Enabling quality improvement in systemic cancer treatment through a collaborative approach.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 88-88
Author(s):  
Vicky Simanovski ◽  
Sherrie Hertz ◽  
Esther Green ◽  
Elaine Meertens ◽  
Leonard Kaizer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Systemic Treatment ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Average Score ◽  
Quality And Safety ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Safe Delivery ◽  
Regional Engagement

88 Background: The Regional Systemic Treatment Program at Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) aims to ensure the highest quality of systemic treatment is available to Ontarians, as close to home as possible. CCO initiated a provincial collaborative with the aim of improving the safe delivery of parenteral chemotherapy from orders through preparation, to administration, for patients, and providers. Methods: From April 2011 to March 2012, interdisciplinary hospital teams across Ontario followed multiple Plan, Do, Study, Act cycles to perform QI projects focusing on safe delivery of systemic treatment. Over this period, three in-person sessions educating participants on improvement methodology were held. Monthly teleconferences and an electronic discussion forum encouraged a culture of knowledge sharing and collaboration. Results: 113 participants from 26 teams participated in a total of 81 improvement initiatives. 96% of participants surveyed indicated that the collaborative provided a valuable opportunity to network with peers, share ideas, and discuss lessons learned. During the collaborative, teams reported their progress on a scale of 1-5. At May 2011, teams averaged a self-assessment score of 1, indicating no progress had been made. By February 2012, this increased to an average score of 4, indicating significant progress and achievement of at least one improvement objective/goal. CCO has leveraged the foundations built by the collaborative to develop a Regional Quality and Safety Network. This network provides a regular forum for health care providers and administrators to share knowledge and collaborate on strategies for improving quality and safety in the delivery of systemic treatment. Conclusions: The collaborative demonstrated that the use of a formal quality improvement model is a successful mechanism for regional engagement; that provides the foundation necessary for building a provincial network with common goals and understanding regarding quality improvement. By educating participants, supporting local efforts and enabling knowledge transfer and exchange, the collaborative showed that shared ideas and even small changes can lead to large-scale improvements for patients and providers.

scholarly journals Wales Inverse Care Law Programme - Design and Implementation of Routine Data Evaluation and Lessons Learned

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley Akbari ◽  
Rowena Griffiths ◽  
Alice Puchades ◽  
Sara Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Routine Data ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Health Check ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Targeted Interventions ◽  
Inverse Care Law ◽  
The Impact

IntroductionThe Inverse Care Law (ICL) programme in Wales was setup to tackle health inequalities. Eligible populations from deprived communities, at higher risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) were invited to a health-check and offered appropriate lifestyle and clinical interventions. Objectives and ApproachEvaluation of this programme is vital to ensure that targeted interventions have been received by those most in need, including referrals to lifestyle services and support. The use of longitudinal population-scale routine-data required the development of an approach which was both efficient and cost effective. To achieve this, the Welsh Longitudinal General Practice (WLGP) data held in SAIL Databank was utilised. A programme-specific methodology was agreed by the programme-board and developed so that data collected from GP records prior, during and post health-check accurately identified the eligible population and allowed the effective assessment of lifestyle and clinical risk factors for CVD; poor diet, physical inactivity, smoking and high alcohol intake, so appropriate interventions could be offered. ResultsWe evaluated the programme from 2015 to 2019 in 70 GP’s across the participating Health-Boards, and identified 175,671 individuals eligible by the programme criteria. Substantial preliminary work has been carried out to ensure the specification of outcome measures are both clinically and epidemiologically accurate and relevant. The final report scheduled for release in August-2020, which will evaluate the impact of the programme. Conclusion / ImplicationsThis ambitious evaluation of a large-scale programme set in the community involving disparate systems and a range of stakeholders, has been both complex and challenging, requiring substantial effort to design and implement. We hope the outcomes and lessons learned from our experience will improve the design, implementation and evaluation of the programme and lead to improvements in services and the quality of life for people in Wales, and provide an exemplar for health care providers worldwide wishing to conduct similar programmes in the future.

