scholarly journals Phase II Trial of Cetuximab With or Without Paclitaxel in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Tract Carcinoma

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (28) ◽  
pp. 3545-3551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Ning Wong ◽  
Samuel Litwin ◽  
David Vaughn ◽  
Seth Cohen ◽  
Elizabeth R. Plimack ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Salvage Chemotherapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Setting ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose The benefit of salvage chemotherapy is modest in metastatic urothelial cancer. We conducted a randomized, noncomparative phase II study to measure the efficacy of cetuximab with or without paclitaxel in patients with previously treated urothelial cancer. Patients and Methods Patients with metastatic urothelial cancer who received one line of chemotherapy in the perioperative or metastatic setting were randomly assigned to 4-week cycles of cetuximab 250 mg/m2 with or without paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 per week. We used early progression as an indicator of futility. Either arm would close if seven of the initial 15 patients in that arm progressed at the first disease evaluation at 8 weeks. Results We enrolled 39 evaluable patients. The single-agent cetuximab arm closed after nine of the first 11 patients progressed by 8 weeks. The combination arm completed the full accrual of 28 patients, of whom 22 patients (78.5%) had visceral disease. Twelve of 28 patients had progression-free survival greater than 16 weeks. The overall response rate was 25% (95% CI, 11% to 45%; three complete responses and four partial responses). The median progression-free survival was 16.4 weeks (95% CI, 12 to 25.1 weeks), and the median overall survival was 42 weeks (95% CI, 30.4 to 78 weeks). Treatment-related grade 3 and 4 adverse events that occurred in at least two patients were rash (six cases), fatigue (five cases), and low magnesium (three cases). Conclusion Although it had limited activity as a single agent, cetuximab appears to augment the antitumor activity of paclitaxel in previously treated urothelial cancers. The cetuximab and paclitaxel combination merits additional study to establish its role in the treatment of urothelial cancers.

Phase II Study of Sunitinib in Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 1373-1379 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Gallagher ◽  
Matthew I. Milowsky ◽  
Scott R. Gerst ◽  
Nicole Ishill ◽  
Jamie Riches ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Previously Treated Patients ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

Purpose No standard therapy exists for metastatic urothelial cancer (UC) that has progressed after initial chemotherapy. This trial was designed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of sunitinib in patients with advanced, previously treated UC. Patients and Methods In this phase II trial, 77 patients received sunitinib between September 2006 and January 2009 on one of two schedules (50 mg per day for 4 weeks on and 2 weeks off [cohort A], 37.5 mg per day continuously [cohort B]), using a Simon 2 stage design in each cohort separately. Results A partial response was seen in three of 45 patients (95% CI, 1% to 18%) in cohort A, and in one of 32 patients (95% CI, 0% to 16%) in cohort B. Clinical regression or stable disease was achieved in 33 of 77 patients (43%). Tumor regression lasted between 0.6 and 23.4 months with 29% of patients achieving response lasting longer than 3 months. The progression-free survival (2.4 v 2.3 months; P = .4) and overall survival (7.1 v 6.0 months; P = .4) were similar in both cohorts. There was one treatment-related death, and 47 patients (33 cohort A, 24 cohort B) experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Conclusion Sunitinib did not achieve the predetermined threshold of ≥ 20% activity defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. However, antitumor responses were observed, identifying the vascular endothelial growth factor axis as a viable pathway for UC treatment. The reported clinical benefit in previously treated patients warrants further investigation in a disease for which there is no US Food and Drug Administration–approved treatment.

A phase II trial of oxaliplatin and docetaxel in patients with androgen independent prostate cancer (AIPC) who have progressed to two prior regimens of chemotherapy

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15545-15545 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Feinstein ◽  
L. J. Appleman ◽  
D. M. Friedland ◽  
S. A. Jacobs ◽  
W. A. Ferri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Psa Response ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3

