Phase II Study of Sunitinib in Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 1373-1379 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Gallagher ◽  
Matthew I. Milowsky ◽  
Scott R. Gerst ◽  
Nicole Ishill ◽  
Jamie Riches ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Previously Treated Patients ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

Purpose No standard therapy exists for metastatic urothelial cancer (UC) that has progressed after initial chemotherapy. This trial was designed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of sunitinib in patients with advanced, previously treated UC. Patients and Methods In this phase II trial, 77 patients received sunitinib between September 2006 and January 2009 on one of two schedules (50 mg per day for 4 weeks on and 2 weeks off [cohort A], 37.5 mg per day continuously [cohort B]), using a Simon 2 stage design in each cohort separately. Results A partial response was seen in three of 45 patients (95% CI, 1% to 18%) in cohort A, and in one of 32 patients (95% CI, 0% to 16%) in cohort B. Clinical regression or stable disease was achieved in 33 of 77 patients (43%). Tumor regression lasted between 0.6 and 23.4 months with 29% of patients achieving response lasting longer than 3 months. The progression-free survival (2.4 v 2.3 months; P = .4) and overall survival (7.1 v 6.0 months; P = .4) were similar in both cohorts. There was one treatment-related death, and 47 patients (33 cohort A, 24 cohort B) experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Conclusion Sunitinib did not achieve the predetermined threshold of ≥ 20% activity defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. However, antitumor responses were observed, identifying the vascular endothelial growth factor axis as a viable pathway for UC treatment. The reported clinical benefit in previously treated patients warrants further investigation in a disease for which there is no US Food and Drug Administration–approved treatment.

scholarly journals Phase II Trial of Cetuximab With or Without Paclitaxel in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Tract Carcinoma

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (28) ◽  
pp. 3545-3551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Ning Wong ◽  
Samuel Litwin ◽  
David Vaughn ◽  
Seth Cohen ◽  
Elizabeth R. Plimack ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Salvage Chemotherapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Setting ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose The benefit of salvage chemotherapy is modest in metastatic urothelial cancer. We conducted a randomized, noncomparative phase II study to measure the efficacy of cetuximab with or without paclitaxel in patients with previously treated urothelial cancer. Patients and Methods Patients with metastatic urothelial cancer who received one line of chemotherapy in the perioperative or metastatic setting were randomly assigned to 4-week cycles of cetuximab 250 mg/m2 with or without paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 per week. We used early progression as an indicator of futility. Either arm would close if seven of the initial 15 patients in that arm progressed at the first disease evaluation at 8 weeks. Results We enrolled 39 evaluable patients. The single-agent cetuximab arm closed after nine of the first 11 patients progressed by 8 weeks. The combination arm completed the full accrual of 28 patients, of whom 22 patients (78.5%) had visceral disease. Twelve of 28 patients had progression-free survival greater than 16 weeks. The overall response rate was 25% (95% CI, 11% to 45%; three complete responses and four partial responses). The median progression-free survival was 16.4 weeks (95% CI, 12 to 25.1 weeks), and the median overall survival was 42 weeks (95% CI, 30.4 to 78 weeks). Treatment-related grade 3 and 4 adverse events that occurred in at least two patients were rash (six cases), fatigue (five cases), and low magnesium (three cases). Conclusion Although it had limited activity as a single agent, cetuximab appears to augment the antitumor activity of paclitaxel in previously treated urothelial cancers. The cetuximab and paclitaxel combination merits additional study to establish its role in the treatment of urothelial cancers.

Phase II study of the FGFR inhibitor AZD4547 in previously treated patients with FGF pathway-activated stage IV squamous cell lung cancer (SqNSCLC): LUNG-MAP sub-study SWOG S1400D.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9055-9055 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charu Aggarwal ◽  
Mary Weber Redman ◽  
Primo Lara ◽  
Hossein Borghaei ◽  
Philip C. Hoffman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Grade 5 ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Previously Treated Patients ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3

