Evaluation of the prognostic value of guanylyl cyclase C (GCC) lymph node (LN) classification in patients with stage II colon cancer: A pooled analysis.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 443-443
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Sargent ◽  
Qian Shi ◽  
Murray B. Resnick ◽  
Stephen Lyle ◽  
Michael O. Meyers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Strong Relationship ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Risk Status ◽  
Cox Models

443 Background: Identification of a sensitive and specific prognostic marker would aid in the management of patients (pts) with standard histopathology node negative colon cancer (CC). We conducted a pooled individual pt data analysis to confirm the prognostic value of GCC for disease recurrence in untreated stage II CC. Methods: GCC mRNA was quantified by RT-qPCR using formalin-fixed LN from 310 stage II pts diagnosed from 1991-2006 enrolled in two studies (Sargent 2011 [study1] and Haince 2009 [study2]). Patients were classified by GCC LN ratio (LNR) (high risk: LNR ≥ 0.1; low risk: LNR < 0.1), with LNR defined as number of GCC positive LN divided by number of informative LNs. Clinical outcomes included time to recurrence (TTR), overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Stratified log-rank tests and multivariate Cox models assessed the association between clinical outcomes and GCC LN status. Results: The 5-year recurrence rate in study 1 (n=241) was 15.8%, 24.9% in study 2 (n=69). GCC LNR high risk pts had significantly higher risk of TTR, OS, DSS and DFS, which remained after adjusting for age, T stage, grade, number of LNs examined, and presence of lymphovascular invasion ( Table ). In a secondary analysis of low risk stage II pts (T3, ≥12 LNs examined, and negative surgical margins, n=241), a strong relationship between GCC LNR and each endpoint remained (TTR HR=4.34, 95% CI=2.07 – 9.13, p<0.001). Conclusions: Pts with GCC LNR high risk status have significantly poorer outcomes compared to pts with low risk status, particularly among those traditionally considered to be low risk. [Table: see text]

Adjuvant Therapy With Fluorouracil and Oxaliplatin in Stage II and Elderly Patients (between ages 70 and 75 years) With Colon Cancer: Subgroup Analyses of the Multicenter International Study of Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin in the Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer Trial

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (27) ◽  
pp. 3353-3360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christophe Tournigand ◽  
Thierry André ◽  
Franck Bonnetain ◽  
Benoist Chibaudel ◽  
Gérard Lledo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
International Study ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Cancer Trial ◽  
Subgroup Analyses

Purpose Oxaliplatin combined with fluoropyrimidine improves survival in patients with stage III colon cancer. However, adjuvant chemotherapy with oxaliplatin is controversial in stage II and elderly patients. Patients and Methods We performed subgroup analyses of stage II and elderly patients randomly assigned fluorouracil with leucovorin (FL) ± oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) in the Multicenter International Study of Oxaliplatin/Fluorouracil/Leucovorin in the Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer study. Comorbidities, severe adverse events, second cancers, management of relapse and death as a result of causes than other colon cancer were studied. Results Two thousand two hundred forty-six patients were enrolled. Overall, 899 patients had stage II disease, including 330 low-risk and 569 high-risk patients. A total of 315 patients were ages 70 to 75 years. For stage II patients, the hazard ratio (HR) for comparing FOLFOX4 with FL was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.62 to 01.14) for disease-free survival (DFS), 0.70 (95% CI, 0.49 to 0.99) for time to recurrence (TTR), and 1.00 (95% CI, 0.70 to 1.41) for overall survival (OS). There was no interaction between treatment and stage or age. Low-risk stage II patients did not benefit from oxaliplatin. In high-risk stage II patients, the HR comparing FOLFOX4 with FL was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.51 to 1.01) for DFS, 0.62 (95% CI, 0.41 to 0.92) for TTR, and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.61 to 1.36) for OS. In elderly patients, the HR comparing FOLFOX4 with FL was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.64 to 1.35) for DFS, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.47 to 1.11) for TTR, and 1.10 (95% CI, 0.73 to 1.65) for OS. Conclusion The results of these subset analyses show no statistically significant benefit (OS and DFS) for the addition of oxaliplatin to FL as adjuvant treatment for either stage II and elderly patients.

scholarly journals Prognostic value of nucleotyping, DNA ploidy and stroma in high-risk stage II colon cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 123 (6) ◽  
pp. 973-981 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lujing Yang ◽  
Pengju Chen ◽  
Li Zhang ◽  
Lin Wang ◽  
Tingting Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Dna Ploidy ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Contributory Factor ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer

