scholarly journals Targeted Androgen Pathway Suppression in Localized Prostate Cancer: A Pilot Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 229-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elahe A. Mostaghel ◽  
Peter S. Nelson ◽  
Paul Lange ◽  
Daniel W. Lin ◽  
Mary Ellen Taplin ◽  
...  

Purpose Ligand-mediated activation of the androgen receptor (AR) is critical for prostate cancer (PCa) survival and proliferation. The failure to completely ablate tissue androgens may limit suppression of PCa growth. We evaluated combinations of CYP17A and 5-α-reductase inhibitors for reducing prostate androgen levels, AR signaling, and PCa volumes. Patients and Methods Thirty-five men with intermediate/high-risk clinically localized PCa were randomly assigned to goserelin combined with dutasteride (ZD), bicalutamide and dutasteride (ZBD), or bicalutamide, dutasteride, and ketoconazole (ZBDK) for 3 months before prostatectomy. Controls included patients receiving combined androgen blockade with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist and bicalutamide. The primary outcome measure was tissue dihydrotestosterone (DHT) concentration. Results Prostate DHT levels were substantially lower in all experimental arms (0.02 to 0.04 ng/g v 0.92 ng/g in controls; P < .001). The ZBDK group demonstrated the greatest percentage decline in serum testosterone, androsterone, and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (P < .05 for all). Staining for AR and the androgen-regulated genes prostate-specific antigen and TMPRSS2 was strongly suppressed in benign glands and moderately in malignant glands (P < .05 for all). Two patients had pathologic complete response, and nine had ≤ 0.2 cm3 of residual tumor (defined as a near-complete response), with the largest numbers of complete and near-complete responses in the ZBDK group. Conclusion Addition of androgen synthesis inhibitors lowers prostate androgens below that achieved with standard therapy, but significant AR signaling remains. Tissue-based analysis of steroids and AR signaling is critical to informing the search for optimal local and systemic control of high-risk prostate cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 238-238
Author(s):  
Rana R. McKay ◽  
Jacob E Berchuck ◽  
Lucia Kwak ◽  
Wanling Xie ◽  
Rebecca Silver ◽  
...  

238 Background: Patients with high-risk prostate cancer have an increased risk of recurrence and death from prostate cancer. Intense NHT prior to RP has been associated with favorable pathologic responses in a subset of patients with high-risk disease. We conducted a pooled analysis of post-RP outcomes of four, multicenter, randomized, clinical trials of intense NHT prior to RP. Methods: All patients included were enrolled on trials evaluating intense NHT followed by RP. The primary endpoint was time to biochemical recurrence (BCR), defined as the time from RP to prostate specific antigen (PSA) >0.1 ng/mL or start of first post-RP therapy. Secondary endpoints included metastasis-free survival (MFS), overall survival (OS), and time to testosterone recovery. We evaluated outcomes in the overall population, favorable responders (defined as a pathologic complete response or minimum residual disease ≤ 5 mm at RP), and non-responders. We correlated pathologic parameters, including RP pathologic response, PTEN status, ERG status, and presence of intraductal carcinoma with BCR. Results: 121 patients were included of whom 78.5% (n=95) had high-risk disease by NCCN risk categories. Following NHT, 20.7% (n=25) had 0-5 mm of residual tumor (including 9.1%, n=11, with pathologic complete response). Overall, 52 patients (43.0%) experienced BCR, of whom two were exceptional responders (Table). Testosterone recovery was observed in 94.0% of patients (n=109/116). PTEN loss and presence of intraductal carcinoma were associated with shorter time to BCR. Conclusions: In this pooled analysis of clinical trials, we demonstrate that patients who achieve a favorable pathologic response to NHT prior to RP experienced a decreased PSA relapse rate and prolonged time to BCR. Larger residual tumor volumes and tissue-based parameters, including PTEN loss and intraductal carcinoma, were associated with BCR. Additional follow-up is warranted to evaluate the impact on long-term outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT00298155; NCT00924469; NCT01547299; NCT02268175 . [Table: see text]


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS5100-TPS5100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary-Ellen Taplin ◽  
Martin Gleave ◽  
Christopher P. Evans ◽  
Eleni Efstathiou ◽  
Philip W. Kantoff ◽  
...  

