The management of dysphagia in esophageal adenocarcinoma patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Can invasive tube feeding be avoided?

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15034-e15034
Author(s):  
Jonathan Cools-Lartigue ◽  
Daniel Jones ◽  
Taline Zourikian ◽  
Mathieu Rousseau ◽  
Jonathan Spicer ◽  
...  

e15034 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an accepted standard for locally advanced esophago-gastric adenocarcinoma. However the dysphagia frequently associated with this condition may interfere with patient tolerance of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Surgical or endoscopic invasive tube feeding (ITF), including stents, is a commonly employed strategy to maintain nutritional support however it can cause significant morbidity in its own right. We sought to determine if an approach of careful dietary counseling and fast-tracked neoadjuvant chemotherapy can obviate the need for ITF. Methods: Pts undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (DCF or ECF Q3 weeks x3 or FLOT Q2weeks x4) for locally advanced (cT3 and/or N+) esophageal or EGJ adenocarcinoma at a single institution from 3/07-9/12 were identified from a prospective database. All received dietary counseling and were closely monitored for signs/ symptoms of malnutrition with serial (baseline/pre-surgery) Body Mass Index (BMI), albumin, dysphagia scores (DS: 0 best - 4 worse), and quality of life (FACT-E). We assessed the response of dysphagia and nutritional status to neoadjuvant treatment and the need for ITF. Data presented as median (Interquartile Range) or median (±SD), paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed ranks test determined significance (*p=0.05). Results: Of 130 patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy 78 had dysphagia scores of 2 or greater, most of whom received DCF (91%). Overall the dysphagia improved in 75/78 (96%) from a DS of 3 (2-4) to 0 (0-1)*. This was associated with an increase in FACT-E QoL scores (117±23 to 140±20)*. Weight (Kg)(70±22:69±24), BMI (24.5±8 to 23.9±7), and Albumin (40±5 to 37±4) were maintained. Only one patient required a stent, and none a jejunostomy, or gastrostomy. Conclusions: Appropriately timed neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a highly effective regimen rapidly restores normal swallowing, maintains nutritional status, and obviates the need for stenting or invasive tube feeding in patients with significant dysphagia from esophageal adenocarcinoma.

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9613-9613
Author(s):  
M. Rousseau ◽  
P. Guevremont ◽  
M. Chasen ◽  
J. Spicer ◽  
E. Eckert ◽  
...  

9613 Background: The dysphagia commonly associated with esophageal cancer often interferes with patient tolerance of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Surgical or endoscopic invasive tube feeding (ITF - gastroscopy/jejunostomy/stent) is a commonly employed strategy to maintain nutritional support however it can cause significant morbidity in its own right. We sought to determine if a strategy of careful dietary counseling and appropriately-timed neoadjuvant chemotherapy can obviate the need for ITF. Methods: Pts undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (TAX/CDDP/5FU Q3 weeks x3) for esophageal or GEJ adenocarcinoma at a single institution from 3/07–7/08 were identified from a prospective database. All received dietary counseling and were closely monitored for signs/ symptoms of malnutrition with serial (baseline, after 1st cycle, pre-surgery) Body Mass Index (BMI), albumin, dysphagia scores (0 best - 4 worse), and quality of life (FACT-E). We assessed the response of dysphagia and nutritional status to neoadjuvant treatment and the need for ITF. Data presented as median (range) or mean (±SD), paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed ranks test determined significance. Results: 25 pts received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and significant dysphagia (score 2–4) was found in 14. Dysphagia scores improved in all 14 (all results in Table 1 ), and 10/13 improved after the first cycle. No patient required ITF. QoL as assessed by the FACT-E improved in 13/14 patients. A small decrease in BMI was noted, however serum albumin did not significantly decrease. Conclusions: Appropriately timed neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a highly effective regimen rapidly restores normal swallowing, maintains nutritional status, and obviates the need for ITF in patients with significant dysphagia from esophageal adenocarcinoma. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 1858-1865 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Cools-Lartigue ◽  
D. Jones ◽  
J. Spicer ◽  
T. Zourikian ◽  
M. Rousseau ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 3394
Author(s):  
Fereshteh Izadi ◽  
Benjamin Sharpe ◽  
Stella Breininger ◽  
Maria Secrier ◽  
Jane Gibson ◽  
...  

Neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery is the standard of care for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Unfortunately, response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is poor (20–37%), as is the overall survival benefit at five years (9%). The EAC genome is complex and heterogeneous between patients, and it is not yet understood whether specific mutational patterns may result in chemotherapy sensitivity or resistance. To identify associations between genomic events and response to NAC in EAC, a comparative genomic analysis was performed in 65 patients with extensive clinical and pathological annotation using whole-genome sequencing (WGS). We defined response using Mandard Tumor Regression Grade (TRG), with responders classified as TRG1–2 (n = 27) and non-responders classified as TRG4–5 (n =38). We report a higher non-synonymous mutation burden in responders (median 2.08/Mb vs. 1.70/Mb, p = 0.036) and elevated copy number variation in non-responders (282 vs. 136/patient, p < 0.001). We identified copy number variants unique to each group in our cohort, with cell cycle (CDKN2A, CCND1), c-Myc (MYC), RTK/PIK3 (KRAS, EGFR) and gastrointestinal differentiation (GATA6) pathway genes being specifically altered in non-responders. Of note, NAV3 mutations were exclusively present in the non-responder group with a frequency of 22%. Thus, lower mutation burden, higher chromosomal instability and specific copy number alterations are associated with resistance to NAC.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1852
Author(s):  
Gry Assam Taarnhøj ◽  
Henriette Lindberg ◽  
Christoffer Johansen ◽  
Helle Pappot

Patients with urothelial cell carcinoma (UCC) often have comorbidities, which cause trouble for the completion of oncological treatment, and little is known about their quality of life (QoL). The aim of the present study was to obtain and describe patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and QoL data from UCC patients in the treatment for locally advanced muscle-invasive or metastatic UCC. A total of 79 patients with UCC completed four questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-BLM30, HADS, and select PRO-CTCAE™ questions) once weekly during their treatment. From those, 26 patients (33%) underwent neoadjuvant treatment for local disease while 53 patients (67%) were treated for metastatic disease. Of all patients, 54% did not complete the planned treatment due to progression, nephrotoxicity, death, or intolerable symptoms during treatment. The five most prevalent PRO-CTCAE grade ≥ 2 symptoms were frequent urination (37%), fatigue (35%), pain (31%), dry mouth (23%), and swelling of the arms or legs (23%). The baseline mean overall QoL was 61 (±SD 24) for all patients (neoadjuvant (73, ±SD 19) and metastatic (54, ±SD 24)) and remained stable over the course of treatment for both groups. A stable overall QoL was observed for the patients in this study. More than half of the patients did not, however, complete the planned treatment. Further supportive care is warranted for bladder cancer patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 405-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Wagner

Summary Background The majority of patients who suffer from head and neck cancer are malnourished even prior to treatment initiation. In addition, side effects from cancer therapy including change in taste, mucositis, nausea or diarrhea increase patients’ malnutrition. Therefore, early management is crucial to improve nutritional status, prognosis and quality of life of patients. Methods A literature research was performed in PubMed, Medline and other available databases. The guidelines of the German Society for Nutritional Medicine, the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism and common recommendations of other countries were selected, analyzed and summarized. Results Early screening for malnutrition is recommended for all cancer patients. Adequate intake of energy and protein should be ensured which may be achieved by consumption of oral nutritional supplements or enteral nutrition such as tube feeding. Conclusion It is important to determine the best course of management to maintain body weight and reduce typical adverse effects of malnutrition to improve quality of life. All patients at any stage of their treatment should receive intensive dietary counseling.


2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
F Izadi ◽  
G Devonshire ◽  
R Walker ◽  
M Lloyd ◽  
J Gibson ◽  
...  