Rapid Project Management in a Time of COVID-19 Crisis: Lessons learned from a Global VIRUS: COVID-19 Registry (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janice R. Turek ◽  
Vikas Bansal ◽  
Aysun Tekin ◽  
Mayank Sharma ◽  
Marija Bogojevic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Project Management ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Healthcare Organizations ◽  
Collect Patient Data ◽  
The Impact

UNSTRUCTURED The COVID-19 pandemic emerged globally in a rapid and precipitous manner devastating healthcare organizations worldwide. The progression of the illness, the impact to the vulnerable and best care for the hospitalized patient, is undefined. Incomplete knowledge of best practices by frontline health care providers may result in error-prone care. Data on symptoms and advancement of the SARS-CoV-2 virus leading to critical care admission has not been captured or communicated well between international organizations experiencing the same impact from the virus. As the SARS-CoV-2 virus quickly reached every country, it was recognized that global communication and data collection on the critical care patients admitted with COVID-19 needed to be rapidly put in place. Developing a global registry to collect patient data and treatment in the critical care setting was of utmost priority with the goal to minimize preventable death, disability, and costly complications for patients with COVID-19. Project management around the prompt implementation of the registry is crucial. Valuable information could be lost daily without a format to record data and the opportunity to share significant findings. Putting the VIRUS: COVID-19 Registry in place could change patient outcomes by gaining insight to progression of symptoms and treatments worldwide. This article addresses project management lessons in a time of crises outlining the methodology used and is meant to be a useful tool for other organizations for rapid project management for a large-scale health care data registry.

Medical Informatics and the Quality of Health: New Approaches to Support Patient Care

2003 ◽  
Vol 42 (02) ◽  
pp. 185-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Haux ◽  
C. Kulikowski ◽  
A. Bohne ◽  
R. Brandner ◽  
B. Brigl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Medical Informatics ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Medical Knowledge ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Access To Health Services ◽  
Leading Role ◽  
Future Challenges

Summary Objectives: The Yearbook of Medical Informatics is published annually by the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) and contains a selection of excellent papers on medical informatics research which have been recently published (www.yearbook.uni-hd.de). The 2003 Yearbook of Medical Informatics took as its theme the role of medical informatics for the quality of health care. In this paper, we will discuss challenges for health care, and the lessons learned from editing IMIA Yearbook 2003. Results and Conclusions: Modern information processing methodology and information and communication technology have strongly influenced our societies and health care. As a consequence of this, medical informatics as a discipline has taken a leading role in the further development of health care. This involves developing information systems that enhance opportunities for global access to health services and medical knowledge. Informatics methodology and technology will facilitate high quality of care in aging societies, and will decrease the possibilities of health care errors. It will also enable the dissemination of the latest medical and health information on the web to consumers and health care providers alike. The selected papers of the IMIA Yearbook 2003 present clear examples and future challenges, and they highlight how various sub-disciplines of medical informatics can contribute to this.

Abstract 2197: Telestroke: Optimizing Access to Emergency Interventions in Acute Stroke Care

Stroke ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rayetta Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Nurse Specialist ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Acute Stroke Care ◽  
Evidenced Based

Background and Issues: The burden of stroke in North Carolina is one of the highest in the nation (approximately 28,000 stroke hospitalizations from 2003-2007). The number and high costs of stroke have made it incumbent to improve the numbers of patients receiving effective treatment. There are two major barriers for treatment of acute stroke: time and access. The utilization of telestroke in community hospitals aids in decreasing these barriers by providing immediate access to a stroke neurologist. In order for telestroke to be successful, awareness and education regarding acute stroke care must be provided for health care providers as well as the communities. Thus, the development of a telestroke system requires nursing and medical expertise. The Primary Stroke Center Team at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center in Winston-Salem, N.C. implemented a telestroke network system (Intouch's Health's RP-7 Robotic system) in January of 2010 to provide 24/7 access to the medical center's acute stroke experts and the latest advancements in stroke interventions. There are eight hospitals in the network at the present time. Methods: Our team identified that many of the network hospital's staff are not experienced in taking care of a stroke patient and that a “roadmap” is useful to guide them in these steps.The stroke nurse specialist developed a quality improvement plan for the network hospitals which included: an evidence-based algorithm for patient care; stroke education, in particular, neurological assessment and tPA administration classes for the ED staff; quarterly meetings to provide outcome and feedback data with each network hospital; stroke awareness events for the community. Mock telestroke consults were also performed prior to “going live” with telestroke for each of the network hospitals. Of utmost importance is the early involvement and education of the EMS system in the respective county of the network hospital. The buy-in of EMS was found to be a key component in the success of the network. Finally, attention to customized quality improvement efforts for each of the facilities are required to accomplish integration into the telestroke network. Results: The data has been analyzed, and thus far, a 24% rate of tPA administration has been seen with our network hospitals (an increase from the 3.6% national average). Comparisons between each of the eight network hospitals' rates of administration of tPA prior to and after joining the network show a trend of increase (10%-40%). The effectiveness of the algorithm has also been explored by analysis of feedback and initial results have shown a positive impact. Conclusion: A combination of improving access to stroke neurologists in conjunction with a focus on improving the level of care via evidenced based stroke care teaching and implementation of algorithms at a network hospital is required for implementing and building a successful telestroke network.

