Use of exon-based transcriptome profiling to identify novel signaling pathways and survival-associated genes in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8074-8074
Author(s):  
Sirpa Leppa ◽  
Minna Taskinen ◽  
Satu Koivula ◽  
Ping Chen ◽  
Riku Louhimo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Signaling Pathways ◽  
Differentially Expressed Genes ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Transcriptome Profiling ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell

8074 Background: Identification of biological prognostic factors that could be used to define poor risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients is a main concern. Methods: Study population consisted of 38 de novo high risk DLBCL patients less than 65 years old. The patients were treated in the Nordic phase II protocol with six courses of R-CHOEP14 followed by systemic central nervous system prophylaxis with one course of high dose methotrexate and one course of high dose cytarabine. Exon array-based profiling was used to screen signaling pathways and differentially expressed genes between the clinically high risk patients, who had relapsed or remained in remission in response to dose dense chemoimmunotherapy. At the time of the analysis, median follow up was 34 months, progression free survival (PFS) 78% and overall survival (OS) 78%. Results: The screen between relapsed patients and the patients in remission using criteria of p ≤ 0.05 and fold change ≥ 1.6 revealed 566 differentially expressed genes (131 protein coding), of which 24 were likely to be involved in conventional signaling pathways, including those regulating antigen processing and presentation (CIITA, HLA-DQA2, HLA-DQB1, RFXAP), Jak-STAT signaling (SOCS3), Notch signaling (NOTCH1) and Toll-like receptor signalling (IRF5). In cox univariate analysis, 12 of 24 genes were found to associate with PFS (p<0.05). Of these, high expression of CIITA, DLL4, HLA-DQA2, HLA-DQB1, IRF5, NOTCH1, PER1, RFXAP, SEMA4D and ZFP36 had a favorable impact on PFS, whereas high levels of ENPP3 and PRKAR2B were associated with adverse outcome. Differential expression of four genes was confirmed by quantitative PCR, and prognostic value of six genes validated using Lymphoma/Leukemia Molecular Profiling Project microarray data set. Immunohistochemical validation of the findings in a larger patient cohort is ongoing. Germinal centre B-cell signature did not predict survival in this cohort. Conclusions: The results provide evidence that exon-based transcriptome profiling can identify biologically relevant signaling pathways and genes that discriminate the outcome of homogenously treated young high risk DLBCL patients.

Addition of R-HMA to R-DA-EPOCH Favourably Changes the Outcome in Patients with Untreated High-Grade Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: The First Results of Russian Prospective Multicenter Trial

