressive disease, 4 due to death unrelated to treatment (cardiac arrest, variceal bleed, progressive disease, probable HCC rupture), and 1 other (pt entered hospice care). 40 pts were evaluable for response at ≥16 weeks follow-up. Conclusions: No unexpected safety signals with durvalumab and tremelimumab were seen in this unresectable HCC population. Clinical activity observed predominantly in uninfected pts though interpretation limited by small subsets. Enrollment to the phase II portion of the study is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02519348. [Table: see text]

Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Mitomycin, Cisplatin, and Protracted Venous-Infusion Fluorouracil (PVI 5-FU) With Epirubicin, Cisplatin, and PVI 5-FU in Advanced Esophagogastric Cancer

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 1996-2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Ross ◽  
M. Nicolson ◽  
D. Cunningham ◽  
J. Valle ◽  
M. Seymour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Study ◽  
Squamous Carcinoma ◽  
Undifferentiated Carcinoma ◽  
Palmar Erythema ◽  
Esophagogastric Cancer ◽  
Equivalent Efficacy ◽  
Venous Infusion ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive

PURPOSE: We report the results of a prospectively randomized study that compared the combination of epirubicin, cisplatin, and protracted venous-infusion fluorouracil (PVI 5-FU) (ECF) with the combination of mitomycin, cisplatin, and PVI 5-FU (MCF) in previously untreated patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five hundred eighty patients with adenocarcinoma, squamous carcinoma, or undifferentiated carcinoma were randomized to receive either ECF (epirubicin 50 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, cisplatin 60 mg/m2 every 3 weeks and PVI 5-FU 200 mg/m2/d) or MCF (mitomycin 7 mg/m2 every 6 weeks, cisplatin 60 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, and PVI 5-FU 300 mg/m2/d) and analyzed for survival, response, toxicity, and quality of life (QOL). RESULTS: The overall response rate was 42.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 37% to 48%) with ECF and 44.1% (95% CI, 38% to 50%) with MCF (P = .692). Toxicity was tolerable, and there were only two toxic deaths. ECF resulted in more grade 3/4 neutropenia and grade 2 alopecia, but MCF caused more thrombocytopenia and plantar-palmar erythema. Median survival was 9.4 months with ECF and 8.7 months with MCF (P = .315); at 1 year, 40.2% (95% CI, 34% to 46%) of ECF and 32.7% (95% CI, 27% to 38%) of MCF patients were alive. Median failure-free survival was 7 months with both regimens. Global QOL scores were better with ECF at 3 and 6 months. CONCLUSION: This study confirms response, survival, and QOL benefits of ECF observed in a previous randomized study. The equivalent efficacy of MCF was demonstrated, but QOL was superior with ECF. ECF remains one of the reference treatments for advanced esophagogastric cancer.

scholarly journals Early combination therapy with etanercept and methotrexate in JIA patients shortens the time to reach an inactive disease state and remission: results of a double-blind placebo-controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ekaterina Alexeeva ◽  
Gerd Horneff ◽  
Tatyana Dvoryakovskaya ◽  
Rina Denisova ◽  
Irina Nikishina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Disease State ◽  
Inactive Disease ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Standard Regimen ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Early Combination Therapy

Abstract Background Remission is the primary objective of treating juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). It is still debatable whether early intensive treatment is superior in terms of earlier achievement of remission. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of early etanercept+methotrexate (ETA+MTX) combination therapy versus step-up MTX monotherapy with ETA added in refractory disease. Methods A multi-centre, double-blind, randomized study in active polyarticular JIA patients treated with either ETA+MTX (n = 35) or placebo+MTX (n = 33) for up to 24 weeks, followed by a 24-week open-label phase. The efficacy endpoints included pedACR30 criteria improvement at week 12, inactive disease at week 24, and remission at week 48. Patients who failed to achieve the endpoints at week 12 or at week 24 escaped to open-label ETA+MTX. Safety was assessed at each visit. Results By intention-to-treat analysis, more patients in the ETA+MTX group reached the pedACR30 response at week 12 (33 (94.3%)) than in the placebo+MTX group (20 (60.6%); p = 0.001). At week 24, comparable percentages of patients reached inactive disease (11 (31.4%) vs 11 (33.3%)). At week 48, 11 (31.4%) and eight (24.2%) patients achieved remission. The median (+/−IQR) times to achieve an inactive disease state in the ETA+MTX and placebo+MTX groups were 24 (14–32) and 32 (24–40) weeks, respectively. Forty-four (74/100 patient-years) adverse events (AEs) were reported, leading to treatment discontinuation in 6 patients. Conclusions Early combination therapy with ETA+MTX proved to be highly effective compared to the standard step-up regimen. Compared to those treated with the standard regimen, more patients treated with a combination of ETA+MTX reached the pedACR30 response and achieved inactive disease and remission more rapidly.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document