scholarly journals Mobile Apps for Drug–Drug Interaction Checks in Chinese App Stores: Systematic Review and Content Analysis (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunying Shen ◽  
Bin Jiang ◽  
Qilian Yang ◽  
Chengnan Wang ◽  
Kevin Z Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Arithmetic Mean ◽  
Mobile App ◽  
Average Score ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Rating Score ◽  
Average Rating ◽  
Mhealth Apps

BACKGROUND As a computerized drug–drug interaction (DDI) alert system has not been widely implemented in China, health care providers are relying on mobile health (mHealth) apps as references for checking drug information, including DDIs. OBJECTIVE The main objective of this study was to evaluate the quality and content of mHealth apps supporting DDI checking in Chinese app stores. METHODS A systematic review was carried out in November 2020 to identify mHealth apps providing DDI checking in both Chinese iOS and Android platforms. We extracted the apps’ general information (including the developer, operating system, costs, release date, size, number of downloads, and average rating), scientific or clinical basis, and accountability, based on a multidimensional framework for evaluation of apps. The quality of mHealth apps was evaluated by using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS). Descriptive statistics, including numbers and percentages, were calculated to describe the characteristics of the apps. For each app selected for evaluation, the section-specific MARS scores were calculated by taking the arithmetic mean, while the overall MARS score was described as the arithmetic mean of the section scores. In addition, the Cohen kappa (κ) statistic was used to evaluate the interrater agreement. RESULTS A total of 7 apps met the selection criteria, and only 3 included citations. The average rating score for Android apps was 3.5, with a minimum of 1.0 and a maximum of 4.9, while the average rating score for iOS apps was 4.7, with a minimum of 4.2 and a maximum of 4.9. The mean MARS score was 3.69 out of 5 (95% CI 3.34-4.04), with the lowest score of 1.96 for Medication Guidelines and the highest score of 4.27 for MCDEX mobile. The greatest variation was observed in the information section, which ranged from 1.41 to 4.60. The functionality section showed the highest mean score of 4.05 (95% CI 3.71-4.40), whereas the engagement section resulted in the lowest average score of 3.16 (95% CI 2.81-3.51). For the information quality section, which was the focus of this analysis, the average score was 3.42, with the MCDEX mobile app having the highest score of 4.6 and the Medication Guidelines app having the lowest score of 1.9. For the overall MARS score, the Cohen interrater κ was 0.354 (95% CI 0.236-0.473), the Fleiss κ was 0.353 (95% CI, 0.234-0.472), and the Krippendorff α was 0.356 (95% CI 0.237-0.475). CONCLUSIONS This study systematically reviewed the mHealth apps in China with a DDI check feature. The majority of investigated apps demonstrated high quality with accurate and comprehensive information on DDIs. However, a few of the apps that had a massive number of downloads in the Chinese market provided incorrect information. Given these apps might be used by health care providers for checking potential DDIs, this creates a substantial threat to patient safety.

scholarly journals “Breaking the Silence” to Improve Cancer Survivorship Care for First Nations Peoples

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 160940691877413
Author(s):  
Wendy Gifford ◽  
Roanne Thomas ◽  
Gwen Barton ◽  
Viviane Grandpierre ◽  
Ian D. Graham
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
First Nations ◽  
Cancer Survivorship ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Survivorship Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Knowledge To Action

There is a significant knowledge-to-action gap in cancer survivorship care for First Nations (FN) communities. To date, many approaches to survivorship have not been culturally responsive or community-based. This study is using an Indigenous knowledge translation (KT) approach to mobilize community-based knowledge about cancer survivorship into health-care programs. Our team includes health-care providers and cancer survivors from an FN community in Canada and an urban hospital that delivers Cancer Care Ontario’s Aboriginal Cancer Program. Together, we will study the knowledge-to-action process to inform future KT research with Indigenous peoples for improving health-care delivery and outcomes. The study will be conducted in settings where research relations and partnerships have been established through our parent study, The National Picture Project. The inclusion of community liaisons and the continued engagement of participants from our parent study will foster inclusiveness and far-reaching messaging. Knowledge about unique cancer survivorship needs co-created with FN people in the parent study will be mobilized to improve cancer follow-up care and to enhance quality of life. Findings will be used to plan a large-scale implementation study across Canada.