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2708-2708
Author(s):  
Olga A. Gavrilina ◽  
Eugene E. Zvonkov ◽  
Elena N. Parovichnikova ◽  
Vera V. Troitskaya ◽  
Nelly G. Gabeeva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Bone Marrow Involvement ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract Background: Approximately 50% of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) are defined as high-grade by IPI. They are characterized by aggressive course and poor response to standard chemotherapy (CT): 5-years overall survival (OS) rate of less than 30%. R-DA-EPOCH has demonstrated very optimistic results (overall and progression-free survival (PFS) were 90%), but high-risk patients (IPI 3-4) showed only 43% of OS and PFS [1]. The addition of high-dose AraC (12 g/m2) to the upfront therapy of high-risk DLBCL has significantly improved the outcome on Hyper-CVAD/HMA and mNHL-BFM-90 protocols [2, 3]. But high toxicity of these protocols restricts their application. We suggested that addition of courses R-HMA in rotation with R-DA-EPOCH could improve the treatment outcome and decrease toxicity. Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of R-DA-EPOCH/R-HMA protocol in patients with untreated high-grade diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Patients and Methods: 33 untreated DLBCL patients from 4 centers were enrolled in a prospective study between August 2013 - July 2015; stage II-IV; ECOG 0-3; median age 55 years (27-76); age ≥60y/<60y 50%/50%; M/F 60%/40%; IPI: 48% high-intermediate and 52% high risk; 15% with bone marrow involvement. All patients underwent 4-8 courses (2-4 cycles) of chemotherapy: R-DA-EPOCH (standard dose and scheme), R-HMA (R 375 mg/m2 d1, MTX 1000 mg/m2 24 hours d 2, AraC 3000 mg/m2 q 12 hrs d 3-4). For patients older than 60 year dose of R-HMA was reduced (R 375 mg/m2 d1, MTX 500 mg/m2 24 hours d 2, AraC 1000 mg/m2 q 12 hrs d 3-4). In 4 cases of DLBCL with bone marrow involvement BEAM conditioning and autologous stem cell transplantation were applied. Results: The median follow-up is 12 months (4-24). There was no mortality associated with toxicity. The main non-hematological toxicities of R-HMA were infections (mucositis, pneumonia, sepsis, enteropathy) grades 1-2 and 3-4 in 90% and 10%, respectively. Hematological toxicity grade 4 for less than 4 days we observed only after courses R-HMA. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 29 (88%) patients. In 2 patients we observed progression of the disease after first cycle of chemotherapy, in another 2 cases - partial remission after 2-3 cycles and following progression of disease. In patients older than 60 years with doses reduction in R-HMA failures were absent, except one later relapse after 13 month CR. With a median follow 12 months overall and disease-free survival of 33 patients constituted 90,5% and 74% , respectively. In a group of patients older than 60 years results of therapy seemed to be better than in young patients: OS were 100% vs 85,6% (p=0,1), DFS were 80% vs 74,9% (p=0,2), respectively. So the combination of R-DA-EPOCH/R-HMA may be considered as optimal intensive approach in the older patients. Conclusions: TheR-DA-EPOCH/R-HMA protocol demonstrated acceptable toxicity and high efficacy in patients with high-grade DLBCL. This protocol has shown optimistic results in the elderly patients and it could be recommended for further investigation in that group. Ññûëêè: 1. Salit RB, Fowler DH, Wilson WH, et al. Dose-adjusted EPOCH-rituximab combined with fludarabine provides an effective bridge to reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in patients with lymphoid malignancies.J Clin Oncol. 2012. 10;30(8):830-6. 2. Oki Y, Westin JR, Vega F, et al. Prospective phase II study of rituximab with alternating cycles of hyper-CVAD and high-dose methotrexate with cytarabine for young patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Br J Haematol 2013; 163(5):611-20. 3. Magomedova AU, Kravchenko SK, Kremenetskaia AM, et al. Nine-year experience in the treatment of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphosarcoma. Ter Arkh. 2011;83(7):5-10. Figure 1. Figure 1. Figure 2. Figure 2. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Rituximab Improves the Efficacy of High-Dose Chemotherapy With Autograft for High-Risk Follicular and Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Multicenter Gruppo Italiano Terapie Innnovative nei Linfomi Survey

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (19) ◽  
pp. 3166-3175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corrado Tarella ◽  
Manuela Zanni ◽  
Michele Magni ◽  
Fabio Benedetti ◽  
Caterina Patti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Late Relapse ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Refractory Disease ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Large B Cell

Purpose To investigate the impact of adding rituximab to intensive chemotherapy with peripheral-blood progenitor cell (PBPC) autograft for high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLB-CL) and follicular lymphoma (FL). Patients and Methods Data were collected from 10 centers associated with Gruppo Italiano Terapie Innnovative nei Linfomi for 522 patients with DLB-CL and 223 patients with FL (median age, 47 years) who received the original or a modified high-dose sequential (HDS) chemotherapy regimen. HDS was delivered to 396 patients without (R−) and to 349 patients with (R+) rituximab; 154 (39%) and 178 patients (51%) in the R− and R+ subsets, respectively, underwent HDS for relapsed/refractory disease. Results A total of 355 R− (90%) and 309 R+ patients (88%) completed the final PBPC autograft. Early treatment-related mortality was 3.3% for R− and 2.8% for R+ (P = not significant). Two parameters significantly influenced the outcome: disease status at HDS, with 5-year overall survival (OS) projections of 69% versus 57% for diagnosis versus refractory/relapsed status, respectively, and rituximab addition, with 5-year OS of 69% versus 60% in the R+ versus R− groups, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, these two variables maintained an independent prognostic value. The marked benefit of rituximab was evident in patients receiving HDS as salvage treatment: the 5-year OS projections for R+ versus R− were, respectively, 64% versus 38%, for patients with refractory disease or early relapse and 71% versus 57%, for patients with late relapse, partial response, or second/third relapse. Conclusion The results of this large series indicate that rituximab should be included in the current practice of PBPC autograft for DLB-CL and FL.

