Safety report of a phase II trial of irinotecan plus S-1 (IRIS) with cetuximab in patients with KRAS wild type of metastatic colorectal cancer: HGCSG0902.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14062-e14062
Author(s):  
Yoshito Komatsu ◽  
Satoshi Yuki ◽  
Takashi Kato ◽  
Ayumu Hosokawa ◽  
Ichiro Iwanaga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Safety Analysis ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Safety Report ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Grade 3

e14062 Background: IRIS is one of the standard regimens as second line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer since IRIS demonstrated the non-inferiority to FOLFIRI (FIRIS study) in Japan. We previously presented IRIS plus bevacizumab (ESMO 2010), however; there is still lack of combination data of IRIS plus molecular target drugs. Thus we conduct the study of IRIS plus cetuximab (HGCSG0902) and this is the planned safety analysis for first 20 patients. Methods: HGSCG0902 is a multicenter phase ll study. Eligibility includes histologically confirmed colorectal cancer, previously received oxaliplatin-contained chemotherapy, PS: 0-1, EGFR positive and KRAS wild type. Patients (pts) received S-1 80-120 mg/m2/day p.o. on days 1-14 and irinotecan 100mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 repeated 28 days. Cetuximab administrated 400mg/m2 loading dose and continued 250mg/m2 every week or 500mg/m2 bi-weekly. The primary endpoint was response rate and the secondary endpoints were disease control rate, PFS, OS and safety. Results: Demographics of the 20 enrolled pts were male/female: 13/7, median age: 64.5, colon/rectal: 13/7, PS0/1: 12/8, prior bevacizumab +/-: 15/4 pts. Cetixumab were administrated weelkly/bi-weekly: 9/11 pts. 70% of pts had adverse events (AE). The most common non-hematological AE were diarrhea (85%), acne-like rash (80%), fatigue (75%) and anorexia (60%) and hematological AE were anemia (90%), AST increase (75%) and ALT increase (70%). The main grade 3-4 AE were diarrhea (45%), acne-like rash (20%), anorexia (20%) and stomatitis (20%). These AE were as expected. Nineteen pts stopped the treatment due to progression (52.6%) and AE (36.8%). Conclusions: This safety analysis suggests that IRIS plus cetuximab is well-tolerated and easy to administer.

Multicenter phase Ib/II study of everolimus (RAD001) and tivozanib (AV-951) in patients with refractory, metastatic colorectal cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 560-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian M. Wolpin ◽  
Kimmie Ng ◽  
Andrew X. Zhu ◽  
Thomas Adam Abrams ◽  
Peter C. Enzinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

560 Background: Everolimus (E) is an oral inhibitor of mTOR. Tivozanib (T) is a highly potent, selective, oral inhibitor of VEGF receptors-1, -2, and -3. Preclinical data suggest antitumor activity for this combination in colorectal cancer. We therefore performed a multicenter Phase Ib trial of E + T in patients (pts) with any refractory gastrointestinal (GI) malignancy, followed by a Phase II trial of E + T in pts with refractory, metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods: Eligibility criteria: histologically confirmed, measurable disease; ECOG PS≤2; blood pressure ≤150/100; no venous thromboembolism within prior 6 months. Pts with mCRC must have received prior fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, bevacizumab and anti-EGFR antibody (if KRAS wt). E was administered once daily continuously. T was administered once daily for 3 out of every 4 weeks. The Phase Ib study in pts with any GI malignancy followed a standard 3+3 design with 3 dose levels: (1) E 5 mg/d + T 1 mg/d; (2) E 10 mg/d + T 1 mg/d; (3) E 10 mg/d + T 1.5 mg/d. The Phase II study in pts with mCRC was a non-randomized, one-stage design with a primary endpoint of progression-free survival. Results: Between 02/10-12/10, 12 pts were enrolled to the Phase Ib study. Median age, 60 (39-81) years; male, 50%; ECOG PS 0/1/2, 42/58/0%; tumor types: esophagus 1, colorectal 11 pts. Dose limiting toxicities of grade 3 fatigue and grade 3 fatigue/ dehydration occurred in 2/6 pts on dose level 3. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events in ≥10% of pts were dehydration, fatigue, headache, hyperglycemia, hypertension, and hypophosphatemia. The phase II study proceeded at the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of E 10 mg/d and T 1 mg/d. Between 02/11-06/11, 40 pts with mCRC were enrolled to the phase II study. All but 1 pt received prior bevacizumab. Median age, 56 (35-81) years; male, 48%; ECOG PS 0/1/2, 45/53/2%. Treatment is ongoing. Conclusions: Among pts with refractory GI malignancies, the combination of Everolimus + Tivozanib was well-tolerated with MTD of E 10 mg/d and T 1 mg/d. A phase II trial has completed enrollment using these doses of E + T in pts with refractory mCRC; safety and efficacy data will be available for presentation.