9055 Background: LungMAP is a National Clinical Trials Network umbrella trial for previously-treated SqNSCLC. S1400D is a phase II biomarker-driven therapeutic sub-study evaluating the FGFR inhibitor AZD4547 in patients (pts) with FGFR positive chemo-refractory SqNSCLC. Methods: Eligible pts had tumor FGFR alteration and/or mutation by next generation sequencing (Foundation Medicine), measurable disease, Zubrod PS 0-2, progression after 1 line of systemic therapy, and adequate end organ function. Receipt of prior immunotherapy was allowed. Eligible pts received AZD4547 80 mg bid orally. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by RECIST; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and duration of response (DoR). Originally designed as a randomized trial of AZD4547 versus docetaxel, it was redesigned to be a single arm AZD4547 trial with the emergence of immunotherapy as standard 2ndline therapy. Forty pts were required to rule out an ORR of < = 15% if the true ORR was > 35% (90% power, alpha 0.05). Results: 93 pts (13% of pts screened on S1400) were assigned to S1400D; 43 were enrolled with 28 receiving AZD4547. Pt characteristics: median age 66.3 y (49-88), female (n = 8, 29%), & Caucasian (n = 25; 89%). Biomarker profile: FGFR1 amplification (n = 38; 86%); FGFR3 S249C (n = 4; 9%); FGFR3 amplification (n = 3; 7%); and FGFR3 fusion (n = 2; 5%). Nine pts (26%) had more than one biomarker alteration. The study was closed at interim analysis for futility in October 2016. Treatment related Grade 3 AEs were seen in 5 pts (dyspnea, fatigue, hyponatremia, lung infection & retinopathy); 1 pt had Grade 4 sepsis. There were no Grade 5 AEs. Median follow up among alive pts was 4.3 months (mos). Of 25 response evaluable pts, one with FGFR3 S249C had unconfirmed PR (4%, 95% CI 1-20%) with DoR of 1.5 mos. Median PFS was 2.7 mos (95% CI 1.4 - 4.3 mos). Conclusions: This is the first Phase II trial to evaluate AZD4547 as a targeted approach in pts with previously treated FGFR-altered SqNSCLC. AZD4547 had an acceptable safety profile but minimal activity in this biomarker-enriched cohort. Evaluation of other targeted agents in LUNG-MAP is currently ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02965378.

Phase II study of NGR-hTNF, a selective vascular targeting agent (VTA), in previously treated patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7582-7582
Author(s):  
V. Gregorc ◽  
G. L. Ceresoli ◽  
P. A. Zucali ◽  
F. G. De Braud ◽  
E. Bajetta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Weekly Schedule ◽  
Previously Treated Patients ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
High Doses ◽  
Grade 3

7582 Background: NGR-hTNF is a VTA exploiting a tumor-homing peptide (NGR) that selectively binds to an aminopeptidase N (CD13) overexpressed on tumor blood vessels. In preclinical models, NGR-hTNF has shown potent anti-vascular and antitumor activity, both at low and at high doses. Methods: Patients with advanced MPM were treated with a low-dose of NGR-hTNF given intravenously at 0.8 μg/m2 as 1-hour infusion every 3 weeks (q3w). This phase II trial had a 2-stage design with 16 and a total of 27 patients to be enrolled after first and second stage, respectively. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) with restaging performed q6w according to MPM-modified RECIST criteria. Results: From May 2007 to January 2008, forty-three patients with radiologically-documented progressive disease after a pemetrexed-based regimen were evaluated over 167 cycles (range, 1 to 17). Patient characteristics were: median age 64 years (range, 54 to 80); male/female 27/16; epithelial/non-epithelial histology 34/9; PS 0/1/2 24/10/9; EORTC score good/poor 34/9. Main grade 1–2 toxicity was chills (71%), transiently occurring after the first infusions. Only one grade 3 treatment-related toxicity was observed. One patient (2%) had a partial response lasting 7.1+ months and 17 patients (40%) maintained stable disease for a median duration of 4.4 months (range, 1.3 to 12.4+ months). The median and 3-month PFS were 2.8 months and 43%, respectively, whereas the median and 1-year overall survival were 11.6 months and 48%, respectively. In an additional 14 patients treated at same dose with a weekly schedule, there was any suggestion of toxicity exacerbation. In this cohort, the PFS rate at 6 months was 36%, with 7 patients (50%) experiencing stable disease for a median duration of 6.9 months (range, 2.4 to 9.3+ months). Conclusions: NGR-hTNF 0.8 μg/m2 weekly is well tolerated, showing prolonged disease control in previously treated MPM patients, and will be further developed in this setting. [Table: see text]

Phase II Trial of Cisplatin, Gemcitabine, and Bevacizumab As First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: Hoosier Oncology Group GU 04-75

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (12) ◽  
pp. 1525-1530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noah M. Hahn ◽  
Walter M. Stadler ◽  
Robin T. Zon ◽  
David Waterhouse ◽  
Joel Picus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
First Line ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Grade 3

