Comparison of the KRAS/EGFR mutation profile and survival of “collegiate smokers” and never smokers with advanced lung cancers.
7580 Background: In practice, we encounter patients (pts) with lung cancers who state they smoked only while in college. The impact of this degree of tobacco use on cancer biology is unknown. We have shown that EGFR mutations are less common in pts who smoked > 15 pack years (PY). We hypothesize that among pts with lung cancer the KRAS / EGFR mutation profile and overall survival (OS) of “collegiate smokers” (former smokers who smoked between 101 lifetime cigarettes and 5 PY) will be distinct from never smokers and former smokers with ≥ 15 PY. Methods: We collected age, sex, stage, and survival for pts evaluated from 2004 - 2009 with stage IIIB/IV lung cancer with known KRAS and EGFR status. ALK testing was not available routinely during this time. Smoking history was obtained using a patient completed survey. The Fisher exact test was used to compare mutation profiles. The log rank test was used to compare OS. Results: Smoking history and clinical data were available for 852 pts with Stage IIIB/IV lung cancer with known KRAS and EGFR status: 307 never smokers, 178 current smokers, and 367 former smokers. Of the former smokers, 55 were “collegiate smokers”, 61 had smoked 5-15 PY, and 251 had smoked ≥ 15 PY. The KRAS / EGFR mutation profiles by smoking history are shown below (Table). The KRAS / EGFR mutation profile of “collegiate smokers” is distinct from those of pts who were never smokers (p < .001) and former smokers with ≥ 15 PY (p < .001) but similar to that of pts who were former smokers with 5-15 PY (p = 0.9). Median OS after diagnosis of stage IIIB/IV lung cancer for “collegiate smokers” was 25 months (mos), compared to 32 mos for never smokers (p = 0.4) and 21 mos for former smokers with ≥ 15 PY (p = 0.63). Conclusions: “Collegiate smokers” are a distinct group of pts with a higher incidence of KRAS mutations and lower incidence of EGFR mutations compared to never smokers. These data suggest that even a small amount of cigarette smoking influences the biology of lung cancer. These findings reinforce the importance of doing mutation testing routinely for all pts with lung cancer to guide clinical care. [Table: see text]