Masitinib in comparison to imatinib as first-line therapy of patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): A randomized phase III trial.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS10102-TPS10102
Author(s):  
Antoine Adenis ◽  
Loic Chaigneau ◽  
Pierre Michel ◽  
Nicolas Isambert ◽  
François Bertucci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Naive Patient ◽  
Post Surgery ◽  
Advanced Gist

TPS10102^ Background: Masitinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that has greater in vitro kinase activity and/or selectivity than imatinib against KIT and PDGFRA/B. A phase 2 study has previously reported that masitinib treatment produced clinically relevant activity in imatinib-naïve patients with advanced GIST. Considering the promising long term response observed in overall survival (OS) (see Table) there is compelling evidence to compare masitinib against imatinib (the current standard of care) in the first-line setting. Methods: A multicenter, randomized, open label, phase 3, 1:1 study to compare efficacy and safety of masitinib (7.5 mg/kg/day) to the active control of imatinib (400 or 600 mg/day) in first-line treatment of patients with advanced GIST. Primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints including OS, time to progression (TTP), and clinical response rates (RECIST). Based on a planned sample size of 222 patients (111/arm) this 15% non-inferiority study was designed to have an 85% power using a 95% two-sided CI of the hazard ratio. Patient eligibility criteria include: histologically proven, metastatic or locally advanced nonresectable, or recurrent post-surgery GIST; TKI naïve patient or patient previously receiving imatinib only as a neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy; and confirmed KIT-positive or PDGFRA-positive tumors. Recruitment is ongoing. On 09/2011, the DMC recommended continuation of this study. Clinicaltrial.gov: NCT00812240. [Table: see text]

Masitinib in imatinib-naive advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): Five-year follow-up of the French Sarcoma Group phase II trial.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10089-10089 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel Le Cesne ◽  
Jean-Yves Blay ◽  
Binh Bui Nguyen ◽  
Olivier Bouche ◽  
Julien Domont ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Data ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Surgical Complication ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Exon 11 ◽  
Advanced Gist

10089 Background: Masitinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that in vitro has greater activity and selectivity than imatinib against KIT. This multicenter, open label, phase 2 study evaluated efficacy and safety of masitinib as a first-line treatment of advanced GIST. Initial results with a median follow-up of 34 months, were previously reported in EJC 2010. We present here 5-year follow-up data from the same series with updated safety and survival data. Methods: Imatinib-naïve patients (pts) with inoperable, advanced GIST received oral masitinib (7.5 mg/kg/day) until progression, refusal or toxicity. Results: Thirty pts with a median age of 58 years (60% of males) were included from 06/2005 to 04/2007 in 5 institutions. At the cut-off date of 13/09/2011, 7/30 pts (23%) were still under treatment with median follow-up of 65 months and the median overall survival (OS) had not yet been reached (NR). The 5-year OS rate was 61.5% (95% CI [41.1;76.6]) (see Table). Among patients with confirmed KIT exon 11 mutation, 8/9 pts (89%) were still alive with one pt having died from non-treatment related causes (surgical complication) following a complete response while receiving masitinib. No additional progressions have been reported giving a total of 14 events (13 progressions and 1 death). Updated median PFS was 41.3 months (95% CI [17.5;53.8]).No additional grade 3/4 adverse events have been reported. Conclusions: Long term results of masitinib confirm an interesting activity with prolonged PFS and OS. The median PFS rate in masitinib compares very favorably to that of imatinib, which is reported as 18 months (JCO 26:626, 2008). The 5-year OS rates for masitinib in the overall and exon 11 populations also compare favorably to imatinib, both of which are reported at ≤50% for imatinib (JCO 26:626, 2008; JCO 28:1247, 2010). These results support the head to head comparison with imatinib in the currently ongoing phase 3 randomized clinical trial in first line advanced GIST pts. [Table: see text]

Anlotinib Plus Toripalimab and Nab-Paclitaxel in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Study Protocol for An Open-Label, Non-Randomized, Phase II Study (ATNPA)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingwen Chen ◽  
Yiqian Liu ◽  
Yizhi Zhu ◽  
Shiyun Cui ◽  
Chongqi Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Combination Strategy