Phase II trial of modified FOLIRI plus Panitumumab as first-line treatment in elderly patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15053-e15053
Author(s):  
Athanasios Karampeazis ◽  
Lampros Vamvakas ◽  
Nikolaos K. Kentepozidis ◽  
Athanasios Kotsakis ◽  
Kostas Kalbakis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
First Line ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
First Line Treatment

e15053 Background:The role of combination chemotherapy plus anti-EGFR treatment in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is unclear. We conducted an open label phase II trial in order to evaluate the safety and efficacy of modified FOLFIRI plus panitumumab as first-line treatment in elderly patients with RAS wild-type mCRC. Methods: Patients ≥70 years old with unresectable all-RAS wild-type mCRC were treated with Panitumumab 6mg/kg as 60min iv infusion followed by Irinotecan 130mg/m2 as 90min iv infusion, Leucovorin 400mg/m2 as 2h iv infusion and 5-Fluorouracil 400mg/m2 as bolus iv infusion on day 1 and 5-Fluorouracil 1.200 mg/m2 as continuous iv infusion for 46h, every 2 weeks. Sample size calculation was based on the minimax Simon two-step design: The null hypothesis was that the overall response rate (ORR) is ≤ 30% versus the alternative hypothesis of ORR ≥ 50% (α = 0.05, power 80%). Results: Forty-six patients were enrolled in the study. Two patients did not receive treatment because they were RAS mutant. Median age for the 44 treated patients was 76 years (range 70-88). Males were 32 and the PS was 0, 1 and 2 in 25%, 70.5% and 4.5% of patients, respectively. Rectal cancer accounted for 25% while 15.9% of patients had the primary tumour in situ. Twenty-one partial responses were observed for an ORR of 47.7% (95%CI: 32.9%-62.5%) while seven patients (15.9%) had stable disease. After a median follow-up of 36.0 months, the median progression-free survival was 6.1 months (95%CI: 3.6-8.7) and the median overall survival was 20.9 months (95%CI: 11.7-30.1). Grade 3-4 neutropenia was recorded in 4 (9%) and grade 3-4 diarrhea in 9 (20.4%) patients while one patient had a grade 4 bowel perforation. One patient experienced grade 3 mucositis, two patients grade 3 skin toxicity and two patients grade 3 fatigue. There were no toxic deaths while one patient died due to bowel obstruction and one due to postoperative complications after removal of the primary tumor. Conclusions: The modified FOLFIRI plus panitumumab combination presented significant efficacy with manageable toxicity in elderly patients with mCRC.

Results of the Quad wild type arm of the AGITG ICECREAM study: A randomised phase II study of cetuximab alone or in combination with irinotecan in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer with no mutations in KRAS, NRAS, BRAF or PIK3CA.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3572-3572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy David Shapiro ◽  
Subotheni Thavaneswaran ◽  
Craig Underhill ◽  
Kristy Pamela Robledo ◽  
Christos Stelios Karapetis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Response Characteristics ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