Abstract   In the UK, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is the standard of care. Unfortunately, response to NAC, following surgery is often low (&lt;30%) and survival benefit at 2 years is only 5.1%. The EAC genome is complex and heterogeneous between patients, where specific mutagenic processes and mutations may result in chemotherapy resistance. Here we report preliminary results from whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of 48 patients who were subsequently treated with NAC. Methods We defined response as Mandard Tumor Regression Grade (TRG) 1-2 (n = 15) and non-response as TRG4-5 (n = 33). WGS of 50x coverage and calling of genomic events (Strelka2, SCAT/GISTIC) was performed according to Frankell Nat Genet 2019 with modifications, to differentiate driver from passenger mutations (dNdScv, oncodriveCLUST), determine variant allele frequencies (VAF; copy number-adjusted) and mutation signatures (NMF R-package). Following stringent variant QC (Phred score ≥ 30), filtering (VAF &gt;0.02) and annotation (ANNOVAR, cancer census/helper, the 77 known EAC drivers and false positive genes) and visualisation in maftools, we evaluated the data for associations between genomic events and response to NAC. Results COSMIC mutation signatures 2 (TRG1-2; Cosθ = 0.89) and 6 (TRG4-5; Cosθ = 0.82) were enriched, suggesting defective mismatch repair in non-responders. Using 5,193 high-confidence non-silent mutations (TRG1-2,n = 1969; TRG4-5, n = 3224), we identified 39 mutated driver genes (Figure-1) with a median of 2.9(0-5) (TRG1-2) and 2.7(0-9) (TRG4-5) driver events/patient. Shared dysregulated pathways, included DNA-damage (TP53), cell cycle (CDKN2A), TGF-β (SMAD4) and chromatin regulation (ARID1A). There was no difference in the prognostic of SMAD4 and GATA4 genes. Interestingly, NAV3 mutations were only present in non-responders (21%,7/33); and in responders TP53 incidence was higher (93% vs. 58%) with a concomitant reduction in clonal cell fraction (0.25 vs. 0.39;Wilcoxon, p &lt; 0.0001). Conclusion The data suggest that specific genomic events, such as NAV3 mutation and the intra-tumoral heterogeneity of mutated DNA-damage response genes may offer additional predictive value. Ongoing work includes analysis of the impact of non-coding variation on response. While our analysis is limited by sample size and requires validation in additional cohorts, it demonstrates the potential of genomic sequencing to identify NAC response biomarkers and may guide alternative or novel treatment modalities for chemo-resistant tumours.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15178-e15178
Author(s):  
Ahmed Abdalla ◽  
Amr M. Aref ◽  
Amer Alame ◽  
Danny Ma ◽  
Mohammed Barawi ◽  
...  

e15178 Background: The role of neoadjuvant FOLFOX in achieving clinical downstaging and improvement in quality of life (QOL) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) remains to be established. We are conducting a phase II prospective clinical trial to evaluate the use of six cycles of FOLFOX as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with T2-T3/N0-N+ rectal cancer. We now report tumor clinical downstaging and patient-reported QOL in our first patient cohort. Methods: Eleven Patients enrolled in our phase II prospective trial. Patients received three months of FOLFOX (infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) administered every two weeks. After three weeks of recovery, each patient was treated with conventional chemo-radiotherapy (5FU or capecitabine) All patients had an MRI and endorectal ultrasound at baseline and after completion of FOLFOX. A compilation of validated QOL questionnaires were also administered before and after FOLFOX. Results: A total of 11 patients completed the chemotherapy regimen. Based on pelvic MRI, complete clinical response (T0N0) was achieved by seven patients (64%), one patient (9%) was clinically downstaged but three (27%) didn’t have any changes following FOLFOX. Importantly, we found no disease progression during the FOLFOX course. QOL assessment after FOLFOX regimen showed trend towards improvement in general health, mobility, bladder control and psychological health. These changes in QOL were not statistically significant due to the small sample size. Patients self-grading of their general health before starting FOLFOX was 50% compared to 75% after. Of the five patients with pain at time of diagnosis, four reported complete pain relief while the fifth reported improvement from extreme to moderate pain. Three patients reported improvement in their anxiety/depression. In terms of bowel function, although there was trend towards improvement in the urgency subscale, other bowel functions subscales were unchanged. In general, scores for mobility, selfcare, and bladder function were slightly better after FOLFOX. Conclusions: This study suggests that adding only six cycles of neoadjuvant FOLFOX before CRT not only resulted in clinical downstaging of (LARC) but showed a trend toward improved QOL. This result provides some reassurance for oncologists that this approach does not diminish QOL with no risk of disease progression during the time of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. These findings need to be validated in a larger phase III trial.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zechuan Jin ◽  
Du He ◽  
Yu Shen ◽  
Xiangbing Deng ◽  
Ziqiang Wang