TPS5100 Background: Patients (pts) with localized high-risk PC experience disease progression rates of approximately 50% after RP (Kane et al. J Urol. 2007). With the approval of next-generation androgen receptor inhibitors, neoadjuvant studies have shown that 6 months of androgen blockade may improve local disease control at the time of RP (McKay et al. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017; Taplin et al. JCO. 2014). The purpose of this study is to determine if treatment with APA plus ADT before and after RP in pts with localized high-risk or locally advanced PC results in an improvement in pathologic complete response (pCR) rate and metastasis-free survival (MFS) compared with PBO plus ADT. Methods: This international multicenter trial is enrolling pts with localized high-risk or locally advanced PC who are candidates for RP. Eligibility criteria: Any Gleason score (GS) ≥ 4 + 3 with ≥ 6 positive systematic biopsies (SB); any GS ≥ 4 + 3 with ≥ 3 SB and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥ 20 ng/mL; GS ≥ 9 in ≥ 1 SB or targeted biopsies (TB); or ≥ 2 SB or TB with continuous GS ≥ 8, each with ≥ 80% involvement. Stratification: GS (7 or ≥ 8), cN0 or N1, and region (North America, Europe, or rest of world). Randomization: 1:1 to APA (240 mg) plus ADT (LHRHa) or PBO plus ADT. Pts will receive 6 treatment cycles, followed by RP, followed by an additional 6 cycles. Dual primary end points: pCR rate (to be assessed by blinded independent central pathology review) and MFS (to be assessed by blinded independent central radiology review [BICR]). Secondary end points: PSA-free survival and progression-free survival. Imaging with CT or MRI and bone scan will be conducted at baseline and then every 6 months following biochemical failure until documented distant metastasis by BICR, or death. Approximately 1500 pts will be enrolled globally over 3.0 years in 240 sites in 19 countries. An independent data monitoring committee is commissioned to review trial data. Clinical trial information: NCT03767244.


2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (28) ◽  
pp. 4563-4571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerhardt Attard ◽  
Alison H.M. Reid ◽  
Timothy A. Yap ◽  
Florence Raynaud ◽  
Mitch Dowsett ◽  
...  

Purpose Studies indicate that castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) remains driven by ligand-dependent androgen receptor (AR) signaling. To evaluate this, a trial of abiraterone acetate—a potent, selective, small-molecule inhibitor of cytochrome P (CYP) 17, a key enzyme in androgen synthesis—was pursued. Patients and Methods Chemotherapy-naïve men (n = 21) who had prostate cancer that was resistant to multiple hormonal therapies were treated in this phase I study of once-daily, continuous abiraterone acetate, which escalated through five doses (250 to 2,000 mg) in three-patient cohorts. Results Abiraterone acetate was well tolerated. The anticipated toxicities attributable to a syndrome of secondary mineralocorticoid excess—namely hypertension, hypokalemia, and lower-limb edema—were successfully managed with a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. Antitumor activity was observed at all doses; however, because of a plateau in pharmacodynamic effect, 1,000 mg was selected for cohort expansion (n = 9). Abiraterone acetate administration was associated with increased levels of adrenocorticotropic hormone and steroids upstream of CYP17 and with suppression of serum testosterone, downstream androgenic steroids, and estradiol in all patients. Declines in prostate-specific antigen ≥ 30%, 50%, and 90% were observed in 14 (66%), 12 (57%), and 6 (29%) patients, respectively, and lasted between 69 to ≥ 578 days. Radiologic regression, normalization of lactate dehydrogenase, and improved symptoms with a reduction in analgesic use were documented. Conclusion CYP17 blockade by abiraterone acetate is safe and has significant antitumor activity in CRPC. These data confirm that CRPC commonly remains dependent on ligand-activated AR signaling.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 143-143
Author(s):  
A. J. Zurita ◽  
J. F. Ward ◽  
J. C. Araujo ◽  
C. A. Pettaway ◽  
P. Dieringer ◽  
...  