3572 Background: Cetuximab (cet) increases survival in RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in first-line and chemorefractory patients (pts). Adding irinotecan (iri) to cet in refractory pts who had progressed on iri increased response and delayed progression in the BOND trial, which was conducted prior to recognition that RAS mutations are predictive of EGFR-inhibitor (EGFR-I) resistance. Subsequent trials in chemorefractory pts used single agent EGFR-I as standard. In the era of biomarker selection, the benefit of continuing iri versus single agent EGFR-I had not been resolved. Methods: ICECREAM is a randomised phase II trial evaluating cet v cet + iri in chemotherapy-refractory mCRC, stratified for KRAS G13D mutation (previously reported) or no mutations in KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and PI3KCA (Quad WT ). EGFR-I naïve, ECOG PS 0-1 pts, progressing within 6 months of iri and refractory (or intolerant) to fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin were randomised to cet 400mg/m2 IV loading then 250mg/m2 weekly +/- iri 180mg/m2q2 wks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 6 months (6m PFS); secondary endpoints were response rate (RR), overall survival (OS), toxicity and quality of life (QOL). Results: From Nov 2012 to June 2016, 48 Quad WT pts were recruited: 2 ineligible (not iri-refractory, BRAF mutation) wre not included for analyses and a further 2 not evaluable for response. Characteristics were balanced between cet (n = 21) v cet-iri (n = 25), except for sex (male 62 v 72%) and primary site (left 95 v 68%). 6m PFS rate was 14% v 41%; HR 0.39 (95% CI: 0.20–0.78, p = 0.008). RR was 10% (2 PR) v 36% (1 CR, 8 PR); p = 0.04. Toxicities were higher with cet-iri; at least one grade 3/4 adverse event in 50 v 23%. No differences in global or specific QOL were seen. Conclusions: The AGITG ICECREAM trial confirms a significant synergy for the addition of iri to cet and improved PFS in Quad WT chemorefractory mCRC, echoing data in molecularly unselected pts. Clinical trial information: ACTRN12612000901808.

Sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil: improved response rate in metastatic colorectal cancer.

1984 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 591-594 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Herrmann ◽  
J Spehn ◽  
J H Beyer ◽  
U von Franqué ◽  
A Schmieder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Human Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
Sequential Methotrexate

The efficacy of chemotherapy with sequential methotrexate (MTX) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in metastatic colorectal cancer was studied in a multicenter phase II trial using a seven-hour time interval. Forty-two patients were evaluable for response and 16 achieved objective tumor regression (greater than 50%). Median survival of all patients was 12.5 months. The result of this study indicates that MTX and 5-FU are synergistic in human colorectal cancer if given sequentially with a seven-hour time interval. This is supported by a review of the literature that reveals a significantly higher response rate in patients treated with a four-hour or more MTX/5-FU interval as compared to a one-hour interval.

Multicenter Phase II Study of Nordic Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid Bolus Schedule Combined With Oxaliplatin As First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Halfdan Sørbye ◽  
Bengt Glimelius ◽  
Åke Berglund ◽  
Tone Fokstuen ◽  
Kjell Magne Tveit ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Bolus Injection ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
First Line Treatment

Purpose This Nordic multicenter phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin combined with the Nordic bolus schedule of fluorouracil (FU) and folinic acid (FA) as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients and Methods Eighty-five patients were treated with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion on day 1, followed by a 3-minute bolus injection with FU 500 mg/m2 and, 30 minutes later, by a bolus injection with FA 60 mg/m2 every second week. The same doses of FU and FA were also given on day 2. Results Fifty-one of 82 assessable patients achieved a complete (n = 4) or partial (n = 47) response, leading to a response rate of 62% (95% CI, 52% to 72%). Nineteen patients showed stable disease, and 12 patients had progressive disease. Thirty-eight of the 51 responses were radiologically confirmed 8 weeks later (confirmed response rate, 46%; 95% CI, 36% to 58%). The estimated median time to progression was 7.0 months (95% CI, 6.3 to 7.7 months), and the median overall survival was 16.1 months (95% CI, 12.7 to 19.6 months) in the intent-to-treat population. Neutropenia was the main adverse event, with grade 3 to 4 toxicity in 58% of patients. Febrile neutropenia developed in seven patients. Nonhematologic toxicity consisted mainly of neuropathy (grade 3 in 11 patients and grade 2 in another 27 patients). Conclusion Oxaliplatin combined with the bolus Nordic schedule of FU+FA (Nordic FLOX) is a well-tolerated, effective, and feasible bolus schedule as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer that yields comparable results compared with more complex schedules.