“Recognize Our Humanity”: Immigrant Youth Voices on Health Care in Arizona’s Restrictive Political Environment

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 498-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofía Gómez ◽  
Heide Castañeda
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Immigrant Youth ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Policy Recommendations ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Action Research Approach ◽  
Important Position

The “DACAmented Voices in Healthcare” project examined the intersection of restrictive immigration policies and health care via photovoice, a participatory action research approach, with immigrant youth living in Arizona, who were recipients of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. These “DACAmented” youth took part in nine photovoice sessions exploring their health care experiences and accessibility to care using documentary photography and narratives. They poignantly illustrated their experiences through images identifying their main health concerns and strengths, facilitating the development of health policy recommendations. This article illustrates the thematic findings and discusses policy recommendations and lessons learned from presentations to policy makers and health care providers. Findings suggest that immigrant youth are knowledgeable of their family’s health care needs and hold a unique and important position within mixed-status households. Health care providers can benefit from the proposed recommendations by building bridges to care to address health equity in immigrant communities.

scholarly journals Crossing Knowledge Boundaries: Health Care Providers’ Perceptions and Experiences of What is Important to Achieve More Person-Centered Patient Pathways For Older People

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecilie Olsen ◽  
Astrid Bergland ◽  
Asta Bye ◽  
Jonas Debesay ◽  
Anne Langaas
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Older People ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Transitional Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Quality Improvement Collaborative ◽  
Patient Journey ◽  
Patient Pathways

Abstract Background: Improving the transitional care of older people, especially hospital-to-home transitions, is a salient concern worldwide. Older people’s patient pathways may be unpredictable and complex, posing significant challenges for health care providers (HCPs). In particular, appropriate follow-up in primary care after discharge is key. Current research in the field endorses person-centered care as crucial to improving the patient pathways of older people. The aim of this study was to explore HCPs’ perceptions and experiences of what is important to achieve more person-centered patient pathways for older people.Methods: This was a qualitative study. We performed individual semistructured interviews with 20 HCPs and three key persons who participated in a Norwegian quality improvement collaborative. In addition, participant observation of 22 meetings in the quality improvement collaborative was performed. Results: A thematic analysis resulted in five themes: 1) Finding common ground through the mapping of the patient journey; 2) the importance of understanding the whole patient pathway; 3) the significance of getting to know the older patient; 4) the key role of home care providers in the patient pathways of older people; and 5) ambiguity toward checklists and practice implementation. Conclusion: To understand the findings, it proved useful to see them in light of knowledge sharing and boundary crossing, which are central concepts in the literature on transitional care. HCPs in the collaborative shared and coproduced new knowledge of the patient pathways of older people based on a patient journey perspective. Mapping the patient journey and asking, “What matters to you?” facilitated the crossing of knowledge boundaries between the HCPs; hence, a new and more holistic view of the patient pathways of older people in the current context emerged. The centrality of getting to know the patient and the special role of providers working in home care services was a central finding. The study adds to existing knowledge by suggesting that the achievement of person-centered patient pathways for older people does not only depend on the crossing of knowledge boundaries among HCPs, but also between HCPs and older persons.

Strategies and Challenges: Qualitative Lessons Learned From Georgia Produce Prescription Programs

2021 ◽  
pp. 152483992110285
Author(s):  
Taylor Newman ◽  
Jung Sun Lee
Keyword(s):  
Nutrition Education ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Comparative Case Study ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Farmers Market ◽  
Study Approach ◽  
Field Notes ◽  
Facilitators And Barriers ◽  
Nutrition Educators

Produce prescription programs (PPPs) have grown in numbers in the past decade, empowering health care providers to promote health by issuing subsidies for produce to vulnerable patients. However, little research has been conducted on the facilitators that make it easier for PPPs to succeed or the barriers that programs face, which could provide guidance on how to improve future PPP design and implementation. The study sought to identify the facilitators and barriers affecting positive outcomes in Georgia PPPs called Fruit and Vegetable Prescription (FVRx) Programs. A process evaluation with a qualitative comparative case study approach was conducted. Fifteen FVRx providers, ranging from nutrition educators to farmers market managers, were interviewed in a focus group interview or on the phone between 2016 and 2017. Two nutrition education classes and an FVRx best practices meeting were observed, and program documents were collected. Interview transcripts, field notes from observations, and documents were then thematically analyzed. Four overall themes were determined regarding facilitators and barriers experienced by FVRx programs: (1) creating accessible programming may encourage FVRx participation, (2) provider dedication to the program is important, (3) participants’ challenging life circumstances can make participation difficult, and (4) the sustainability of the program is a concern. The findings of this study suggest helpful strategies and challenges for providers to consider when developing and implementing PPPs in Georgia and beyond. Research on the long-term program impact is needed, and policy options for sustainable, scaling up of PPPs should be explored.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document