15545 Background: Single agent docetaxel has demonstrated survival benefit in AIPC. In a phase I study of single agent oxaliplatin at our institution, two patients with AIPC experienced a substantial and durable reduction in PSA. Thus, we hypothesised that a combination of oxaliplatin and docetaxel maybe beneficial in AIPC. Methods: This single arm phase II trial in patients with previously treated (0–2 regimens) and progressive AIPC commenced in June 2005, with the objectives of evaluating PSA response rates, progression free survival, and the toxicity (tolerance/safety) of the regimen. In patients with soft tissue disease, measurable responses were assessed by RECIST criteria. Using Simon stage II design, a total of 37 patients with AIPC will be accrued. No prior treatment with platinum was allowed. Treatment consisted of oxaliplatin (110 mg/m2) and docetaxel (60 mg/m2), administered intravenously every 21 days for a maximum of 6 cycles. Results: 27 men have been enrolled to date: median age 66 yrs (56–84). 21 of 27 men have completed at least two cycles of the above regimen, and are evaluable. Prior therapies included antiandrogens (100%); ketaconazole (14%); docetaxel alone or in combination (27%); anthracyclines (27%); and vaccine (5%). Median PSA at baseline was 88 ng/ml (range 2.2–3559.4). 62% of patients received all six cycles. PSA declines of ≥50% were noted in 11 of 21 patients: 3 of 8 responders being chemo-naïve; and 8 of 13 with prior chemotherapy exposure. In addition, 4 of 11 patients with measurable disease at baseline, had a partial response. Treatment was well tolerated with no treatment-related deaths. The most significant grade 3/4 adverse event (AE) was neutropenia (43%). Grade 2 or less fatigue (66%), neuropathy (53%) diarrhea (47%), nausea (41%), anorexia (29%), thrombocytopenia (12%) and anemia (6%). Conclusions: The combination of oxaliplatin and docetaxel has promising activity in both chemo-naïve and previously treated AIPC. This 2-stage study will accrue a total of 37 patients. Final analysis will include time to progression, duration of response, and median survival. [Table: see text]

A phase II study of irinotecan combined with S-1 in patients with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer previously treated with platinum based chemotherapy

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 474-479
Author(s):  
Seiji Mabuchi ◽  
Eriko Yokoi ◽  
Kotaro Shimura ◽  
Naoko Komura ◽  
Yuri Matsumoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Cervical Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3

ObjectivesWe conducted a phase II study to investigate the efficacy and toxicities of irinotecan plus oral S-1 in patients with advanced or recurrent uterine cervical cancer.MethodsPatients with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer previously treated with platinum based chemotherapy were enrolled. Irinotecan (150 mg/m2) was administered intravenously over the course of 90 min on day 1, and S-1 (80 mg/m2) was given orally in two divided doses from days 1 to 14 of a 21 day cycle. The primary endpoint of this phase II study was response rate. Secondary endpoints included safety, progression free survival, and overall survival.ResultsA total of 19 patients were enrolled and treated. The response rate was 29.4%. Grade 3–4 hematologic toxicities were observed in three patients (15.7%). The only grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicity observed was grade 3 diarrhea. The median progression free survival and overall survival were 3 months and 9 months, respectively.ConclusionS-1 plus irinotecan in a 3 weekly setting is safe and active in women with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer previously treated with platinum based chemotherapy. Future corroborative clinical studies are warranted.

Phase II study of biweekly administration of CPT-11 and gemcitabine in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer in Japan.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15150-e15150
Author(s):  
Ryoji Takada ◽  
Tatsuya Ioka ◽  
Nobuko Ishida ◽  
Takuo Yamai ◽  
Nobuyasu Fukutake ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Grade 3

e15150 Background: The current standard therapies for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma in Japan are the single-agent Gemcitabine (Gem) or S-1 and Gem plus erlotinib. Irinotecan (CPT-11) is one of the promising drugs for Gem-refractory PC pts. Both Irinotecan and Gem have shown activity against these diseases with different mechanisms and are non-cross-resistant with each other. Japanese pts have the different metabolism with Irinotecan rather than pts in western countries. Methods: The aim of this phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CPT-11 and Gem in Japanese pancreatic cancer pts. Patients with MPC and PS 0-2 were enrolled in this phase II trial. CPT-11, 100mg/m (2), was administered in 90 min. and Gem, 1000mg/m (2), was administered in 30 min. soon after CPT-11 on day1. Chemotherapy was repeated biweekly. Results: From May 2002 to May 2006 40 pts, with median age of 62 (40-74) years, were enrolled in this study. The overall response rate (RR) was 15% with disease control rate of 50%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.0 months (range: 1.0-15.0 months), and median overall survival (OS) was 7.5 months (range: 3.0-24.0 months). Grade 3/4 anemia, leucopenia occurred in 26.3, 5.2% of pts. The most common non-hematologic toxities were fatigue, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting and anorexia. Grade 3 diarrhea and nausea occurred in 10.5% of pts. Conclusions: The combination chemotherapy with Gem and CPT-11 showed favorable RR as expected and the treatment was manageable in Japanese pts with MPC. We plan to evaluate this combination chemotherapy for MPC pts after progression of FOLFIRINOX in near the future. Clinical trial information: UMIN000009963.