Abstract Background There have not been standard second-line or maintenance regimens with definite survival benefits so far for patients with pancreatic carcinoma who have lost the opportunity of curable resections or failed first-line chemotherapy. Anlotinib, a potent small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor, exhibits anti-angiogenic and anti-tumour effects by specifically binding to multiple targets such as VEGFR, FGFR, PDGFR, c-Kit and Ret. Toripalimab, a novel anti-PD-1 mAb, has been proved to significantly prolong progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in various solid tumours with manageable toxicities when combining with cytotoxic chemotherapy. We design this study to assess the combination of anlotinib, toripalimab and nab-paclitaxel as a second-line or maintenance therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) or metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC). Patients and Methods: This is an open-label, non-randomized, single-arm phase Ⅱ study, aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety profile of the above-mentioned combination strategy in first-line therapy-failed LAPC or MPC. Totally 53 patients are to be enrolled and receive anlotinib (12 mg, po. qd.) plus toripalimab (240 mg, ivgtt. q3w.) and nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2, ivgtt, d1, d8) every 3 weeks as a cycle until disease progression or intolerable adverse events. The primary endpoint is PFS. Secondary end points include OS, disease control rate (DCR), object response rate (ORR), quality of life (QoL) and safety. Enrollment started in April 2021, and follow-up will be finished in April 2023. Discussion and Significance: Combination of anlotinib, toripalimab and nab-paclitaxel may promote vessel normalization and drug delivery, and activate the immune response, thus exerting synergistic anti-tumour effects and counteracting the immunosuppressive microenvironment of pancreatic cancer. As the first intending to assess this combination in pancreatic cancer, this study will provide comprehensive evidence for second-line or maintenance therapy of LAPC and MPC. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: ATNPA, NCT04718701. Registered January 22, 2021. (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04718701?term=NCT04718701&draw=2&rank=1)

Phase III trial of nilotinib versus imatinib as first-line targeted therapy of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10501-10501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Yves Blay ◽  
Lin Shen ◽  
Yoon-Koo Kang ◽  
Piotr Rutkowski ◽  
Shukui Qin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Type I ◽  
First Line ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Exon 9 ◽  
Exon 11 ◽  
Advanced Gist

10501^ Background: Nilotinib (N) is a Bcr-Abl, KIT, and PDGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor. This Phase III trial compared N and imatinib (I) as first-line therapy of advanced GIST. Accrual was stopped when a futility boundary was crossed at interim analysis (IA). This final analysis of the core study examined the effect of mutation on outcomes. Methods: Patients (pts) with unresectable and/or metastatic GIST who had no prior antineoplastic therapy or had recurrence ≥6 months (mos) after adjuvant I were randomized 1:1 to open-label N 400 mg bid or I 400 mg qd (400 mg bid for KIT exon 9 mutants). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) per adjudicated central review. Enrollment targeted 736 pts to observe 375 events, yielding 90% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.71 (median, 28 [N] and 20 [I] mos) with two-sided 5% type I error. Prior to IA, crossover was allowed only for pts with progressive disease (PD); after IA, pts on N with or without PD were offered I. Results: At IA, the PFS HR for N vs I of >1.111 suggested a low probability of N superiority to I. Final analysis was performed in 644 pts; both PFS and OS favored I. In subgroup analysis of 401 pts who had mutational data, there was a large PFS difference favoring I in KIT exon 9 mutants, but similar PFS in KIT exon 11 mutants (Table). Based on immature data, OS favored I in all mutants. Conclusions: The IA showed N could not be superior to I for PFS in the overall population as first-line targeted therapy for pts with advanced GIST. PFS of N and I differed according to molecular subtypes, with PFSfavoring Iin KIT exon 9 mutants but roughly similar in exon 11 mutants. Clinical trial information: NCT00785785. [Table: see text]

KEYNOTE-062: Phase III study of pembrolizumab (MK-3475) alone or in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line therapy for advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS185-TPS185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josep Tabernero ◽  
Yung-Jue Bang ◽  
Charles S. Fuchs ◽  
Atsushi Ohtsu ◽  
Uma Kher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
End Points ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