Abstract Background Heterogeneity with respect to recurrence and survival in high-risk stage II colon cancer patients still exists, and further classification is urgently required. This study aimed to ascertain the prognostic value of DNA ploidy, stroma-tumour fraction and nucleotyping in the prognosis of high-risk stage II colon cancer. Methods A total of 188 high-risk stage II colon cancer patients received radical surgery in Peking University Cancer Hospital, from 2009 to 2015. Status of mismatch repair proteins in tumours was analysed using immunohistochemistry. DNA ploidy, stroma-tumour fraction and nucleotyping were estimated by automated digital imaging systems. Results Nucleotyping and DNA ploidy were significant prognostic factors, while stroma-tumour fraction were not significantly prognostic in the univariate analysis. In the multivariable model, the dominant contributory factor of disease-free survival was chromatin heterogeneous vs. chromatin homogeneous [HR 3.309 (95% CI: 1.668–6.564), P = 0.001]. Conclusions Our study indicates that nucleotyping is an independent prognostic factor in high-risk stage II colon cancer. Therefore, it may help subdivide patients into different subgroups and give them different strategies for follow-up and treatment in the future.

scholarly journals Use of a Combination of CEA and Tumor Budding to Identify High-risk Patients with Stage II Colon Cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 267-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changzheng Du ◽  
Weicheng Xue ◽  
Fangyuan Dou ◽  
Yifan Peng ◽  
Yunfeng Yao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Tumor Budding ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Prognostic Accuracy ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer

Background High-risk patients with stage II colon cancer may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy, but identifying this patient population can be difficult. We assessed the prognosis value for predicting tumor progression in patients with stage II colon cancer, of a panel of 2 biomarkers for colon cancer: tumor budding and preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). Methods Consecutive patients (N = 134) with stage II colon cancer who underwent curative surgery from 2000 to 2007 were included. Multivariate analysis was used to evaluate the association of CEA and tumor budding grade with 5-year disease-free survival (DFS). The prognostic accuracy of CEA, tumor budding grade and the combination of both (CEA-budding panel) was determined. Results The study found that both CEA and tumor budding grade were associated with 5-year DFS. The prognostic accuracy for disease progression was higher for the CEA-budding panel (82.1%) than either CEA (70.9%) or tumor budding grade (72.4%) alone. Conclusions The findings indicate that the combination of CEA levels and tumor budding grade has greater prognostic value for identifying patients with stage II colon cancer who are at high-risk for disease progression, than either marker alone.

Development and validation of a robust prognostic and predictive signature for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4036-4036
Author(s):  
A. M. Glas ◽  
P. Roepman ◽  
R. Salazar ◽  
G. Capella ◽  
V. Moreno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Gene Signature ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Independent Cohort

4036 Background: Between 25 and 35% of stage II CRC patients will experience a recurrence of their disease and may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Official guidelines give suggestions but no clear recommendation for best risk stratification. Here we describe the development a robust signature that predicts disease relapse and can assist in treatment decisions. Methods: Fresh frozen tumor tissues from 180 patients with stage I, II and III colorectal cancer undergoing surgery were analyzed using high density Agilent 44K oligonucleotide arrays. Median FU was 70.2 months; 85% of patients did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering based on full-genome gene expression measurement indicated the existence of 3 main colon molecular subclasses. Survival analysis of the 3 classes showed that subtype C (n= 27) had a poor outcome and subtype A (n= 48) good outcome. Only the intermediate group B (n=104) was used to develop a signature by using a cross validation procedure to score all genes for their association with 5-yr distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) and subsequently applied to all samples (n=180). The obtained gene signature was further validated on an independent cohort of 178 stage II + III colon samples. Results: A set of 38 prognosis related gene probes showed robust DMFS association in over 50% of all iterations in the Training Set of 180 samples. The gene signature was validated on an independent cohort of 178 samples from stage II + III colon cancer patients. The profile classified 61% of the validation samples as low-risk and 39% as high-risk. The low- and high-risk samples showed a significant difference in DMFS with a HR of 3.19 (P= 8.5e-4). Five-year DMFS rates were 89% (95%CI 83–95) for low-risk and 62% (95%CI 50–77) for high-risk samples. Moreover, the profile showed a significant performance within stage II (P=0.0058) and III (P=0.036) only samples. The performance of the profile was significant for both untreated (P=0.0082) and treated patients (P=0.016) suggesting that its power is independent of treatment benefits. Conclusions: ColoPrint is able to predict the prognosis of stage II and III colon cancer patients and facilitates the identification of patients who would benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. [Table: see text]