143 Background: Presurgical ADT does not improve long-term outcomes in patients (pts) with high-risk localized PCa. Since the VEGF and PDGF signaling pathways have been implicated in PCa progression, and ADT results in endothelial cell apoptosis in the prostate by a VEGF-mediated mechanism, we hypothesized that combined treatment with sunitinib malate (SU), an oral inhibitor of the tyrosine kinases of VEGFR and PDGFR, might improve the efficacy of ADT in this pt population. Methods: Pts with no radiological evidence of metastases and either PCa ≥ clinical (c)T3 disease or Gleason grade 8-10 or serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥ 20 ng/mL or cT2b-c and Gleason 7 and PSA ≥10 ng/mL (AJCC, 1992), received i.m. leuprolide and oral SU for three 30-day cycles followed by surgery. SU was administered continuously at 37.5 mg daily (25 mg daily in the initial 6 pts). The primary endpoint of this phase II trial was rate of pathologic complete response (pCR). Secondary endpoints included safety and time to progression (TTP). Unresectable pelvic nodal disease, confirmed post-operative PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL, or administration of post-operative radiation or ADT, defined treatment failure. Results: Forty-four pts completed accrual, with a median age of 58 years (range 47-72); 34 Caucasian, 5 African-American, 4 Hispanic, and 1 Indian. High-risk criteria included cT3 (24/44), Gleason 8-10 (30/44), PSA ≥ 20 ng/mL (16/44). Two men were ineligible/declined therapy and one postponed surgery. No grade 4 toxicities or related discontinuations were observed. Thirty-five pts completed 3 months on 37.5 mg daily SU plus ADT and surgery with no unexpected complications. Of these, 2 pts experienced a pCR. Twenty (57%) pts have failed treatment or died, with a median TTP 27 months (95% CI: 12 – not estimable). The median follow-up of the remaining event-free pts is 35 months (range 23-41). Conclusions: The 3-months preoperative combination of SU and ADT is safe and well tolerated in pts with high-risk primary PCa. We observed 2 complete remissions in 35 patients. Ongoing characterization of molecular changes in the epithelial and stromal compartments will help understand the mechanisms of SU activity in PCa. [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS383-TPS383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary-Ellen Taplin ◽  
Martin Gleave ◽  
Christopher P. Evans ◽  
Eleni Efstathiou ◽  
Philip W. Kantoff ◽  
...  

TPS383 Background: Patients (pts) with localized high-risk PC have disease progression rates of ~50% after RP (Kane et al. J Urol. 2007). Neoadjuvant studies show that androgen blockade can improve local disease control at the time of RP (McKay et al. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017; Taplin et al. JCO. 2014; Efstathiou et al. Eur Urol. 2019). This study will determine if treatment with APA + ADT before RP in pts with localized high-risk or locally advanced PC improves pathologic complete response (pCR) rate and if neoadjuvant and adjuvant peri-operative treatment with APA + ADT improves metastasis-free survival (MFS) compared with PBO + ADT. Methods: This international multicenter trial is enrolling candidates for RP with localized high-risk or locally advanced PC. Eligibility criteria: any combination of Gleason score (GS) 4 + 3 (= Grade Group [GG] 3) and GS 8 (4 + 4 or 5 + 3) from ≥ 6 systematic biopsy cores (SB) or targeted biopsy cores (TB) (with ≥ 1 core GS 8 [4 + 4 or 5 + 3] included); any combination of GS 4 + 3 (= GG 3) and GS 8 (4 + 4 or 5 + 3) from ≥ 3 SB or TB (with ≥ 1 core GS 8 [4 + 4 or 5 + 3]) included and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥ 20 ng/mL; GS ≥ 9 (GG 5) in ≥ 1 SB or TB; or ≥ 2 SB or TB with continuous GS ≥ 8 (GG 4), each with ≥ 80% involvement. Stratification: GS (7 or ≥ 8), cN0 or N1, and region. Randomization: 1:1 to APA (240 mg) + ADT or PBO + ADT. Pts will receive 6 months neoadjuvant treatment and RP + 6 months adjuvant treatment. Dual primary end points: pCR rate (assessed by blinded independent central pathology review) and MFS (assessed by blinded independent central radiology review). Secondary end points: PSA-free survival and progression-free survival. Imaging with CT or MRI and bone scan at screening, after RP, and then every 6 months following biochemical failure until documented distant metastasis, or death. ~1500 pts will be enrolled globally over 3 years at 240 sites in 19 countries. An independent data monitoring committee is commissioned to review trial data. Clinical trial information: NCT03767244.


2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 331-334
Author(s):  
Fedor Moiseenko ◽  
Vladislav Tyurin ◽  
Nikita Levchenko ◽  
Yevgeniy Levchenko ◽  
Aglaya Ievleva ◽  
...  