RECIST and iRECIST criteria for the evaluation of nivolumab + ipilimumab combination in patients (pts) with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Results of the GERCOR NIPICOL phase II study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 101-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Romain Cohen ◽  
Jaafar Bennouna ◽  
Julie Henriques ◽  
Christophe Tournigand ◽  
Christelle De La Fouchardiere ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

101 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICKi) are highly effective for MSI/dMMR mCRC pts. RECIST1.1 criteria are reported to underestimate response to ICKi. The GERCOR NIPICOL phase II study aimed to evaluate disease control rate (DCR) using RECIST1.1 and iRECIST for MSI/dMMR mCRC pts treated with nivolumab (NIVO) and ipilimumab (IPI). Methods: MSI/dMMR mCRC pts previously treated with fluoropyrimidines (FP), oxaliplatin (OX) and irinotecan (IRI) ± targeted therapies received NIVO 3 mg/kg + IPI 1 mg/kg Q3W for 4 cycles then NIVO 3 mg/kg Q2W until progression or a maximum of 20 cycles. CT-scan tumor assessments were done every 6 weeks during 24 weeks and then every 12 weeks. Primary objective was DCR at 12 weeks (12wDCR) according to RECIST1.1 and iRECIST by central review. Response rates and progression-free survival (PFS) by central review were secondary objectives. A one-stage Fleming design was used with a targeted improvement of 12wDCR from 70% to 85%. Results: Of 57 pts included between Dec 2017 and Nov 2018, 43.9% had received ≥ 3 prior lines including FP (100%), OX (100%), IRI (95.5%), antiangiogenics (57.9%) and anti-EGFRs (45.6%). 17.5% of pts had BRAF mutation and 27.5% Lynch syndrome. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 49.1% of pts, mainly hepatitis (12.3%). 12wDCR was 86.0% and 87.7% using RECIST1.1 and iRECIST respectively, with only 1 pseudo-progression (1.8%) observed during the first 12 weeks, and one later. Kappa coefficient between RECIST and iRECIST 12wDCR was 0.92 (95%CI 0.77-1.0). Best observed responses with RECIST1.1/iRECIST were: 2/2 complete responses (3.5/3.5%), 19/19 partial responses (33.3/33.3%), 30/31 stable diseases (52.6/54.4%) and 3/2 disease progressions (5.3/3.5%), with 3 pts not evaluable (cancer-related deaths before first evaluation). Conclusions: Combination of NIVO and IPI in MSI/dMMR mCRC is associated with a low frequency of pseudo-progression and high DCR rate. PFS will be evaluated in Dec 2019, with all pts having completed the predefined 1-year of ICKi therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT033501260.

A phase II trial of pazopanib in relapsed/refractory small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7099-7099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leena Gandhi ◽  
Rebecca Suk Heist ◽  
Joan Vern Lucca ◽  
Jennifer S. Temel ◽  
Panos Fidias ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Competitive Inhibitor ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Therapeutic Benefit ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Median Progression Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3

7099 Background: Despite response to initial therapy, SCLC has high rates of relapse or distant metastasis and limited 2nd-line therapeutic options. Angiogenesis is an essential part of cell invasion, dissemination, and outgrowth of distant metastases and therefore is a potential therapeutic target in SCLC. Pazopanib (Votrient, GSK) is a potent, competitive inhibitor of the tyrosine kinase activity of VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, VEGFR-3, PDGF, and c-kit. We initiated a phase II single-arm trial of pazopanib in relapsed or refractory SCLC to determine impact on disease progression. Methods: Patients were eligible if they had progressive disease following up to two lines of prior therapy. Patients were treated at the FDA-approved dose of 800 mg pazopanib once daily. The primary endpoint was progression-free rate (PFR) at 8 weeks. Secondary endpoints included median progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. The trial followed a Simon 2-stage design to limit accrual if no therapeutic benefit was observed. Results: To date, 27 of 30 planned subjects have been enrolled since October 2010. Two did not complete cycle 1 and were considered inevaluable for response. Major toxicities (mostly grade 1/2) were those previously described including nausea, fatigue, hypertension, electrolyte abnormalities, and AST/ALT elevations (grade 3 in 4 subjects). Three subjects were removed from study due to toxicity: 1 with grade 3 nausea, 1 with grade 3 drop in the cardiac ejection fraction, and 1 with multiple grade 2 toxicities including diarrhea, fatigue, and nausea. A fourth was removed due to grade 1 hemoptysis despite clinical response. The PFR at 8 weeks of 21 subjects evaluable for response to date was 52%; 4 of these 11 subjects had chemo-refractory disease. There were no confirmed responses, but tumor regressions ranged from 2-20%. Median progression-free survival is 14.1 weeks. Conclusions: In patients with SCLC, single-agent pazopanib demonstrated a notable rate of stable disease (including among chemo-refractory patients) and a median PFS that exceeds that of historical PFS rates of < 2 months on ineffective 2nd-line therapies. These data suggest that the potential for pazopanib in SCLC treatment should be further investigated.