Validation of a genomic classifier (ColoPrint) for predicting outcome in the T3-MSS subgroup of stage II colon cancer patients.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3510-3510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramon Salazar ◽  
Josep Tabernero ◽  
Victor Moreno ◽  
Ulrich Nitsche ◽  
Thomas Bachleitner-Hofmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Disease Relapse ◽  
Risk Of Disease

3510 Background: Adjuvant therapy for stage II patients is recommended for patients with high risk features, especially with T4 tumors. Adjuvant therapy is not indicated for patients with MSI-H status who are considered of being at low risk of disease relapse. However, this leaves the majority of patients with an undetermined risk. ColoPrint is an 18-gene expression classifier that identifies early-stage colon cancer patients at higher risk of disease relapse. Methods: ColoPrint was developed using whole genome expression data and was validated in public datasets (n=322) and independent patient cohorts from 5 European hospitals. Tissue specimen, clinical parameters, MSI-status and follow-up data (median follow-up 70 months) for patients were available and the ColoPrint index was determined using validated diagnostic arrays. Uni-and multivariate analysis was performed on the pooled stage II patient set (n=320) and the subset of patients who were T3/ MSS (n=227). Results: In the analysis of all stage II patients, ColoPrint classified two-third of stage II patients as being at lower risk. The 3-year Relapse-Free-Survial (RFS) RFS was 91% for Low Risk and 74% for patients at higher risk with a HR of 2.9 (p=0.001). Clinicopathological parameters from the ASCO recommendations (T4, perforation, <12 LN assessed, and/ or high grade) or NCCN guidelines (ASCO factors plus angio-lymphatic invasion) did not predict a differential outcome for high risk patients (p< 0.20). In the subgroup of patients with T3 and MSS phenotype, ColoPrint classified 61% of patients at lower risk with a 3-year RFS of 91% (86-96%) and 39% of patients at higher risk with a 3-year RFS of 73% (63-83%) (p=0.002). No clinical parameter was significantly prognostic in this subgroup. Conclusions: ColoPrint combined with established clinicopathological factors and MSI, significantly improves prognostic accuracy, thereby facilitating the identification of patients at higher risk who might be considered for additional treatment.

Genomic classifiers (ColoPrint/MSI-Print) predict outcome and chemotherapy benefit in stage II and III colon cancer patients.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 378-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Kopetz ◽  
Zhi-Qin Jiang ◽  
Michael J. Overman ◽  
Christa Dreezen ◽  
Sun Tian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Additional Treatment ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

378 Background: Although the benefit of chemotherapy in stage II and III colon cancer patients is significant, many patients might not need adjuvant chemotherapy because they have a good prognosis even without additional treatment. ColoPrint is a gene expression classifier that distinguish patients with low or high risk of disease relapse. It was developed using whole genome expression data and has been validated in public datasets, independent European patient cohorts and technical studies (Salazar 2011 JCO, Maak 2012 Ann Surg). Methods: In this study, the commercial ColoPrint test was validated in stage II (n=96) and III patients (n=95) treated at the MD Anderson Cancer Center from 2003 to 2009. Frozen tissue specimen, clinical parameters, MSI-status and follow-up data (median follow-up 64 months) were available. The 64-gene MSI-signature developed to identify patients with deficient mismatch repair system (Tian 2012 J Path) was evaluated for its accuracy to identify MSI patients and also for prognosis. Results: In this cohort, ColoPrint classified 56% of stage II and III patients as being at low risk. The 3-year Relapse-Free-Survival (RFS) was 90.6% for Low Risk and 78.4% for High Risk patients with a HR of 2.33 (p=0.025). In uni-and multivariate analysis ColoPrint and stage were the only significant factors to predict outcome. The MSI-signature classified 47 patients (24.6%) as MSI-H and most MSI-H patients were ColoPrint low risk (81%). Patients who were ColoPrint low risk and MSI-H by signature had the best outcome with a 3-year RFS of 95% while patients with ColoPrint high risk had a worse outcome independently of the MSI-status. Low risk ColoPrint patients had a good outcome independent of stage or chemotherapy treatment (90.1% 3-year RFS for treated patients, 91.4% for untreated patients) while ColoPrint high risk patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy had 3-year RFS of 84%, compared to 70.1% 3-year RFS in untreated patients (p=0.026). Conclusions: The combination of ColoPrint and MSI-Print improves the prognostic accuracy in stage II and stage III patients and may help the identification of patients at higher risk who are more likely to benefit from additional treatment

