Risk factors for fractures in patients on hormonal therapies for breast cancer and DCIS.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19627-e19627
Author(s):  
Abdullah Ladha ◽  
Josy Mathew
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Bone Mineral Density ◽  
Aromatase Inhibitors ◽  
Hormonal Therapy ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Risk Of Fracture ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Hormonal Therapies ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

e19627 Background: Hormonal therapy with aromatase inhibitors (AI) or tamoxifen (TAM) is standard of care for hormone receptor positive breast cancer and DCIS. Fractures are a complication of treatment with AI due to accelerated bone loss. Risk factors for fracture in patients on hormonal therapy (HT) for breast cancer and DCIS are poorly defined. Methods: All 71 patients with breast cancer or DCIS seen in the bone and mineral clinic of our institution from 2000 to 2010 were analyzed. Data on demographics, pathology, type and duration of HT, bone mineral density studies (BMD), number and site of fractures were collected. Statistical analysis: t test, chi square test and Fisher’s exact test for categorical data. Results: The age of the patients ranged 40 to 97 years. 65 patients had ER positive breast cancer, 6 patients had DCIS. 9 patients had fractures.41 patients were on an AI alone, 8 were on TAM alone and 14 were on both sequentially. Fractures involved: vertebral compression, femur, hip, distal radioulnar, rib, hand and feet bones. Patients who had osteoporosis at the femur, osteoporosis or osteopenia in the lumbar spine or forearm in the initial BMD study were found to have an increased risk of fracture (P<0.05). Patients who were on TAM and AI sequentially had an increased risk of fracture (P<0.05) compared AI alone. The use of bisphosphonates and the duration of use were significantly associated with fracture (P<0.05) as these patients already had osteoporosis. The age, race, duration of AI use and the use of calcium and vitamin D were not found to be significantly different in patients who had fractures compared to those who did not. In the 24 patients who had two BMD studies, there was no significant change in the BMD overall. Conclusions: Patients with osteoporosis or osteopenia at baseline have an increased risk of fracture with the use of hormonal therapies for breast cancer and DCIS. This risk was not eliminated by the use of bisphosphonates. Sequential use of tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors increase the risk of fractures. Bone mineral density studies done prior to the initiation of hormonal therapy for breast cancer maybe useful estimating the risk of fracture while on treatment.

scholarly journals Review of: Are breast density and bone mineral density independent risk factors for breast cancer?

2005 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. L. Hopper
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Bone Mineral Density ◽  
Breast Cancer Risk ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Breast Density ◽  
Mammographic Breast Density ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Increased Risk

Citation of original article:K. Kerlikowske, J. Shepherd, J. Creasman, J. A. Tice, E. Ziv, S. R. Cummings. Are breast density and bone mineral density independent risk factors for breast cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2005; 97(7): 368–74.Abstract of the original articleBackground: Mammographic breast density and bone mineral density (BMD) are markers of cumulative exposure to estrogen. Previous studies have suggested that women with high mammographic breast density or high BMD are at increased risk of breast cancer. We determined whether mammographic breast density and BMD of the hip and spine are correlated and independently associated with breast cancer risk. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study (N = 15 254) and a nested case-control study (of 208 women with breast cancer and 436 control subjects) among women aged 28 years or older who had a screening mammography examination and hip BMD measurement within 2 years. Breast density for 3105 of the women was classified using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) categories, and percentage mammographic breast density among the case patients and control subjects was quantified with a computer-based threshold method. Spearman rank partial correlation coefficient and Pearson's correlation coefficient were used to examine correlations between BI-RADS breast density and BMD and between percentage mammographic breast density and BMD, respectively, in women without breast cancer. Logistic regression was used to examine the association of breast cancer with percentage mammographic breast density and BMD. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Neither BI-RADS breast density nor percentage breast density was correlated with hip or spine BMD (correlation coefficient = −.02 and −.01 for BI-RADS, respectively, and −2.06 and .01 for percentage breast density, respectively). Neither hip BMD nor spine BMD had a statistically significant relationship with breast cancer risk. Women with breast density in the highest sextile had an approximately threefold increased risk of breast cancer compared with women in the lowest sextile (odds ratio: 2.7; 95% confidence interval: 1.4–5.4); adjusting for hip or spine BMD did not change the association between breast density and breast cancer risk. Conclusion: Breast density is strongly associated with increased risk of breast cancer, even after taking into account reproductive and hormonal risk factors, whereas BMD, although a possible marker of lifetime exposure to estrogen, is not. Thus, a component of breast density that is independent of estrogen-mediated effects may contribute to breast cancer risk.