A patient with lung cancer carrying ROS1 translocation was treated by crizotinib and then subjected to surgery. Morphological analysis revealed pathologic complete response in surgically removed tissues, while PCR test provided convincing evidence for the presence of residual tumor cells. PCR analysis of lung cancer specific gene translocations allows carrying out highly sensitive and reliable monitoring of tumor disease during the course of treatment.


2014 ◽  
Vol 65 (6) ◽  
pp. 1184-1190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Nordström ◽  
Markus Aly ◽  
Martin Eklund ◽  
Lars Egevad ◽  
Henrik Grönberg

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5061-5061
Author(s):  
Matthew R. Cooperberg ◽  
Paul Brendel ◽  
Daniel J. Lee ◽  
Rahul Doraiswami ◽  
Hariesh Rajasekar ◽  
...  

5061 Background: We used data from a specialty-wide, community-based urology registry to determine trends in outpatient prostate cancer (PCa) care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: 3,165 (̃ 25%) of US urology providers, representing 48 states and territories, participate in the American Urological Association Quality (AQUA) Registry, which collects data via automated extraction from electronic health record systems. We analyzed trends in PCa care delivery from 156 practices contributing data in 2019 and 2020. Risk stratification was based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at diagnosis, biopsy Gleason, and clinical T-stage, and we used a natural language processing algorithm to determine Gleason and T-stage from unstructured clinical notes. The primary outcome was mean weekly visit volume by PCa patients per practice (visits defined as all MD and mid-level visits, telehealth and face-to-face), and we compared each week in 2020 through week 44 (November 1) to the corresponding week in 2019. Results: There were 267,691 PCa patients in AQUA who received care between 2019 and 2020. From mid-March to early November, 2020 (week 10 – week 44) the magnitude of the decline and recovery varied by risk stratum, with the steepest drops for low-risk PCa (Table). For 2020, overall mean visits per day (averaged weekly) were similar to 2019 for the first 9 weeks (̃25). Visits declined to week 14 (18.19; a 31% drop from 2019), recovered to 2019 levels by week 23, and declined steadily to 11.89 (a 58% drop from 2019) as of week 44, the cut off of this analysis. Conclusions: Access to care for men with PCa was sharply curtailed by the COVID-19 pandemic, and while the impact was less for men with high-risk disease compared to those with low-risk disease, visits even for high-risk individuals were down nearly one-third and continued to fall through November. This study provides real-world evidence on the magnitude of decline in PCa care across risk groups. The impact of this decline on cancer outcomes should be followed closely.[Table: see text]


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. e046588
Author(s):  
Stephen J Freedland ◽  
Ugo De Giorgi ◽  
Martin Gleave ◽  
Brad Rosbrook ◽  
Qi Shen ◽  
...  

IntroductionLimited data from controlled clinical trials are available for men who experience biochemical recurrence after definitive therapy for prostate cancer. In the absence of overt metastases, patients with non-metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (nmCSPC) often receive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). There is no standard-of-care consensus on optimal ADT timing, although most men are treated prior to metastases, especially those with high-risk features (Gleason score 8–10 or prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSADT) <9–12 months). Given data that ADT plus novel hormonal agents improve survival in men with metastatic CSPC, there is a desire to evaluate these agents earlier in the disease course. The main objective of EMBARK is the comparative assessment of enzalutamide plus leuprolide (luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonist (LHRHa)) or enzalutamide monotherapy versus monotherapy LHRHa to improve metastasis-free survival (MFS) in patients with high-risk nmCSPC PSA recurrence after definitive therapy.Methods and analysisEMBARK is a randomised, phase 3 study of high-risk patients with nmCSPC, a PSADT of ≤9 months and a screening PSA of ≥2 ng/mL above the nadir after radiotherapy (RT) or ≥1 ng/mL after radical prostatectomy (RP) with or without postoperative RT. Men (n=1050) are randomised 1:1:1 to enzalutamide 160 mg/day plus LHRHa or placebo plus LHRHa (double-blind arms) or enzalutamide monotherapy (open-label arm). Treatment is suspended at week 37 if PSA concentrations are <0.2 ng/mL and reinstated if levels rise to ≥2.0 ng/mL with RP or ≥5.0 ng/mL without RP. Patients with PSA ≥0.2 ng/mL at week 37 continue until treatment discontinuation criteria are met. The primary endpoint is MFS comparing enzalutamide plus LHRHa versus placebo plus LHRHa.Ethics and disseminationThe study is conducted under the guiding principles of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. The results will be disseminated at research conferences and in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberNCT02319837.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document