Overexpression of IL-32 as a novel prognostic factor in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma after a nephrectomy.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 413-413
Author(s):  
Hyo Jin Lee ◽  
Hyun-Jung Lee ◽  
Zhe Long Liang ◽  
Jae-Sung Lim ◽  
Jin Man Kim

413 Background: Interleukin-32 (IL-32) is a proinflammatory cytokine, which acts as an important pathogenetic factor in various diseases and malignancies. However, the clinical significance of IL-32 expression in renal cell carcinoma has not been previously investigated. Methods: We examined 112 patients with localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) who underwent nephrectomy. The clinicopathologic data were obtained by retrospective review and the expression levels of IL-32 were studied by immunohistochemistry. Tumors were classified into four scores based on the staining intensity (0, no staining intensity; 1, weak; 2, intermediate; 3, strong). The cases with staining intensities from 0 to 2 were included in the IL-32 low expression group (LEG); whereas, those with staining intensity of 3 were considered the IL-32 high expression group (HEG). Correlations between IL-32 expression and clinicopathologic features were determined. Results: Staining intensities were determined for all cases as follows: 26 cases (23.2%) (score 0), 43 cases (38.4%) (score 1), 31 cases (27.7%) (score 2), and 12 cases (10.7%) (score 3). IL-32 HEG showed a higher recurrence rate compared to the IL-32 LEG (50% vs. 13%, P=0.001). For survival rates, the 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS) rates were lower in the IL-32 HEG compared with the IL-32 LEG (RFS, 87% vs. 50%, P = 0.001; DSS, 92% vs. 58.3%, P < 0.001; OS, 84% vs. 58.3%, P = 0.026, respectively). Univariate analyses showed that Fuhrman nuclear grade and high IL-32 expression were significant prognostic factors for predicting RFS, DSS, and OS in CCRCC; while, multivariate analyses indicated Fuhrman nuclear grade and high IL-32 expression (RFS, HR, 4.932, P = 0.009; DSS, HR 6.736, P = 0.002; OS, HR, 2.992, P = 0.037, respectively) were still independent risk factors. Conclusions: IL-32 overexpression was associated with high recurrence rates and low RFS, DSS, and OS, suggesting that it could be a novel prognostic factor for predicting outcomes in patients with CCRCC after a nephrectomy.

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 665-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiao Zhang ◽  
Xiaojia Yi ◽  
Zhe Yang ◽  
Qiaoqiao Han ◽  
Xuesong Di ◽  
...  

Aging ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 7585-7602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Stefano Netti ◽  
Giuseppe Lucarelli ◽  
Federica Spadaccino ◽  
Giuseppe Castellano ◽  
Margherita Gigante ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongzhe Shi ◽  
Chuanzhen Cao ◽  
Li Wen ◽  
Lianyu Zhang ◽  
Jin Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Several models and markers were developed and found to predict outcome of advanced renal cell carcinoma. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the ratio of maximum to minimum tumor diameter (ROD) in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC).Methods: Patients with mccRCC (n=213) treated with sunitinib from January 2008 to December 2018 were identified. Cut-off value for ROD was determined using receiver operating characteristic. Patients with different ROD scores were grouped and evaluated. Survival outcomes were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.Results: The optimal ROD cutoff value of 1.34 was determined for progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients in ROD≥1.34 group had shorter PFS (9.6 versus 17.7 months, p<0.001) and OS (25.5 versus 32.6 months, p<0.001) than patients in ROD<1.34 group. After adjustment for other factors, multivariate analysis showed ROD≥1.34 was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (p<0.001) and OS (p=0.006). Patients in ROD³1.34 group presented higher proportions of T3/4 stage (92.9% versus 7.1%, p=0.012), WHO/ISUP grade III/IV (72.0% versus 28.0%, p=0.010), tumor necrosis (71.0% versus 29.0%, p=0.039), sarcomatoid differentiation (79.1% versus 20.9%, p=0.007), poor MSKCC risk score (78.4% versus 21.6%, p<0.001) and poor IMDC risk score (74.4% versus 25.6%, p<0.001) than ROD<1.34 group.Conclusion: Primary tumor with higher ROD was an independently prognostic factor for both PFS and OS in patients with mccRCC who received targeted therapy. Higher ROD was also associated with high T stage, high WHO/ISUP grade, sarcomatoid features, tumor necrosis, poor MSKCC and IMDC risk score.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document