scholarly journals Bone Density Screening in Postmenopausal Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer Treated With Aromatase Inhibitors

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. e505-e515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie Stratton ◽  
Xin Hu ◽  
Pamela R. Soulos ◽  
Amy J. Davidoff ◽  
Lajos Pusztai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Bone Mineral Density ◽  
Postmenopausal Women ◽  
Bone Mineral ◽  
Aromatase Inhibitors ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Dxa Scan ◽  
Bone Mineral Density Testing

Purpose: In postmenopausal women with breast cancer treated with aromatase inhibitors (AIs), most expert panels advise baseline bone mineral density testing with a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan repeated every 1 to 2 years. How often this recommendation is followed is unclear. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of women with stage I to III breast cancer who started AI therapy from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2010, with follow-up through December 31, 2012, by using the SEER-Medicare database. Selection criteria included AI use for ≥ 6 months and no recent osteoporosis diagnosis or bisphosphonate use. We used multivariable logistic regression to investigate associations between patient characteristics and receipt of a baseline DXA scan. In patients who continued AI treatment, we assessed rates of follow-up scans. Results: In the sample of 2,409 patients (median age, 74 years), 51.0% received a baseline DXA scan. Demographic characteristics associated with the absence of a baseline DXA scan were older age (85 to 94 years v 67 to 69 years; odds ratio [OR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.92) and black v white race (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.97). Among patients who underwent a baseline DXA scan and continued AI for 3 years, 28.0% had a repeat DXA scan within 2 years and 65.9% within 3 years. In aggregate, of the 1,164 patients who continued with AI treatment for 3 years, only 34.5% had both a baseline and at least one DXA scan during the 3-year follow-up period. Conclusion: The majority of older Medicare beneficiaries with breast cancer treated with AIs do not undergo appropriate bone mineral density evaluation.

scholarly journals FRI0549 Impact of chemotherapy on bone mineral density in postmenopathic women with breast cancer in treatment with aromatase inhibitors

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Loarce-Martos ◽  
WA Sifuentes Giraldo ◽  
LV Maldonado Romero ◽  
M Ahijόn Lana ◽  
C Velázquez Arce ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Bone Mineral Density ◽  
Bone Mineral ◽  
Aromatase Inhibitors ◽  
Mineral Density

Osteoporosis in multiple sclerosis

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 1031-1043 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew P Hearn ◽  
Eli Silber
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Bone Mineral Density ◽  
Bone Mineral ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Review Management ◽  
Multiple Sclerosis Patients ◽  
Reduced Mobility

Fractures resulting from osteoporosis are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the developed world. People with multiple sclerosis experience reduced mobility and are susceptible to falls. Glucocorticoid use and reduced mobility are known risk factors for osteoporosis. This paper is a review of osteoporosis in people with multiple sclerosis, looking at its prevalence, risk factors and possible mechanisms. We also review management guidelines for osteoporosis in the general population and use these to propose guidelines for osteoporosis management amongst multiple sclerosis patients. A number of studies have examined the incidence of reduced bone mineral density amongst people with multiple sclerosis; the majority provide convincing evidence that bone mineral density is significantly reduced in multiple sclerosis patients. The most significant risk factors appear to arise from the chronic disease process of multiple sclerosis and not from glucocorticoid use. There are currently no guidelines or consensus as how best to treat osteoporosis amongst multiple sclerosis patients despite their being at an increased risk. We propose an algorithm for the screening and treatment of osteoporosis in people with multiple sclerosis.