PurposeNovel approaches are needed for patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (UC). This trial assessed the efficacy and toxicity of bevacizumab in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine (CGB) as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic UC.Patients and MethodsChemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic or unresectable UC received cisplatin 70 mg/m2on day 1, gemcitabine 1,000 to 1,250 mg/m2on days 1 and 8, and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg on day 1, every 21 days.ResultsForty-three patients with performance status of 0 (n = 26) or 1 (n = 17) and median age of 66 years were evaluable for toxicity and response. Grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity included neutropenia (35%), thrombocytopenia (12%), anemia (12%), and neutropenic fever (2%). Grade 3 to 5 nonhematologic toxicity included deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (21%), hemorrhage (7%), cardiac (7%), hypertension (5%), and proteinuria (2%). Three treatment-related deaths (CNS hemorrhage, sudden cardiac death, and aortic dissection) were observed. Best response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors was complete response in eight patients (19%) and partial response in 23 patients (53%), for an overall response rate of 72%. Stable disease lasting ≥ 12 weeks occurred in four patients (9%), and progressive disease occurred in six patients (14%). With a median follow-up of 27.2 months (range, 3.5 to 40.9 months), median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.2 months (95% CI, 6.8 to 10.3 months) with a median overall survival (OS) time of 19.1 months (95% CI, 12.4 to 22.7 months). The study-defined goal of 50% improvement in PFS was not met.ConclusionCGB demonstrates promising OS and antiangiogenic treatment-related toxicities in the phase II setting of metastatic UC. The full risk/benefit profile of CGB in patients with metastatic UC will be determined by an ongoing phase III intergroup trial.

Phase II trial of pazopanib and weekly paclitaxel in metastatic urothelial cancer (UC).

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 299-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandy Srinivas ◽  
Sujata Narayanan ◽  
Lauren Christine Harshman ◽  
Anthony P. Lam ◽  
Ulka N. Vaishampayan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Weekly Paclitaxel ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Grade 3

299 Background: Currently, there are no standard treatments for relapsed or refractory urothelial carcinoma (UC). Discouraging results have been achieved in trials evaluating drugs as single agents or in combination regimens. Paclitaxel has activity when used alone and in combination in urothelial cancer, and pazopanib is active in solid tumors secondary to its potent anti-angiogenic effect. We report the results of an ongoing multicenter phase II study evaluating the combination of paclitaxel with pazopanib in refractory UC. Methods: Patients (pts) eligible for the study have histologically confirmed UC, with relapse after receiving up to 2 chemotherapeutic regimens. Pazopanib (800 mg) is administered daily, with weekly paclitaxel (80mg/m2) for 3 weeks in a 28 day cycle. Treatment is continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint of the study is the response-rate (RR) based on RECIST criteria. Secondary endpoints include safety, and progression free-survival (PFS). For designing the study, Simon’s two-stage method was applied, and 9 pts were recruited in the first stage. After having ≥1 response in the first group, a full enrollment of 32 pts has been initiated. Results: 25 pts were enrolled from April 2010 to September 2013. Their median age was 67 years (47-89), with a median ECOG performance status of 1 (0-2). 10 pts (40%) had UC of the upper urinary tract and 15 had primary bladder/ureter tumors. All pts had multiple metastatic sites, including 11 (44%) with liver metastases. Median number of prior cytotoxic regimens was 2, and 50% were considered cisplatin responsive. Based on RECIST (v1.1) criteria,13 pts (52%) had partial response (PR), 5 (20%) had stable disease (SD), and 2 (8%) had complete response (CR) (80% clinical benefit). The side effects included grade 3 hypertension (n=2), grade 3 fatigue (n=4), grade 3 thrombosis (n=2) and grade 4 neutropenia (n=2). 14 pts required growth factor support. Conclusions: Our phase II study combining paclitaxel and pazopanib demonstratedsignificant anti-tumor activity of combining paclitaxel in relapsed/refractory UC. This combination is safe, and is worthy of evaluation in larger studies. Clinical trial information: 1108055.

Endometriumkarzinom: Kombination aus Lenvatinib und Pembrolizumab zeigt Wirksamkeit unabhängig vom Mikrosatellitenstatus

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Sarah Matz
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Carcinoma ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Efficacy Analysis ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Previously Treated Patients ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Prior Systemic Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