TPS185 Background: Pembrolizumab (pembro) is a monoclonal antibody against PD-1 designed to block its interaction with PD-L1 and PD-L2 and permit an antitumor immune response. In KEYNOTE-012, pembro showed a 22% ORR (RECIST v1.1, central review) and a manageable safety profile in patients (pts) with advanced gastric cancer. The randomized, phase 3 KEYNOTE-062 study (NCT02494583) is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of pembro alone or in combination with cisplatin + a fluoropyrimidine with those of cisplatin + a fluoropyrimidine as first-line therapy for PD-L1+/HER2– advanced gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma. Methods: Key eligibility criteria include age ≥ 18 y, locally advanced or metastatic PD-L1+/HER2– gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma, ECOG PS 0-1, no active autoimmune disease or brain metastases, and no prior therapy for advanced disease. Pts are randomized 1:1:1 to pembro 200 mg Q3W (arm 1), pembro + cisplatin 80 mg/m2 Q3W + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 800 mg/m2 on days 1-5 of each Q3W cycle (arm 2), or placebo Q3W + cisplatin + 5-FU (arm 3); 5-FU may be replaced with capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14 of each cycle. Randomization is stratified by region (Europe/North America/Australia vs Asia vs rest of world), disease status (locally advanced vs metastatic), and chosen fluoropyrimidine (5-FU vs capecitabine). Arm 1 is open label; in arms 2 and 3, assignment to pembro vs placebo is double blind. In all arms, treatment will continue for 35 cycles or until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or pt/investigator decision. Response will be evaluated every 6 wk per RECIST v1.1 by central review and per RECIST adapted for immunotherapy response patterns; eligible pts may continue treatment beyond initial RECIST-defined progression. AEs will be assessed throughout treatment and for 30 d thereafter (90 d for serious AEs) and graded per NCI CTCAE v4.0. Pts will be followed for survival every 3 mo. OS and PFS per RECIST v1.1 are the primary study end points; secondary end points include ORR and duration of response. Enrollment in KEYNOTE-062 is ongoing and will continue until ~750 pts have enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT02494583.

First-line use of cabazitaxel in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): A three-arm study in comparison with docetaxel.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS4696-TPS4696
Author(s):  
Stephane Oudard ◽  
Lisa Sengelov ◽  
Paul N. Mainwaring ◽  
Antoine Thiery- Vuillemin ◽  
Christine Theodore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Measurable Disease ◽  
Ecog Ps

TPS4696^ Background: Docetaxel (D) in combination with prednisone (P) as first-line (1L) chemotherapy in patients (pts) with mCRPC is the current standard of care. However, treatment is not curative and D-resistant disease typically develops. Cabazitaxel (Cbz) is a novel taxane active in D-sensitive and -resistant tumor models. Clinical activity of Cbz plus P (CbzP) was demonstrated in the Phase III TROPIC study in mCRPC pts previously treated with a D-containing regimen; CbzP showed a significant overall survival (OS) benefit vs mitoxantrone plus prednisone (median OS 15.1 vs 12.7 months; HR 0.70; P < 0.0001). Therefore, it is of interest to determine if CbzP provides an OS advantage vs DP in 1L mCRPC pts. Methods: The phase III FIRSTANA study (NCT01308567) is a randomized, open-label, multinational trial in 1L mCRPC pts, designed to compare the efficacy of Cbz 25 mg/m² IV Q3W (Arm A) and Cbz 20 mg/m² IV Q3W (Arm B) vs D 75 mg/m2 IV Q3W (Arm C). P 10 mg PO QD is to be given concomitantly. Pts are stratified by ECOG PS (0–1 vs 2), measurable disease (yes/no) and region (depending on availability of Cbz as 2L). Pts with ECOG PS ≤ 2, histologically/cytologically confirmed metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma, with no prior chemotherapy and with disease progression following medical or surgical castration are eligible. The primary endpoint is OS. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS) (PCWG2 criteria), radiologic PFS, tumor response in measurable disease (RECIST 1.1), PSA response and PSA PFS, pain response and pain PFS, time to occurrence of any skeletal-related events, safety profile and health-related quality of life. Cbz pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenomics will be assessed in pt subgroups. Pts will be treated until progression, unacceptable toxicity or pt request. Planned enrollment is 1,170 pts; study size was calculated to achieve 90% power for OS. Study start was in May 2011; at January 2012, 219 pts were enrolled. The first DMC meeting recommended continuing the study without change.

