KRAS aKtive, an Italian network for assessment of KRAS mutations in colorectal cancer patients: Results on 7,432 cases.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14042-e14042
Author(s):  
Antonio Marchetti ◽  
Carmine Pinto ◽  
Gian Luigi Taddei ◽  
Claudio Clemente ◽  
Giancarlo Troncone ◽  
...  

e14042 Background: The KRAS aKtive program was started on March 2009, promoted by the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) and the Italian Society of Surgical Pathology and Cytopathologyy (SIAPEC) to support the activity of oncologists and pathologists involved in the management of metastatic colorectal cancer patients who need the assessment of the mutational status of the KRAS gene. Methods: The program was specifically devised to facilitate the exchange of biologic material, clinicopathological data and diagnostic reports within a network of oncologist, pathologists and pathology/molecular biology reference laboratories throughout Italy, connected through the site www.kras-aKtive.it. KRAS mutation analysis was performed by Sanger sequencing (SS), real time PCR or other techniques, including pyrosequencing and hybridization strip assays. Data were collected in a common database. Results: The KRAS aKtive program has involved 478 oncologists, 144 pathologists, and 24 reference laboratories. A total of 7,432 KRAS mutations analyses were performed. The tests were informative in 7,265 cases (98%). The vast majority of tests (5,626 cases, 77.4%) were conducted by SS. In 529 (7.3%) cases a real-time PCR assay was used, other detection techniques were used in 1,110 (15.3%) cases. KRAS mutations at codons 12-13 were detected in 2,874 cases (39,6%). The frequency of mutations detected by real-time PCR or other techniques (45%, and 43%, respectively) was significantly higher (p=0.002, and p=0.008%, respectively) than that observed by SS (38%). The percentage of cases evaluated by non-SS-based methods has increased during the first three years of the program. Conclusions: The results of this large survey allow an accurate estimation of the actual prevalence of KRAS mutations and their types in caucasian colorectal cancer patients. Our data indicate that the frequency of mutations detected by non-SS-based methods is higher than that obtained by SS.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Awidi ◽  
Nidaa Ababneh ◽  
Maha Shomaf ◽  
Feras Al Fararjeh ◽  
Laila Owaidi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background A constitutively active RAS protein in the absence of stimulation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is the result of mutations in KRAS and NRAS genes. Mutations in the KRAS exon 2 and outside exon 2 have been found to predict the resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal therapy. A substantial proportion of metastatic colorectal cancer cases (mCRC) exhibit RAS mutations outside KRAS exon 2, particularly in KRAS exon 3 and 4 and NRAS exons 2, 3. No data about RAS mutations outside KRAS exon 2 are available for Jordanian patients with mCRC. We aim to study the molecular spectrum, frequency, and distribution pattern of KRAS and NRAS mutations in Jordanian patients with mCRC. Methods A cohort of 190 Jordanian metastatic colorectal cancer patients were enrolled in the trial. We detected mutations in exon 2 of the KRAS and NRAS gene as well as mutations outside of exon 2 using the StripAssay technique. The KRAS StripAssay covered 29 mutations and 22 NRAS mutations. Results Mutations were observed in 92 (48.42%) cases, and KRAS exon 2 accounted for 76 cases (83.69%). KRAS G12D was the most common mutation, occurring in 18 cases, followed by KRAS G12A in 16 cases, and G12T in 13 cases. Mutations outside of KRAS exon 2 represented 16.3% of the mutated cases. Among those, 6 cases (6.48%) carried mutations in NRAS exon 2, 3 and 10 cases (10.87%) in KRAS exon 3 and 4. Conclusion The frequency of NRAS and KRAS mutations outside of exon 2 appears to be higher in Jordanian patients in comparison with patients from western countries. KRAS mutations outside of exon 2 should be tested routinely to identify patients who should not be treated with anti-EGFR antibodies.


2014 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. ii74
Author(s):  
Jankovic Radmila ◽  
Brotto Ksenija ◽  
Malisic Emina ◽  
Krivokuca Ana ◽  
Cavic Milena ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document