<b>Purpose:</b> Patients with advanced endometrial carcinoma have limited treatment options. We report final primary efficacy analysis results for a patient cohort with advanced endometrial carcinoma receiving lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in an ongoing phase Ib/II study of selected solid tumors. <b>Methods:</b> Patients took lenvatinib 20 mg once daily orally plus pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks, in 3-week cycles. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) at 24 weeks (ORRWk24); secondary efficacy end points included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Tumor assessments were evaluated by investigators per immune-related RECIST. <b>Results:</b> At data cutoff, 108 patients with previously treated endometrial carcinoma were enrolled, with a median follow-up of 18.7 months. The ORRWk24 was 38.0% (95% CI, 28.8% to 47.8%). Among subgroups, the ORRWk24 (95% CI) was 63.6% (30.8% to 89.1%) in patients with microsatellite instability (MSI)-high tumors (n = 11) and 36.2% (26.5% to 46.7%) in patients with microsatellite-stable tumors (n = 94). For previously treated patients, regardless of tumor MSI status, the median DOR was 21.2 months (95% CI, 7.6 months to not estimable), median PFS was 7.4 months (95% CI, 5.3 to 8.7 months), and median OS was 16.7 months (15.0 months to not estimable). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 83/124 (66.9%) patients. <b>Conclusion:</b> Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab showed promising antitumor activity in patients with advanced endometrial carcinoma who have experienced disease progression after prior systemic therapy, regardless of tumor MSI status. The combination therapy had a manageable toxicity profile. <b>Trial registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02501096.

A phase II study of irinotecan combined with S-1 in patients with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer previously treated with platinum based chemotherapy

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 474-479
Author(s):  
Seiji Mabuchi ◽  
Eriko Yokoi ◽  
Kotaro Shimura ◽  
Naoko Komura ◽  
Yuri Matsumoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Cervical Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3

ObjectivesWe conducted a phase II study to investigate the efficacy and toxicities of irinotecan plus oral S-1 in patients with advanced or recurrent uterine cervical cancer.MethodsPatients with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer previously treated with platinum based chemotherapy were enrolled. Irinotecan (150 mg/m2) was administered intravenously over the course of 90 min on day 1, and S-1 (80 mg/m2) was given orally in two divided doses from days 1 to 14 of a 21 day cycle. The primary endpoint of this phase II study was response rate. Secondary endpoints included safety, progression free survival, and overall survival.ResultsA total of 19 patients were enrolled and treated. The response rate was 29.4%. Grade 3–4 hematologic toxicities were observed in three patients (15.7%). The only grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicity observed was grade 3 diarrhea. The median progression free survival and overall survival were 3 months and 9 months, respectively.ConclusionS-1 plus irinotecan in a 3 weekly setting is safe and active in women with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer previously treated with platinum based chemotherapy. Future corroborative clinical studies are warranted.

Phase II trial of carboplatin, weekly paclitaxel, and biweekly bevacizumab in patients with unresectable stage IV melanoma

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8560-8560 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. G. Perez ◽  
V. Suman ◽  
T. Amatruda ◽  
M. Gornet ◽  
R. Morton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Uncontrolled Hypertension ◽  
Unresectable Stage ◽  
Full Study ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Stage Iv Melanoma

8560 Background: In patients with metastatic melanoma, the combination of chemotherapy with an agent that specifically targets vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) might be able to control tumor growth and progression much more effectively than chemotherapy alone. Methods: A two-stage phase II clinical trial was conducted in patients with unresectable stage IV melanoma to assess the anti-tumor activity and toxicity profile of the combination of paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle), carboplatin (AUC = 6 IV on day 1) and bevacizumab (10 mg/kg IV on days 1 and 15). The primary end point of the study was the 8-week progression-free survival rate (PFS). Enrollment to the second stage of the study was opened if 8 or more of the first 20 patients enrolled remained progression-free at 8 weeks. Eligible patients had measurable disease by RECIST criteria, a performance status (PS) of 0–2 and acceptable pre-registration organ function. Exclusion criteria included: brain metastases, significant recent bleeding, uncontrolled hypertension and ongoing anticoagulation. The study opened in February 2006 and completed full study accrual in August 2006. Data from the 20 patients enrolled in the first stage are presented here. Results: Patients (60% male) had a median age of 63 and had a good performance status (85% had PS of 0). M1c disease was present in 45% of patients and 35% had undergone previous chemotherapy for stage IV melanoma (50% prior immunotherapy). Only 6 patients did not complete more than 2 cycles of chemotherapy due to refusal (3), desire for alternative treatment (1) or progression (2). Median follow-up among the 15 patients still alive was 5.5 months (range: 6 weeks - 9 months). The 8-week PFS rate was 70% (14/20). The median time to progression was 163 days. One partial response was observed. There were 3 disease-related deaths at 65, 120 and 190 days post-registration. The most common toxicities were neutropenia (95%; 45% = grade 3), anemia (95%; 15% = grade 3), fatigue (90%; 5% = grade 3), leukopenia (85%; 25% = grade 3), and thrombocytopenia (75%; 5% = grade 3). Conclusions: The combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin and bevacizumab appears to be well tolerated and clinically active in patients with stage IV melanoma. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II trial of gemcitabine and irinotecan in previously treated patients with small-cell lung cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7718-7718
Author(s):  
M. Nishio ◽  
F. Ohyanagi ◽  
A. Horikike ◽  
Y. Okano ◽  
Y. Satoh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Time ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Refractory Disease ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Previously Treated Patients ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3