Imatinib failure-free survival (IFS) in patients with localized gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) treated with adjuvant imatinib (IM): The EORTC/AGITG/FSG/GEIS/ISG randomized controlled phase III trial.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10500-10500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Giovanni Casali ◽  
Axel Le Cesne ◽  
Andres Poveda Velasco ◽  
Dusan Kotasek ◽  
Piotr Rutkowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Secondary Resistance ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
End Point ◽  
Consensus Classification ◽  
Advanced Gist

10500 Background: In 2004 we launched an open-label randomized trial with adjuvant IM for 2 yrs in localized, surgically resected, high/intermediate-risk GIST. Methods: Pts were randomized between 2 yrs of IM, 400 mg daily, and no further therapy after surgery. The primary end-point was OS, while RFS, RFI and toxicity were secondary end-points. Main eligibility criteria were: age >18 yrs, PS 0-2, localized CD117-positive GIST, intermediate or high risk according to the 2002 Consensus classification, R0 or R1 surgical margins, no previous medical therapy. Pts were stratified by risk, tumor site and margins. An accrual of 400 pts was planned, then escalated to 900. Given the prognostic improvement of advanced GIST pts, in 2009 the study IDMC authorized to change the primary end-point into IFS, whose failure was defined as the time when a different tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) is started. We report on a planned interim analysis carried out after 115 events according to the new primary end-point, with a significance level of 1.5%. Hazard ratios (HR) and p-values were adjusted for stratification factors. Results: 908 pts were randomized between 2005 and 2008, 454 to IM and 454 to observation arm; 835 pts were eligible. 17% of pts treated with IM stopped early due to toxicity or refusal. With a median follow-up of 4.7 yrs, 5-yr IFS was 87% in the IM-arm vs 84% in the control arm (HR=0.80, 98.5% CI [0.51; 1.26], p=0.23); RFS was 84% vs 66% at 3 yrs, and 69% vs 63% at 5 yrs (p<0.001); 5-yr OS was 100% vs 99%. Among 528 pts with high-risk GIST by local pathology, 5-yr IFS was 79% vs 73% (p=0.11), and 77% vs 73% (p=0.44) amongst 336 high-risk GIST pts by centrally reviewed pathology. Conclusions: This study confirms that adjuvant IM has an overt impact on short-term freedom from relapse. In the high-risk subgroup, a non-statistically significant trend in favor of the adjuvant arm was observed in terms of IFS. This new end-point for the adjuvant setting, i.e. survival free from any failure of the first employed TKI, was designed to incorporate secondary resistance, i.e. the currently main factor adversely affecting prognosis of advanced GIST pts. Clinical trial information: NCT00103168.

BEACON CRC (binimetinib [BINI], encorafenib [ENCO], and cetuximab [CTX] combined to treat BRAF-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer [mCRC]): A multicenter, randomized, open-label, three-arm phase III study of ENCO plus CTX plus or minus BINI vs irinotecan (IRI)/CTX or infusional 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid/IRI (FOLFIRI)/CTX with a safety lead-in of ENCO + BINI + CTX in patients (Pts) with BRAFV600E mCRC.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3622-TPS3622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanne Huijberts ◽  
Jan H. M. Schellens ◽  
Marwan Fakih ◽  
Marc Peeters ◽  
Scott Kopetz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Mek Inhibitor ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Braf Mutations ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Egfr Inhibition ◽  
Metastatic Setting

TPS3622 Background: BRAF mutations are found in ≈10% of mCRC cases. Pts with BRAFV600E mCRC have a poor prognosis, with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than pts with BRAFwt mCRC (Van Cutsem et al 2011; Modest et al 2012; Sorbye et al 2015). The benefits of combined BRAF + EGFR inhibition in mCRC have been demonstrated in vitro (Corcoran et al 2012; Prahallad et al 2012; Yang et al 2012), and preclinical evidence suggests that adding MEK signaling inhibition improves antitumor activity. Early clinical data indicate that BRAF + EGFR + MEK inhibition has greater activity than BRAF + EGFR inhibition in pts with BRAFV600E mCRC (Van Cutsem et al 2016). Our study will examine the combination of BINI (a MEK inhibitor) + ENCO (a selective BRAF kinase inhibitor) + CTX (an anti-EGFR antibody) and of ENCO + CTX in pts with BRAFV600E mCRC. Methods: BEACON CRC (NCT02928224) is enrolling pts with BRAFV600E mCRC whose disease has progressed after 1 or 2 prior regimens in the metastatic setting. A safety lead-in phase (≈30 pts) will determine the safety and tolerability of oral ENCO 300 mg QD + oral BINI 45 mg BID + intravenous CTX 400 mg/m2 followed by 250 mg/m2 QW. In the phase 3 portion, ≈615 pts will be randomized 1:1:1 to triplet (ENCO + BINI + CTX), doublet (ENCO + CTX), or control (investigator’s choice of IRI/CTX or FOLFIRI/CTX) arms. Pts will be treated in 28-day cycles until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, initiation of subsequent anticancer therapy, or death. The primary endpoint is OS (triplet vs control). Secondary endpoints include OS (doublet vs control), confirmed investigator-assessed objective response rate according to RECIST version 1.1 (triplet or doublet vs control; triplet vs doublet), PFS (triplet or doublet vs control), duration of response, time to response, pharmacokinetics, and pt-reported outcomes. Safety will be summarized using standard adverse event reporting. Clinical trial information: NCT02928224.

