Feasibility of dignity therapy in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 671-671
Author(s):  
Maxwell Thomas Vergo ◽  
Halla Sayed Nimeiri ◽  
Mary Frances Mulcahy ◽  
Jamie H. Von Roenn ◽  
Al Bowen Benson ◽  
...  

671 Background: Dignity Therapy (DT) is a structured psychotherapeutic interview which allows people to create a permanent document to validate their existence and leave a legacy. It focuses on life review, meaningful relationships, and words of comfort to loved ones. In terminal patients no longer receiving chemotherapy, this intervention improved the majority of patients’ sense of dignity, purpose, and meaning, and also reduced depression and self reported suffering (Chochinov, J Clin Oncol, 2005). This study evaluates the feasibility of DT in patients receiving active chemotherapy. Methods: Outpatients ≥ 18 years of age with metastatic colorectal cancer recently starting second line chemotherapy were recruited. DT was administered, the interview transcribed, and the transcription edited into a proof version. This version was read to the patient and given to them after it was finalized. Main outcome was feasibility as measured by enrollment rate, discontinuation rate, and satisfaction after completing therapy. Other secondary measures included assessments for terminal illness acknowledgement (TIA), symptoms, peacefulness, quality of life, and finally preferences in a hypothetical end-of-life scenario. Results: Overall, there has been a 91% enrollment rate (10 out of 11 approached), 0% discontinuation, and a 100% rate of being satisfied or very satisfied (7 patients). 3 patients were removed due to non-compliance, sedation, or lost data. Of those who completed therapy, > 70% felt it was helpful or very helpful and strongly or very strongly felt it increased their sense of dignity, purpose, and meaning as well as the potential to help their family in the future. Symptoms remained stable over time. Exploratory endpoints included a 33% increase in TIA (p=0.23), no increase in peacefulness (p=0.44), less aggressive goals of care (p=0.28), and decreased distress. Conclusions: DT is a highly satisfying and meaningful intervention for advanced colorectal cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Given its feasibility, an ongoing randomized wait-list control study should help answer if DT effects TIA, end-of-life goals of care, or distress levels in this population. Funding: ACS-IRG 93-037-15.

2017 ◽  
Vol 60 (10) ◽  
pp. 1041-1049 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keiichi Arakawa ◽  
Kazushige Kawai ◽  
Soichiro Ishihara ◽  
Keisuke Hata ◽  
Hiroaki Nozawa ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14186-e14186
Author(s):  
Shivi Jain ◽  
Kireet Agrawal ◽  
Shinoj Pattali ◽  
Abhijai Singh ◽  
Kamal Agrawal ◽  
...  

e14186 Background: Overall survival in colorectal cancer is influenced by obesity, age, gender and stage at diagnosis. However, in minority based populations, effect of the above factors on overall survival has not been studied in any detail. Hence, we undertook this retrospective study to evaluate effect of above factors on overall survival in young colorectal cancer patients. Methods: 1,195 subjects with colorectal cancer treated at John H. Stroger Hospital of Cook County between 2000 and 2008 were retrospectively analyzed. 179 subjects with age 50 years and younger were identified. 146 of 179 subjects with available Body Mass Index (BMI) in kg/m2 were included in the study. Effect of BMI, age, sex, race, LDH and CEA levels, stage, site of tumor, smoking and family history on overall survival was evaluated using standard statistical multivariate analysis. Results: In our population, 22 of 146(15%) were underweight (BMI<20), 56 of 146(38.4%) were normal weight (BMI 20-24.9), 46 of 146(31.5%) were overweight (BMI 25-29.9) and 22 of 146(15%) were obese (BMI >30). Male: female ratio was 1.4:1. 75 of 146(51.7%) were African American, 23 of 146(15.9%) were Caucasians. 50 of 146(34.2%) were stage IV colorectal cancer at diagnosis. On univariate analysis, BMI<20(p=0.031, HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.15-3.82), CEA >4ng/ml (p=0.005, HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.21-3.08) and stage IV colorectal cancer (p<0.001, HR 6.1, 95% CI 2.42-15.53) were significantly associated with decreased overall survival. LDH<200 U/L was significantly associated with improved overall survival (p 0.029, HR 0.6, 95% CI 0.391-0.950). On multivariate analysis, stage IV colorectal cancer was a single significant independent predictor of overall survival (p=0.001, 95% CI 2.47-27.78). CEA>4ng/ml was marginally significant for decreased overall survival (p=0.06, 95% CI 0.978-3.015). On the contrary, no statistically significant difference was found on overall survival with age, BMI>20, gender, race, tumor location, smoking and family history. Conclusions: Advanced stage and CEA >4ng/ml are independent prognostic variables for decreased overall survival in minority based population of young colorectal cancer.


2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (9) ◽  
pp. 1217-1225 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. ‘t Lam-Boer ◽  
C. Al Ali ◽  
R.H.A. Verhoeven ◽  
R.M.H. Roumen ◽  
V.E.P.P. Lemmens ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Dong Peng ◽  
Yu-Xi Cheng ◽  
Yong Cheng

Purpose. The purpose of the current meta-analysis was to evaluate whether multidisciplinary team improved overall survival of colorectal cancer. Methods. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library database were searched from inception to October 25, 2020. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence (CI) of overall survival (OS) were calculated. Results. A total of 11 studies with 30814 patients were included in this meta-analysis. After pooling the HRs, the MDT group was associated with better OS compared with the non-MDT group ( HR = 0.81 , 95% CI 0.69-0.94, p = 0.005 ). In subgroup analysis of stage IV colorectal cancer, the MDT group was associated with better OS as well ( HR = 0.73 , 95% CI 0.59-0.90, p = 0.004 ). However, in terms of postoperative mortality, no significant difference was found between MDT and non-MDT groups ( OR = 0.84 , 95% CI 0.44-1.61, p = 0.60 ). Conclusion. MDT could improve OS of colorectal cancer patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document