7718 Background: Gemcitabine and irinotecan has been shown to have an antitumor activity as a single agent against previously treated SCLC. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine combined with irinotecan in patients with refractory or relapsed SCLC. Methods: Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed SCLC, 20 to 74 years in age, performance status 0–2, with a history of receiving one platinum-based chemotherapy were eligible for the study. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2) and irinotecan (150 mg/m2) on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle.The primary endpoint was the response rate (RR), and planned sample size for this phase II study was 30 patients (Simon's two-stage minimax design). Results: Thirty-one patients were enrolled and 30 patients (24 males/6 females, 10 refractory/20 sensitive, median age, 65 years) receive protocol treatment in this phase II trial. The median treatment cycles were 3 (1–10). The overall response rates was obtained in 39.3% (95% CI: 18.1% to 60.5%) of the patients, including two patients with refractory disease and 9 patients with sensitive disease. The median overall survival time was 14.4 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 51%. The median survival time of the patients with refractory disease was 7.4 months, compared with 14.4 months for patients with sensitive disease. The chief grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (42%), thrombocytopenia (3%), diarrhea (9%), and liver dysfunction (3%). The only grade 4 toxicities were one case of grade 4 neutropenia (3.3%) and one case of grade 4 thrombocytopenia (3.3%). Conclusion: Gemcitabine plus irinotecan is an active regimen that seems to be well- tolerated by patients with previously treated SCLC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Randomized phase II study of S-1/CDDP plus TSU-68 versus S-1/CDDP in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 72-72
Author(s):  
Kensei Yamaguchi ◽  
Wasaburo Koizumi ◽  
Hisashi Hosaka ◽  
Yasutaka Takinishi ◽  
Norisuke Nakayama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Parallel Group ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

72^ Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is the second leading cause of cancer death in Japan as well as globally. Effective treatment of GC remains a therapeutic challenge. Although in the AVAGAST trial, bevacizumab was found to offer no survival benefit. Angiogenesis continues to be the standard treatment for GC, and thus, clinical trials on many anti-angiogenic drugs have been conducted. TSU-68 (orantinib) is an oral, angiokinase inhibitor targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, platelet-derived growth factor receptor β, and fibroblast growth factor receptor 1. The present study evaluated the progression-free survival (PFS) and pharmacokinetics (PK) of TSU-68 in combination with Japanese standard S-1 and cisplatin (S-1/CDDP) in patients with advanced GC. Methods: In this open-label, multicenter, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, phase II trial, patients were randomized to Arm A (S-1/CDDP) or Arm B (TSU-68 plus S-1/CDDP). All patients received oral S-1 (40-60 mg/m2) twice daily for 21 days followed by a 14 day rest plus intravenous CDDP (60 mg/m2) on Day 8, repeated every 35 days. In Arm B pts received oral TSU-68 (400 mg/dose) alone, twice daily by addition 35 days. The primary endpoint was PFS. Results: In total, 93 patients were enrolled. For Arm A [male:female ratio], n=47 [35:11]; Arm B, n=45 [30:15]; the respective median age was 63.5 and 62.0 years. The median PFS was 7.0 and 6.8 months in Arms A and B, respectively (HR, 1.23; 95%CI, 0.74 to 2.05; P=0.425); the respective response rates were 56.5% and 62.2%. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (Arms A and B, 34.8% and 31.1%) and hemoglobin (Arms A and B, 26.1% and 48.9%). There were no differences in other toxicities between the 2 arms, both treatments were tolerated, and no treatment-related deaths were observed. In the PK study, although Arm B had a significantly lower plasma exposure to FT, CDHP, and Oxo compared to Arm A, the exposure to 5-FU was not different between the 2 arms. The exposure to CDDP in Arm B was significantly but slightly lower than that in arm A. Conclusions: Thus,TSU-68 plus S-1/CDDP therapy did not prolong PFS of patients with advanced GC as compared with S-1/CDDP. Clinical trial information: JapicCTI-101327.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document