The Aromatase Inhibitors as Adjuvant Therapy for Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer

2003 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-221
Author(s):  
Jennifer A. Ligibel ◽  
Eric P. Winer
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Aromatase Inhibitors ◽  
Hormonal Therapy ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Uterine Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Hormonal Therapy ◽  
Adjuvant Setting ◽  
Modest Improvement ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

Adjuvant hormonal therapy has been shown to decrease the risk of breast cancer recurrence and overall mortality in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Tamoxifen has been used in this setting for many years, both in premenopausal and postmenopausal patients. Tamoxifen is not devoid of toxicity, and attempts have been made to develop newer hormonal agents with better efficacy and less toxicity. The aromatase inhibitors have shown equivalent or superior efficacy to tamoxifen in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, and efforts are underway to determine the role of these agents in early breast cancer. The ATAC trial recently showed that use of the third-generation aromatase inhibitor anastrozole in the adjuvant setting led to a modest improvement in relapse-free survival as compared with tamoxifen. Patients treated with anastrozole were also less likely to develop uterine cancer or experience a thromboembolic event. However, patients treated with anastrozole were more likely than those treated with tamoxifen to suffer a fracture or other musculosketal problem. An ASCO technology assessment panel reviewed the relevant data and issued a consensus statement regarding the use of aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant setting. In general, the panel favored the continued use of tamoxifen as adjuvant hormonal therapy for most postmenopausal women. Within the next few years, further data from the ATAC trial and from other trials of aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant setting should be available to guide treatment recommendations for this patient population.

scholarly journals The effect of exercise on body composition and bone mineral density in breast cancer survivors taking aromatase inhibitors

Obesity ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 346-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gwendolyn A. Thomas ◽  
Brenda Cartmel ◽  
Maura Harrigan ◽  
Martha Fiellin ◽  
Scott Capozza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Bone Mineral Density ◽  
Body Composition ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Bone Mineral ◽  
Aromatase Inhibitors ◽  
Breast Cancer Survivors ◽  
Mineral Density

The effect of monthly ibandronate on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in patients with haemophilia A and B and increased risk for fracture

2013 ◽  
Vol 110 (08) ◽  
pp. 257-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timoleon-Achilleas Vyzantiadis ◽  
Maria Charizopoulou ◽  
Fotini Adamidou ◽  
Spyridon Karras ◽  
Dimitrios Goulis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Mineral Density ◽  
Bone Resorption ◽  
Bone Formation ◽  
Bone Mineral ◽  
Tartrate Resistant Acid Phosphatase ◽  
Haemophilia A ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Risk Of Fracture ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Turnover Markers

SummaryHaemophilia A and B have been associated with increased prevalence of low bone mineral density (BMD). However, no study has so far evaluated the effects of anti-osteoporotic therapy on BMD in haemophilia. The primary endpoint of this prospective study was to estimate the effect of 12-month therapy of oral ibandronate 150 mg/ month on BMD in patients with haemophilia A and B. Secondary endpoint was its effect on turnover markers (BTM) of bone resorption [serum C-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen (sCTX), tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase band 5b] and bone formation (osteocalcin and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase. Ten adult patients with T-score < −2.5 SD or Z-score < −2 and/or increased risk of fracture according to FRAX model were included. All received 1,000 mg/day calcium carbonate with 800 IU/d cholecalciferol. Males with haemophilia A (n=7) or B (n=3) (mean age 43.5 ± 13.5 years) were studied. Ibandronate resulted in an increase in lumbar BMD (from 0.886 ± 0.169 to 0.927 ± 0.176 g/cm2, 4.7%, p=0.004). No change in BMD of total hip (from 0.717 ± 0.128 to 0.729 ± 0.153 g/cm2, p=0.963) or femoral neck (0.741 ± 0.135 to 0.761 ± 0.146 g/cm2, p=0.952) was noticed. Ibandronate led to a decrease in sCTX (from 0.520 ± 0.243 to 0.347 ± 0.230 ng/ml, −29.9%, p=0.042). No change was observed in other BTM. Ibandronate was generally well-tolerated. In conclusion, ibandronate significantly improved BMD in lumbar spine and reduced bone resorption in adults with haemophilia at increased risk of fracture. Its effect on hip BMD and bone formation markers was not significant.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document