Identification of risk factors for stage II colon cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 375-375
Author(s):  
Sho Sawazaki ◽  
Manabu Shiozawa ◽  
Koji Numata ◽  
Masakatsu Numata ◽  
Teni Godai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Lymphatic Invasion ◽  
Clinicopathological Features ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Tumor Diameter ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer ◽  
Disease Free

375 Background: The use of adjuvant chemotherapy remains controversial in Stage II colon cancer. However, patients with specific clinicopathological features are thought to have high risk for recurrence. The aim of this study was to identify the subgroup of patients at great risk, by investigating the clinicopathological features associated with poor survived in Stage II. Methods: A total of 282 patients with Stage II colon cancer who underwent curative resection from January 1990 to September 2007 at Kanagawa Cancer Center were enrolled. Then, the clinicopathological data of the patients were retrospectively evaluated. Disease-free survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and survival curves were compared by the log-rank test. Cox’s regression analysis was used for multivariate analyses. P values <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Results: The median follow up was 62.5 months. The 5-year disease-free survival was 92.2% in the study group as a whole. Among the recurrent patients (n=23), the most recurrent site was the liver (n=11, 44%), followed by lung (n=6, 24%), and peritoneum (n=5, 20%). Univariate analysis for 5-year disease-free survival identified two factors; tumor diameter (>5cm vs…5cm, p=0.018), and lymphatic invasion (p=0.009). Multivariate analysis for 5-year disease-free survival identified two independent factors; tumor diameter (hazard ratio [HR], 4.82; 95% CI, 1.55-15.0; p=0.006), and lymphatic invasion (HR, 4.15; 95% CI, 1.68-10.2; p=0.002). The 5-year disease-free survival differed significantly among patients with neither of these prognostic factors (98.6%), those with only 1 factor (93.3%), and those with 2 factors (76.6%, p=0.000). Conclusions: Patients with stage II colon cancer who have both 5cm in diameter and lymphatic invasion are at high risk for recurrence. The use of adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered in this subgroup of patients.

Clinical effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) with or without oxaliplatin following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in stage II rectal cancer (RC).

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 686-686
Author(s):  
Jonathan M. Loree ◽  
Hagen F. Kennecke ◽  
Erin Diana Powell ◽  
Rachel Anne Goodwin ◽  
Patricia A. Tang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Clinical Effectiveness ◽  
Margin Status ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Curative Surgery ◽  
Small Magnitude ◽  
Cox Models ◽  
Lymph Node Sampling

686 Background: Use of AC in RC following nCRT is controversial because of concerns regarding its potentially small magnitude of benefit. We aimed to 1) examine real-world patterns of AC use in stage II RC and assess its impact on outcomes and 2) determine whether the addition of oxaliplatin to fluoropyrimidines modifies effectiveness. Methods: Using a cohort of yp stage II RC patients from 5 Canadian centers that underwent curative surgery, we assessed the relationship between AC +/- oxaliplatin and overall (OS) and disease free survival (DFS). Cox models adjusting for age, gender, ECOG, and high risk features (T4 lesion, poor differentiation, inadequate lymph node sampling, lymphovascular/perineural invasion, and obstruction/perforation) were constructed. Results: Among 485 pts, 74% received AC of whom 19% received oxaliplatin-based treatment. Median follow up was 4.5 yrs. Pts in the AC group were younger (median age 61 vs 64; P= 0.003) and had higher rates of TME (82% vs 79%; P= 0.049), but they had similar demographics, ECOG, high risk features, preoperative CEA, margin status and nCRT regimen when compared to pts in the non-AC group (all P> 0.05). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that receipt of any AC (OS HR 0.93 95% CI 0.58-1.50 P =0.77; DFS HR 0.91 95% CI 0.58-1.43 P =0.69), fluoropyrimidine AC (OS HR 0.82 95% CI 0.49-1.36 P =0.44; DFS HR 0.83 95% CI 0.51-1.34 P =0.44), or oxaliplatin-based AC (OS HR 1.37 95% CI 0.74-2.55 P =0.32; DFS HR 1.17 95% CI 0.66-2.05 P =0.59) did not improve outcomes versus no AC. In subgroup analyses that stratified pts by high risk features, presence of 1, 2, or 3 high risk factors, preoperative CEA and margin status, AC did not result in better OS or DFS in any subgroup. A further exploratory analysis that focused only on those receiving AC within 12 weeks of surgery did not reveal any consistent correlations between AC and survival. Conclusions: Use of fluoropyrimidine or oxaliplatin-based AC in this multi-institutional cohort of yp stage II RC pts after nCRT did not improve outcomes compared to observation. Conventional high risk features used to risk stratify stage II colon cancer for AC decision making have limited utility in RC after nCRT.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document