Rituximab-Supplemented High-Dose Sequential (HDS) Chemotherapy with Autograft Is Highly Effective in High-Risk (aaIPI 2–3) Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Results of a Prospective Multicenter Study on 91 Consecutive Patients Treated at Diagnosis.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 891-891 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuela Zanni ◽  
Massimo Di Nicola ◽  
Caterina Patti ◽  
Claudia Castellino ◽  
Alessandra Pescarollo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Jc Virus ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Sequential Administration ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract Recent trials have shown that anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody Rituximab may be effectively employed in association with high-dose (hd) chemotherapy and peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) autograft in the management of high-risk B-cell lymphoma. Addition of Rituximab has a dual effect: increased tumour cytoreduction and in vivo purging prior to PBPC harvesting. We here report the results of a prospective, multicenter trial evaluating Rituximab-supplemented hd-sequential chemotherapy (R-HDS) as frontline treatment in patients with high-risk Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL). So far, 6 Italian Centres associated to GITIL have participated to the study. Eligibility criteria included: i. biopsy-proven DLBCL, with CD20+ phenotype; ii. no previous cytotoxic treatments; iii. age between 16–60 yrs.; iv. advanced stage disease with 2–3 aaIPI score. The R-HDS regimen includes an initial debulkying (3 APO courses) and then the sequential administration, at 15–20 day intervals, of: i. cyclophosphamide (CY) 7gr/sqm (day 1) + Rituximab 375mg/sqm (day +2 and +10), followed by PBPC harvest; ii. Ara-C 2gr/sqm b.i.d. for 6 days, reinfusion of 1–3x106 autologous CD34+ve cells/kg (day 7) and then Rituximab 375mg/sqm (day +8 and day +18); iii. etoposide 2.4gr/sqm day +1 + Cisplatin 100mg/sqm day +2; iv. a final myeloablative regimen (Mitoxantrone 60mg/sqm + L-Pam 180mg/sqm), with PBPC autograft (≥5x106 CD34+ve cells/kg) + Rituximab 375 mg/sqm (day +30 and +37); v. involved-field radiotherapy on areas of previous bulky lesions or residual lesions, within 2–3 mos. following autograft. Presently, 91 patients (median age: 48 yrs.) have been enrolled and are evaluable. They all had 2 (58) or 3 (33) aaIPI score; in addition, 63 (69%) presented with disease-related symptoms, 52 (57%) had extranodal disease, and 27 (30%) had BM involvement. There were 4 early toxic deaths (three due to sepsis following CY, Ara-C and autograft, respectively, and one due to leucoencephalopathy from JC-virus infection 2 mos. after autograft); one more toxic death due to pneumonia occurred at 10 mos. after R-HDS, for an overall TRM of 5.5%. In addition, 21 patients had CMV or VZV reactivation that resolved after antiviral therapy. Overall 73 patients (80 %) reached CR. So far, at a median follow-up of 24 mos., 76 patients (83.5%) are alive and 68 (75%) are in continuous CR (CCR), with 4.3-yr OS and and EFS projections of 80% and 74%, respectively. There was a trend towards a better outcome in aaIPI 2 vs. 3, although the difference was not statistically significative. Among 27 patients with BM+, 17 (63%) are presently in CCR, at a median follow-up of 25 mos. In conclusion, R-HDS was feasible at the multicenter level although the occurrence of severe infectious complications should not be underestimated. Nevertheless, both CR rate and survival curve projections compare favorably with the poor outcome usually observed in aaIPI 2–3 patients managed with conventional chemotherapy. The results here presented urge a comparative analysis between conventional vs. intensified Rituximab-supplemented chemoimmunotherapy in younger patients with high-risk DLBCL.

scholarly journals Plasma Affinity Proteomic Immunoprofiling As a Novel Prognostic Tool in High Risk Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients: A Nordic Lymphoma Group Study