Abstract Background: For patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, side effects such as nausea, vomiting and loss of appetite may occur during neoadjuvant chemotherapy, but small intestinal perforation is very rare.Case presentation: We present a case of a 62-year-old man who suffered small intestinal perforation in the first cycle neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer with capecitabine and oxaliplatin. Six days after the start of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, he began to develop intermittent abdominal pain, accompanied by diarrhea and abdominal distension. The CT scan revealed an abscess with free air in the pelvic cavity with proximal intestinal ileus. Then we performed a laparotomy. After enterolysis, the rectum with tumor was carefully examined with no perforative lesion, and the terminal ileum about 15cm from the ileocecum which adhere to the pelvic abscess had one about 0.8cm ulcer. The patient had a radical anterior resection and the morbid small bowel resection with protective ileostomy. The postoperative pathological examination showed the full-thickness necrosis of the intestinal wall in the ileal lesion with peripheral acute suppurative inflammation. AND the final pathological stage of the tumor was pT3N0M0 (American Joint Committee on Cancer, eighth edition).Conclusion: As a chemotherapy regimen based on fluorouracil and oxaliplatin, small intestinal perforation is a very rare complication. The most common complications of these two drugs are gastrointestinal symptoms such as diarrhea. Therefore, when the complications are not relieved during chemotherapy, we should think of a more serious possibility.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 749-756
Author(s):  
Fernanda Nunes de Arruda ◽  
Samantha da Costa ◽  
Renata Bonadio ◽  
Abraão Dornellas ◽  
Daniela Pereira ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe CIRCE trial (NCT 01973101) investigated the efficacy, safety, and quality of life of the addition of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine to standard chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer (stages IIB–IVA). The impact of both treatment arms on quality of life is reported in the present study.MethodsPatients completed the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaire QLQ-C30 and CX24 before treatment and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after treatment. Linear mixed models were fitted to analyze differences in quality of life over time and between groups. Differences in mean quality of life scales >10 points and p<0.05 were considered clinically relevant and statistically significant, respectively. Inclusion criteria were: (1) histological diagnosis of locally advanced invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages IIB–IVA; (2) signed informed consent to participate in the CIRCE trial; and (3) answered at least one quality of life questionnaire. Excluded were patients who did not complete any quality of life questionnaire. Relevant exclusion criteria for the CIRCE trial included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status >2 and peripheral neuropathy >2. Mann–Whitney U tests were performed to assess differences between groups in quality of life at baseline. To evaluate differences between treatment arms, linear mixed models were fitted using the transformed quality of life scores as a dependent variable and time of follow-up and study arm as factors.ResultsA total of 107 patients were enrolled (n=55 neoadjuvant chemotherapy arm; n=52 chemoradiation arm). Quality of life compliance rates were higher for the chemoradiation group at every assessment time (ranging from 75–86.5% in the chemoradiation arm vs 55–81.8% in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy arm). For quality of life results at baseline, no statistically significant difference between the groups was seen. For both groups, most scales showed improvements over time, except for worsening of the summary score, sexual enjoyment, peripheral neuropathy, and menopausal symptoms. For chemoradiation, body image was lower (p<0.001) and patients presented more lymphedema (p<0.001) and sexual worry (p<0.001) at 12 months compared with baseline. Comparing study arms, neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed significantly lower scores in the menopausal symptoms scale (p=0.03) and higher scores for sexual/vaginal functioning (p=0.01). At 12 months, clinical differences were seen only for body image and menopausal symptoms scale, with neoadjuvant chemotherapy presenting better body image scores and a lower burden of menopausal symptoms.ConclusionAfter treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer, patients improved in most quality of life aspects. However, worsening was observed in sexual enjoyment, peripheral neuropathy, and menopausal symptoms. To improve patients’ quality of life, efforts should be made to prevent and treat these long term effects of locally advanced cervical cancer treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document