Real-world response monitoring and tolerability of imatinib-treated chronic myeloid leukemia patients captured in a retrospective research registry.
6583 Background: Monitoring tolerability and response to imatinib (IM) is an important aspect of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) management. The objective of this study is to assess real-world tolerability and response monitoring in IM treated CML patients (pts). Methods: A comprehensive retrospective outcomes research registry of CML pts was created from the University of Utah electronic health record system. Study inclusion was limited to pts diagnosed with CML in chronic phase in 2001 to 2010 and treated with IM as a first-line therapy. Utilization and outcome of cytogenetic and molecular testing within 18 months of IM initiation, rates of adverse drug events (ADEs), and therapy modifications were evaluated by chart review. Results: A total of 92 pts were treated with IM as first-line therapy. Within the first 18 months of treatment, cytogenetic testing was recorded in 45 pts (49%) and of these 33 pts (73%) achieved a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) in a median of 241 days (range: 110-542); molecular testing was completed in 48 pts (52%) and of these 24 pts (50%) achieved at least a major molecular response (MMR) in a median of 254 days (range: 99-546). Imatinib associated ADEs of any grade (n = 60) occurred in 42 (46%) pts resulting in dose reductions in 15 pts (36%) in a median of 77 days and discontinuation of IM occurred in 9 (21%) pts in a median of 130 days. The IM dose was increased to >400 mg in 21 (23%) pts in a median of 457 days (range: 21-2112). Of pts diagnosed between 2006 to 2010 (n = 34; 37%), 8 (25%) pts transitioned to dasatinib or nilotinib in a median of 397 days (range: 147 to 1057). Reasons for therapy change included physician documented suboptimal response or treatment failure (n = 5) and ADEs to IM (n = 3). Conclusions: Utilization of cytogenetic and molecular testing within 18 months of IM initiation was lower than the National Comprehensive Cancer Network or European LeukemiaNet CML guidelines would suggest. Further research is warranted to understand limited response monitoring and outcomes in non-monitored pts. The ADE rate was similar to clinical trial data. The impact of ADEs on subsequent treatment and outcomes in CML pts deserves further study.