Phase II trial of combined chemotherapy with S-1, oral leucovorin, and bevacizumab in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 627-627
Author(s):  
Kazuhisa Yamaguchi ◽  
Hiroya Taniguchi ◽  
Azusa Komori ◽  
Yukiya Narita ◽  
Shiori Uegaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Severe Toxicity ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Primary Resistance ◽  
Grade 3

627 Background: Regorafenib improves survival in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but alternative chemotherapy is required to avoid severe toxicity. S-1+oral leucovorin (SL) has shown promising results in untreated mCRC without severe toxicity. TML trial demonstrated that continuation of bevacizumab (Bev) after progression prolongs overall survival. Thus, we hypothesized that combination chemotherapy of SL/Bev would be beneficial; we conducted a single-center phase II trial to assess the efficacy and safety of SL/Bev as a salvage therapy in mCRC. Methods: Major eligibility criteria were: mCRC with confirmed adenocarcinoma diagnosis; age > 20 years; ECOG performance status, 0–2; and progression after administration or intolerance to approved drugs for mCRC (5-FU, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, Bev, and anti-EGFR antibody, if KRAS wild-type). S-1 (80–120 mg/body) and leucovorin (25 mg) were orally administered for 1 week followed by 1 week rest. Bev (5 mg/kg) was administered on day 1 of every 2-week cycle. Primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR). Results: Twenty-three patients were enrolled: 8 (35%) females; median age, 70 years (range, 38–78); and 14 (61%) with KRAS wild-type. DCR was 65% [95% confidence interval (CI), 41.3–82.7%] and response rate was 6% (95% CI, 1.1–27.0%). One patient experiencing partial response to SL/Bev had BRAF mutant tumor with primary resistance to XELOX+Bev as first-line and irinotecan+cetuximab as second-line chemotherapy. Median progression-free and overall survival period were 4.1 and 9.5 months, respectively. Major adverse events were mucositis, (grade 3, 12%), diarrhea (grade 3, 12%), and decreased hemoglobin (grade 3, 12%). Conclusions: SL/Bev was well tolerated and delayed progression; therefore, it can be an alternative chemotherapy for refractory mCRC. We will report the data from final analysis at the meeting. Clinical trial information: 000009083.

Panitumumab or cetuximab combined with irinotecan in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-based regimens.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 642-642
Author(s):  
Nobuaki Ikezawa ◽  
Satoru Iwasa ◽  
Hirokazu Shoji ◽  
Yoshitaka Honma ◽  
Atsuo Takashima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Similar Response ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3

642 Background: Panitumumab and cetuximab are known to be effective in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, it is not clear whether panitumumab and irinotecan confers benefit that are comparable to those of cetuximab and irinotecan in patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC previously treated with fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-based regimes. Methods: We analyzed 139 patients who had received panitumumab or cetuximabu combined with irinotecan for KRAS wild-type mCRC previously treated with fluor opyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-based regimes.We evaluated and compared efficacy and safety of panitumumab plus irinotecan and cetuximab plus irinotecan. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar for the two groups receving cetuximab pulus irinotecan (n = 97) and panitumumab plus irinotecan (n = 42),respectively.In patients with measurable lesions,the response rate (unconfirmed complete or partial response) were 20% (18/92) in the group receving cetuximab plus irintecan and 34% (14/41) in that receving panitumumab plus irinotecan. Median progression-free survival was 5.7 months in the cetuximab plus irinotecan group versus 4.3 months in the panitumumab plus irinotecan group. Median overall survival was 11.2 months in the cetuximab plus irinotecan group versus 13.6 months in the panitumumab plus irinotecan group. The most common adverse events in the cetuximab plus irinotecan versus panitumumab plus irinotecan groups were all-grade rash acneiform (82% versus 90%), paronychia (61% versus 52%), and grade 3-4 neutropenia (26% versus 19%). Conclusions: Panitumumab or cetuximab plus irinotecan were well tolerated and produced similar response rate and survivals compared to those previous clinical traials.These combinations are cosidered as standard treatment in patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC previously treated with fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-based regimes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document