scholarly journals Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in recurrent, advanced urothelial cancer in Japanese patients: a subgroup analysis of the phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 165-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Nishiyama ◽  
Yoshiaki Yamamoto ◽  
Naoto Sassa ◽  
Kazuo Nishimura ◽  
Kiyohide Fujimoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Open Label ◽  
End Points ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background The open-label, randomized, active-controlled KEYNOTE-045 study (NCT02256436) showed that second-line pembrolizumab significantly improved overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced/metastatic urothelial cancer (UC) that progressed after first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy, compared with standard chemotherapy (paclitaxel, docetaxel, or vinflunine). Pembrolizumab is approved for patients with bladder cancer in Japan. Patients and methods Analysis was performed in the subgroup of Japanese patients enrolled in the KEYNOTE-045 study. Coprimary end points were OS and progression-free survival (PFS). Objective response rate (ORR) and safety were secondary end points. Results Fifty-two Japanese patients (pembrolizumab, n = 30; chemotherapy, n = 22) were followed up for a median of 26.1 months. Patients who received pembrolizumab compared with chemotherapy had a 19% lower risk for death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81, 95% CI 0.44–1.50); after adjusting for baseline covariates, the HR for OS was 0.61 (95% CI 0.32–1.15). The 24-month OS rate was higher with pembrolizumab (26.9% vs 14.3%). PFS was 2.0 and 4.9 months for pembrolizumab and chemotherapy, respectively (HR 1.71, 95% CI 0.95–3.08). ORR was similar for pembrolizumab and chemotherapy (20.0% vs 18.2%); durability of response was higher with pembrolizumab: 67% and 33% of patients, respectively, maintained a response for > 12 months. Treatment-related adverse events, including grade 3–5 events, occurred less frequently with pembrolizumab. Conclusions Pembrolizumab provided durable antitumor activity in patients with locally advanced/metastatic UC that progressed after platinum-containing chemotherapy in the overall population and in the Japanese subgroup; safety profile was consistent with that previously observed for pembrolizumab.

Phase II study of S-1 monotherapy in taxane, cisplatin refractory gastric cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4551-4551
Author(s):  
S. Cho ◽  
S. Lee ◽  
J. Hwang ◽  
W. Bae ◽  
H. Shim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Salvage Chemotherapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3

4551 Background: S-1 is a fourth-generation oral fluoropyrimidine that was developed to mimic protracted continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). In previous study, S-1 demonstrated promising activity which is comparable to combination chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of S-1 salvage chemotherapy, in patients with taxane and cisplatin refractory gastric cancer. The primary end point was progression free survival and secondary end points were overall survival, safety and clinical benefit. Methods: Patients were eligible if they had histologically documented gastric adenocarcinoma previously treated with taxane (docetaxel or paclitaxel) and cisplatin; age≥18; Eastern Clinical Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 or less; adequate organ function; no evidence of gastrointestinal obstruction or passage disturbance. S-1 treatment was performed according to BSA as followed; < BSA 1.25, 80 mg/day, 1.25 ≤ BSA < 1.5, 100 mg/day; BSA ≥ 1.5, 120 mg/day. Every dosage was delivered divided two times and administered for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks of resting period. Treatment continued until progression of disease or life-threatening adverse events were occurred. Results: Fifty-four patients were enrolled in this study and of the patients, forty-eight patients were evaluable. A total 194 chemotherapy cycles were administered and median number of cycles was three. Four (8.3%) patients had a partial response and 18 (37.5%) patients had stable disease. The median progression free survival and overall survival were 3.8 and 10.2 months, respectively. Grade III/IV hematologic toxicities included neutropenia in 6 patients (12.5%) and there was no febrile neutropenia. Most of nonhematologic toxicities were diarrhea, asthenia, and mucositis, and there was no grade 3 or grade 4 except two patients, who developed grade 3 anorexia and diarrhea, respectively. The clinical benefit response was observed in 16 patients (33.3%). Conclusions: This results showed that S-1 monotherapy was active and safe salvage chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer previously treated with taxane and cisplatin. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Progression-free survival as an endpoint for clinical trials in first-line metastatic urothelial cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 251-251
Author(s):  
Matt D. Galsky ◽  
Susanne Krege ◽  
Chia-Chin Lin ◽  
Noah M. Hahn ◽  
Thorsten Ecke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Cancer ◽  
First Line Treatment