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1618-1618
Author(s):  
Karin Fjordén ◽  
Frida Pauly ◽  
Sirpa Leppä ◽  
Harald Holte ◽  
Magnus Björkholm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Protein Expression ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Plasma Samples ◽  
Antibody Microarrays ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract Background Despite recent advances in molecular profiling of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), only a few biomarkers currently have an impact on treatment. In a previous study we could observe the heterogeneity of DLBCL in the plasma immunoprofile from DLBCL patients, by use of recombinant antibody microarrays. By unsupervised hierarchical clustering, an immunoprofile of 23 plasma proteins could divide patients into two subgroups with significantly different overall survival (OS). In this study we aimed to expand the immunoprofiling with longitudinal plasma samples from high risk DLBCL patients, to search for novel prognostic and potentially predictive markers. Material and Methods Plasma samples from 126 high risk DLBCL patients included in a phase II clinical trial of the Nordic Lymphoma Group (CRY04) were collected at diagnosis, during and after treatment, and in the event of progression or relapse. Inclusion criteria were age 18-65 years, primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma without CNS involvement, age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) 2-3 and WHO performance score 0-3. Six courses of R-CHOEP-14 were given followed by systemic CNS prophylaxis with one course of high-dose cytarabine and one course of high-dose methotrexate. Additionally, age and sex matched controls (n = 40) were included. Two hundred and eighty-three recombinant scFv antibody fragments directed against 97 known serum antigens, mainly immunoregulatory proteins, were selected from phage display libraries to be used in the antibody microarrays. Results Immunoprofiles distinguishing DLBCL patients from healthy controls were identified. Furthermore, a different protein expression was found in patients with aaIPI 3 versus 2 as well as in patients with shorter versus longer progression free survival (PFS). The kinases CDK-2 and BTK were upregulated both in patients with higher aaIPI score and in patients with shorter PFS. Comparing the patients who developed disease progression with those who did not, seven differentially deregulated proteins were identified including the phosphatase PTP-1B, the chemokine MCP-1, and the cytokines IL-4, IL-6 and IL-12, all previously implicated in B-cell lymphoma pathogenesis. In addition, results showed that subdivision of patients according to immunoprofile as defined in our previous study, could be performed also in the present patient cohort. The immunoprofile comprises T-helper (TH)1 cytokines, TH2 cytokines, complement proteins, chemokines, enzymes, and membrane proteins. The 23 included proteins are β-galactosidase, C1 esterase inhibitor, C4, C5, Cystatin C, Eotaxin, GLP-1 R, GM-CSF, HLA-DR/DP, IgM, IL-1ra, IL- 2, IL- 3, IL- 6, IL- 10, IL- 12, Leptin, MCP-1, MCP-3, Mucin-1, PSA, TNF-α, and TNF-β. Although not significant, a potential association to PFS and OS could be observed between the two generated subgroups. Finally, expression of IL-10 was shown to improve the prognostic value of aaIPI regarding both PFS and OS. Conclusion Protein expression profiling of plasma from high risk DLBCL patients provided novel insights into the biology of DLBCL. New candidate prognostic markers were identified which could potentially guide us in the prediction of outcome and in the choice of treatment for DLBCL patients. However, as this study was aimed for discovery, the findings must be validated in future studies with independent patient cohorts. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Prophylaxis with intrathecal or high-dose methotrexate in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and high risk of CNS relapse

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabela Bobillo ◽  
Erel Joffe ◽  
David Sermer ◽  
Patrizia Mondello ◽  
Paola Ghione ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Relapse Risk ◽  
Cns Prophylaxis ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cns Relapse ◽  
Large B Cell

AbstractAlthough methotrexate (MTX) is the most widely used therapy for central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the optimal regimen remains unclear. We examined the efficacy of different prophylactic regimens in 585 patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL and high-risk for CNS relapse, treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) or R-CHOP-like regimens from 2001 to 2017, of whom 295 (50%) received prophylaxis. Intrathecal (IT) MTX was given to 253 (86%) and high-dose MTX (HD-MTX) to 42 (14%). After a median follow-up of 6.8 years, 36 of 585 patients relapsed in the CNS, of whom 14 had received prophylaxis. The CNS relapse risk at 1 year was lower for patients who received prophylaxis than patients who did not: 2% vs. 7.1%. However, the difference became less significant over time (5-year risk 5.6% vs. 7.5%), indicating prophylaxis tended to delay CNS relapse rather than prevent it. Furthermore, the CNS relapse risk was similar in patients who received IT and HD-MTX (5-year risk 5.6% vs. 5.2%). Collectively, our data indicate the benefit of MTX for CNS prophylaxis is transient, highlighting the need for more effective prophylactic regimens. In addition, our results failed to demonstrate a clinical advantage for the HD-MTX regimen.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document