ABC-06 | A randomised phase III, multi-centre, open-label study of active symptom control (ASC) alone or ASC with oxaliplatin / 5-FU chemotherapy (ASC+mFOLFOX) for patients (pts) with locally advanced / metastatic biliary tract cancers (ABC) previously-treated with cisplatin/gemcitabine (CisGem) chemotherapy.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4003-4003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Lamarca ◽  
Daniel H. Palmer ◽  
Harpreet Singh Wasan ◽  
Paul J. Ross ◽  
Yuk Ting Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cox Regression ◽  
Symptom Control ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Disease Extent ◽  
Platinum Sensitivity ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

4003 Background: Level A evidence supports use of CisGem as first-line chemotherapy for ABC; no robust evidence is available for second-line chemotherapy. Methods: Pts diagnosed with ABC with disease progression after prior CisGem were randomised (1:1) to either ASC+mFOLFOX or ASC. Randomisation was stratified by serum albumin levels ( < 35 vs ≥35 g/L), platinum sensitivity (determined from first-line CisGem) and disease extent (locally advanced vs metastatic). Pts with ECOG PS0-1, adequate haematological, renal and liver function, and adequate biliary drainage were eligible. Primary end-point was overall survival (OS) (multivariable Cox regression adjusted for stratification factors); sample size: 162 pts delivering 148 events were required (80% power; 5% two-sided alpha) for a hypothesised hazard ratio (HR) of 0.63. Assumed median survival for ASC was 4 months. Results: 162 pts (81 in each arm) were randomised (27 March ‘14 - 04 Jan ‘18); median age 65 yrs (range 26-84); sex: 80 (49%) male, 82 (51%) female; primary site: intrahepatic 72 (44%), extrahepatic 45 (28%), gallbladder 34 (21%) and ampullary 11 (7%). Baseline characteristics were balanced between arms except platinum sensitivity (ASC+mFOLFOX 27 pts (33%); ASC 34 pts (42%)). After 150 OS events, the adjusted HR was 0.69 (95% CI 0.50-0.97; p = 0.031; ASC+mFOLFOX vs ASC). Median OS (months (m)), 6m and 12m OS-rate (%) were 6.2m, 50.6% and 25.9% for the ASC+mFOLFOX and 5.3m, 35.5%, 11.4% for the ASC arm, respectively. Grade 3/4 toxicities were reported in 48 (59%) and 32 (39%) pts in the ASC+mFOLFOX and ASC arm, respectively; these were balanced between arms except for fatigue and neutropenia (more frequent in ASC+mFOLFOX arm); data cleaning is ongoing. No chemotherapy-related deaths were reported. Conclusion: Survival with ASC was greater than assumed; ASC+mFOLFOX improved OS after progression to CisGem with a clinically meaningful increase in 6m and 12m OS rate. ASC+mFOLFOX should become standard of care in second-line for ABC. Clinical trial information: NCT01926236.

scholarly journals FIGHT-302: first-line pemigatinib vs gemcitabine plus cisplatin for advanced cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 rearrangements

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (30) ◽  
pp. 2385-2399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanios S Bekaii-Saab ◽  
Juan W Valle ◽  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
Lorenza Rimassa ◽  
Junji Furuse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Survival Duration ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Duration Of Response

FGFR2 rearrangements resulting in dysregulated signaling are drivers of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) tumorigenesis, and occur almost exclusively in intrahepatic CCA. Pemigatinib, a selective, potent, oral inhibitor of FGFR1–3, has demonstrated efficacy and safety in a Phase II study of patients with previously treated locally advanced/metastatic CCA harboring FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements. We describe the study design of FIGHT-302, an open-label, randomized, active-controlled, multicenter, global, Phase III study comparing the efficacy and safety of first-line pemigatinib versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with advanced CCA with FGFR2 rearrangements (NCT03656536). The primary end point is progression-free survival; secondary end points are objective response rate, overall survival, duration of response, disease control rate, safety and quality of life. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03656536 ( ClinicalTrials.gov )

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document