251 Background: Advances in the first-line treatment of metastatic urothelial cancer (UC) have proven elusive. The lack of appropriate intermediate endpoints to screen the activity of novel regimens may be a barrier to progress, particularly in this disease state characterized by relatively high response rates but short response durations. Progression-free-survival (PFS) at fixed time points may overcome several of the limitations of response rate-based endpoints, but would be further supported by establishing benchmarks and demonstrating a correlation between PFS and overall survival (OS). Methods: Data were pooled from eight phase II and III trials evaluating first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy in metastatic UC. Landmark analyses for progression at 3, 6, and 9 months after treatment initiation were performed to minimize lead-time bias. A proportional hazards model was used to assess the utility of PFS for predicting OS. Results: 545 patients were included in the analysis. The median PFS was 7.75 months (95% CI, 7.06, 8.18) and the median OS was 12.35 months (95% CI, 10.97, 13.44). The results of the landmark analysis, adjusted for performance status ≥ 1 and presence of visceral metastases, is shown in the Table. By using the Fleischer model, the estimated correlation between PFS and OS was 0.86 (bootstrap standard error 0.001, 95% CI 0.83, 0.89). Conclusions: PFS at 3, 6, and 9 months predicted OS in this analysis of patients with metastatic UC treated with first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy. This analysis provides benchmarks, and support, for the use of PFS as an endpoint for phase II trials screening the activity of novel regimens as first-line treatment for metastatic UC. [Table: see text]

Phase II trial of pazopanib and weekly paclitaxel in metastatic urothelial cancer (UC).

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 299-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandy Srinivas ◽  
Sujata Narayanan ◽  
Lauren Christine Harshman ◽  
Anthony P. Lam ◽  
Ulka N. Vaishampayan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Weekly Paclitaxel ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Grade 3

299 Background: Currently, there are no standard treatments for relapsed or refractory urothelial carcinoma (UC). Discouraging results have been achieved in trials evaluating drugs as single agents or in combination regimens. Paclitaxel has activity when used alone and in combination in urothelial cancer, and pazopanib is active in solid tumors secondary to its potent anti-angiogenic effect. We report the results of an ongoing multicenter phase II study evaluating the combination of paclitaxel with pazopanib in refractory UC. Methods: Patients (pts) eligible for the study have histologically confirmed UC, with relapse after receiving up to 2 chemotherapeutic regimens. Pazopanib (800 mg) is administered daily, with weekly paclitaxel (80mg/m2) for 3 weeks in a 28 day cycle. Treatment is continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint of the study is the response-rate (RR) based on RECIST criteria. Secondary endpoints include safety, and progression free-survival (PFS). For designing the study, Simon’s two-stage method was applied, and 9 pts were recruited in the first stage. After having ≥1 response in the first group, a full enrollment of 32 pts has been initiated. Results: 25 pts were enrolled from April 2010 to September 2013. Their median age was 67 years (47-89), with a median ECOG performance status of 1 (0-2). 10 pts (40%) had UC of the upper urinary tract and 15 had primary bladder/ureter tumors. All pts had multiple metastatic sites, including 11 (44%) with liver metastases. Median number of prior cytotoxic regimens was 2, and 50% were considered cisplatin responsive. Based on RECIST (v1.1) criteria,13 pts (52%) had partial response (PR), 5 (20%) had stable disease (SD), and 2 (8%) had complete response (CR) (80% clinical benefit). The side effects included grade 3 hypertension (n=2), grade 3 fatigue (n=4), grade 3 thrombosis (n=2) and grade 4 neutropenia (n=2). 14 pts required growth factor support. Conclusions: Our phase II study combining paclitaxel and pazopanib demonstratedsignificant anti-tumor activity of combining paclitaxel in relapsed/refractory UC. This combination is safe, and is worthy of evaluation in larger studies. Clinical trial information: 1108055.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document